I'm as straight as an arrow but I got to say people debating this chit out in the open bothers me slightly less than a dude who makes money being a snake oil salesman, bashing some people and then going home late at night and getting his fix of that same thing on pr0nhub. Especially if hes supposed to be a compass for conservative values.

Makes you think if his listeners know how cucked they are.

Why are you telling me you’re straight as an arrow?

It’s almost like an admission of guilt about something, but I could care less if you’re a ******* or trannie. As long as you’re not impacting me or my family in a negative way I don’t care what your warped mind cares to do.

What you degenerates want to do is frame this guy as representative of all people who claim conservative.

Give it a break. What you guys are doing here isn’t normal.

A lot of assumptions in the question.

Sounds like this forum is not for you though.

This topic seems like it's pushed you over the edge (perhaps you are triggered by transgender people and non-heterosexuals), but this entire forum is degenerate.

Porn is discussed on here all the time.

Miscers frequently post pictures of girls they've had one night stands with.

Miscers genuinely try to destroy people's self esteem.

Many miscers genuinely seem to hate women, and believe they lack value.

Etc.

I can see myself leaving at some point - if I take trying to live a more Godly life seriously - but I do like a good debate, and find this place entertaining.

not sure why i always get lumped into this. people can think whatever they want about sexuality, it's not something that gives me any conflict. i'm not leading a fukkin SJW pride march, all i'm doing is posting hnnng tgirls.

i just find it funny when it's the same people that keep coming back to rail against tgirls. posters like you and maylie are magnetized to these types of threads almost as much as i post in them. if you're on a crusade to try to prove something that is specific to transwomen, or brahs that like transwomen, my question is: why?

there are a ton of tgirls that are attractive in a conventional manner. you can say whatever you want about angles (and that isn't just confined to tgirls), at the end of the day they put a ton of effort into their appearance (more so than most other girls) and many of them pass IRL. a lot of (most?) brahs are gonna be attracted to something like this, don't think that's anything controversial to say. doesn't mean you're gonna go through with banging them after you find out they're trans, just means that they're attractive in a conventional sense.



unless of course they are following their aristotelian-approved checklist of whether or not it is appropriate to find something attractive.

It’s one thing for guys to discuss fanstasizing about women they will never be able to have a relationship with, I get that.

It’s another for guys to be getting into debates about banging other guys and trannies.

Obviously, you were triggered, probably due to tha fact you need employment. Go out an get a job, bro. The economy is going well. Take advantage of it while it lasts.

Degenerates and the mentally deranged will get a good gassing.

That wasn't on the list I gave.It sounds like you have no problem with talk about promiscuity or porn with women, but have a problem if women are replaced in the discussion by transwomen and men.

Only then it becomes degenerate?

what about the economics economy like you originally posted? how is that going?

Didn't read the whole thread - but what has Jones said against trans people in the past?

He got warned by ******** for it a number of times...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TCEyfeNEZY4

anything beyond using a pejorative term?

Chopped vid is chopped. Lol @ those who fell for it.

Not, that I've seen.

The only other thing was him saying that he hates the widespread transgender coverage on TV. "They are everywhere" rhetoric.

He also has spoken out against porn, and advised his views that it is a destructive social influence and not to watch it.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3w0iu58mr9A

I think those are the reasons why they are calling him a hypocrite.

He is and he's also a lunatic, but he's right about the porn.

I think things change once they reveal they're trans

Changes nothing.

Lumped into it?

1. You admit in this thread already that you deliberately post transsexuals - and you take pleasure in writing things like 'lol you rated one a 10 in a recent thread of mine'. This is deliberately done on your part to push this agenda that Ernie accuses me of being a 'homophobe' for not accepting. So, to put it clearly, you're frequently posting about transsexuals and every time pretend you're randomly chosen for being associated with it. It's a mark of your delusion - more on this in subsequent points;

2. In the same way you mis-use the phrase 'rail against' - could you and Ernie please consult dictionaries before using phrases like this, or homophobe, or 'fraud' (more on this latter one in a subsequent point)? I don't rail against them. I make a point about biology. Those are two very distinct issues, and I'm not sure why this is not understood. People like you consistently put forward messages like 'most brahs are attracted to a male who got breast implants, hormone 'therapy', and puts on a lot of makeup and perhaps a wig/extensions' - but what those males are trying to do is resemble actual women. And in your own post you rail against actual women by claiming that they don't take care of themselves as much as transsexuals - please cite some sources here please for your science-laden position. It's frankly delusional. I'm just one of the rare persons (and posters on this forum frankly) that'll put effort into a post which puts forward this opinion: that gender tracks biological facts;

3. I have never made objective claims about attractiveness - cite them. I hope you know the difference between subjective (my personal preference which hopefully I'm allowed to share!) and objective (what you're claiming I put out there); and, finally

4. You are the second person in 24 hours who wants to insist that I'm some kind of fraud. Post evidence that I'm a fraud and earn me a perma-ban - this is an offer that is open to anyone. Else, take the perma ban yourself.

It's seriously concerning to me that people like you don't get your own flaw: you claim people 'rail against transsexuals' but all you do is post transsexuals, extrapolate from your behavior that somehow 'most men are attracted to them because actual women don't really take care of themselves', and then claim that I'm 'not nice and a fraud' for calling you out on this mistake. It's the classic mistaken inference from fact (that you post transsexuals and some posters at specific angles and poses like them) to value (that most men are attracted to them). Surely you can see the flaw in your position...?

obviously i'm lumped into the trans conversation considering i post so much about it. i'm talking about caring or pushing an agenda that it has to be viewed as straight, regardless of what i think. i only make posts about that for the lulz; people can think whatever they want and are almost always set in their ways, i'm not trying to convince anyone of anything. i could care less about biological arguments or arguments about sexuality.

i'm pointing out that it's something consistent that you're coming back to. anything that is this specific probably means there's something going on there that makes you angry about it; i call you a fraud because you're not being as overt about it as someone like maylie is, but there's still some kind of deep-seated issue going on there for you to come back to it as much as you do.

you negged me for identity politics on an offhanded post i made and are formulating 4-point arguments on things i don't give a fuk about. you've got blinders on and can't differentiate between different posters. it's like you see red and just stick with your guns on recycling the same things over and over.

saying prime kate beckinsale is attractive is subjective, not objective, but at the same time you can make a fair assumption that most straight guys would find her attractive. that's all i'm doing with the tgirls that are by most measures considered to be conventionally attractive. it's not pushing an agenda that everyone should find it attractive, it's just posting hnnng on a forum. i'm not trying to bury you with citing instances of where you made references to certain things or earn you a perma-ban, jesus christ brah. i don't take the misc that seriously.

you also need a lesson on manipulating quotes, holy fuk. also need a lesson on thinking it's just angles.

Ahh, I see. When called out for your approach to the subject your posts suddenly become 'for the lulz'. Yet:To be clear: you have more posts in pretty much every Misc transsexual thread than I do. You regularly post transsexuals and try to catch 'straight' guys who think that a shot from behind simply showing lower back and an arse means that 'they adore transsexuals'. These are your own words, by the way, and since it seems you have lost your memory you wrote: "at the end of the day they put a ton of effort into their appearance (more so than most other girls) and many of them pass IRL. a lot of (most?) brahs are gonna be attracted to something like this" - that's not a lulzy comment. That's a delusional position derived from an utter failure in logical consistency. That is your agenda - you're trying to make it seem like most males are attracted to men who adopt female (especially secondary) sexual characteristics. There is no science to back that up that you or Ernie can show, despite trying to insult me as a 'homophoStop trying to backpedal. I have quoted your posts in their entirety to help any other readers realize that I'm calling you out on facts - on what you're saying. First it's 'lulz' then it's 'you don't care' and yet you postfar morematerial on transsexuals, including in transsexual threads than I do. So who is 'recycling' material here?By whose measure? You lazily quote things in an offhanded way and your lack of intellectual rigor when trying to make your points is why I negged you in the first place. You're a perfect example of a lazy SJW who thinks 'yeah if some guy clicks this skewed pic of a tranny I post then...the MISC likes trannies! And I don't have to feel bad fapping looking at men with breast implants and fapping!' - and to be clear, in a previous post in this thread - I know guys who like getting head from trannies. That is not off putting to me. It is not for me, and never will be. And it is not for the entirety of heterosexual males, by definition - from biology, not self identity.You keep trying to tell me what I need, what I am, etc., yet you can't even see how badly I'm ethering you here. If anyone needs a lesson here it's you: stick to your guns if you have a point to make and don't backpedal claiming that all your posts are 'for the lulz' or 'you don't care' or some other form of coping mechanism when writing (poor) essays either here or on my CP. And if you want to call me out as a fraud, do it - you don't care enough to do the work, and even there you backpedal saying you don't care enough. So, you're happy to call out and not happy to prove it - typical chit poster.

Now lulz at that.

have you ever seen me post? i don't take anything seriously. i say **** like "the numbers [of ppl who watch trans porn] are also skewed considering brahs that are looking for trans porn are probably just searching for "straight porn" because it's straight. realistically they should just combine trans and straight porn categories. yeah, brahs will have to dodge the odd vagina, but what can you do."

doesn't mean i don't actually like or respect trans girls, or care about the plight they go through to be viewed as women themselves, but i realize the absurdity of treating the misc like a debate class on gender identity, and know when people are set in their ways of thinking. i don't give a fuk what you think about any of it. i don't bother to get involved with any debates on sexuality or anything on biology because it doesn't matter to me personally. i like tgirls, i like girls, but the biggest question of them all... do i like men (or in your terms men that don't look like female supermodels)? the answer is who cares.of course i do. i post tgirls all the time. what i'm exaggerating in that comment (because no one comes close to posting about trans as much as i do) is that you post a lot about it, and are an obvious advocate against anything trans. maylie has more or less reached parody status considering how frequently she posts about it, but you're getting up there. the question doesn't have anything to do with whatever your arguments are, it's why are you posting about it? my answer is to post some hnnng (that isn't just your typical HTC/LTC ****). i don't know exactly what your reason is. got some ideas tho.

paraphrasing quotes or leaving things out is exactly what i'm talking about. 'they adore transsexuals' are my words? i don't even use the word transsexual. and why leave out "doesn't mean you're gonna go through with banging them after you find out they're trans, just means that they're attractive in a conventional sense." after quoting "at the end of the day they put a ton of effort into their appearance (more so than most other girls) and many of them pass IRL. a lot of (most?) brahs are gonna be attracted to something like this". this is basic debate ****. aren't you an esteemed member of the R&P section? you don't even know how to quote things properly.

the way you describe transgender girls is like you saw an ad with a drag queen and associated everything you know/think about tgirls with that. don't really think you're the type of brah that would just look at something like that and move on with your life. i think it's probably something you get uncomfortable with seeing and try to block it out as much as possible.

if you saw someone like what i've posted on the street, most people would consider them attractive, that's not a fabrication. i did not poll 1000 people on this to determine the scientific results, i'm just using common sense to make an assumption the same way you can say a lot of hetero guys would find a supermodel attractive. it's delusional to think that someone who looks like a model would not be seen as being attractive in a conventional manner because you found out they were trans after the fact. or even if you knew they were trans before, it doesn't physically alter their appearance. all of this says nothing on whether any hetero male or you (since everything apparently has to come back to you in the end) would fuk a tgirl or not after you found out.no ****. i very rarely (if ever) get involved with massive arguments (until this ****) because it's about the same thing with the same people over and over again. making comments like the one you negged is just entertaining to me. did i make an R&P mistake by just quoting one specific line out of a body of text and making an inane comment? does that mean i lose the battle?

who's feeling bad about anything? i don't care how you perceive it. again, you're using something that someone else said and applying it to anyone even semi-linked with the general point of view. i don't need validation on it being straight/gay/whatever.

also, you don't always need implants brah. just the breast development from taking HRT can do wonders for some tgirls, and IMO can look quite a bit better. just some food for thought.what i'm telling you is that i think you have some kind of anger issue specific to this issue that keeps you coming back. but you have friends that blew some tgirls or some other anecdotal BS so this is purely a clinical argument for you lol. maybe something you're repressing, or something that you just hate about trans people, but who knows. you're just a miscer, tough to pinpoint every fiber of your being with just your posts.

ethering, perma-banned, reps, negs, etc., etc. lol

He probably said tranny 50 times in that video but aside from the Maxine Watters joke I missed where he said anything against trannies.

still though even if he acts like he has something against trans, this has to be a troll job. He would leave that tab open on his phone unless he wanted us to see it.

Leaked audio after jones was caught

https://youtu.be/sDyZVTJoyzM


Lol he’s now trying to lie about it

I saw saw a couple of news articles about that, it’s ridiculous. I was like looking up some reporter we’re trying to hire today and punched in some number and porn popped up on my phone. Everybody has had porn pop-up on their phone hundreds of times,” Jones explained to a caller on Tuesday.

“I probably had porn menus pop up 500 times on my phone,” he added. “There’s two types of people: People who look at porn and people who lie about it. But I wasn’t looking at porn on my phone. I don’t take phones on air that I look at porn on.”

or maybe he actually likes chicks with dicks? Lol “trolling” sure buddy

I'm guessing none of you have ever heard of opposition research, or the concept of understanding your enemies. Sometimes you need to get an idea of what's out there so you can better defend against it.

I'm not into socialism, banning guns or gay porn, but if you looked at my browsing history, you'd sure think I was

Good subtle troll job... Bravo.

This thread was lit

I personally view men like Alex Jones to be snakes. They are liars and manipulate people. Im not no moral police and would never pretend to be. Thats why I find it hypocritical when any person who pretends to be extremely righteous turn out to have no morals. Thats when they beg for forgiveness and say "Im only human"

lol @ looking at pron while not in incognito.

publicity is publicity