04-26-2023, 05:31 PM
-
#31
- kingmanaverage
- Terrible poster
-
- kingmanaverage
- Terrible poster
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Posts: 15,250
- Rep Power: 107906
-
-
Originally Posted By Robmnrd⏩
I would say around 10-12% ish is ideal for aesthetics. I would agree that shooting for sub 10% is pointless unless you're a pro athlete or competitive bber. My op was in reference to all those who bloat up to 18+% so they can look big big in a t shirt, not worth it mane imo.Adding my thoughts:
The 12% area (real 12%, not "but but muh calipers and impedance results!!!) is where 80% ofnattieslook their best under the largest array of circumstances and to the largest portion of the general population.
Only BBers and wannabe BBers prefer leaner than that, and their perception is so skewed itshould notbe applied to other circumstances. Because as impressive as it is for a nattie to reach a true, real 9% bf (and to be clear it actually is impressive), outside of the BBing world and niche fetish communities it doesnotactually look "attractive". Chicks don't want your arms to be the same size (small) and veininess (excessive) as your cawk. Dudes that aren't into lifting DGAF about how lean you are, and honestly dudes that aren't into liftingactually aremore impressed by size and strength (hence the comments like "bro do you play football!" "Holy cow I bet you carried your new fridge in by yourself lul") than by how lean you are.
Plus the nonlinear loss of size, muscle, and "fullness" (the filling out Sennas mentioned) when a nattie starts cutting below 11% means that it is nearly impossible to look builtin clothesas a natty sub-11%.
TLDR:
-No idea what OP is referring to when he says "better to look good" because he gives zero actual measurements (other than just arbitrarily saying "less than 200")
-Law of diminishing returns applies to everything, and the pursuit of being excessively lean (for a natty) hits a spot where you aren't actually getting anything out of it quicker than some people would think
-12% and as big as you can get is where it's at for 80% of natties
The 12% area (real 12%, not "but but muh calipers and impedance results!!!) is where 80% ofnattieslook their best under the largest array of circumstances and to the largest portion of the general population.
Only BBers and wannabe BBers prefer leaner than that, and their perception is so skewed itshould notbe applied to other circumstances. Because as impressive as it is for a nattie to reach a true, real 9% bf (and to be clear it actually is impressive), outside of the BBing world and niche fetish communities it doesnotactually look "attractive". Chicks don't want your arms to be the same size (small) and veininess (excessive) as your cawk. Dudes that aren't into lifting DGAF about how lean you are, and honestly dudes that aren't into liftingactually aremore impressed by size and strength (hence the comments like "bro do you play football!" "Holy cow I bet you carried your new fridge in by yourself lul") than by how lean you are.
Plus the nonlinear loss of size, muscle, and "fullness" (the filling out Sennas mentioned) when a nattie starts cutting below 11% means that it is nearly impossible to look builtin clothesas a natty sub-11%.
TLDR:
-No idea what OP is referring to when he says "better to look good" because he gives zero actual measurements (other than just arbitrarily saying "less than 200")
-Law of diminishing returns applies to everything, and the pursuit of being excessively lean (for a natty) hits a spot where you aren't actually getting anything out of it quicker than some people would think
-12% and as big as you can get is where it's at for 80% of natties
“Steroids is now just a word that the lazy and ignorant use to describe any guy that has more muscle and dedication than them”– Mike O'Hearn
"I am like getting the feeling of cumming in the gym; I'm getting the feeling of cumming at home; I'm getting the feeling of cumming backstage; when I pump up, when I pose out in front of 5000 people I get the same feeling, so I am cumming day and night. It's terrific, right? So you know, I am in heaven."
04-26-2023, 05:33 PM
-
#32
- gmenfan40
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: Fuck Israel
- Posts: 37,479
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 156588
-
-
Originally Posted By Robmnrd⏩
Realistically anything under 15% with a decent amount of mass will look better than 99% of the population. (Ded fkn Srs)Adding my thoughts:
The 12% area (real 12%, not "but but muh calipers and impedance results!!!) is where 80% ofnattieslook their best under the largest array of circumstances and to the largest portion of the general population.
Only BBers and wannabe BBers prefer leaner than that, and their perception is so skewed itshould notbe applied to other circumstances. Because as impressive as it is for a nattie to reach a true, real 9% bf (and to be clear it actually is impressive), outside of the BBing world and niche fetish communities it doesnotactually look "attractive". Chicks don't want your arms to be the same size (small) and veininess (excessive) as your cawk. Dudes that aren't into lifting DGAF about how lean you are, and honestly dudes that aren't into liftingactually aremore impressed by size and strength (hence the comments like "bro do you play football!" "Holy cow I bet you carried your new fridge in by yourself lul") than by how lean you are.
Plus the nonlinear loss of size, muscle, and "fullness" (the filling out Sennas mentioned) when a nattie starts cutting below 11% means that it is nearly impossible to look builtin clothesas a natty sub-11%.
TLDR:
-No idea what OP is referring to when he says "better to look good" because he gives zero actual measurements (other than just arbitrarily saying "less than 200")
-Law of diminishing returns applies to everything, and the pursuit of being excessively lean (for a natty) hits a spot where you aren't actually getting anything out of it quicker than some people would think
-12% and as big as you can get is where it's at for 80% of natties
The 12% area (real 12%, not "but but muh calipers and impedance results!!!) is where 80% ofnattieslook their best under the largest array of circumstances and to the largest portion of the general population.
Only BBers and wannabe BBers prefer leaner than that, and their perception is so skewed itshould notbe applied to other circumstances. Because as impressive as it is for a nattie to reach a true, real 9% bf (and to be clear it actually is impressive), outside of the BBing world and niche fetish communities it doesnotactually look "attractive". Chicks don't want your arms to be the same size (small) and veininess (excessive) as your cawk. Dudes that aren't into lifting DGAF about how lean you are, and honestly dudes that aren't into liftingactually aremore impressed by size and strength (hence the comments like "bro do you play football!" "Holy cow I bet you carried your new fridge in by yourself lul") than by how lean you are.
Plus the nonlinear loss of size, muscle, and "fullness" (the filling out Sennas mentioned) when a nattie starts cutting below 11% means that it is nearly impossible to look builtin clothesas a natty sub-11%.
TLDR:
-No idea what OP is referring to when he says "better to look good" because he gives zero actual measurements (other than just arbitrarily saying "less than 200")
-Law of diminishing returns applies to everything, and the pursuit of being excessively lean (for a natty) hits a spot where you aren't actually getting anything out of it quicker than some people would think
-12% and as big as you can get is where it's at for 80% of natties
04-26-2023, 05:34 PM
-
#33
- gmenfan40
- Join Date: Mar 2007
- Location: Fuck Israel
- Posts: 37,479
- Subscribers: 6
- Rep Power: 156588
-
-
Originally Posted By kingmanaverage⏩
I've bloated up to 20% at times, simply because I love to fukking eat during the holidays. I get fat a fukk very fast if I'm not disciplined. I can kill 5-6k calories in 20 minutes. It's also ridiculously hard for me to go from 15% to 10%. Genetics plays a major factor with bodyfat on an aesthetics side of things for most people. Some people hardly have to try to get shredded.(Super Ded fkn Srs)I would say around 10-12% ish is ideal for aesthetics. I would agree that shooting for sub 10% is pointless unless you're a pro athlete or competitive bber. My op was in reference to all those who bloat up to 18+% so they can look big big in a t shirt, not with it mane imo.
04-26-2023, 05:35 PM
-
#34
- LogicalLifts
- Registered User
-
- LogicalLifts
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 13,157
- Rep Power: 204849
-
-
Yup. Even a reasonably jacked dadbod mogs a beefcake approach.
04-26-2023, 05:36 PM
-
#35
- guest89
- Forever aBOARD
-
- guest89
- Forever aBOARD
- Join Date: Sep 2003
- Location: United States
- Posts: 41,691
- Rep Power: 169649
-
-
A lot of it depends on your bone structure/size. But in general its better to be big and lean.
I've a few buddies in the 5'4-5'5 range that are 200-220lbs lean (On juice) and they look pretty good whether their shirt is off or if they are wearing a t-shirt, polo, v-neck or even fitted dress shirt. They might be manlets but at least they give off the appearance of being a man.
On the flip size I know a few other guys about that height range that are 135-140lbs lean/shredded. They look great in photos. But when they are wearing clothes they basically look like a skinny teenager. They get weight mogged by the majority of females walking around too.
I'm 5'8. Back when I was in the 160s and really lean/athletic looking I felt great and performed well at that weight. Fast forward a few cycles/years later and I'm 193 with just slightly higher body-fat. Still relatively lean and vascular though. I get way more compliments at this body weight from females. My girlfriends friends/cousins/coworkers even tell her they think I look good at this size (srs). When you are jacked and lean you get more respect from men, more all around attention/being noticed. And if women are into muscles they are easy AF/its like shooting fish in a barrel because so few dudes out there have a standout physique.
As someone who's been average physique. Really lean/light/athletic. And now jacked & lean. There is no comparison. Its easy to see the superior choice. Anyone who hasn't run a few cycles and been jacked and lean can't possibly have an accurate opinion on this topic. As you've never lived the before & after.
I've a few buddies in the 5'4-5'5 range that are 200-220lbs lean (On juice) and they look pretty good whether their shirt is off or if they are wearing a t-shirt, polo, v-neck or even fitted dress shirt. They might be manlets but at least they give off the appearance of being a man.
On the flip size I know a few other guys about that height range that are 135-140lbs lean/shredded. They look great in photos. But when they are wearing clothes they basically look like a skinny teenager. They get weight mogged by the majority of females walking around too.
I'm 5'8. Back when I was in the 160s and really lean/athletic looking I felt great and performed well at that weight. Fast forward a few cycles/years later and I'm 193 with just slightly higher body-fat. Still relatively lean and vascular though. I get way more compliments at this body weight from females. My girlfriends friends/cousins/coworkers even tell her they think I look good at this size (srs). When you are jacked and lean you get more respect from men, more all around attention/being noticed. And if women are into muscles they are easy AF/its like shooting fish in a barrel because so few dudes out there have a standout physique.
As someone who's been average physique. Really lean/light/athletic. And now jacked & lean. There is no comparison. Its easy to see the superior choice. Anyone who hasn't run a few cycles and been jacked and lean can't possibly have an accurate opinion on this topic. As you've never lived the before & after.
04-26-2023, 05:43 PM
-
#36
- Sevenlionz
- 6’2/cali
-
- Sevenlionz
- 6’2/cali
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 9,524
- Rep Power: 107152
-
-
Being big AND lean and looking athletic is the best


04-26-2023, 05:52 PM
-
#37
- Robmnrd
- Who the **** was phone?!
-
- Robmnrd
- Who the **** was phone?!
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Michigan, United States
- Age: 34
- Posts: 6,472
- Rep Power: 69123
-
-
Originally Posted By kingmanaverage⏩
That is a fair bf% range - should edit it into your OP so Miscers know what you're referencing when they come in the thread brah (srs)I would say around 10-12% ish is ideal for aesthetics. I would agree that shooting for sub 10% is pointless unless you're a pro athlete or competitive bber. My op was in reference to all those who bloat up to 18+% so they can look big big in a t shirt, not worth it mane imo.
Originally Posted By gmenfan40⏩
Agreed (super ded fkn srs)Realistically anything under 15% with a decent amount of mass will look better than 99% of the population. (Ded fkn Srs)
Originally Posted By gmenfan40⏩
Another big factor that many people aren't as attuned to is fat distribution.I've bloated up to 20% at times, simply because I love to fukking eat during the holidays. I get fat a fukk very fast if I'm not disciplined. I can kill 5-6k calories in 20 minutes. It's also ridiculously hard for me to go from 15% to 10%. Genetics plays a major factor with bodyfat on an aesthetics side of things for most people. Some people hardly have to try to get shredded.(Super Ded fkn Srs)
Some people are just really fukking unlucky and hold all of their fat in their lower chest, abs, and lower back. It makes looking good fukking difficult because you could achieve a nice bf% but those areas attract so much attention that the remaining fat deposits significantly detract from aesthetics. You'll see it now and then - brahs who are genuinely pretty lean but their midsection just doesn't have any real definition, and the v-taper just isn't there in spite of achieving good delt:upper arm separation and serratus visibility. Decent quad definition, even that little bit of vascularity starting to show itself, etc.... and yet that midsection is just. So. Stubborn.
Then on the flipside you get those fukkers that look cotdam yoked all the time because their traps and upper back are 'soft', tris are 'soft', and glutes and legs are 'soft' - yet everything else stays lean longer and becomes lean on a cut quicker.
MISC Haxball Crew
(Haxball Username: "Jus' Saiyan...")
Misc Positivity and Never Neg Crew
I always pick second to last in the pick a number threads Crew
04-26-2023, 06:02 PM
-
#38
- PaulJerome
- Zealot from the housetops
-
- PaulJerome
- Zealot from the housetops
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Posts: 3,410
- Rep Power: 54695
-
-
Originally Posted By kingmanaverage⏩
Why is the cutoff at 200 lbs?Better to look good and weigh less than 200lbs
6'5" 210 lbs, 10.9% body fat
Disagree with me, fine; but before calling me a fraudster click: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=185252663
Bodily exercise profits a little, but godliness is profitable unto all things.
04-26-2023, 06:03 PM
-
#39
04-26-2023, 06:03 PM
-
#40
- guest89
- Forever aBOARD
-
- guest89
- Forever aBOARD
- Join Date: Sep 2003
- Location: United States
- Posts: 41,691
- Rep Power: 169649
-
-
Originally Posted By kingmanaverage⏩
12% bodyfat is probably the best all around body-fat for males. Leaner then 99% of the population. Healthy range. And can still live life without being too extreme.I would say around 10-12% ish is ideal for aesthetics. I would agree that shooting for sub 10% is pointless unless you're a pro athlete or competitive bber. My op was in reference to all those who bloat up to 18+% so they can look big big in a t shirt, not worth it mane imo.
I do agree getting fat just to look bigger in a t-shirt is dumb. The good news is, there is an easy way to determine leanness. If you can flex and have visible abs, you good. If you can't see your ab out-line, too fat.
Actual body-fat percentages are irrelevant for anyone not in the fitness industry.
Originally Posted By gmenfan40⏩
15% looks fine when you have muscle mass. But most guys don't have a lot of muscle mass at 15% so they look like crap.Realistically anything under 15% with a decent amount of mass will look better than 99% of the population. (Ded fkn Srs)
It really just depends on the physique under that 15%
04-26-2023, 06:16 PM
-
#41
04-26-2023, 06:42 PM
-
#42
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts