Sign in

Forum Β» More General Categories Β» Religion and Politics Β» Can we get Forum Admin or a Mod to Ban Chit Sources?
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 243
  2. Page 3 of 9
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  9. 5
  11. Last

Thread: Can we get Forum Admin or a Mod to Ban Chit Sources?

  1. Rate This Thread
08-26-2024, 01:33 PM
#61
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
^^Reported for Fake News. I can only neg every 10 days, not 8.
Lmao confirmed loser has a spreadsheet to remind him who's off spread.

Literally negged today from fake news buggati boy today and exactly 10 days ago.
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. NYPats avatar
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 37,461
  5. Rep Power: 196,105
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:36 PM
#62
Originally Posted By ClivesTriceps⏩
You mean this proof?



groomer
Retard detected.
  1. MinisterOfLust
  2. πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½
  3. MinisterOfLusts avatar
  1. MinisterOfLust
  2. πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½
  3. Join Date: Aug 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 51,453
  6. Rep Power: 688,208
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:37 PM
#63
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Lmao confirmed loser has a spreadsheet to remind him who's off spread.

Literally negged today from fake news buggati boy today and exactly 10 days ago.
^^Reported for Fake News. I keep track of your negs in this thread:

https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...180913&page=55
  1. gwg77
  2. Registered User
  3. gwg77s avatar
  1. gwg77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 12,237
  6. Rep Power: 870,066
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:40 PM
#64
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
I remember MOL confirming this. He said he was drunk at the time, then deleted the post later. But some of us remember
Except for the fact that, MOL is straight edge crew. He doesn't drink ; he doesn't do drugs.

Rekt
  1. MinisterOfLust
  2. πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½
  3. MinisterOfLusts avatar
  1. MinisterOfLust
  2. πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½
  3. Join Date: Aug 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 51,453
  6. Rep Power: 688,208
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:40 PM
#65
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Let's be real. X (Twitter), NY Post, Daily Mail and the like are straight up fake news. Intelligent people will not click those links. If they were banned like the word p3do is, this place would have much more reputable sources and legitimacy.

K thx.
Since I have known you on here you have continually made statements like this and it really does blow my mind. It doesn't seem like you are autism or a low IQ person, and yet your penchant for this one particular subject is an obsession of yours that has no basis in reality. Which makes me think that your perception of reality is skewed.

Your biggest go to line is when someone posts a video of someone doing or saying something or reporting on an event that you don't like or agree with, with real legit video mind you….unless the video was posted from the AP or CNN or MSNBC? You just scream fake news. It makes no rationale sense. A video of someone or something is still the same video whether it was posted on the AP or Pron hub. Just because the video was posted on a source that you don't deem credible does not make the video any less true or valid.

The video is not fake. It is real. Now if you want to talk AI fake videos or pics? That is another story and a valid argument. But that isn't what you are arguing. You are arguing completely legit videos that are posted on sites or sources that YOU don't deem credible. That doesn't mean the video itself is not credible.

It really is a big hole in your game.
Words to live by…."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
  1. BeachPro11
  2. Registered User
  3. BeachPro11s avatar
  1. BeachPro11
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 5,513
  6. Rep Power: 82,573
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:43 PM
#66
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
^^Reported for Fake News. I keep track of your negs in this thread:

https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showt...180913&page=55
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. JUSAs avatar
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 44,272
  6. Rep Power: 458,793
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:44 PM
#67
Originally Posted By MinisterOfLust⏩
Retard detected.
Said the actual pΔ›dophile.
Wort ew in th wold.
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. ClivesTricepss avatar
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 12,003
  5. Rep Power: 330,584
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:45 PM
#68
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
Since I have known you on here you have continually made statements like this and it really does blow my mind. It doesn't seem like you are autism or a low IQ person, and yet your penchant for this one particular subject is an obsession of yours that has no basis in reality. Which makes me think that your perception of reality is skewed.

Your biggest go to line is when someone posts a video of someone doing or saying something or reporting on an event, with video mind you….unless the video was posted from the AP or CNN or MSNBC? You just scream fake news. It makes no rationale sense. A video of someone or something is still the same video whether it was posted on the AP or Pron hub. Just because the video was posted on a source that you don't deem credible does not make the video any less true or valid.

The video is not fake. It is real. Now if you want to talk AI fake videos or pics? That is another story and a valid argument. But that isn't what you are arguing. You are arguing completely legit videos that are posted on sites or sources that YOU don't deem credible. That doesn't mean the video itself is not credible.

It really is a big hole in your game.
Derp. I'll spell it out for you since you obviously can't figure it out yourself.

Whether something actually happened or not isn't the point. The facts are the facts. I am not clicking on an X link from MonkeesFlingPoo. Period.

If you want to be taken seriously, post a legit link. It doesn't have to be left or right wing, just not a known fake news source like X.

And it's not a "hole in my game". It's common sense. People should post links that their intended audience feels confident clicking. They should post a link to bring validity to their post. They should want people to read the link - not ignore it.
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. NYPats avatar
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 37,461
  5. Rep Power: 196,105
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:49 PM
#69
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Whether something actually happened or not isn't the point. The facts are the facts. I am not clicking on an X link from MonkeesFlingPoo. Period.
The facts are the facts. That is no one's problem but your own.










Originally Posted By JUSA⏩


  1. gwg77
  2. Registered User
  3. gwg77s avatar
  1. gwg77
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 12,237
  6. Rep Power: 870,066
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:52 PM
#70
Originally Posted By MinisterOfLust⏩
Retard detected.
you are disgusting, I forgot how real of a piece of chit you are
  1. AlwaysFocus
  2. Registered AI
  3. AlwaysFocuss avatar
  1. AlwaysFocus
  2. Registered AI
  3. Join Date: Sep 2016
  4. Location: BC, Canada
  5. Posts: 30,399
  6. Rep Power: 322,202
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:52 PM
#71
Originally Posted By J.L.C.⏩
We only trust sources that confirm our (biased) opinions.
Must be rough for pat when he's getting shat upon by even JCL and in his own thread.

Btw, I see someone quoted the 1-star man, which is rather unfortunate, but let me lay this one out and his own response (or by completely avoiding it) will demonstrably prove beyond the shadow of doubt what a liar and wretch our sad boy is:

1* man, you've claimed your waist is a trim 32". You continue to screech to the heavens I am fat and pear-shaped. 1*man is 5'10", I am slightly taller but not much at 5'11", so about the same there. With that in mind…

Permaban bet right here, right now: whoever has a wider/larger waist, measured with measuring tape at the navel, photos taken and uploaded, whoever is the larger is perm'd forever and ever. You or I.

Now, you'd think someone who demands they are thin (but we know better) and has a 32" waist would surely be thinner than a pear-shaped guy roughly his own height? Wouldn't you?

I'll even up the ante, pretty sure my waist is 33" if even that small, might be more. I don't measure regularly, I wear size 32 jeans, sometimes on the loose side, but that is meaningless. In any event: I am 100% certain it's wider than the 32", I've cut down and measured before and I know I am not that lean right now.

1*man says he is – so it's a forgone conclusion, if he's telling the truth that he would win this challenge.

What do you say, 1*man? Will you accept and prove all along I've been lying (despite photographic evidence showing otherwise) and you're Mr. Honest who hates Chit Sources? Or will you ignore, deflect or not accept and prove beyond doubt you're full of chit? Which is it?
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. JUSAs avatar
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 44,272
  6. Rep Power: 458,793
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:55 PM
#72
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
Must be rough for pat when he's getting shat upon by even JCL and in his own thread.

Btw, I see someone quoted the 1-star man, which is rather unfortunate, but let me lay this one out and his own response (or by completely avoiding it) will demonstrably prove beyond the shadow of doubt what a liar and wretch our sad boy is:

1* man, you've claimed your waist is a trim 32". You continue to screech to the heavens I am fat and pear-shaped. 1*man is 5'10", I am slightly taller but not much at 5'11", so about the same there. With that in mind…

Permaban bet right here, right now: whoever has a wider/larger waist, measured with measuring tape at the navel, photos taken and uploaded, whoever is the larger is perm'd forever and ever. You or I.

Now, you'd think someone who demands they are thin (but we know better) and has a 32" waist would surely be thinner than a pear-shaped guy roughly his own height? Wouldn't you?

I'll even up the ante, pretty sure my waist is 33" if even that small, might be more. I don't measure regularly, I wear size 32 jeans, sometimes on the loose side, but that is meaningless. In any event: I am 100% certain it's wider than the 32", I've cut down and measured before and I know I am not that lean right now.

1*man says he is – so it's a forgone conclusion, if he's telling the truth that he would win this challenge.

What do you say, 1*man? Will you accept and prove all along I've been lying (despite photographic evidence showing otherwise) and you're Mr. Honest who hates Chit Sources? Or will you ignore, deflect or not accept and prove beyond doubt you're full of chit? Which is it?
Dear Diary..

  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. NYPats avatar
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 37,461
  5. Rep Power: 196,105
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:56 PM
#73
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Says the guy who posts here all day long every day.
gwg's 12k posts in 7 years = 1714 posts per year

VS

RAPEYPAt's 37.2k posts in 15 years = 2480 posts per year

Fkn lolll

Swe
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. SaltyDog920s avatar
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Posts: 9,170
  5. Rep Power: 152,179
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:57 PM
#74
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Derp. I'll spell it out for you since you obviously can't figure it out yourself.

Whether something actually happened or not isn't the point. The facts are the facts. I am not clicking on an X link from MonkeesFlingPoo. Period.

If you want to be taken seriously, post a legit link. It doesn't have to be left or right wing, just not a known fake news source like X.

And it's not a "hole in my game". It's common sense. People should post links that their intended audience feels confident clicking. They should post a link to bring validity to their post. They should want people to read the link - not ignore it.
See but it is a hole in your game. I am not sure what you think happens to these videos if they are posted on a site that you don't like. Are they somehow changed? Altered? Ai? Certainly that happens occasionally but by and large we are still at the point in our society where what you see is what you get. Real video showing real events. Just because a video is not posted on something that you approve of (usually left leaning websites or media outlets) does not make the video less valid.

Plus also remember that there are some "legit-in your eyes" media outlets that flat out refuse to report or show anything that goes against the left leaning narrative. We have seen that countless times. So often times the only places to find the actual videos are on places like X (which up until Elon you loved btw) or a Breitbart or a Fox. It is just because you are so biased towards the left that anything from sites like that make you go screeching like a chicken with its head cut off.

It's very odd and only makes you appear more cult like than you already do. If there was a video on MSNBC or on some far left youtubers account about some far right person doing something bad, my reaction would not be to say "I don't believe it or I am not going to watch it".

I would watch the video and then make my own judgement based on the video. Not where it was posted or who posted it.

Don't you have enough faith in your own judgement to watch something and make an informed decision about it based on what your own eyes see rather than just dismiss it firsthand and scream FAKE NEWS? (Funny how you have adopted one of Trump's favorite sayings btw)

I guess not.
Words to live by…."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
  1. BeachPro11
  2. Registered User
  3. BeachPro11s avatar
  1. BeachPro11
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 54
  5. Posts: 5,513
  6. Rep Power: 82,573
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:58 PM
#75
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩
gwg's 12k posts in 7 years = 1714 posts per year

VS

RAPEYPAt's 37.2k posts in 15 years = 2480 posts per year

Fkn lolll
We've been through this dum dum.. libs are expected to respond to the vast majority of retarded Trumpers on this forum.

When a dozen morons, like yourself, post idiotic things, we have to respond a dozen plus times.
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. NYPats avatar
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 37,461
  5. Rep Power: 196,105
Quote
08-26-2024, 01:59 PM
#76
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
We've been through this dum dum.. libs are expected to respond to the vast majority of retarded Trumpers on this forum.

When a dozen morons, like yourself, post idiotic things, we have to respond a dozen plus times.
So did you or did you not post more times per year than gwg; a person you just called out for posting frequently?
Swe
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. SaltyDog920s avatar
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Posts: 9,170
  5. Rep Power: 152,179
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:02 PM
#77
Originally Posted By AlwaysFocus⏩
you are disgusting, I forgot how real of a piece of chit you are
I don't even know who you are.

Stay mad
  1. MinisterOfLust
  2. πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½
  3. MinisterOfLusts avatar
  1. MinisterOfLust
  2. πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½
  3. Join Date: Aug 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 51,453
  6. Rep Power: 688,208
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:03 PM
#78
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩
So did you or did you not post more times per year than gwg; a person you just called out for posting frequently?
This guy is super slow..

Ok dum dum… count how many posts I have itt. Now count everyone else's posts.

And I said he posts here all day long every day. Nothing about the quantity of posts.. He lives here.. every day.

Now take your L and go sit the fuk down.
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. NYPats avatar
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 37,461
  5. Rep Power: 196,105
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:03 PM
#79
Originally Posted By ClivesTriceps⏩
Said the actual pΔ›dophile.
Sure buddy


We believe you
  1. MinisterOfLust
  2. πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½
  3. MinisterOfLusts avatar
  1. MinisterOfLust
  2. πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½
  3. Join Date: Aug 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 51,453
  6. Rep Power: 688,208
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:08 PM
#80
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
This guy is super slow..

Ok dum dum… count how many posts I have itt. Now count everyone else's posts.

And I said he posts here all day long every day. Nothing about the quantity of posts.. He lives here.. every day.

Now take your L and go sit the fuk down.

Ahh so now the past 15 years of history is irrelevant because you only want me to count the numbers in this topic only? LOL….that's called cherry picking, son.

Let me repost so you can analyze 15 years of data:

gwg's 12k posts in 7 years = 1714 posts per year

VS

RAPEYPAt's 37.2k posts in 15 years = 2480 posts per year

Fkn lolll








I'll ask you again (but won't expect an answer)

So did you or did you not post more times per year than gwg; a person you just called out for posting frequently?
Swe
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. SaltyDog920s avatar
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Posts: 9,170
  5. Rep Power: 152,179
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:09 PM
#81
Originally Posted By MinisterOfLust⏩
Sure buddy


We believe you
Your own words, buddy. Jump into a wood chipper
Wort ew in th wold.
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. ClivesTricepss avatar
  1. ClivesTriceps
  2. Indian troll farm bot
  3. Join Date: Nov 2019
  4. Posts: 12,003
  5. Rep Power: 330,584
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:10 PM
#82
Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩
Ahh so now the past 15 years of history is irrelevant because you only want me to count the numbers in this topic only? LOL….that's called cherry picking, son.

Let me repost so you can analyze 15 years of data:

gwg's 12k posts in 7 years = 1714 posts per year

VS

RAPEYPAt's 37.2k posts in 15 years = 2480 posts per year

Fkn lolll
It's always a sure sign you're losing when you have to keep spamming a gif.

I explained why my post count is artificially high and why bugatti boy's is irrelevant because he is on this forum 24/7 sun up to sun down.. and then some.

Inb4 you repeat yourself and spam another gif.
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. NYPats avatar
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 37,461
  5. Rep Power: 196,105
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:11 PM
#83
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Let's be real. X (Twitter), NY Post, Daily Mail and the like are straight up fake news. Intelligent people will not click those links. If they were banned like the word p3do is, this place would have much more reputable sources and legitimacy.

K thx.
Somehow the Daily Mail had legit US political stories before our sources here did.
As much as posters say it is trash, it has gotten so much right that i would need a list of alternatives from you.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and…It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. x-trainer bens avatar
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 46,927
  6. Rep Power: 418,327
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:12 PM
#84
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
It's always a sure sign you're losing when you have to keep spamming a gif.

I explained why my post count is artificially high and why bugatti boy's is irrelevant because he is on this forum 24/7 sun up to sun down.. and then some.

Inb4 you repeat yourself and spam another gif.
So, since the posts on your account are artificial, are you admitting you didn't post them? Or did you post all of them? If you posted them, doesn't that mean you post more times per day (by a substantial margin) than gwg?

(I'll still not expect an answer)
Swe
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. SaltyDog920s avatar
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Posts: 9,170
  5. Rep Power: 152,179
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:15 PM
#85
Originally Posted By x-trainer ben⏩
Somehow the Daily Mail had legit US political stories before our sources here did.
As much as posters say it is trash, it has gotten so much right that i would need a list of alternatives from you.
The Daily Mail runs so many daily fear mongering anti-tranny, anti-immigrant stories that get spammed here by our resident boomer that I refuse to click the links any more. That's my point. It's not that the source can never get it right every now and then, it's that it's so trash now people refuse to click it.

If it is a legit story then there should be plenty of legit sources to link instead.




Originally Posted By SaltyDog920⏩
So, since the posts on your account are artificial, are you admitting you didn't post them? Or did you post all of them? If you posted them, doesn't that mean you post more times per day (by a substantial margin) than gwg?

(I'll still not expect an answer)
Ok I'm done responding to this dum dum, he's making my post count go artificially higher..
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. NYPats avatar
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 37,461
  5. Rep Power: 196,105
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:20 PM
#86
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Dear Diary..

Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
It's always a sure sign you're losing when you have to keep spamming a gif.

Inb4 you repeat yourself and spam another gif.












































Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
It's always a sure sign you're losing when you have to keep spamming a gif.
sad. sad.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. JUSAs avatar
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 44,272
  6. Rep Power: 458,793
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:21 PM
#87
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
Ok I'm done responding to this dum dum, he's making my post count go artificially higher..
[Complains gwg is always posting. Sees the data]:

gwg's 12k posts in 7 years = 1714 posts per year

VS

RAPEYPAt's 37.2k posts in 15 years = 2480 posts per year

Fkn lolll

Swe
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. SaltyDog920s avatar
  1. SaltyDog920
  2. Certified jawstethics
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Posts: 9,170
  5. Rep Power: 152,179
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:23 PM
#88
Originally Posted By ClivesTriceps⏩
Your own words, buddy. Jump into a wood chipper
Lame.
Try again, ph0ggot.
  1. MinisterOfLust
  2. πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½
  3. MinisterOfLusts avatar
  1. MinisterOfLust
  2. πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½πŸ‘½
  3. Join Date: Aug 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 51,453
  6. Rep Power: 688,208
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:23 PM
#89
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
Must be rough for pat when he's getting shat upon by even JCL and in his own thread.
If it's my post you're referencing, you clearly missed the point
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. J.L.C.s avatar
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 21,372
  5. Rep Power: 37,920
Quote
08-26-2024, 02:23 PM
#90
Originally Posted By JUSA⏩
sad. sad.
It's a pic dum dum, not a gif.

  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. NYPats avatar
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 37,461
  5. Rep Power: 196,105
Quote
Bookmarks
Digg
del.icio.us
StumbleUpon
Google
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts