Forum
»
How do you define a "groomer"?
- Results 1 to 5 of 5
-
Page 1 of 1
Thread:
How do you define a "groomer"?
06-07-2024, 05:59 PM
-
#1
How do you define a "groomer"?
Was just wondering, because America is actually in the minority when it comes to consent.
As for example, in Italy and other EU nations consent is age 14.

Back in the beginning 1900's the age of consent in some jurisdictions in America ranged from ages 7-9.
The age of sexual consent
R F Kourany, R Y Hill, M H Hollender
PMID: 3730628
Abstract
In 1899 the age of sexual consent in some American jurisdictions was 9 years (Delaware). It has ranged from 7 to 21 years and at present the range is from 11 to 18 years.The age selected seems to be an arbitrary matter, the product of legislative compromise. The age of sexual consent should not be so early that little protection is provided for a child. Conversely, it should not be so late that a man can be held for statutory rape when the "victim" is fully capable of informed consent and readily acquiesced to a proposal or even invited a sexual relationship.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3730628/
Actually, you'll see relatively not too long ago consent ages, historically, are extremely low compared to now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent_reform
Were all these people in the past groomers?
How could the prophet Mohammad be considered a groomer when consent laws just a little over a hundred years ago were the same age range as Aisha?
Just wondering, because the debate around this seems kind of subjective per the time you live in.
As for example, in Italy and other EU nations consent is age 14.

Back in the beginning 1900's the age of consent in some jurisdictions in America ranged from ages 7-9.
The age of sexual consent
R F Kourany, R Y Hill, M H Hollender
PMID: 3730628
Abstract
In 1899 the age of sexual consent in some American jurisdictions was 9 years (Delaware). It has ranged from 7 to 21 years and at present the range is from 11 to 18 years.The age selected seems to be an arbitrary matter, the product of legislative compromise. The age of sexual consent should not be so early that little protection is provided for a child. Conversely, it should not be so late that a man can be held for statutory rape when the "victim" is fully capable of informed consent and readily acquiesced to a proposal or even invited a sexual relationship.
https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/3730628/
Actually, you'll see relatively not too long ago consent ages, historically, are extremely low compared to now.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_consent_reform
Were all these people in the past groomers?
How could the prophet Mohammad be considered a groomer when consent laws just a little over a hundred years ago were the same age range as Aisha?
Just wondering, because the debate around this seems kind of subjective per the time you live in.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
06-07-2024, 06:15 PM
-
#2
- Muscle2021
- Registered User
-
- Muscle2021
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 12,737
- Rep Power: 73379
-
-
OP is a groomer
***NEUTRAL CREW*** ™
06-07-2024, 06:15 PM
-
#3
- fitnessislife
- Registered User
-
- fitnessislife
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Age: 37
- Posts: 27,183
- Rep Power: 223047
-
-
If you approve of subjecting children to sexualized performances by drag queens and screech like a stuck pig when elementary schools take graphic porn out of elementary school libraries, you're a groomer. If you get angry when schools are ordered to stop allowing "teachers" to talk about their fetishes with children as young as 3rd grade, you're a groomer. If you support and encourage children who haven't even hit puberty yet to cut off their genitals and go on permanent hormone blockers, you're a groomer.
This isn't a right vs. left issue. It's common sense that even most Democrats as recently as 10 years ago completely agreed with.
This isn't a right vs. left issue. It's common sense that even most Democrats as recently as 10 years ago completely agreed with.
"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."
- PJ O'Rourke
06-07-2024, 06:17 PM
-
#4
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 120,479
- Rep Power: 316531
-
-
Who's arguing that Mohammed wasn't a peeeeedo?
06-07-2024, 06:19 PM
-
#5
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
He wasn't, per when he lived.Who's arguing that Mohammed wasn't a peeeeedo?
It really is all subjective when you look at the history of consent laws, which I was totally unaware of.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts