Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Srs how can you realistically fix the homelessness problem?
  1. Results 91 to 120 of 142
  2. First
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. 4
  6. 5
  7. Last
post 1613892251 08-18-2020, 08:35 AM
-
#91
  1. GlassMoon
  2. Negged srs
  1. GlassMoon
  2. Negged srs
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 28,993
  5. Rep Power: 129907
if you are homeless and fail a drug test/breathalyzer, mandatory euthanasia. if mentally ill, also euthansia. if can be rehabilitated (small portion) do something to give them a better shot.
See user title srs
post 1613897431 08-18-2020, 09:49 AM
-
#92
  1. FingerFood
  2. Registered User
  1. FingerFood
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 1,372
  6. Rep Power: 8213
Originally Posted By ErnieMccracken
You can fit a million doses of ******** inside a shoe box and it's odorless. You'll never stop it.
You will never stop it completely, but having a market flooded with it and the ability to buy it online sure reduces the price and makes it easy to encounter.

I have heard the argument they are replicating their defeat in the Opium Wars and have a hard time not believing their government is behind a lot of the drugs.
post 1613898651 08-18-2020, 10:02 AM
-
#93
  1. TaeBoNinja
  2. Vagina Whisperer
  1. TaeBoNinja
  2. Vagina Whisperer
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 46,748
  6. Rep Power: 174067
Originally Posted By Ratfish
My buddy volunteered once a week at some hobo assistance thing for God knows what reason for a couple years and he said less than 5% could be even remotely helped or rehabilitated.

Libs will tell you it's a cost of living issue (while raising taxes) but that's utter nonsense.
Your buddy is right.
6'3 Master Race
GOATCal Crew
No Pillow Crew
Pureblood Crew
post 1613898981 08-18-2020, 10:05 AM
-
#94
  1. exxtracool
  2. Registered User
  1. exxtracool
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 20,766
  7. Rep Power: 77972
The issue of homelessness isn’t really an issue of homelessness.. it’s an issue of drug addiction.


I don’t have the stats on hand, but here in Canada some whopppingly high % of homeless are addicted to heavy drugs such as heroin or crack and are in the situation they are in as a direct result of those drugs.

If you can find a solution to drug abuse then you will have fixed homelessness. Srs.
post 1613899191 08-18-2020, 10:08 AM
-
#95
  1. andres93
  2. Registered User
  1. andres93
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2011
  4. Age: 33
  5. Posts: 3,241
  6. Rep Power: 3970
The government should all put them to work building houses so they are productive and at the end of the project they get to keep a house! The economy moves, everybody wins!
post 1613899851 08-18-2020, 10:18 AM
-
#96
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543
Originally Posted By EnochsProphecy
make it easier to construct new homes, instead of needing paperwork for every little detail, making it really expensive to build new homes. Sadly a lot of politicians and people in local government make their money off real-estate so this will never happen.
You have a point on this one. I'm totally behind having safety related building standards and not allowing stuff like heavy industry or strip clubs to locate next to family homes. But zoning goes way beyond that to essentially keep out anyone not rich enough to be considered acceptable- square footage requirements, roof pitch, exterior materials, etc.

Sure you can find an inexpensive lot here and there. However you likely won't be allowed to build a modest '50s style ranch house on the site and will have to build a McMansion style home that hits a minimum sq. footage, has brick/stone exterior, etc.

Just dropping "single family" for something that allows 2 to 3 residences on a lot provided that all other rule are met (maximum built area, minimum setbacks, etc.) would help.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1613899981 08-18-2020, 10:20 AM
-
#97
  1. kingHanley
  2. Arizona to East Texas
  1. kingHanley
  2. Arizona to East Texas
  3. Join Date: Oct 2014
  4. Location: Goodyear, Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 6,038
  6. Rep Power: 62242
Vote red (srs)
*Firefighter-Paramedic Crew*
*HTC Crew*
*White Zero Ultra Monster Crew*
*2A Crew*
*Conservative Crew*
post 1613900161 08-18-2020, 10:22 AM
-
#98
  1. imbored21
  2. SoCal Sick Cunt
  1. imbored21
  2. SoCal Sick Cunt
  3. Join Date: Oct 2015
  4. Posts: 37,982
  5. Rep Power: 0
men have no incentive to try because women are only giving it up to Chad these days. We need government mandated gfs.
post 1613900231 08-18-2020, 10:24 AM
-
#99
  1. ChelshireCat
  2. Registered User
  1. ChelshireCat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 5,214
  7. Rep Power: 115456
Originally Posted By imbored21
men have no incentive to try because women are only giving it up to Chad these days. We need government mandated gfs.
I thought you were leaving?
Gender Identity: Miscer pronouns: ****/****g‏‏‎ot

Traitors gonna trait

Currently playing: Dynasty Warriors 8: Xtreme Legends
post 1613901261 08-18-2020, 10:37 AM
-
#100
  1. DesiredUserphag
  2. 1:12TilTheDayIFukinDie
  1. DesiredUserphag
  2. 1:12TilTheDayIFukinDie
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 40,176
  5. Rep Power: 397140
You really think there is a way to fix it? You can't make people hate doing drugs, actually want to work or improve themselves in any way. You can lead all the horses to water but they'll just roll out for another hit of H under the bridge.
𝗣𝗨𝗥𝗘𝗕𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗗
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω ₅₀/₁₉₅
𝕬𝖊𝖘𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑𝖑𝖞 𝕮𝖚𝖙 𝕸𝖆𝖘𝖙𝖊𝖗 𝕽𝖆𝖈𝖊 ®
ᗪIᔕᑕᖇIᗰIᑎᗩTIOᑎ E᙭ᑕᒪᑌᔕIOᑎ IᑎᗪOᑕTᖇIᑎᗩTIOᑎ
post 1613901851 08-18-2020, 10:45 AM
-
#101
  1. DBoyDaRealest
  2. Registered User
  1. DBoyDaRealest
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2013
  4. Posts: 3,357
  5. Rep Power: 15798
Originally Posted By exxtracool
The issue of homelessness isn’t really an issue of homelessness.. it’s an issue of drug addiction.


I don’t have the stats on hand, but here in Canada some whopppingly high % of homeless are addicted to heavy drugs such as heroin or crack and are in the situation they are in as a direct result of those drugs.

If you can find a solution to drug abuse then you will have fixed homelessness. Srs.
this.

Homeless is almost the wrong word at this point in time to describe the type of mentally destitute people you see camping/ littering/ and chitting in sidewalks. These people won't even stay in an actual homeless shelter due to the rules in place.

I have zero answers. If you told them they would get the death penalty if they shot up one more time they wouldn't care or try to get clean. It's a really sad situation.
post 1613903281 08-18-2020, 11:00 AM
-
#102
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  3. Join Date: Sep 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 41,701
  6. Rep Power: 170156
No real solution to the problem. You cannot force people to be sober and to be a working, healthy member of society, etc. Very small percent of the long term homeless population are in their right mind and sober and are in that spot due to the cost of housing.


You can have police make and/or enforce city ordinances that drive them out of a city. Which is pretty much the strategy to keep them out of places that don't want them.

- Its illegal to loiter on side-walks and in roadways in most places.
- Its illegal to panhandle (beg) in most places.
- Its illegal to consume alcohol in public in most places.
- Its illegal to possess narcotics and paraphernalia (In most places...)
-Add to those statutes that its illegal to give money to panhandlers and start arresting/fining people that give them anything so you start hooking/fining citizens that enable them.
-Add a bunch of strict regulations to any 'shelters' or 'diners' that house or feed them.
-Anytime a homeless is arrested all of his property except the clothes on his back becomes abandoned property on the side-walk/in the street so its dumpstered. Etc.

Have the police enforce all of those ^ with 0 tolerance. On their release from jail provide them a 1 way bus ticket to the nearly liberal city that caters to homeless.



Walla you've just solved homelessness in your city. Any homeless that do wander into your fair city will soon move along down the highway when nobody gives them anything and they get fukked with non-stop for every crime they commit.
post 1613904011 08-18-2020, 11:08 AM
-
#103
  1. Ramoneb87
  2. Registered User
  1. Ramoneb87
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 12,686
  6. Rep Power: 29183
There's no fix, but I think we need to take a more out of site out of mind approach. Build or designate sanctioned homeless encampments near the outskirts of town. Quickly dismantle any and all encampments, in highly populated areas especially near schools, parks and tourist destinations.
Know Justice

Know Peace
post 1613904491 08-18-2020, 11:12 AM
-
#104
  1. Ramoneb87
  2. Registered User
  1. Ramoneb87
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 12,686
  6. Rep Power: 29183
Originally Posted By guest89
No real solution to the problem. You cannot force people to be sober and to be a working, healthy member of society, etc. Very small percent of the long term homeless population are in their right mind and sober and are in that spot due to the cost of housing.


You can have police make and/or enforce city ordinances that drive them out of a city. Which is pretty much the strategy to keep them out of places that don't want them.

- Its illegal to loiter on side-walks and in roadways in most places.
- Its illegal to panhandle (beg) in most places.
- Its illegal to consume alcohol in public in most places.
- Its illegal to possess narcotics and paraphernalia (In most places...)
-Add to those statutes that its illegal to give money to panhandlers and start arresting/fining people that give them anything so you start hooking/fining citizens that enable them.
-Add a bunch of strict regulations to any 'shelters' or 'diners' that house or feed them.
-Anytime a homeless is arrested all of his property except the clothes on his back becomes abandoned property on the side-walk/in the street so its dumpstered. Etc.

Have the police enforce all of those ^ with 0 tolerance. On their release from jail provide them a 1 way bus ticket to the nearly liberal city that caters to homeless.



Walla you've just solved homelessness in your city. Any homeless that do wander into your fair city will soon move along down the highway when nobody gives them anything and they get fukked with non-stop for every crime they commit.
Here's the problem though, often times especially in colder months homeless would welcome an arrest. They get a bed, shelter free food etc. For homeless in the winter commuting crime is a win win situation.
Know Justice

Know Peace
post 1613906201 08-18-2020, 11:32 AM
-
#105
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  3. Join Date: Sep 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 41,701
  6. Rep Power: 170156
Originally Posted By Ramoneb87
Here's the problem though, often times especially in colder months homeless would welcome an arrest. They get a bed, shelter free food etc. For homeless in the winter commuting crime is a win win situation.
1. Everything I listed are nuisance crimes. Enforce them strict enough year round and they won't stick around to wait for winter.

2. Homeless people don't want to abide by strict rules on a long term basis. Which is why they aren't in shelters/government housing. If every time they get caught slipping they get incarcerated (No drugs, no alcohol, no cigs). And literally everything they own gets tossed in a dumpster. They aren't going to want too many repeats of that. They do not want to just live in jail.




I grew up in a city without a homeless population and have been to a lot of places without any homeless. If nobody gives them anything and they just get fukked with constantly they will move on to a place that caters to them.
post 1613906391 08-18-2020, 11:34 AM
-
#106
  1. snailsrus
  2. 💙💙💙💙💙🪳
  1. snailsrus
  2. 💙💙💙💙💙🪳
  3. Join Date: Apr 2016
  4. Posts: 15,306
  5. Rep Power: 189841
Originally Posted By cncman
Seems to be addicts and mental illness including bipolar. Neither allow someone to function with society. It takes a unique individual
most the time the addicts have a mental illness
SuperHercules crew
cancer survivor crew
Dyslexic crew
Friend of Mr.Wilson crew
Ugly and old cell crew
Cat crew
Insomniac crew
post 1613906721 08-18-2020, 11:38 AM
-
#107
  1. 128
  2. We on TV?
  1. 128
  2. We on TV?
  3. Join Date: Mar 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 64,672
  6. Rep Power: 351111
Originally Posted By DesiredUser****
You really think there is a way to fix it? You can't make people hate doing drugs, actually want to work or improve themselves in any way. You can lead all the horses to water but they'll just roll out for another hit of H under the bridge.
Well it's worse in places that have a greater % of hippie types.


I wonder how bad the drug problem is in countries where drug dealing = death penalty
post 1613907131 08-18-2020, 11:43 AM
-
#108
  1. SAD_COW_DISEASE
  2. Registered Sex Defender
  1. SAD_COW_DISEASE
  2. Registered Sex Defender
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 4,691
  5. Rep Power: 7454
"The homeless problem" will mean different things to different people. Sometimes it's high housing costs, sometimes it's mental health, sometimes it's medical costs bankrupting people. I live in the Bay Area, CA, and probably as is the case for any city in America, the problem is drug addicts.

No amount of assistance, shelters, low-cost housing, financial aid/UBI, or even caring, is going to solve these people's woes. This is why I propose doing 2 things:

1. Decriminalize all drugs, and release current prisoners held for drug possession. This is going to seem to contradict what I just said, but prisons are over-crowded, and many of those people would be functional outside of prison, even if they do drugs. The drug-addicts currently out on the street are not being charged for their constant crimes because we can't afford to jail/imprison them. So step #1 will be reallocating space in our prisons to the people causing problems - that will require freeing up space as we just can't afford infinite prison space for every degenerate.

2. Start considering drug addiction a mental health problem serious enough for involuntary commitment. These people are causing harm to themselves and society if they are homeless, and should be committed. This is going to shift drug addicts from prisons to homes where they can get help. There isn't much hope for the majority of people who would be committed, but it's better than sending them to prison, and it's better than letting them wreak havoc on anyone around them.
Operation Swole.
post 1613907771 08-18-2020, 11:49 AM
-
#109
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  1. Maestro
  2. отличнo!
  3. Join Date: Oct 2002
  4. Location: New Mexico, United States
  5. Posts: 58,400
  6. Rep Power: 203698
Originally Posted By Sevenlionz
There should be harsher punishment for violent homeless, and for repeated offending homeless.
how do you punish someone with nothing to lose and no assets?

If anything, throwing them in jail would help them because you're giving them a roof over their head and scheduled square meals, and I don't think they care if other inmates are violent. They're use to that as well from other homeless and literal wild animals (not a metaphor for a violent person)

so in the end, we're paying for these people to live their lifestyle.
post 1613921121 08-18-2020, 02:18 PM
-
#110
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  1. Johnez
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,771
  6. Rep Power: 87772
Originally Posted By SAD_COW_DISEASE
"The homeless problem" will mean different things to different people. Sometimes it's high housing costs, sometimes it's mental health, sometimes it's medical costs bankrupting people. I live in the Bay Area, CA, and probably as is the case for any city in America, the problem is drug addicts.

No amount of assistance, shelters, low-cost housing, financial aid/UBI, or even caring, is going to solve these people's woes. This is why I propose doing 2 things:

1. Decriminalize all drugs, and release current prisoners held for drug possession. This is going to seem to contradict what I just said, but prisons are over-crowded, and many of those people would be functional outside of prison, even if they do drugs. The drug-addicts currently out on the street are not being charged for their constant crimes because we can't afford to jail/imprison them. So step #1 will be reallocating space in our prisons to the people causing problems - that will require freeing up space as we just can't afford infinite prison space for every degenerate.

2. Start considering drug addiction a mental health problem serious enough for involuntary commitment. These people are causing harm to themselves and society if they are homeless, and should be committed. This is going to shift drug addicts from prisons to homes where they can get help. There isn't much hope for the majority of people who would be committed, but it's better than sending them to prison, and it's better than letting them wreak havoc on anyone around them.
And where are they gonna build these homes? Half the problem is nobody wants these people around. NIMBYism kills a lot of projects or ties them up in legal battles. On top of that a lot of these drug rehab places are simply not that effective. It's an easy payday since insurance pays everything and the licensing isn't that strict. Company I used to work for would furnish a lot of these places, owner of one ODed in a parking lot.

Drugs/alcohol addiction are heavily tied with homelessness. I don't see how legalizing or decriminalization would help.
Virtue is its own reward.
post 1613921161 08-18-2020, 02:19 PM
-
#111
  1. rectifryer
  2. enlightened
  1. rectifryer
  2. enlightened
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Posts: 25,634
  5. Rep Power: 208783
You can't really help people who don't care about being homeless. You'd have to house them against their will honestly.
Boycott foodservice industry crew
post 1613922441 08-18-2020, 02:34 PM
-
#112
  1. 128
  2. We on TV?
  1. 128
  2. We on TV?
  3. Join Date: Mar 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 64,672
  6. Rep Power: 351111
Originally Posted By Johnez
And where are they gonna build these homes? Half the problem is nobody wants these people around. NIMBYism kills a lot of projects or ties them up in legal battles. On top of that a lot of these drug rehab places are simply not that effective. It's an easy payday since insurance pays everything and the licensing isn't that strict. Company I used to work for would furnish a lot of these places, owner of one ODed in a parking lot.

Drugs/alcohol addiction are heavily tied with homelessness. I don't see how legalizing or decriminalization would help.
Can't blame people for not wanting dregs in their neighborhoods, they'd have to be moved to trailer parks in some bumfuk area
post 1613923381 08-18-2020, 02:46 PM
-
#113
  1. rectifryer
  2. enlightened
  1. rectifryer
  2. enlightened
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Posts: 25,634
  5. Rep Power: 208783
Originally Posted By 128
Can't blame people for not wanting dregs in their neighborhoods, they'd have to be moved to trailer parks in some bumfuk area
You absolutely cannot blame people for protecting their families. If that leaves drug addicts in the cold then so be it. That does not mean we should create more addicts by bringing them in to associate in the suburbs like we do with forcing section 8 housing in.

It's almost as if the people pushing these policies want the problems to continue....


You don't have to treat the people currently addicted for the issue to go away in a generation. In fact, separation from society is about the best thing that can happen for them and society. It's a mutual divestment. Forcing anything else is just some bizarre and misguided charity that shows how disconnected from the issue one's ideals are.

Bringing the addicts into the neighborhoods just ensures the culture propagates.

NIMBY? You're goddamn right. Get the fuk off my lawn, and fist yourself.
Boycott foodservice industry crew
post 1613924521 08-18-2020, 02:59 PM
-
#114
  1. SAD_COW_DISEASE
  2. Registered Sex Defender
  1. SAD_COW_DISEASE
  2. Registered Sex Defender
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 4,691
  5. Rep Power: 7454
Originally Posted By Johnez
And where are they gonna build these homes? Half the problem is nobody wants these people around. NIMBYism kills a lot of projects or ties them up in legal battles. On top of that a lot of these drug rehab places are simply not that effective. It's an easy payday since insurance pays everything and the licensing isn't that strict. Company I used to work for would furnish a lot of these places, owner of one ODed in a parking lot.

Drugs/alcohol addiction are heavily tied with homelessness. I don't see how legalizing or decriminalization would help.
If we can find places for prisons, we can find places for rehab centers/loony bins. If they aren't deemed as somewhat functional after some amount of time in the rehab center, then they don't leave. It's involuntary commitment, like we do with people who have dangerous mental problems. These people are addicted to drugs, harming themselves, and are a danger to everyone around them. That warrants commitment, similar to how prison also isn't voluntary. The question you have to ask is, where do you want to send them? Option 1: You don't send them anywhere, as we are currently doing. Option 2: you send them to prison. That's expensive and doesn't help. Option 3: you involuntarily commit them to a rehab/loony bin. It's hopefully cheaper than prison, and will help them MORE than prison will, even if there is little hope.

When an obvious drug addict is charged with a crime, they are not prosecuted because they have no where to put them. In my scenario, they would either be sent to prison, or the drug rehab center where they will be kept away from society. If they are sent to prison first to do their time, then they can be sent to the rehab center after until they show enough progress. And if they relapse (drugs and crime not trannies) then they get sent back - which is still better than not sending them anywhere in the first place. SOME of the released prisoners who were convicted of drug related crimes will live functional lives without dragging down society. This will free up space in prisons or resources for rehab centers, for those who are a detriment to society. The main point is to keep the problem drug addicts away from society.

We also need to BEG catholic churches and any other religious institution to help maintain these facilities.
Operation Swole.
post 1613924801 08-18-2020, 03:03 PM
-
#115
  1. SAD_COW_DISEASE
  2. Registered Sex Defender
  1. SAD_COW_DISEASE
  2. Registered Sex Defender
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 4,691
  5. Rep Power: 7454
Originally Posted By 128
Can't blame people for not wanting dregs in their neighborhoods, they'd have to be moved to trailer parks in some bumfuk area
These drug addicts are already in people's neighborhoods, just not the suburbs. You're just outsourcing your problem to the city. That's not fair, or financially smart.
Operation Swole.
post 1613925151 08-18-2020, 03:09 PM
-
#116
  1. rectifryer
  2. enlightened
  1. rectifryer
  2. enlightened
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Posts: 25,634
  5. Rep Power: 208783
Originally Posted By SAD_COW_DISEASE
These drug addicts are already in people's neighborhoods, just not the suburbs. You're just outsourcing your problem to the city. That's not fair, or financially smart.
These murderers are already in people's neighborhoods, just not the suburbs. You're just outsourcing your problem to the city. That's not fair, or financially smart.
Boycott foodservice industry crew
post 1613925291 08-18-2020, 03:11 PM
-
#117
  1. exxtracool
  2. Registered User
  1. exxtracool
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2018
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 20,766
  7. Rep Power: 77972
Mental Illness & Substance Use
Data from research conducted in the past five years indicates thatxi xii xiii:

• About 30% of people who are chronically homeless have mental health conditions.

• About 50% have co-occurring substance use problems.

According to analyses of data from the 1996 NSHAPCxiv:

• Over 60% of people who are chronically homelessness have experienced lifetime mental health problems

• Over 80% have experienced lifetime alcohol and/or drug problems




There’s your problem... 80% with drug abuse issues.
post 1613925871 08-18-2020, 03:18 PM
-
#118
  1. SAD_COW_DISEASE
  2. Registered Sex Defender
  1. SAD_COW_DISEASE
  2. Registered Sex Defender
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 4,691
  5. Rep Power: 7454
Originally Posted By rectifryer
These murderers are already in people's neighborhoods, just not the suburbs. You're just outsourcing your problem to the city. That's not fair, or financially smart.
If you read my post above that one, it's clear I'm not for giving homes to the homeless, or even subsidizing through section 8 housing. Not in cities, or in suburbs. I'm for committing the problem drug addicts (who comprise the majority of the homeless) to rehab and mental health centers until they can function enough on their own. And if that never happens, then they don't leave.

Edit: I think your and 128's response suggest you're ok with them being homeless drug addicts, wreaking havoc on their neighbors, as long as they are in the city and not the suburbs. That's expensive.
Operation Swole.
post 1613925931 08-18-2020, 03:19 PM
-
#119
  1. Droopdx
  2. Registered User
  1. Droopdx
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 8,664
  7. Rep Power: 49507
Originally Posted By AgRyan
The problem shouldn't be how we eliminate homeless people (not all are bad) it should be how do we eliminate problem homeless people? The homeless people who are addicted to drugs, mentally ill (potentially violent) and out there committing crimes.

For drug addicts, we need to have harsher punishments for repeat convictions of drug use. I know this isn't popular because it goes against the whole "my body" thing, but for people running around naked in the streets high AF, they need more than one night in jail they won't remember and time served. Lets get them off the street for 6 months + at a time, increasing to years. Just like DUI, there should be the separate crime of being under the influence of drugs in public where you are causing a nuisance or endangering others.

For the mentally ill people, we need to bring back mental institutions. Simple. Especially people who have been placed on multiple WIC 5150 holds (mental evaluation holds), after say, 5, you should spend mandatory X amount of time in a mental institution.

For the criminals, we just need harsher punishments and longer jail/prison sentences. It shouldn't be about punishment per say, it should be about getting these people off of the street. My PD has arrested the same guy before twice in a day for the same crimes. They get out, and just do the same chit again that night, and then the next morning, because there's no punishments. Build more prisons. Let's fill those up.

Fixing these 3 groups will get rid of 90% ish of the problem homeless population people bitch about, leaving the "normal" functioning homeless people that don't really bother people left. The ones that are sleeping in their cars when they're not working to get back on their feet or the ones that just like the homeless lifestyle but aren't into crazy drug addictions, mentally unstable, or criminal activity.
This. Just like the catch and release program they have here in portland for antifa. If the peaceful protester gets arrested and released in the same night (and likely charges dropped) they’ll be back to throwing rocks at police the next night
"Stop sitting back saying yeah man, I wanna be this, I wanna be that, grab your phucking nuts and be it" -Greg Plitt

Can't edit avi, mod tried to help but he couldn't figure it out either
post 1613926101 08-18-2020, 03:21 PM
-
#120
  1. Jhamaican
  2. Registered User
  1. Jhamaican
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2006
  4. Posts: 4,056
  5. Rep Power: 42978
Your videos are from Portland and New York

What do these cities have in common?
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts