Too much truth.

Did not read
but it is statistical fact that women/men with more partners have shorter marriages. Statistically if you want a long marriage, then don't **** around too much beforehand.

Yeah yeah blah blah blah OP hurry up and deliver on the good stuff.

I don't think it's good vs. bad. It's the number of people who are compatible with a lifestyle that is no longer supported by mainstream society.

Most people aren't naturally cut out for that life.

Resident misc granny here bored of another "female body count" thread.

It might be nice to think that her education level, number of previous partners, parents' marriage, or size of her arms will guarantee your "happily ever after" marriage. Real life doesn't work like that.

Actually it was inspired by this thread:
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showt...hp?t=179007281

I don't know that you can get there in 3 dates. If you wanna go for more efficiency then you might want to set yourself up in a "group interview" type situation. Do you have a friend group? Know other guys that are looking too, but maybe not for exactly what you are looking for?

If you can pull together a crew with regular social activities then you can spend time with multiple women and some of them repeatedly. Would be tough to do right now because of the pandemic restrictions, but that has to end eventually.

IMO the "not naturally cut out for that" is lame.

We are naturally cut out to seek high calorie density foods and eat a lot of them when we can find them as the next meal could be a long time coming and of questionable quality. That's been the smart play for most of human existence, and could be again in the future.

Right now? Not the greatest idea for most of us.

Children actually do the best if they have 3 committed adult caretakers. Someone did a study. That could be mom and dad plus a grandparent, aunt/uncle, older sibling...heck it could even be two moms and a day.

I can't argue against your point that mainstream society currently doesn't support what we call the traditional nuclear family.

Maybe there is a different family system that we will morph to. ATM the single mom family appears to be insufficient for raising boys to be good men.

I believe an extended family matriarchy might work (females of a family cohabitate to share child rearing duties w/brothers filling the masculine role instead of lovers). Your lover might leave you, but your brother knows he is related to you and your child. Romance & sex could be divorced from cohabitation and family that way.

Why is it lame?I've known since I was a kid that I didn't want that life even though I come from a big family and my folks are still together. It doesn't make sense within the context of modern society and doesn't fit my personal life goals. I guess never say never, but the selection of potential partners only seems to be narrowing as I get older. You are a miscer, so you should be aware of what it's like.

I think traditional nuclear families will slowly disappear in the coming generations and we will go back to being more communal. I'm not sure how it will work, but we're definitely at the beginning of a major transition now. Everything is going back to nature and families are no different.

We granny maxing now?

Agree pretty much. Although I would place less emphasis on attraction. Important in the beginning you bet, but it always wanes. And you better believe everything else is spot on when that happens (usually a few years in).

Resident misc granny here bored of another "female body count" thread.

There isn't one single reliable factor to find the right wifey for you. Yeah, there are "red flags" to watch out for and you may absolutely have your own personal preferences.

But by putting up more and more "gates" to filter your choices you may reduce your pool of likely candidates down to a point where you can't find anyone at all either due to chance or your own personal value vs. the value of the women you are pursuing.

There are still some good ones out there. I think there must be since good parents mostly raise good kids.

If you are serious about wanting to have a family the common factors I've seen in relationships that last are:

Attraction:Doesn't matter if other people think your choice is hot, just if you think she is attractive. Attraction can start with face + body, but it can also be things like sound of her voice, how she moves, a sparkle in her eyes, the way she dresses, etc. etc. etc.

Good Character: Does she have integrity? Loyalty? Kindness? Perseverance? Bravery? Openness?You may have some others that matter to you. Those first few matter quite a bit though. If she keeps her word, isn't two-faced, wouldn't intentionally lash out at someone who is down, and doesn't quit at the first hard situation, or the second, then you have a better chance of making it.

Shared Vision:Do you want the same thing? Share the way that you prioritize? This is big.

If you can't imagine a life with kids or a life without them then you want to know if you are on the same page early. Is religion important to you and are your partners desires around faith compatible? Do you want to always live near your family or do you want to tramp around until something clicks? Maybe there is someplace that you have always wanted to live. Do you expect to share all of the work (earning money, keeping house, childcare, money management) or are there areas that you want primary control of, or want minimal involvement with? Talk that out. Maybe you both want children, but neither one wants to be a stay home parent. Could be that you can arrange your jobs/work schedules so that you both share in child rearing, or maybe you hire someone or use outside childcare.

That's it. It might be nice to think that her education level, number of previous partners, parents' marriage, or size of her arms will guarantee your "happily ever after" marriage. Real life doesn't work like that.

Pics of a woman I found on Insta while looking at pics of RVs.

About 5 years ago:



She met a man (fellow outdoor enthusiast/hiker), fell in love, got married.

He is a welder and travels to jobsites. They wanted to keep their family together, so they bought a toyhauler and took to the road:



Over the years they have had 3 children (which has to be very challenging under the circumstances) and they seem happy together:



Don't trip yourself up with a bunch of superficial BS.

To me it sounds like an excuse; as in "monogamous committed relationships are too hard". A lot of things are difficult.

If you meant "suited" to mean preference instead of ability then that isn't lame, that is just people.

To me it sounds like an excuse; as in "monogamous committed relationships are too hard". A lot of things are difficult.

If you meant "suited" to mean preference instead of ability then that isn't lame, that is just people.

If you make something a priority (in this case a wife and kids) then the difficulty shouldn't put you off it.

Agree we are at a major transition point. Saw a good video that outlined a lot and matched up with my thoughts on it generally. Haven't gotten around to posting it though.



Yes.



Bet if you have a favorite Golden Girl it isn't about her face and body.



Aging happens. I intend to see a woman I can recognize as myself in the mirror for as long as I can though.

That's it. It might be nice to think that her education level, number of previous partners, parents' marriage, orsize of her armswill guarantee your "happily ever after" marriage. Real life doesn't work like that.

About 5 years ago:

Of course there are extremes with body count that head into fundamental attitudes and mental health territory. I posted this up in response to a thread that was the usual misc (under 5/ zero) chorus about women worth marrying. Someone could have quite a few casual encounters while in an experimental stage and then mature and be ready to settle down. Alternately another person could have very few partners, but got burned by them and is carrying baggage from those prior relationships that hinder their ability to be open and trusting, or to simply not project the behavior of past partners onto a new partner.

That's it. It might be nice to think that her education level, number of previous partners, parents' marriage, or size of her arms will guarantee your "happily ever after" marriage. Real life doesn't work like that.

Problem for me is I don't have good social skills, and I'm introverted (have been since a child). I'm not that smart either, and my career path isn't going to make me rich either. I'd take a shot with anyone, but even anyone is hard to find

Problem for me is I don't have good social skills, and I'm introverted (have been since a child). I'm not that smart either, and my career path isn't going to make me rich either. I'd take a shot with anyone, but even anyone is hard to find

So an attention seeking kunt who posts topless pics on social media is what female miscers consider the ideal marriage material

Just fukin lol

Is it OK to post a pic of your topless back if you made gainzz?

Is it OK to post a pic of your topless back if you made gainzz?

The implication of a topless pic is that your breasts are hanging out on the other side. First of all, she clearly isn't making a post to show off her back gainz, you don't have to be on top of a fuking mountain to do that. It's obviously a sexual angle she's going for.

Secondly, you can have on gym clothes and still show off your back right?