Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » More General Categories » Religion and Politics » lol Putin ain't fukin around
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 153
  2. Page 2 of 6
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: lol Putin ain't fukin around

post 1574131121 02-20-2019, 04:48 PM
-
#31
  1. johnnydeep1
  2. Registered User
  1. johnnydeep1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 43,974
  6. Rep Power: 20436
Leaders of unfree, third world nations only care about war and useless issues but don't care about human or animal rights. They don't care about their own people's welfare or freedoms and don't even care if they have food to eat or not. All they seem to care about is war.

I don't respect them one bit.
AGE-28
Wt-165
HT-5'10"
Bench-100 dumbbell press-5 reps
*Mechanical Engineer*
post 1574131271 02-20-2019, 04:50 PM
-
#32
  1. MrRipley
  2. It Sick
  1. MrRipley
  2. It Sick
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
  5. Age: 31
  6. Posts: 3,068
  7. Rep Power: 1785
This is all theatre. Putin invests his money in the U.S while his friends and relatives live in London.
adde parvum parvo magnus acervus erit.
post 1574131301 02-20-2019, 04:50 PM
-
#33
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By LinuxJon⏩
Doesn't matter if you say they have "first strike" capability. To what end? Our nukes are distributed around the world via multiple launch sites, not to mention all of them that can be deployed via submarines and aircraft carriers. Russia isn't some terrorist state that is okay with seeing an end-times type event.
They have countermeasures, and it may eventually become rational for them to take the risk. A surgical first strike might lead to immediate and unconditional surrender.


BTW here is another example where if we only had 6 mins to respond, the world might have plunged into a nuclear war:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasili_Arkhipov
post 1574131351 02-20-2019, 04:52 PM
-
#34
  1. rybo
  2. whens mine turn
  1. rybo
  2. whens mine turn
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 3,051
  7. Rep Power: 2769
Hopefully they hit close to me. Would rather die from the blast rather than the 1% I live to find out what radiation sickness is like
**RG3 Crew**
post 1574131421 02-20-2019, 04:53 PM
-
#35
  1. LinuxJon
  1. LinuxJon
  3. Join Date: Apr 2014
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 49,073
  6. Rep Power: 325966
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
They have countermeasures, and it may eventually become rational for them to take the risk. A surgical first strike might lead to immediate and unconditional surrender.


BTW here is another example where if we only had 6 mins to respond, the world might have plunged into a nuclear war:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vasili_Arkhipov
On what basis would it be rational?

There is no scenario where trying to conquer the US makes any sense. There are 400m guns here. No country could ever successfully pull off a land invasion. That eliminates any idea that they could win a war and come here and take the spoils. They have no reason to do this out of self preservation, as the US isn't even remotely involved in anything that interferes with their homeland.
480s / 370b / 495d / 235 x 2 SOHP

Trump 2020
DeSantis 2024
Catbrah 2032

Misc Firearms Crew
Misc Wristwatch Crew
Will sell wife's foot pics for watch/gun money crew
Definitely not a fed crew
post 1574131431 02-20-2019, 04:53 PM
-
#36
  1. MrRipley
  2. It Sick
  1. MrRipley
  2. It Sick
  3. Join Date: Jan 2014
  4. Location: Moscow, Russian Federation
  5. Age: 31
  6. Posts: 3,068
  7. Rep Power: 1785
Originally Posted By r32gojirra⏩
Nasha volodya
Vovochka
adde parvum parvo magnus acervus erit.
post 1574131461 02-20-2019, 04:54 PM
-
#37
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By EnochsProphecy⏩
You're a good representation of most of the U.S population. You live in pride and arrogance when it comes to the power you think your country has. Most of our citizens think the U.S is untouchable and underestimates the power of other nations. This is one of the reasons on why we have become soft and immoral.

(Proverbs 16:18) Pride goeth before destruction, and an haughty spirit before a fall.
lol, keep coping you irrelevant eurocuck
post 1574131511 02-20-2019, 04:55 PM
-
#38
  1. johnnydeep1
  2. Registered User
  1. johnnydeep1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 43,974
  6. Rep Power: 20436
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
They have countermeasures, and it may eventually become rational for them to take the risk. A surgical first strike might lead to immediate and unconditional surrender.


BTW here is another example where if we only had 6 mins to respond, the world might have plunged into a nuclear war:
"Lifelong Virgin"

That's hardcore as $hit brother
AGE-28
Wt-165
HT-5'10"
Bench-100 dumbbell press-5 reps
*Mechanical Engineer*
post 1574131591 02-20-2019, 04:56 PM
-
#39
  1. MajorTendonitis
  1. MajorTendonitis
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Location: East Kootenays BC
  5. Age: 65
  6. Height: 5'8"
  7. Weight: 241 lbs
  8. Posts: 41,982
  9. Subscribers: 8
  10. Rep Power: 715344
Do we actually have proof that he even has this capability,other than some cgi video?
Back with my Fam
post 1574131661 02-20-2019, 04:58 PM
-
#40
  1. MajorTendonitis
  1. MajorTendonitis
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Location: East Kootenays BC
  5. Age: 65
  6. Height: 5'8"
  7. Weight: 241 lbs
  8. Posts: 41,982
  9. Subscribers: 8
  10. Rep Power: 715344
Originally Posted By rybo⏩
Hopefully they hit close to me. Would rather die from the blast rather than the 1% I live to find out what radiation sickness is like
Blind and third degree burns 60 miles from ground zero
Back with my Fam
post 1574131851 02-20-2019, 05:03 PM
-
#41
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By LinuxJon⏩
On what basis would it be rational?

There is no scenario where trying to conquer the US makes any sense. There are 400m guns here. No country could ever successfully pull off a land invasion. That eliminates any idea that they could win a war and come here and take the spoils. They have no reason to do this out of self preservation, as the US isn't even remotely involved in anything that interferes with their homeland.
Nobody is trying to conquer or invade. They would be trying to avert a potential future full scale nuclear war. It can make sense to surgically strike if they have enough confidence in their countermeasures and believe that the overwhelming force of their attack would force an immediate surrender.

Russia's immediate goal is to end the threat of nuclear war from the US or (as seems to be the case with the current escalation) to minimize the casualties they suffer from a nuclear war, if inevitable. They may, eventually, conclude war to be inevitable and find it advantageous to be the first striker. That is not a situation anyone wants to be in.
post 1574131961 02-20-2019, 05:04 PM
-
#42
  1. Peter Ruby
  2. Yes, I lift.
  1. Peter Ruby
  2. Yes, I lift.
  3. Join Date: Oct 2007
  4. Posts: 14,453
  5. Rep Power: 202205
I see chicken little is making more doom and gloom threads.

You need to get laid, homie.
post 1574132051 02-20-2019, 05:05 PM
-
#43
  1. Dorich
  2. Banned
  1. Dorich
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2016
  4. Location: Germany
  5. Posts: 14,225
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
No. I happen to live here, and it is in my best interests to not see chit escalate. I also don't want there to be a situation where these idiots only have 6 min to respond if they detect an attack. Imagine if this kind of thing:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stanislav_Petrov

happened with only 6 mins. It gets much scarier.
This is absurd.
post 1574132071 02-20-2019, 05:05 PM
-
#44
  1. TommyRO
  2. Always keeping it Real
  1. TommyRO
  2. Always keeping it Real
  3. Join Date: Dec 2015
  4. Location: Prince From, Lagos, Nigeria
  5. Posts: 28,971
  6. Rep Power: 379644
Doesn't matter, we have Dr. Manhattan
****Bringing sixy back in 2019****
6'6" 666lbs......str8 sixy!

Who Tests God and Does Not Wager Their Lives?
post 1574132361 02-20-2019, 05:11 PM
-
#45
  1. Casca
  2. Registered User
  1. Casca
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2005
  4. Posts: 14,997
  5. Rep Power: 62013
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
You can't defend chit if they first strike you dude. All we could do is retaliate in vain or surrender. They also have missile defense systems just like we do. The difference is we have no defense against their new missiles.
We have military forces dispersed around the country and the world. First strike on what? Retaliate in vain??? I don't know how many SSBN's we have or the damage just one of them can do, but just lol at this stupid ****.
☆☆☆USA �яєω☆☆☆


Not Casca Berserk. Casca The Eternal Soldier



☆☆☆Perfectly Imperfect �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆What is the point of doing a bunch of reps if every rep you do is CRAP? �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆SuperStraight �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆snailsrus �яєω☆☆☆

☆☆☆High Five �яєω☆☆☆
post 1574132501 02-20-2019, 05:13 PM
-
#46
  1. lolXlol
  2. Registered User
  1. lolXlol
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2015
  4. Posts: 2,837
  5. Rep Power: 0
based russians and putin of peace

america has always been the world's no. 1 enemy

we must all unite to defeat these monstrous people and their empire

washington MUST fall
post 1574132531 02-20-2019, 05:14 PM
-
#47
  1. dannyg1217
  2. Registered User
  1. dannyg1217
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2007
  4. Location: Greeley, Colorado, United States
  5. Age: 45
  6. Posts: 14,987
  7. Rep Power: 62602
This had been the case for decades. Nothing new here
Yellow fever crew
High test Manlet crew
EE master race

5'7" @ 175
PRs, B325 S405 D405
post 1574132641 02-20-2019, 05:17 PM
-
#48
  1. backinthegymbro
  2. Never accept defeat!
  1. backinthegymbro
  2. Never accept defeat!
  3. Join Date: Aug 2018
  4. Posts: 23,402
  5. Rep Power: 275845
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
The difference is that Russia can effectively first strike us, and we are provoking them. And the difference is their new weapons make the risks of an accidental war considerably higher, so it is extremely important that we deescalate the situation.
It doesn't matter who strikes first because nukes can still be launched after the usa would get nuked.
There's also submarines carrying nukes in the oceans.
Not to mention you don't even need to hit the usa for menkind to die. If nukes hit everywhere else in the world, the usa would still perish from the nuclear fall out.

There's no winner in a nuclear war. It's mutually assured destruction guaranteed. So whoever strikes first doesn't matter.
There's no scenario where russia would take out the usa instantly without any retaliation.

Also what makes you think a first strike would make the usa surrender instead of sent nukes back?
Wouldn't go that way. Also wonder what got you banned this time.
Cobra Kai never dies!
post 1574132711 02-20-2019, 05:17 PM
-
#49
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 36,839
  5. Rep Power: 86393
i dont understand how u.s. doesn't have anything russia has. or at the very least us couldn't turn around and fuk russia up even more

post 1574132861 02-20-2019, 05:20 PM
-
#50
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 17,781
  6. Rep Power: 50628
Originally Posted By sandaltan⏩
trumpers love putin
He's the leader that we wish Trump was.
post 1574132901 02-20-2019, 05:21 PM
-
#51
  1. LinuxJon
  1. LinuxJon
  3. Join Date: Apr 2014
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 49,073
  6. Rep Power: 325966
Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩
i dont understand how u.s. doesn't have anything russia has. or at the very least us couldn't turn around and fuk russia up even more

Unfortunately, we abide by the arms treaties we sign. Other countries do not. This is largely why Russia has any advantage over us.

Also, huge amounts of inefficiency in our bid process.
480s / 370b / 495d / 235 x 2 SOHP

Trump 2020
DeSantis 2024
Catbrah 2032

Misc Firearms Crew
Misc Wristwatch Crew
Will sell wife's foot pics for watch/gun money crew
Definitely not a fed crew
post 1574132951 02-20-2019, 05:22 PM
-
#52
  1. Vexidi
  2. ( . )( . )
  1. Vexidi
  2. ( . )( . )
  3. Join Date: Mar 2012
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Age: 48
  6. Posts: 37,351
  7. Rep Power: 459730
Apparently OP took a break from fapping long enough to watch the news for the first time in his life and now he's pissing his pants over a cruise missile with a 600 mile range. lmao, probably a good thing this little boy still still lives at home with daddy.
post 1574133101 02-20-2019, 05:25 PM
-
#53
  1. johnnydeep1
  2. Registered User
  1. johnnydeep1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 43,974
  6. Rep Power: 20436
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Nobody is trying to conquer or invade. They would be trying to avert a potential future full scale nuclear war. It can make sense to surgically strike if they have enough confidence in their countermeasures and believe that the overwhelming force of their attack would force an immediate surrender.

Russia's immediate goal is to end the threat of nuclear war from the US or (as seems to be the case with the current escalation) to minimize the casualties they suffer from a nuclear war, if inevitable. They may, eventually, conclude war to be inevitable and find it advantageous to be the first striker. That is not a situation anyone wants to be in.
Why did they ban you
AGE-28
Wt-165
HT-5'10"
Bench-100 dumbbell press-5 reps
*Mechanical Engineer*
post 1574133161 02-20-2019, 05:26 PM
-
#54
  1. johnnydeep1
  2. Registered User
  1. johnnydeep1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 43,974
  6. Rep Power: 20436
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
Nobody is trying to conquer or invade. They would be trying to avert a potential future full scale nuclear war. It can make sense to surgically strike if they have enough confidence in their countermeasures and believe that the overwhelming force of their attack would force an immediate surrender.

Russia's immediate goal is to end the threat of nuclear war from the US or (as seems to be the case with the current escalation) to minimize the casualties they suffer from a nuclear war, if inevitable. They may, eventually, conclude war to be inevitable and find it advantageous to be the first striker. That is not a situation anyone wants to be in.
Why did they ban you
AGE-28
Wt-165
HT-5'10"
Bench-100 dumbbell press-5 reps
*Mechanical Engineer*
post 1574133451 02-20-2019, 05:30 PM
-
#55
  1. faxanadu
  2. Registered User
  1. faxanadu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 13,123
  6. Rep Power: 54413
It has always been a chess game between powerful nations. Each trying to get the other to slip up so that they can justify military action. Economic power has been shifting West to East for some time now. The powerful eastern countries and many smaller ones around the world have been forming economic and military alliances for the past decade.

I suspect there is some plan to either topple the dollar and therefore Americas worldwide economic stranglehold ... or take advantage of the dollar collapse that they believe to be inevitable. The turmoil induced by an economic disaster of that level has almost always lead to war historically.

Americas strength is its technological capability. However, that is also its greatest weakness. It wasn't that long ago that a squadron of F22's almost went down because of a bug in the flyby-wire software with regards to the international dateline.

http://www.f-22raptor.com/news_view.php?nid=267

The problem with being the biggest and baddest kid on the block is you're constantly on view for the world to see, you get comfortable, and you tend to let your guard down. Meanwhile, your enemies have all the time in the world to silently go to task trying to figure out all your weaknesses.

Germany was a cluster fk psot WWI. If i recall none of the major European nations gave them much thought (maybe a little more thought during the second half of the 1930s) until out of nowhere they started blitzkrieg'n everyone. It's like they said in one swoop... "Surprise mother fk'ers! You thought we were still licking our WWI wounds! You thought wrong! Suck on this V2 rocket that we've been secretly developing!"

Zero doubt in my mind that the ramp up in American military spending, our positions in the middle east, and a few other things is directly related to a global conflict scenario that have been encroaching for some time now.
"There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle." -Gym Jones
"The soul becomes dyed with the color of its thoughts." - Marcus Aurelius

?start=(#seconds)

TAMU Corps
Skydiving
Great Divide Mountain Bike Route (Jasper AB to Juarez MX) 2014
Appalachian Trail 2013
post 1574133751 02-20-2019, 05:37 PM
-
#56
  1. backinthegymbro
  2. Never accept defeat!
  1. backinthegymbro
  2. Never accept defeat!
  3. Join Date: Aug 2018
  4. Posts: 23,402
  5. Rep Power: 275845
Originally Posted By faxanadu⏩
It has always been a chess game between powerful nations. Each trying to get the other to slip up so that they can justify military action.
Maybe in the past or among smaller nations who don't have nuclear capabilities or russia taking over in ukraine, but something like russia vs usa is the end of both countries / the world.
Which really makes me wonder why the USA spends so much money on their military.
Wars these days against russia or china isn't going to be fought with the latest f-22's or tanks. It would be a nuclear war.

And we don't need the latest f-22's to lay waste to third world countries like in the middle east.
So why spend so much money on the military? I don't get it.
Pull back out of the middle east and invest all those billions in the USA's infrastructure, border security and everything else that can be improved upon.
Cobra Kai never dies!
post 1574133871 02-20-2019, 05:39 PM
-
#57
  1. faxanadu
  2. Registered User
  1. faxanadu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 13,123
  6. Rep Power: 54413
Originally Posted By LinuxJon⏩
Doesn't matter if you say they have "first strike" capability. To what end? Our nukes are distributed around the world via multiple launch sites, not to mention all of them that can be deployed via submarines and aircraft carriers. Russia isn't some terrorist state that is okay with seeing an end-times type event.
I don't see Russia, China, or any other major nation making bold manoeuvrers towards the USA unless they have figured out a way to nullify a long range ballistic missile threat.

Most people aren't aware that the Russians were way ahead of us in rocket design during the space race. So much so, that after the cold war calmed down I believe America purchased the tech from Russia. Russia aint no dummies and neither is China.
"There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle." -Gym Jones
"The soul becomes dyed with the color of its thoughts." - Marcus Aurelius

?start=(#seconds)

TAMU Corps
Skydiving
Great Divide Mountain Bike Route (Jasper AB to Juarez MX) 2014
Appalachian Trail 2013
post 1574134391 02-20-2019, 05:49 PM
-
#58
  1. faxanadu
  2. Registered User
  1. faxanadu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 13,123
  6. Rep Power: 54413
Originally Posted By backinthegymbro⏩
Maybe in the past or among smaller nations who don't have nuclear capabilities or russia taking over in ukraine, but something like russia vs usa is the end of both countries / the world.
Which really makes me wonder why the USA spends so much money on their military.
Wars these days against russia or china isn't going to be fought with the latest f-22's or tanks. It would be a nuclear war.

And we don't need the latest f-22's to lay waste to third world countries like in the middle east.
So why spend so much money on the military? I don't get it.
Pull back out of the middle east and invest all those billions in the USA's infrastructure, border security and everything else that can be improved upon.
Going back to the Romans and further ... the key to a large and stable empire has always been a large, strong, and capable military. No way America could keep the dollar propped up world wide without its military dominance. It's the 20th/21st century form of plundering a nation. Instead of walking in and taking things and slaves to send back to Rome ... give them pieces of paper in exchange for goods, services, and cheap labor. Extract their wealth right under their noses. That in turn feeds the industrial military complex.
"There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle." -Gym Jones
"The soul becomes dyed with the color of its thoughts." - Marcus Aurelius

?start=(#seconds)

TAMU Corps
Skydiving
Great Divide Mountain Bike Route (Jasper AB to Juarez MX) 2014
Appalachian Trail 2013
post 1574134571 02-20-2019, 05:53 PM
-
#59
  1. LinuxJon
  1. LinuxJon
  3. Join Date: Apr 2014
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 49,073
  6. Rep Power: 325966
Originally Posted By backinthegymbro⏩
Wars these days against russia or china isn't going to be fought with the latest f-22's or tanks. It would be a nuclear war.

And we don't need the latest f-22's to lay waste to third world countries like in the middle east.
Wars between countries like Russia and the US aren't fought directly. They are fought as proxy wars. Places like Syria are a good example. There, yes, it does matter if we have better aircraft.

Also, Russia isn't the only thread. Countries like Iran are extremely provocative and do have advanced tech.
480s / 370b / 495d / 235 x 2 SOHP

Trump 2020
DeSantis 2024
Catbrah 2032

Misc Firearms Crew
Misc Wristwatch Crew
Will sell wife's foot pics for watch/gun money crew
Definitely not a fed crew
post 1574134731 02-20-2019, 05:56 PM
-
#60
  1. faxanadu
  2. Registered User
  1. faxanadu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 13,123
  6. Rep Power: 54413
Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩
i dont understand how u.s. doesn't have anything russia has. or at the very least us couldn't turn around and fuk russia up even more

Just because you throw a bunch of money at something doesn't mean it produces quality results. Israel isn't even on that list and they have the best military defence system in the world. I've heard their cyber warfare abilities are top notch too.
"There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle." -Gym Jones
"The soul becomes dyed with the color of its thoughts." - Marcus Aurelius

?start=(#seconds)

TAMU Corps
Skydiving
Great Divide Mountain Bike Route (Jasper AB to Juarez MX) 2014
Appalachian Trail 2013
Quick Navigation Top Misc
« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts