The complete bullchit narrative is of a ship losing power and drifting helplessly into one out of four critical columns which would bring the entire Francis Scott Key Bridge down if cut (bad redundancy for bridge design in the first place.)

But in the up close video broadcast by WRAL Raleigh the ship can be seen nearly clearing the column when power goes back on long enough to swing hard rudder-right, stops as it loses power again and drifts until precisely aimed at the column, then regains power to charge straight at the column bow first. Total 1,000% inside job at one of the three most critical supply chain ports in America. Farm machinery, fertilizer. You are under attack.



Video at official WRAL Youtube channel:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JebyNOvJmCM

Rumble video backup linkhttps://rumble.com/v4nwzuf-close-up-...-column-u.html

I will play devil's advocate here and ask the question why didn't they align it up before the power got cut?

Was the idea to cut the power to make it look like an accident was occurring, turn the power on just long enough to make the final adjustments, and then cut the power again to continue to make it look like an accident ? Plausible deniability? Just throwing it out there.

This is one of those situations where it could have been intentional or an accident, but likely we will never know the real answer. I am on the side of it being an accident, but absolutely do not rule it out as being intentional.

They did line it up before the power got cut the second time. Then it drifts just the way it would side into a berth until the bow is facing the column dead on. Then the power goes on again and it throttles straight ahead. It's really quite plain to see IMO.

My theory is the controls were hacked and the captain found them unresponsive. He'll come out telling a different story though after being kept on the boat for awhile and straightened out on what he is going to say.

I don't think the power was ever restored to the engine is my contention I guess. The lighting coming back on was a result of backup generators. I am making those assumptions based on the analysis of people in the industry.

The rough timeline was:

-Ship loses main power from the engines resulting in loss of propulsion and steering and total blackout of the ship.
-The plume of smoke from the ship was them trying to restart the main engine.
-Lighting on the ship returns as a result of backup generators firing up, but still no power or extremely limited power from engine to propulsion/steering.

The only part that is questionable, and I believe is your main point, is the hard swing to the right which caused it to head to the bridge. The problem is I don't think at any point they ever restored power to engines. Maybe information has since changed.

BTW I have not followed the story very closely. Just watched youtubes and read analysis so please correct me and add your version of the timeline etc as you see fit.

Appreciating your input.

You can see power is restored to the engines when the boat comes at the support column at a full 90 degree angle from the original motion of travel. Otherwise conservation of momentum would have kept the ship drifting past the column. I don't know if the engines were on after the first power-out but the rudder was sure working, because the ship swings hard rudder-right. It is only in the distance shots which were replayed on TV that it looks like an uncontrolled drift into the column.

I cannot take credit for being the one to notice this. Bannon and Lara Logan were right on it before the narrative got fixed in the media.https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/202...apse-everyone/

False flag brought to you by any of the following immediate suspects below based on 10 years of false flag research:

Department of "Homeland Security"
US Northern Command
MITRE Corporation
Any of the 3-5 letter intel agencies
Booz Allen Hamilton
CACI / Kroll Associates
Also complicit because they developed the technologies to carry out false flags like 9/11:
George Mason University - specifically: SAL: System Architectures Laboratory - Alexander H. Levis
Carnegie Mellon University

Also likely involved in various ways:

RAND Corporation
Center for Strategic and International Studies
Bilderberg Group
Committee of 300
World Economic Forum

The Dali was built in 2015 by Hyundai. All modern ship electronics. Child's play to hack. Slap a wi-fi LAN router in the bridge and it is your toy.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MV_Dali

Related topic, and blast from the past:

https://www.wired.com/2010/07/siemens-scada/

SCADA System's Hard-Coded Password Circulated Online for Years

A sophisticated new piece of malware that targets command-and-control software installed in critical infrastructures uses a known default password that the software maker hard-coded into its system. The password has been available online since at least 2008, when it was posted to product forums in Germany and Russia.

The password protects the database used in Siemens' Simatic WinCC SCADA system, which runs on Windows operating systems. SCADA, short for "supervisory control and data acquisition," systems are programs installed in utilities and manufacturing facilities to manage the operations. SCADA has been the focus of much controversy lately for being potentially vulnerable to remote attack by malicious outsiders who might want to seize control of utilities for purposes of sabotage, espionage or extortion.

"Default passwords are and have been a major vulnerability for many years," said Steve Bellovin, a computer scientist as Columbia University who specializes in security issues. "It's irresponsible to put them in, in the first place, let alone in a system that doesn’t work if you change it. If that’s the way the Siemens systems works, they were negligent."

Siemens did not respond to a request for comment.

Coding a password into software all but ensures that interested third-parties can retrieve it by analyzing the code, though software-makers can employ obfuscation techniques to make this more difficult.

It's not known how long the WinCC database password has been circulating privately among computer intruders, but it was published online in 2008 at a Siemens technical forum, where a Siemens moderator appears to have deleted it shortly thereafter. The same anonymous user, "Cyber," also posted the password to a Russian-language Siemens forum at the same time, where it has remained online for two years.

The password appears to be used by the WinCC software to connect to its MS-SQL back-end database. According to some of the forum posts, changing the password causes the system to stop working.

Last week, a security expert in Germany named Frank Boldewin found the password in a new and sophisticated piece of malware designed to spread through USB thumb drives to attack the Siemens system. The malware exploits a previously unknown vulnerability in all versions of Windows in the part of the operating system that handles shortcut files -- files ending with a .lnk extension. The code launches itself when a file-manager program, such as Windows Explorer, is used to view the contents of the USB stick.

News of the malware was first reported last week by security blogger Brian Krebs who said that a security firm in Belarus named VirusBlokAda had discovered it in June.

Boldewin's analysis showed that once the malware is launched, it searches the computer for the presence of the Simatic WinCC software and then applies the hard-coded password, 2WSXcder, to access the control system's database.

Siemens indicated in a statement to reporters last week that it learned of the malware on July 14 and had assembled a team of experts to evaluate the problem. The company said it had also alerted customers to the potential risk of being infected by the virus. The statement made no mention of the hard coded password.

NSA Director of Cybersecurity Anne Neuberger in Conversation with Garrett Graff

Hard-coded passwords aren't a problem just for Siemens.

"Well over 50 percent of the control system suppliers" hard-code passwords into their software or firmware, says Joe Weiss, author of the book Protecting Industrial Control Systems from Electronic Threats. "These systems were designed so they could be used efficiently and safely. Security was simply not one of the design issues."

The emergence of malware targeting a SCADA system is a new and potentially ominous development for critical infrastructure protection. But for the average user, the Windows vulnerability the code uses to infect its targets is of much greater immediate concern.

Microsoft issued a workaround to address the Windows vulnerability that the malware exploits, suggesting that users modify their Windows registry to disable the WebClient service as well as the display of shortcut icons. Security experts have criticized the company for these suggestions, noting that they are not easy to do in some environments and that disabling the WebClient service would break other services.

In the meantime, a security researcher has published a working exploit for the Windows hole, making it more likely that someone will try to conduct such an attack.

The SANS Institute, which trains security professionals, indicated that it believed "wide-scale exploitation is only a matter of time."

"The proof-of-concept exploit is publicly available, and the issue is not easy to fix until Microsoft issues a patch," wrote Lenny Zeltser at the SANS Internet Storm Center blog. "Furthermore, anti-virus tools' ability to detect generic versions of the exploit have not been very effective so far."

Also:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aurora_Generator_Test

If the ship was built by Hyundai then China 100% has all the backdoors. This was an attack plain as day.

have they announced yet who was at the helm?

So I don't have depth perception, failed the test at MEPS. Watching this video is confusing AF to me, the movement makes no sense at all. Does it look crazy to anyone else? When I watch it, it looks like its going to hit from left to right within seconds of starting the video, but it does crazy movement and hits it from another angle completely.

HHI is Korean. Besides, they're also the largest shipyard in the world. If they're giving info to China, then a fairly large percentage of the world's ships and drilling rigs would be at risk.

The video is sped up and the angle of view, and the size of the bridge and ship, make it confusing without seeing the corresponding ships track on a map.

It started to turn in the current/wind about a 1/2 mile before striking the bridge, and it wasn't moving in the same direction it was pointed when it hit.

I was under the impression that they dropped the anchor as a last ditch attempt only for it to backfire and change their direction right into the bridge...

When that happened, rudder angle, when the engine sopped, speed, all that stuff will contribute to direction. It's a huge ship, so nothing happens fast. Whatever report comes out will have it all except the obvious bit of Russian sub surface anti-gravity directed energy weapons caused the wreck to help Trump win the presidency. That's the pizza boys job to share those facts.

//////

The anchor couldn't cause it to throttle forward right into the bridge.

The food inflation prices are just beginning. I am paying nearly 5 bucks for a small ice coffee and this is not NYC.

That's not a very good idea, you should stop doing that.

Nothing happens fast? Meanwhile:

Your delusional claims, which would'vegroundedthe vessel if it came from the direction you fictionalize, have already been disproven in half your other copy-paste threads on the topic.

Now,MONTHSafter shipping was restored to the port and/or simply diverted to other nearby ports, you claim "food inflation" caused by the short disruption late March into April? Where the hell have you been for the last three years of the Biden administration?

How, exactly, did a few weeks of disrupted shipping into Baltimore cause the cost of coffee to go up now? (Reminder: Baltimore only sees 8% of US coffee imports, any of which would've simply been redirected to other ports for the few weeks of closure).

BRB - A collision that occurred in March 2024 is now blamed for food inflation that started three years earlier...


https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIUFDSL

Lot's of stuff is "reported", it's on you to know what to do with it.

The AIS track of the ship has been out for months now, it was traveling 8 knots (9 mph) in the channel before it lost power. Even under full power at top speed it takes a couple minutes to change the momentum of the ship.

It's correct that the ship changed direction moments before the crash, ackshually any object in motion on Earth is changing direction, there was no significant change in direction moments before impact that would contribute to the conspiracy theories of an intentional crash.

Once again, the actual facts have no connection to your fictional world

Coffee futures on Friday were almost exactly what they were the day before the collision and bridge collapse. The actual inflation in coffee futures occurred fromOct 2023 through Mar 2024.Oops.


https://www.investing.com/commoditie...istorical-data

Tracking data gave the same conclusion:
Again, the tracking data showed that the ship deviated 13 degrees off course almost instantly:

It's a 100,000 ton ship. What do you mean by "almost instantly"?

did they ever look at the crew?

i wouldn't be surprised if it's filled with muslims and they did this on purpose

Abruptly.

I don't know much, but I know 200 million pounds does not change direction abruptly, almost instantly, or anything else like that.

What it will do is drift slowly into a bridge when it loses power a quarter mile away, taking 3 or 4 minutes to get there, and thankfully leaving enough time to radio ahead and stop traffic.

Are you suggesting that the tracking data I cited by Newsweek is wrong?