Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Judge Cannon just put libs in meltdown mode
  1. Results 1 to 20 of 20
  2. Page 1 of 1

Thread: Judge Cannon just put libs in meltdown mode

post 1699394603 03-18-2024, 07:01 PM
-
#1
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233

Judge Cannon just put libs in meltdown mode

Said libs....












post 1699394753 03-18-2024, 07:04 PM
-
#2
  1. OPGenesis
  1. OPGenesis
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Posts: 34,772
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 305834
Where's the meltdown?
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"

"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"


**Summer Walker Crew**
post 1699394803 03-18-2024, 07:05 PM
-
#3
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
I was assured it was over for Drumpf, did it happen yet?
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1699394973 03-18-2024, 07:10 PM
-
#4
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By OPGenesis⏩
Where's the meltdown?
Jack smith ain't "coming in hot" before election. Sorry sir
post 1699395273 03-18-2024, 07:19 PM
-
#5
  1. OPGenesis
  1. OPGenesis
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Posts: 34,772
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 305834
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
Jack smith ain't "coming in hot" before election. Sorry sir
Sure he is.


Trump's health is deteriorating rapidly, especially with all his wealth being confiscated from him, so it may not even be necessary though.


The man should just get out while he can, but his low self esteem, and other host of mental illnesses won't allow him, and will be very costly for him very soon.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"

"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"


**Summer Walker Crew**
post 1699395763 03-18-2024, 07:32 PM
-
#6
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2020
  4. Posts: 27,464
  5. Rep Power: 171374
Not gonna lie, TL;DR

Who? I just learned who Jackie Smith was a couple of months ago, solely through this subforum. I don't know how you guys keep up with every micro detail of certain topics. The soap opera every day details fog my brain, and I'm someone who pays attention way more than the average person.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
post 1699395783 03-18-2024, 07:32 PM
-
#7
  1. OPGenesis
  1. OPGenesis
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Posts: 34,772
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 305834
Originally Posted By gwg78⏩
Gosh. How costly? Let's pray he isn't assassinated. That would be terrible.
He isn't going to be assassinated. He doesn't fall in the realm of somebody that important to have to resort to those types of tactics.


Trump is an idiot. He isn't a JFK.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"

"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"


**Summer Walker Crew**
post 1699395923 03-18-2024, 07:35 PM
-
#8
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By frankdtank20⏩
Not gonna lie, TL;DR

Who? I just learned who Jackie Smith was a couple of months ago, solely through this subforum. I don't know how you guys keep up with every micro detail of certain topics. The soap opera every day details fog my brain, and I'm someone who pays attention way more than the average person.
She made both sides write a set of jury instructions based on this
"(b) A president has sole authority under the PRA to categorize records as personal or
presidential during his/her presidency. Neither a court nor a jury is permitted to make or
review such a categorization decision. Although there is no formal means in the PRA by
which a president is to make that categorization, an outgoing president's decision to exclude what he/she considers to be personal records from presidential records transmitted to the National Archives and Records Administration constitutes a president's categorization of those records as personal under the PRA.
DONE AND ORDERED in Chambers at Fort Pierce, Florida, this 18th day of March"
https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...8652.407.0.pdf



And a potential dismissal of 32 charges....
post 1699396253 03-18-2024, 07:45 PM
-
#9
  1. OPGenesis
  1. OPGenesis
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Posts: 34,772
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 305834
Originally Posted By gachase21⏩
She made both sides write a set of jury instructions based on this



https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...8652.407.0.pdf



And a potential dismissal of 32 charges....
And you honestly think that this third rate Trumper judge is going to outsmart the SC with these types of lame actions? lol


And all charges are just going to vanish?


I know you said Fani was going to be removed.


How'd that work out.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"

"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"


**Summer Walker Crew**
post 1699396413 03-18-2024, 07:49 PM
-
#10
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By OPGenesis⏩
And you honestly think that this third rate Trumper judge is going to outsmart the SC with these types of lame actions? lol


And all charges are just going to vanish?


I know you said Fani was going to be removed.


How'd that work out.
Fanni- i'm the one that didn't want her removed, remember?


The more important part is how many hearings Cannon had for this - and how long it takes.

No verdict before election - sorry sir


After these are done, she's not going to do the hearing on disqualifying JACK Smith- based on improper appointment motion
post 1699396493 03-18-2024, 07:52 PM
-
#11
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By frankdtank20⏩
Not gonna lie, TL;DR

Who? I just learned who Jackie Smith was a couple of months ago, solely through this subforum.I don't know how you guys keep up with every micro detail of certain topics. The soap opera every day details fog my brain, and I'm someone who pays attention way more than the average person.
One more note - my son is currently in law school - so this has been a pretty interesting conversation piece.

Especially with all the various professors and visiting judges.

One heckuva time to be in law school

They are more focused on the Chevron stuff though
post 1699396533 03-18-2024, 07:53 PM
-
#12
  1. GuineaDago585
  2. Bert McGirt
  1. GuineaDago585
  2. Bert McGirt
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 40,554
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 404801
There’s a thought that Cannon might issue an order to dismiss based on selective prosecution. Jack Smith would of course appeal but it would be guaranteed a dead case until well after the election.
post 1699396673 03-18-2024, 07:58 PM
-
#13
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By GuineaDago585⏩
There’s a thought that Cannon might issue an order to dismiss based on selective prosecution. Jack Smith would of course appeal but it would be guaranteed a dead case until well after the election.
Discussion on spaces last night staring at 1:16 ish



This is 4 former Fed prosecutors / including a Harvard grad that's tired in every appellate circuit (rare), Georgetown grad, etc. they are right biased though - one neutral
post 1699397163 03-18-2024, 08:11 PM
-
#14
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By gwg78⏩
Jack Smith is such an awesome dude. Tried war crimes at the Hague, does triathlons, and goes after protofascist orange pukebags. Alpha af.
He is a pretty accomplished guy for sure- it is completely baffling as to why they put him in charge without being prior congressionally approved- possibly causing all these cases to get thrown out later.

They could've just put in an a proper congressionally approved person in charge and then hired him. Literally any US attorney would've worked.
post 1699397683 03-18-2024, 08:25 PM
-
#15
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By gwg78⏩
DOJ works for the POTUS, not congress. Smith works for Garland, who works for Biden. Garland had the authority to appoint a special counsel to investigate to remove the appearance of impropriety. When Barr appointed Durham, nobody screeched about that. Also, Trump has used this same argument against every special counsel who has investigated him. It's a crap argument, and Jack Smith has an unassailable reputation. Pond scum like Trump is unworthy of being the gum under his shoe.
The prior special council at some point had been congressionally approved officers by Congress

Including Durham
post 1699398173 03-18-2024, 08:36 PM
-
#16
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Meese brief regarding special counsel

https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketP...us%20final.pdf


Trumps filing under Cannon upcoming

https://storage.courtlistener.com/re...8652.326.0.pdf
post 1699398383 03-18-2024, 08:40 PM
-
#17
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Also

post 1699399903 03-18-2024, 09:26 PM
-
#18
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By gwg78⏩
Jack Smith's argument:

Special counsel is subject to supervision and oversight by Garland. Garland can remove him at any time. Garland has authority given by the office of the President. The special counsel's actions can be reviewed and corrected by Garland. The special counsel is an inferior officer. So, Meese's argument is trash.

Remember when Meese tried to cover up Iran-Contra? He's doing it again lmfao. Once a crook, always a crook.
Did you also read the 2nd link argument filed by Trump team?


It might not ever get to that argument - idk - could be over before we get to it


If it does come up, it would eventually have to be a scotus call
post 1699401953 03-18-2024, 10:31 PM
-
#19
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Sometimes you get a judge that favors you and sometimes you don't. This looks like it will stall out, but none of this will matter if Trump doesn't win the election. Guess we'll just have to wait and see.
post 1699402003 03-18-2024, 10:33 PM
-
#20
  1. gachase21
  1. gachase21
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 31,767
  6. Subscribers: 4
  7. Rep Power: 389233
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Sometimes you get a judge that favors you and sometimes you don't. This looks like it will stall out, but none of this will matter if Trump doesn't win the election. Guess we'll just have to wait and see.
Georgia will still matter -eventually - even if he wins the election.

No pardon- Trump can't drop it himself


It's crucial that Fanni Willis / Fulton da team - stay in charge and they don't get a legit prosecution team.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts