Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » SCOTUS to hear immunity case April 22
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 33
  2. Page 1 of 2
  3. 1
  4. 2
  6. Last

Thread: SCOTUS to hear immunity case April 22

post 1698482553 02-28-2024, 03:03 PM
-
#1
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233

SCOTUS to hear immunity case April 22



This also put the prosecution on hold for now
post 1698482703 02-28-2024, 03:07 PM
-
#2
  1. GuineaDago585
  2. Bert McGirt
  1. GuineaDago585
  2. Bert McGirt
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 40,554
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 404801
I was just listening to Michael Smerconish earlier discussing this case. He was saying it was interesting SCOTUS took so long to decide whether to hear the immunity arguments. If they kicked it back to the lower courts, Trump would certainly be tried before November. Now that they’re taking it up, even if they rule against him (likely) no chance Chutkin gets to set a trial date by the election.

Jack Smith = CUCKED.
post 1698483093 02-28-2024, 03:13 PM
-
#3
  1. havoc00
  2. Former 40OZ King
  1. havoc00
  2. Former 40OZ King
  3. Join Date: Mar 2009
  4. Posts: 141,934
  5. Subscribers: 9
  6. Rep Power: 567216
jack Smith BTFO
post 1698483553 02-28-2024, 03:23 PM
-
#4
  1. Zelensky
  2. GOAT miscer
  1. Zelensky
  2. GOAT miscer
  3. Join Date: Dec 2022
  4. Posts: 13,915
  5. Rep Power: 166374
OPGayanus on rope watch
post 1698483963 02-28-2024, 03:34 PM
-
#5
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By GuineaDago585⏩
I was just listening to Michael Smerconish earlier discussing this case. He was saying it was interesting SCOTUS took so long to decide whether to hear the immunity arguments. If they kicked it back to the lower courts, Trump would certainly be tried before November. Now that they’re taking it up, even if they rule against him (likely) no chance Chutkin gets to set a trial date by the election.

Jack Smith = CUCKED.
My guess they say the appeal court made an incorrect decision before fact-finding was complete (if Trump was or wasn't in scope of office) it gets sent all the way back to DC court for fact finding in that - goes through appeals again then back to scotus again before a trial
post 1698485863 02-28-2024, 04:18 PM
-
#6
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Had to put on msnbc / listing to them in reality panic mode is so refreshing
post 1698485973 02-28-2024, 04:20 PM
-
#7
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,747
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384419
Libs right now:

“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1698486363 02-28-2024, 04:31 PM
-
#8
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Can't lie Im in euphoria watching CNN and NBC- it's funny
post 1698486683 02-28-2024, 04:40 PM
-
#9
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
So if presidents have total immunity from any potential crimes that occur during their president, Biden could just order Trump to be assassinated tomorrow with no legal repercussions. Hmmm...
post 1698487003 02-28-2024, 04:48 PM
-
#10
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233








post 1698487073 02-28-2024, 04:50 PM
-
#11
  1. TugOfPeace
  2. 1012 ng/dl
  1. TugOfPeace
  2. 1012 ng/dl
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Posts: 4,986
  5. Rep Power: 166022
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
Soif presidents have total immunity from any potential crimes that occur during their president, Biden could just order Trump to be assassinated tomorrow with no legal repercussions. Hmmm...
so this is what the supreme court is determining?
Monster0ultra self proclaimed "Chad" face pic looks like vtech school shooter: https://i.imgur.com/z2m6Why.jpg
post 1698487103 02-28-2024, 04:52 PM
-
#12
  1. yabbayabba
  1. yabbayabba
  3. Join Date: Jun 2005
  4. Location: Burning down the belt warehouse
  5. Posts: 19,040
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 157908
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
So if presidents have total immunity from any potential crimes that occur during their president, Biden could just order Trump to be assassinated tomorrow with no legal repercussions. Hmmm...
And the goat p3do rapist wonders why he got banned. Just can't help but LOL at 68 IQ Philtard antics.

Just waiting for p3do9 homo erotic response.
post 1698487153 02-28-2024, 04:55 PM
-
#13
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By yabbayabba⏩
And the goat p3do rapist wonders why he got banned. Just can't help but LOL at 68 IQ Philtard antics.

Just waiting for p3do9 homo erotic response.
You should worry more about your 40+ BMI than about me, fatty.

Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
so this is what the supreme court is determining?
Trump's lawyers are claiming there is such a thing as "total immunity."
post 1698487163 02-28-2024, 04:55 PM
-
#14
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,747
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384419
Originally Posted By Phil68⏩
So if presidents have total immunity from any potential crimes that occur during their president, Biden could just order Trump to be assassinated tomorrow with no legal repercussions. Hmmm...
S0mali 68

A new way of calling someone a retard. It refers to the average IQ in ****li of 68, which falls well below the cut off to be considered legally mentally retarded. Generally, a ****li 68 will not only exhibit many of the same signs of low IQ as someone you would refer to as a SJW, as well as be highly likely to vote liberal, follow Greta Thunbergs Twitter account and categorize themselves as "Non-binary". ****li 68's are normally weak beta males, and morbidly obese females with neon colored hair.
"Why are Rebecca and Muhammad on that balcony flinging their own feces at each other?"
"Oh, they're both ****li 68's."
"Ah ok, that makes sense."
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1698487253 02-28-2024, 04:56 PM
-
#15
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
S0mali 68

A new way of calling someone a retard. It refers to the average IQ in ****li of 68, which falls well below the cut off to be considered legally mentally retarded. Generally, a ****li 68 will not only exhibit many of the same signs of low IQ as someone you would refer to as a SJW, as well as be highly likely to vote liberal, follow Greta Thunbergs Twitter account and categorize themselves as "Non-binary". ****li 68's are normally weak beta males, and morbidly obese females with neon colored hair.
"Why are Rebecca and Muhammad on that balcony flinging their own feces at each other?"
"Oh, they're both ****li 68's."
"Ah ok, that makes sense."



Bald and autistic.
post 1698488423 02-28-2024, 05:32 PM
-
#16
  1. DuracellBunny
  2. Has new batteries!
  1. DuracellBunny
  2. Has new batteries!
  3. Join Date: Nov 2005
  4. Posts: 15,594
  5. Rep Power: 201320
In my opinion, the case is fairly simple. Does the president have immunity in certain circumstances? The obvious answer is yes, in the same way that soldiers do. As the commander in chief, POTUS must have at least the same level of immunity as military members acting under orders.

There should be no argument about whether POTUShasimmunity, there should only be an argument aboutwhenthey have immunity.

Nobody wants to have that argument, as if you define exactly when a president does and does not have immunity, you may find that past presidents have committed many acts that fall outside of that immunity.

Even though people don't want to have that argument, it's one that needs to be had. The only problem, for both sides, is that it may result in a ruling that states Bush, Obama and others committed criminal acts that were not covered by immunity.

On a side note, I believe that was the intention of impeachment. That blanket immunity exists, but if their behaviour stepped outside of what the vast majority found to be acceptable, impeachment would follow and then criminal charges if successfully impeached. Impeachment would strip them of immunity for the crimes that they were impeached for.

That is howI, at least, would have designed it to work.
Screw nature; my body will do what I DAMN WELL tell it to do!

The only dangerous thing about an exercise is the person doing it.

They had the technology to rebuild me. They made me better, stronger, faster......
post 1698488633 02-28-2024, 05:39 PM
-
#17
  1. leafs43
  2. Registered User
  1. leafs43
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 45
  5. Posts: 45,367
  6. Rep Power: 153657
Chitlibs just want to run a kangaroo court. They already found Trump guilty, doesn't matter the actual laws on the books.
post 1698491173 02-28-2024, 07:11 PM
-
#18
  1. squanto
  2. Registered User
  1. squanto
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 7,482
  6. Rep Power: 12818
Indicted rapist/fraud/epstein friend facing 91 felonies thinks he's above the law

MAGA is defined as being pro-crime, in stark objective terms
No war but class war
post 1698491493 02-28-2024, 07:23 PM
-
#19
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By squanto⏩
Indicted rapist/fraud/epstein friend facing 91 felonies thinks he's above the law

MAGA is defined as being pro-crime, in stark objective terms
MAGA loves criminality. Which is why Trumpy also pardoned his various friends and associates.
post 1698491623 02-28-2024, 07:27 PM
-
#20
  1. squanto
  2. Registered User
  1. squanto
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 7,482
  6. Rep Power: 12818
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
MAGA loves criminality. Which is why Trumpy also pardoned his various friends and associates.
Criminality and grooming.

Oh, and most importantly, losing.

Actually crying and being offended by anything are up there too.

They have varied interests.
No war but class war
post 1698492513 02-28-2024, 08:03 PM
-
#21
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,747
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384419
Originally Posted By squanto⏩
Criminality and grooming.

Oh, and most importantly, losing.

Actually crying and being offended by anything are up there too.

They have varied interests.


You know who else got a mug shot while fighting for peoples' rights?



You commie fascists only have one card to play. Very sad.
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1698492793 02-28-2024, 08:12 PM
-
#22
  1. squanto
  2. Registered User
  1. squanto
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 7,482
  6. Rep Power: 12818
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩


You know who else got a mug shot while fighting for peoples' rights?



You commie fascists only have one card to play. Very sad.
...

So... The guy who organized the poor people's march and assassinated by the government is the same as a billionaire who had the world handed to him because they have mug shots.

Makes sense.
No war but class war
post 1698493863 02-28-2024, 08:56 PM
-
#23
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,747
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384419
Originally Posted By squanto⏩
...

So... The guy who organized the poor people's march and assassinated by the government is the same as a billionaire who had the world handed to him because they have mug shots.

Makes sense.
No two people are the same

But they did both get a mug shot for fighting the establishment.

BuT hEs A cRiMiNaL

Fuk you commie scum
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1698494683 02-28-2024, 09:24 PM
-
#24
  1. dakensta
  2. bad ass
  1. dakensta
  2. bad ass
  3. Join Date: Aug 2008
  4. Posts: 25,983
  5. Rep Power: 111067
Originally Posted By squanto⏩
MAGA is defined as being pro-crime, in stark objective terms
Don't exaggerate. They're not pro-crime at all.
They just think Trump should get away with his crimes, unlike other criminals. They know he's a criminal, and are fine with it.
because
GO LOCAL SPORTSBALL TEAM

*** Pureblood Master Race ***

*** Official Misc Photography Crew ***
post 1698495533 02-28-2024, 10:14 PM
-
#25
  1. FlipBrah
  2. Miscer Chief
  1. FlipBrah
  2. Miscer Chief
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 5,917
  6. Rep Power: 80424
Once again d-list chit libs like Squanto and dakensta come to sperg out with ****liaPhil
Minority for Trump Crew
We're All going to Make it Crew
Ex-Chicago Crew
Pinoy crew

Bench: 295 srs
Squat: ayy
DL: lmao
post 1698501993 02-29-2024, 04:55 AM
-
#26
  1. nutsy54
  2. Random Words
  1. nutsy54
  2. Random Words
  3. Join Date: Apr 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 126,581
  6. Rep Power: 181292
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
So if presidents have total immunity from any potential crimes that occur during their president, Biden could just order Trump to be assassinated tomorrow with no legal repercussions. Hmmm...
Sure...
That bizarre scenario has nothing to do with the actual case as presented to the Supreme Court, but why start caring about Facts now?
post 1698502193 02-29-2024, 05:04 AM
-
#27
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
I would like to throw in again, like I said here before, just how bad Just security analyst are.


Their prior possible timelines lol (yes I posted and laughed about it the day they came out as well)




post 1698539743 02-29-2024, 08:13 PM
-
#28
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
All the lefty legal eagles has so much blind dumb hope.








post 1698541983 02-29-2024, 09:14 PM
-
#29
  1. NitrogenWidget
  1. NitrogenWidget
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 43,261
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 349299
Originally Posted By DuracellBunny⏩
In my opinion, the case is fairly simple. Does the president have immunity in certain circumstances? The obvious answer is yes, in the same way that soldiers do. As the commander in chief, POTUS must have at least the same level of immunity as military members acting under orders.

There should be no argument about whether POTUShasimmunity, there should only be an argument aboutwhenthey have immunity.

Nobody wants to have that argument, as if you define exactly when a president does and does not have immunity, you may find that past presidents have committed many acts that fall outside of that immunity.

Even though people don't want to have that argument, it's one that needs to be had. The only problem, for both sides, is that it may result in a ruling that states Bush, Obama and others committed criminal acts that were not covered by immunity.

On a side note, I believe that was the intention of impeachment. That blanket immunity exists, but if their behaviour stepped outside of what the vast majority found to be acceptable, impeachment would follow and then criminal charges if successfully impeached. Impeachment would strip them of immunity for the crimes that they were impeached for.

That is howI, at least, would have designed it to work.
reps on recharge.
excellent summary.
the best of the best were chosen for scotus.
So lets just pretend they don't understand what is going on because of feels and TDS
post 1698544253 02-29-2024, 10:44 PM
-
#30
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By nutsy54⏩
Sure...
That bizarre scenario has nothing to do with the actual case as presented to the Supreme Court, but why start caring about Facts now?
According to Trump, Presidents should have "total immunity" from any possible crime that occurs via official orders. So yeah, it's relevant.


I notice no one [Including you] can actually argue what Trump is trying a POTUS is privileged to have. Which is made up nonsense anyways. Especially since the case has little to do with official presidential business and was instead trying to force the states to override the votes of Americans in order to keep his fat ass in office.

Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
No two people are the same

But they did both get a mug shot for fighting the establishment.

BuT hEs A cRiMiNaL

Fuk you commie scum
You are fat, bald, and autistic. That's an automatic strike out, ya Putin loving ph@ggot.
  1. Page 1 of 2
  2. 1
  3. 2
  5. Last
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts