Men and women want different things from a relationship.

Women don't want sex. It doesn't matter if it's Tom Brady himself. Of course they will sleep with someone like Tom Brady but why do they do this? Because he can provide in some way. Either financially or via status.

If you think you're sexually appealing to your girl I got some bad news you don't. Sex isn't why she's with you. She has it with you because that's part of the exchange and how a relationship is defined to work but the sex with you is not the reward of the relationship.


The even exchange with women is you want sex with her and can in turn provide for her or protect her in some form.

providing in a LTR/wife is alpha. it's how it's been for millennia.

but theres a difference between providing for a wife, and providing for a whore you won't marry/have kids with.

Women do want sex, just not from you.

It's cope... If they had a girl they could take out to dinner or a date. They would.. but since they don't they just say "blah blah blah what a simp"

No they want the validation of being wanted for sex because it's the currency they work with. Keep coping thinking she's into you sexually. Why do you think so many of them take pride in getting a guy off quickly? That's a weird thing to want if they actually enjoy sex don't you think?

That sounds like someone who pays for sex would say.

I feel weird providing for a sloot that’s working

If I provide I want her to stay at home and look after my kids, iron all my clothes, prepare meals etc

Tuff love but this guy is right ^*

It depends if she's providing value (raising my children, taking care of the home, cleaning, cooking etc.) or not.

This is why there are houses everywhere full of grim, ugly people mindlessly producing offspring for the sake of it.

Women want a hypermasculine guy to have sex with them and a beta male provider to take care of expenses.

Because of values like integrity, sincerity, and posterity.

Apparently you were "raised" by the block whore.

This can obviously work just fine, but in today's world being a full time provider to a chick who can easily provide for herself just isn't worth it.

50 years ago? Completely ok and expected. But nowadays if a chick can't find some way to make money she likely isn't someone you want to involve yourself with.

because women make just as much or even more than men nowadays.

They fought tooth and nail to be able to work and to be able to earn $$$$$. So now they want to keep all their cash while men bend over backwards for them and fund their lifestyles?


How big of a fkn cuck can you be lmaooo

the last 50+ years has been an adventure in making it harder for men to provide...just a logical result at putting 50% more people (women) in the workforce. at the same time making women less grateful for it by pushing the feminist idea of "well i can just do it myself if i want to".

This

I’m not providing for a career woman lmao

If she wants to be a stay at home traditional woman then by all means I’ll take of chit.

imagine being a man that works your way up to $100k+ income and then you ALSO have the option of marrying someone that pays all the bills allowing you to keep every dime you make working.

His mom must’ve been that bish named block head. She got a block head. And after every block party she give the whole block head.

all that can change in an instant if she gets bored and her friends get in her ear. then she could start seeing the benefits of what she could get in a divorce plus alimony...plus having chads chasing her like she's made of gold. probably start analyzing everything you do that annoys her and telling her friends so they can discuss how much better she deserves.

i dont look at it as a negative...


nowadays i just genuinely don't believe women pull their own weight. and i dont mean that financially.. i mean that in the sense of what a relationship is supposed to be

so for instance, i think a guy is a provider and hes supposed to do all of that chit, but on the other end the woman is supposed to do all of this hard chit.. and be feminine and demure. it's interesting most women operate nowadays from the perspective that you HAVE to put up with them in order to even play.. which is very domineering.

its why the unknowing casanovas are like the unwitting fabricators of their own demise

anyways, i dont think that the relationship is supposed to be the man is the provider and his prize is some whore that spreads it to every one... the prize is in the exclusivity

if you're not exclusive then what are you?

This isn't true. She's completely satisfied with that beta provider male. You've been watching way too much porn or Netflix or Instagram.

You guys have this misconception she's unhappy with the beta provider because she's not sexually attracted to him but she's not interested in sex like you all think. The idea they want hypermasculine males as sex toys is a fantasy created by men. Women want the provider. Theo nly thing you have right is that they aren't all that sexually interested in the beta provider. That doesn't mean they don't value a relationship with them. It also doesn't mean they'll be looking for some masculine male outside the relationship to cheat. That's all media fantasy BS. Women are fully content with a good provider.

They step out and cheat when the provider becomes something of a loser. He either stops paying her attention (which is a form of the providing) or times get tough financially. Sometimes due to having kids etc. And yes when the providing declines they start cheating and trying to monkey branch because that's what they do.

This idea women cheat for sexual satisfaction is overblown and it's completely created by men because thats why men cheat. Rarely is this happening.