Forum
»
Doesn't increased carbon emissions just mean that plants and trees have more food?
- Results 1 to 7 of 7
-
Page 1 of 1
07-21-2024, 05:32 AM
-
#1
- WiseOldApe
- Registered User
-
- WiseOldApe
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2020
- Posts: 20,030
- Rep Power: 60849
-
-
Doesn't increased carbon emissions just mean that plants and trees have more food?
Like the more carbon we release into the air, doesn't this just provide more food to trees?
"It's hard to be yourself in a world filled with haters" - WiseOldApe.
"Why be anything when you can be an influencer?" - WiseOldApe.
"It's not about what is said - it's about who it is said by" - WiseOldApe.
07-21-2024, 07:06 AM
-
#2
07-21-2024, 07:09 AM
-
#3
- ninetynine8
- Registered User
-
- ninetynine8
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2020
- Posts: 13,219
- Rep Power: 42745
-
-
I am being watched
07-21-2024, 10:05 AM
-
#4
- crupiea
- Lifetime Member
-
- crupiea
- Lifetime Member
- Join Date: Aug 2006
- Location: San Diego, California, United States
- Posts: 42,878
- Rep Power: 232216
-
-
100% correct.
The reason they want to reduce these co2 levels os to keep the deserts and uninhabitable area the same size or larger,.
This makes sure that we are basically corralled into controllable area.
Imagine what politicians would do if the southwest started to become lush and green and people started moving out of big cities to the open country. The politicians have comtrol over those cities now so they would have to somehow wrangle control over those people moving everywhere.
Its all about control so thats the absolute last thing they want. Imagine you are farmer and your cows are under control in their fenced field. You dont want them getting out and wandering everywhere because you have a lot invested in them and want them under your control.
Control is the entire reason for this green nonsense.
The reason they want to reduce these co2 levels os to keep the deserts and uninhabitable area the same size or larger,.
This makes sure that we are basically corralled into controllable area.
Imagine what politicians would do if the southwest started to become lush and green and people started moving out of big cities to the open country. The politicians have comtrol over those cities now so they would have to somehow wrangle control over those people moving everywhere.
Its all about control so thats the absolute last thing they want. Imagine you are farmer and your cows are under control in their fenced field. You dont want them getting out and wandering everywhere because you have a lot invested in them and want them under your control.
Control is the entire reason for this green nonsense.
"To be a warrior is not a simple matter of wishing to be one. It is rather an endless struggle that will go on to the very last moment of our lives. Nobody is born a warrior, in exactly the same way that nobody is born an average man. We make ourselves into one or the other."-- Carlos Castaneda
07-21-2024, 10:14 AM
-
#5
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
-
- Paul Kreul
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 33,385
- Rep Power: 316746
-
-
We are near lowest amounts of co2 in atmosphere in thousands of years. More co2 means more food for plants means less deserts means more life on earth. Co2 and temperature have no correlation.
07-21-2024, 10:16 AM
-
#6
07-21-2024, 10:21 AM
-
#7
- olemo
- Registered User
-
- olemo
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Age: 32
- Posts: 3,179
- Rep Power: 8054
-
-
it also means you're speeding up and changing natural processes that can result in a change of climate. for example rising sea levels. and do you know most gdp is based on cities near rivers? All the large and big cities are near riviers because of trading.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts