Forum
»
1pm live: closing arguments in Fanni Willis trial
03-01-2024, 10:42 AM
-
#1
- gachase21
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Posts: 31,767
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 389233
-
-
1pm live: closing arguments in Fanni Willis trial
1pm today will be closing arguments in the Fanni Willis appearance of impropriety, and possible perjury , trial associated with her attempt to interfere in the 2024 presidential election.
I'll post live steam when it starts
Live local blog
https://www.ajc.com/news/live-update...p-prosecutors/
My Twitter law list with both lefty and righties
I'll post live steam when it starts
Live local blog
https://www.ajc.com/news/live-update...p-prosecutors/
My Twitter law list with both lefty and righties
03-01-2024, 10:44 AM
-
#2
- DanteEdmond
- Registered User
-
- DanteEdmond
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 6,521
- Rep Power: 29635
-
-
NYPost link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Y7z8zk1Ik
I don't think the case went as well as the defense did, so I don't think the judge will throw Fani out
I don't think the case went as well as the defense did, so I don't think the judge will throw Fani out
03-01-2024, 10:46 AM
-
#3
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
-
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Age: 39
- Posts: 20,625
- Rep Power: 153167
-
-
Originally Posted By DanteEdmond⏩
If she isn't thrown out, then there were some serious shenanigans going on behind the scenes which need to be investigated. This is a slam dunk case. Fani and the others need to have their own investigation/trial for perjury, etc.NYPost link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Y7z8zk1Ik
I don't think the case went as well as the defense did, so I don't think the judge will throw Fani out
I don't think the case went as well as the defense did, so I don't think the judge will throw Fani out
03-01-2024, 10:46 AM
-
#4
03-01-2024, 10:47 AM
-
#5
Originally Posted By DanteEdmond⏩
I listened to her. She didn’t do bad at all. She isn’t getting thrown out.NYPost link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z7Y7z8zk1Ik
I don't think the case went as well as the defense did, so I don't think the judge will throw Fani out
I don't think the case went as well as the defense did, so I don't think the judge will throw Fani out
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
03-01-2024, 10:48 AM
-
#6
- DanteEdmond
- Registered User
-
- DanteEdmond
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 6,521
- Rep Power: 29635
-
-
Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩
They couldn't get Bradley to admit that he knew their relationship began before 2022If she isn't thrown out, then there were some serious shenanigans going on behind the scenes which need to be investigated. This is a slam dunk case. Fani and the others need to have their own investigation/trial for perjury, etc.
03-01-2024, 10:52 AM
-
#7
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
-
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Age: 39
- Posts: 20,625
- Rep Power: 153167
-
-
Originally Posted By DanteEdmond⏩
He texted very definitively that he knew exactly when it happened, and confirmed multiple times in text that it was all accurate. He even said he was nervous and that they would just deny it.They couldn't get Bradley to admit that he knew their relationship began before 2022
Then, between those texts and the trial, someone (i forget the name) in Fani's camp reaches out to him. The wife of this person works under Fani. Likely threatened him. Suddenly he has amnesia and can't remember anything. Anyone watching knew he was lying through his teeth.
Between the lack of paper trail of Fani's "cash," multiple people admitting that they were dating prior to him being hired, Cellphone data showing 1000s of calls and texts and him being at her house overnight on multiple occassions during the timeline in question, etc... Short of them admitting it under oath, this is a slam dunk.
03-01-2024, 10:53 AM
-
#8
03-01-2024, 10:55 AM
-
#9
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
-
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Age: 39
- Posts: 20,625
- Rep Power: 153167
-
-
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Her actions are. And a special prosecutor should be hired to get to the bottom of the funds, the relationship, and them lying under oath.She's not on trial.
03-01-2024, 10:56 AM
-
#10
- gachase21
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Posts: 31,767
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 389233
-
-
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
- we have subpoenaed witnessesShe's not on trial.
-We have sworn witnesses giving testimony
- we have admitted evidence and exhibits
-we have opening and closing arguments
-we have a judgment with possible criminal consequences
Call it whatever you want
03-01-2024, 10:59 AM
-
#11
- kcadrenalin
- Permanent Vacation
-
- kcadrenalin
- Permanent Vacation
- Join Date: Jun 2007
- Posts: 24,727
- Rep Power: 349124
-
-
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
She will be.She's not on trial.
regardless of what happens today
________
MFC
________
Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote. -Benjamin Franklin
Tits and Beer
03-01-2024, 10:59 AM
-
#12
Originally Posted By rampagefc77⏩
OP called it a trial when he most likely (almost certainly) knows it isn't. It's a hearing.Her actions are. And a special prosecutor should be hired to get to the bottom of the funds, the relationship, and them lying under oath.
Regardless I agree, she and Wade should be removed not only from the actual trail, but from their jobs as well.
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
More likeyoucall it whatever you want. It's not a trial.- we have subpoenaed witnesses
-We have sworn witnesses giving testimony
- we have admitted evidence and exhibits
-we have opening and closing arguments
-we have a judgment with possible criminal consequences
Call it whatever you want
-We have sworn witnesses giving testimony
- we have admitted evidence and exhibits
-we have opening and closing arguments
-we have a judgment with possible criminal consequences
Call it whatever you want
03-01-2024, 10:59 AM
-
#13
- DanteEdmond
- Registered User
-
- DanteEdmond
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 6,521
- Rep Power: 29635
-
-
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
No one says she is. If she's removed because of conflict or improper conduct, the case isn't going to be tossed, and Trump and co. aren't out of the woods.She's not on trial.
Removing Fani means removing her entire team. That means a new set of people have to take over, which would ensure the case won't go to trial for a while. But the case would still go on
03-01-2024, 11:00 AM
-
#14
03-01-2024, 11:01 AM
-
#15
Originally Posted By DanteEdmond⏩
OP did in his thread title.No one says she is. If she's removed because of conflict or improper conduct, the case isn't going to be tossed, and Trump and co. aren't out of the woods.
Removing Fani means removing her entire team. That means a new set of people have to take over, which would ensure the case won't go to trial for a while. But the case would still go on
Removing Fani means removing her entire team. That means a new set of people have to take over, which would ensure the case won't go to trial for a while. But the case would still go on
Actually I'm not 100% on what happens if they're removed. OP believes a Trump supporting DA would take over and throw out the actual trial.
03-01-2024, 11:02 AM
-
#16
- gachase21
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Posts: 31,767
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 389233
-
-
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Do you think she, and her co-conspirators, should face Rico charges also for conspiring to interfere in the 2024 presidential election?OP called it a trial when he most likely (almost certainly) knows it isn't. It's a hearing.
Regardless I agree, she and Wade should be removed not only from the actual trail, but from their jobs as well.
More likeyoucall it whatever you want. It's not a trial.
Regardless I agree, she and Wade should be removed not only from the actual trail, but from their jobs as well.
More likeyoucall it whatever you want. It's not a trial.
03-01-2024, 11:03 AM
-
#17
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
-
- rampagefc77
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Age: 39
- Posts: 20,625
- Rep Power: 153167
-
-
Originally Posted By DanteEdmond⏩
The case doesn't disappear, but the case is trash and has been from the start. It was always going to take a corrupt DA and court to bring it along. It's quite possible that whoever takes it up next will come from a more partial region of Georgia and they could toss it if they think nothing is there. Or alter the charges. There is a lot that could happen.No one says she is. If she's removed because of conflict or improper conduct, the case isn't going to be tossed, and Trump and co. aren't out of the woods.
Removing Fani means removing her entire team. That means a new set of people have to take over, which would ensure the case won't go to trial for a while. But the case would still go on
Removing Fani means removing her entire team. That means a new set of people have to take over, which would ensure the case won't go to trial for a while. But the case would still go on
03-01-2024, 11:04 AM
-
#18
- gachase21
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Posts: 31,767
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 389233
-
-
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
I'm not actually sure if she will be removed or not. There's a possibility she stays and dumps wadeOP did in his thread title.
Actually I'm not 100% on what happens if they're removed. OP believes a Trump supporting DA would take over and throw out the actual trial.
Actually I'm not 100% on what happens if they're removed. OP believes a Trump supporting DA would take over and throw out the actual trial.
Right now if I had to bet- it's a close call / but I would bet that she and the DA office is removed for "appearance of" impropriety - and not proved
03-01-2024, 11:06 AM
-
#19
03-01-2024, 11:09 AM
-
#20
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
Yeah I was just watching that exact conversation on MSNBC just now saying there is a possibility.I'm not actually sure if she will be removed or not. There's a possibility she stays and dumps wade
Right now if I had to bet- it's a close call / but I would bet that she and the DA office is removed for "appearance of" impropriety - and not proved
Right now if I had to bet- it's a close call / but I would bet that she and the DA office is removed for "appearance of" impropriety - and not proved
And I agree with your bet, I actually hope they both go. Otherwise it will validate Trump playing his victim card with corrupt prosecutors etc.
They f'd this up and they need to go.
03-01-2024, 11:09 AM
-
#21
- DanteEdmond
- Registered User
-
- DanteEdmond
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 6,521
- Rep Power: 29635
-
-
There are like 4 attorneys on the defense side. I'm glad he is limiting them to 90 minutes combined (instead of 90 mins individually). Those lawyers can go on and on and on
03-01-2024, 11:11 AM
-
#22
- gachase21
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Posts: 31,767
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 389233
-
-
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
I hope she stays - we need the most incompetent person possible doing this trialYeah I was just watching that exact conversation on MSNBC just now saying there is a possibility.
And I agree with your bet, I actually hope they both go. Otherwise it will validate Trump playing his victim card with corrupt prosecutors etc.
They f'd this up and they need to go.
And I agree with your bet, I actually hope they both go. Otherwise it will validate Trump playing his victim card with corrupt prosecutors etc.
They f'd this up and they need to go.
03-01-2024, 11:12 AM
-
#23
03-01-2024, 11:13 AM
-
#24
- DanteEdmond
- Registered User
-
- DanteEdmond
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 6,521
- Rep Power: 29635
-
-
Dude talking now kinda sounds like Kevin McCarthy
03-01-2024, 11:13 AM
-
#25
- stevebec
- Unregistered User
-
- stevebec
- Unregistered User
- Join Date: Aug 2015
- Location: United States
- Posts: 6,542
- Rep Power: 57623
-
-
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
Yeah, but if the judge doesn't remove her after all this it says volumes about how fair we can expect him to be during the actual trial.I hope she stays - we need the most incompetent person possible doing this trial
"Bones heal, pain is temporary, and chicks dig scars" - Evel Knievel
03-01-2024, 11:17 AM
-
#26
- GuineaDago585
- Bert McGirt
-
- GuineaDago585
- Bert McGirt
- Join Date: Nov 2012
- Posts: 40,553
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 404801
-
-
Originally Posted By stevebec⏩
This. The trial won’t happen anyway whether Willis stays or not though. It’s a state case with no timeline. Trump is going to get re-elected in November then they won’t be able to prosecute a sitting President (yes I know he can’t pardon on state charges, but he can’t be tried either – it will get delayed until 2029).Yeah, but if the judge doesn't remove her after all this it says volumes about how fair we can expect him to be during the actual trial.
A classified docs hearing was today as well. Judge Cannon grilled Jack Smith about his “unrealistic” trial date and has refused to set a new one so far. Libs on Twitter are PISSED lol.
03-01-2024, 11:18 AM
-
#27
03-01-2024, 11:18 AM
-
#28
- gachase21
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Posts: 31,767
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 389233
-
-
Originally Posted By stevebec⏩
If you are listening to it right now, it's why I would like her to stay. It will cause an easy appeal later, and throw trial out with reversal judge ledges her.Yeah, but if the judge doesn't remove her after all this it says volumes about how fair we can expect him to be during the actual trial.
Either way it will be a win though.
The integrity of this trial -and it's attempt to interfere in the 2024 election -are destroyed
03-01-2024, 11:21 AM
-
#29
Originally Posted By GuineaDago585⏩
Speaking of someone who should be removed..This. The trial won’t happen anyway whether Willis stays or not though. It’s a state case with no timeline. Trump is going to get re-elected in November then they won’t be able to prosecute a sitting President (yes I know he can’t pardon on state charges, but he can’t be tried either – it will get delayed until 2029).
A classified docs hearing was today as well.Judge Cannongrilled Jack Smith about his “unrealistic” trial date and has refused to set a new one so far. Libs on Twitter are PISSED lol.
A classified docs hearing was today as well.Judge Cannongrilled Jack Smith about his “unrealistic” trial date and has refused to set a new one so far. Libs on Twitter are PISSED lol.
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
Lmao at "attempt at interference". Trump did that in 2020. It's why he's here. But Trumpers gonna Trump.. lolIf you are listening to it right now, it's why I would like her to stay. It will cause an easy appeal later, and throw trial out with reversal judge ledges her.
Either way it will be a win though.
The integrity of this trial -and it's attempt to interfere in the 2024 election -are destroyed
Either way it will be a win though.
The integrity of this trial -and it's attempt to interfere in the 2024 election -are destroyed
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
