Forum
»
More General Categories
»
Religion and Politics
» Transgender woman wins lawsuit against female only dating app.
09-01-2024, 07:26 PM
#151
Originally Posted By freeheeler⏩
So they’re not actually women. They’re still men who pretend to be women because the can’t give birth
So Bodhy was lying along,
So Bodhy was lying along,
Uh, no. Science and now the law recognises trans women as women, and you're going to have to either cope with that, or produce a better counter argument to the contrary. So far, the only real thing we have in terms of a counter-argument is that capacity for reproduction defines one's biological sex.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
Quote
09-01-2024, 07:44 PM
#152
OP can't even produce a good argument. Sex is binary. The argument that gender isn't binary is what you're trying to argue. But sex always has been and always will be binary. Just because some woke idiots are saying it's not doesn't mean that in 500 years, our bones wont only show us as males or females. How that person lived their life, dressed, acted, or how some lib miscer or lib judge tries to say men can be women to hide their transformer fetish doesn't matter in the slightest. If anyone ever digs up our bones, the males will be identified as males and the females as females.
- bigcat3655
- Registered User
-
- bigcat3655
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2017
- Age: 41
- Posts: 7,269
- Rep Power: 87,942
-
09-01-2024, 08:02 PM
#153
Originally Posted By bigcat3655⏩
I mean hes a chronically unemployed, autistic, obese, tranny fuker so nothing he posts is going to make any sense
OP can't even produce a good argument. Sex is binary. The argument that gender isn't binary is what you're trying to argue. But sex always has been and always will be binary. Just because some woke idiots are saying it's not doesn't mean that in 500 years, our bones wont only show us as males or females. How that person lived their life, dressed, acted, or how some lib miscer or lib judge tries to say men can be women to hide their transformer fetish doesn't matter in the slightest. If anyone ever digs up our bones, the males will be identified as males and the females as females.
EDIT: nice negs lmao. Those greys hurt so bad Fraudhy
- 6gorillion
- Registered User
-
- 6gorillion
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2023
- Age: 54
- Posts: 3,200
- Rep Power: 64,857
-
09-01-2024, 08:20 PM
#154
Originally Posted By bigcat3655⏩
OP can't even produce a good argument. Sex is binary. The argument that gender isn't binary is what you're trying to argue. But sex always has been and always will be binary. Just because some woke idiots are saying it's not doesn't mean that in 500 years, our bones wont only show us as males or females. How that person lived their life, dressed, acted, or how some lib miscer or lib judge tries to say men can be women to hide their transformer fetish doesn't matter in the slightest. If anyone ever digs up our bones, the males will be identified as males and the females as females.
Neither the science nor the law are on your side here. Stomping your feet and shouting down anyone on the scientifically accurate side of things is just retarded and childish.
We've done the bones argument on here before. Claiming that a sex is determined through analysis of skeletal remains is not scientifically robust, it's an art at best. No bone analysis definitively tells you that remains are wholly male or female, and that doesn't show sex is completely determined, even if it did.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
09-01-2024, 08:24 PM
#155
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
How about DNA?
Neither the science nor the law are on your side here. Stomping your feet and shouting down anyone on the scientifically accurate side of things is just retarded and childish.
We've done the bones argument on here before. Claiming that a sex is determined through analysis of skeletal remains is not scientifically robust , it's an art at best. No bone analysis definitively tells you that remains are wholly male or female, and that doesn't show sex is completely determined, even if it did.
We've done the bones argument on here before. Claiming that a sex is determined through analysis of skeletal remains is not scientifically robust , it's an art at best. No bone analysis definitively tells you that remains are wholly male or female, and that doesn't show sex is completely determined, even if it did.
That scientifically robust or nah.
"Do you think S actually felt like that was a sxual thing he was doig? he's like. Only an actual p3do would thik that she thought he was groping her, too."
"Not that it's impossibl to touch a minor inapproriately, but it is true that a 6 year old girl will not recognie someone putting a hand on their chest as roping, whether it is inappropriat or not."
- Jayarbie
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.phpt=182007113&p=1671975503#post1671975503
- Bushmaster
- Jacques Rhott
-
- Bushmaster
- Jacques Rhott
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 58,660
- Rep Power: 637,616
-
09-01-2024, 08:34 PM
#156
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
this tranny fukker still in this thread trying to convince normal members of society of his absurd and perverted beliefs.
Neither the science nor the law are on your side here. Stomping your feet and shouting down anyone on the scientifically accurate side of things is just retarded and childish.
We've done the bones argument on here before. Claiming that a sex is determined through analysis of skeletal remains is not scientifically robust, it's an art at best. No bone analysis definitively tells you that remains are wholly male or female, and that doesn't show sex is completely determined, even if it did.
We've done the bones argument on here before. Claiming that a sex is determined through analysis of skeletal remains is not scientifically robust, it's an art at best. No bone analysis definitively tells you that remains are wholly male or female, and that doesn't show sex is completely determined, even if it did.
listen red, we know you are obsessed with men that have tits, but try to keep it to yourself, yeh?
all the pseudo-science you copy and paste from other weirdos on reddit doesn't wash here
if you wanna masturbate to that kind of twisted fantasy, by all means have at it
in the meantime, stop revealing who you truly are
- EireGunner
- Registered User
-
- EireGunner
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2022
- Posts: 2,389
- Rep Power: 72,702
-
09-01-2024, 08:35 PM
#157
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
what law?? where????
Uh, no. Science and now the law recognises trans women as women, and you're going to have to either cope with that, or produce a better counter argument to the contrary. So far, the only real thing we have in terms of a counter-argument is that capacity for reproduction defines one's biological sex.
- EireGunner
- Registered User
-
- EireGunner
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2022
- Posts: 2,389
- Rep Power: 72,702
-
09-01-2024, 08:49 PM
#158
Still trying to figure out where The Science™ says that a trans women can get pregnant, or where trans men could impregnate another women.
Has The Science™ figured that out yet?
Has The Science™ figured that out yet?
09-01-2024, 09:04 PM
#159
Just go have a tranny **** you in the ass Bodhy, and leave us alone.
We all know this anger coming from you is just built up frustration, because you spent 3 years trying to pick a tranny up at your school library, and you got rejected. So now you have this built up frustration where you just need some tranny cawk in your life, but can't get any. So you take that frustration out on the misc.
We all know this anger coming from you is just built up frustration, because you spent 3 years trying to pick a tranny up at your school library, and you got rejected. So now you have this built up frustration where you just need some tranny cawk in your life, but can't get any. So you take that frustration out on the misc.
09-02-2024, 03:51 AM
#160
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Youre now trying to convince us that someone's bones, can't tell you if the person was male or female?
Neither the science nor the law are on your side here. Stomping your feet and shouting down anyone on the scientifically accurate side of things is just retarded and childish.
We've done the bones argument on here before. Claiming that a sex is determined through analysis of skeletal remains is not scientifically robust, it's an art at best. No bone analysis definitively tells you that remains are wholly male or female, and that doesn't show sex is completely determined, even if it did.
We've done the bones argument on here before. Claiming that a sex is determined through analysis of skeletal remains is not scientifically robust, it's an art at best. No bone analysis definitively tells you that remains are wholly male or female, and that doesn't show sex is completely determined, even if it did.
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 96,888
- Rep Power: 316,531
-
09-02-2024, 03:54 AM
#161
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
I guess men and women have identical bone mass and density as well as skeletal size.
Youre now trying to convince us that someone's bones, can't tell you if the person was male or female?
"Science"!
Farcical.
09-02-2024, 04:57 AM
#162
Calling the 'tard..
Originally Posted By Seatard⏩
Where you at 'tard? Body and JFC have their backs together and are taking on all comers in two separate tranny threads that have been running for a week or so. You gonna call them out on it or nah.
freeheeler and bushmaster will only post the tranny stories, because I guess that's what they are most interested in. That may have incorrectly skewed my understanding of the website.
"Do you think S actually felt like that was a sxual thing he was doig? he's like. Only an actual p3do would thik that she thought he was groping her, too."
"Not that it's impossibl to touch a minor inapproriately, but it is true that a 6 year old girl will not recognie someone putting a hand on their chest as roping, whether it is inappropriat or not."
- Jayarbie
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.phpt=182007113&p=1671975503#post1671975503
- Bushmaster
- Jacques Rhott
-
- Bushmaster
- Jacques Rhott
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 58,660
- Rep Power: 637,616
-
09-02-2024, 07:50 PM
#163
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
Bone density, bone mass, the ****ing hips, none of it matters……… SCIENCE.
I guess men and women have identical bone mass and density as well as skeletal size.
"Science"!
Farcical.
"Science"!
Farcical.
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 96,888
- Rep Power: 316,531
-
09-02-2024, 08:02 PM
#164
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
That's because science and academia as a whole are a bunch of spineless pussies. They find ways to pervert the concept of basic human biology because they are afraid of being canceled or hurting the feelings of queer men with mental issues who use transgenderism to force their sexual fantasies towards women and children.
Uh, no. Science and now the law recognises trans women as women, and you're going to have to either cope with that, or produce a better counter argument to the contrary. So far, the only real thing we have in terms of a counter-argument is that capacity for reproduction defines one's biological sex.
It's cute how you attempt to ride in on your moral high horse and oblige us little people with your psuedo science. Fact is, you're completely OK with giving certain privileges to mentally ill people who make up less than 1% of the population at the cost of a group who makes up 50%….
LE6920CA Magpul
DDM4 V7
Glock 19 Gen 3
09-02-2024, 08:22 PM
#165
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
This retard using science to defeat science.. Typical weapons grade autism.
Neither the science nor the law are on your side here. Stomping your feet and shouting down anyone on the scientifically accurate side of things is just retarded and childish.
We've done the bones argument on here before. Claiming that a sex is determined through analysis of skeletal remains is not scientifically robust, it's an art at best. No bone analysis definitively tells you that remains are wholly male or female, and that doesn't show sex is completely determined, even if it did.
We've done the bones argument on here before. Claiming that a sex is determined through analysis of skeletal remains is not scientifically robust, it's an art at best. No bone analysis definitively tells you that remains are wholly male or female, and that doesn't show sex is completely determined, even if it did.
You all are giving Peggy what he wants by engaging him. He craves attention, even if it's negative.
Wort ew in th wold.
- ClivesTriceps
- Indian troll farm bot
-
- ClivesTriceps
- Indian troll farm bot
- Join Date: Nov 2019
- Posts: 12,003
- Rep Power: 330,584
-
09-02-2024, 08:23 PM
#166
I personally assumed you people were simply ignorant but now I'm begging to realize that the truth is far more sinister…none of you are stupid enough to actually believe that you can be any gender you feel like…so that only leads me to believe that you have certain agendas…
What's next? Suing a gym for not letting you take showers with women? Suing boxing or mma organizations for not letting you beat up women? And for what??? Because you don't want to hurt someone's feelings?
What's next? Suing a gym for not letting you take showers with women? Suing boxing or mma organizations for not letting you beat up women? And for what??? Because you don't want to hurt someone's feelings?
LE6920CA Magpul
DDM4 V7
Glock 19 Gen 3
09-02-2024, 08:28 PM
#167
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Not gonna lie, this is a crazy weird hill to die on.
Neither the science nor the law are on your side here. Stomping your feet and shouting down anyone on the scientifically accurate side of things is just retarded and childish.
We've done the bones argument on here before. Claiming that a sex is determined through analysis of skeletal remains is not scientifically robust, it's an art at best. No bone analysis definitively tells you that remains are wholly male or female, and that doesn't show sex is completely determined, even if it did.
We've done the bones argument on here before. Claiming that a sex is determined through analysis of skeletal remains is not scientifically robust, it's an art at best. No bone analysis definitively tells you that remains are wholly male or female, and that doesn't show sex is completely determined, even if it did.
09-02-2024, 08:29 PM
#168
Originally Posted By Irezumi⏩
That's because science and academia as a whole are a bunch of spineless pussies. They find ways to pervert the concept of basic human biology because they are afraid of being canceled or hurting the feelings of queer men with mental issues who use transgenderism to force their sexual fantasies towards women and children.
It's cute how you attempt to ride in on your moral high horse and oblige us little people with your psuedo science. Fact is, you're completely OK with giving certain privileges to mentally ill people who make up less than 1% of the population at the cost of a group who makes up 50%….
It's cute how you attempt to ride in on your moral high horse and oblige us little people with your psuedo science. Fact is, you're completely OK with giving certain privileges to mentally ill people who make up less than 1% of the population at the cost of a group who makes up 50%….
Or we can apply Occam's Razor. Science isn't a bunch of pussies, science just constantly changes and updates its theories and findings. Also, we are humans who didn't evolve to naturally intuit complex scientific truths. We don't naturally intuit the spherical Earth, or revolving around the sun, or relativity or quantum physics.
So it's not at all surprising that we don't naturally intuit the complexity of biology and will resist new findings. Good thing about science though, is that it doesn't care if you stamp your feet.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
09-02-2024, 08:34 PM
#169
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
So can a trans women give birth? Uh, no. Science and now the law recognises trans women as women, and you're going to have to either cope with that, or produce a better counter argument to the contrary. So far, the only real thing we have in terms of a counter-argument is that capacity for reproduction defines one's biological sex.
I mean women can give birth so surely a trans women can give birth if science says they’re women
Scubastevo :-What percentage of women have STDs? (serious) If I just wanted to go bareback with any girl that I could get with, what are my chances of ending up bed ridden with STDs?
- freeheeler
- Registered User
-
- freeheeler
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2002
- Location: United States
- Age: 63
- Posts: 8,838
- Rep Power: 83,841
-
09-02-2024, 09:13 PM
#170
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
If science seriously believes that men can be women, give birth, have menstrual cycles, invade women's safe spaces then God help us all because we are truly lost…like I said..I don't buy your fake sympathy…I believe in classic utilitarianism…im not interested in giving privileges to the mentally ill at the cost of putting women in potentially dangerous situations. The science you keep mentioning is on par with young earth creationists…I personally don't think you're that thick which again…seems like you have certain agendas…I don't care about some homosexual who claims to be a woman..but I have a mother, sister, and niece who I will give my life for before I allow some degenerate to follow them into a bathroom or force their deviant behavior on.
Or we can apply Occam's Razor. Science isn't a bunch of pussies, science just constantly changes and updates its theories and findings. Also, we are humans who didn't evolve to naturally intuit complex scientific truths. We don't naturally intuit the spherical Earth, or revolving around the sun, or relativity or quantum physics.
So it's not at all surprising that we don't naturally intuit the complexity of biology and will resist new findings. Good thing about science though, is that it doesn't care if you stamp your feet.
So it's not at all surprising that we don't naturally intuit the complexity of biology and will resist new findings. Good thing about science though, is that it doesn't care if you stamp your feet.
LE6920CA Magpul
DDM4 V7
Glock 19 Gen 3
09-03-2024, 04:25 AM
#171
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
Saying that trans women equals women isn't evolution.
Or we can apply Occam's Razor. Science isn't a bunch of pussies, science just constantly changes and updates its theories and findings. Also, we are humans who didn't evolve to naturally intuit complex scientific truths. We don't naturally intuit the spherical Earth, or revolving around the sun, or relativity or quantum physics.
So it's not at all surprising that we don't naturally intuit the complexity of biology and will resist new findings. Good thing about science though, is that it doesn't care if you stamp your feet.
So it's not at all surprising that we don't naturally intuit the complexity of biology and will resist new findings. Good thing about science though, is that it doesn't care if you stamp your feet.
Also, science isn't saying that trans women are women, a few scients here and there are.
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 96,888
- Rep Power: 316,531
-
09-03-2024, 04:41 AM
#172
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
And good thing we have teams of highly skilled surgeons along with man-made hormones to change the appearance of said complexities of biology when we don't like them.
Or we can apply Occam's Razor. Science isn't a bunch of pussies, science just constantly changes and updates its theories and findings. Also, we are humans who didn't evolve to naturally intuit complex scientific truths. We don't naturally intuit the spherical Earth, or revolving around the sun, or relativity or quantum physics.
So it's not at all surprising that we don't naturally intuit the complexity of biology and will resist new findings. Good thing about science though, is that it doesn't care if you stamp your feet.
So it's not at all surprising that we don't naturally intuit the complexity of biology and will resist new findings. Good thing about science though, is that it doesn't care if you stamp your feet.
I mean it's only the natural order of things… right?
"Do you think S actually felt like that was a sxual thing he was doig? he's like. Only an actual p3do would thik that she thought he was groping her, too."
"Not that it's impossibl to touch a minor inapproriately, but it is true that a 6 year old girl will not recognie someone putting a hand on their chest as roping, whether it is inappropriat or not."
- Jayarbie
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.phpt=182007113&p=1671975503#post1671975503
- Bushmaster
- Jacques Rhott
-
- Bushmaster
- Jacques Rhott
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 58,660
- Rep Power: 637,616
-
09-03-2024, 04:45 AM
#173
Originally Posted By Irezumi⏩
If science seriously believes that men can be women, give birth, have menstrual cycles, invade women's safe spaces then God help us all because we are truly lost…like I said..I don't buy your fake sympathy…I believe in classic utilitarianism…im not interested in giving privileges to the mentally ill at the cost of putting women in potentially dangerous situations. The science you keep mentioning is on par with young earth creationists…I personally don't think you're that thick which again…seems like you have certain agendas…I don't care about some homosexual who claims to be a woman..but I have a mother, sister, and niece who I will give my life for before I allow some degenerate to follow them into a bathroom or force their deviant behavior on.
But we still don't have anything of a real argument from the opposite position here. To say sex is inscribed in chromosomes is presuming genotype prescribs phenotype, which is no longer a very tenable view. Is that your best argument? Or is the claim that only men can produce sperm, and women, eggs, the best argument?
Just what is the best argument here? I see an incredible amount of hand flapping, but no argument.
Back off, Warchild.
Seriously.
09-03-2024, 04:47 AM
#174
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
But we still don't have anything of a real argument from the opposite position here. To say sex is inscribed in chromosomes is presuming genotype prescribs phenotype, which is no longer a very tenable view. Is that your best argument?
Or is the claim that only men can produce sperm, and woman eggs, the best argument?
Just what is the best argument here? I see an incredible amount of hand flapping, but no argument.
Just what is the best argument here? I see an incredible amount of hand flapping, but no argument.
"Do you think S actually felt like that was a sxual thing he was doig? he's like. Only an actual p3do would thik that she thought he was groping her, too."
"Not that it's impossibl to touch a minor inapproriately, but it is true that a 6 year old girl will not recognie someone putting a hand on their chest as roping, whether it is inappropriat or not."
- Jayarbie
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.phpt=182007113&p=1671975503#post1671975503
- Bushmaster
- Jacques Rhott
-
- Bushmaster
- Jacques Rhott
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 58,660
- Rep Power: 637,616
-
09-03-2024, 05:48 AM
#175
Originally Posted By Bodhy⏩
And your argument is that women can have dicks, and bust nuts……
But we still don't have anything of a real argument from the opposite position here. To say sex is inscribed in chromosomes is presuming genotype prescribs phenotype, which is no longer a very tenable view. Is that your best argument? Or is the claim that only men can produce sperm, and women, eggs, the best argument?
Just what is the best argument here? I see an incredible amount of hand flapping, but no argument.
Just what is the best argument here? I see an incredible amount of hand flapping, but no argument.
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 96,888
- Rep Power: 316,531
-
09-03-2024, 05:50 AM
#176
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
It's "evolution."
And good thing we have teams of highly skilled surgeons along with man-made hormones to change the appearance of said complexities of biology when we don't like them.
I mean it's only the natural order of things… right?
I mean it's only the natural order of things… right?
Love how he says "Science" makes it so, instead of a few scientists claiming it.
"Scientists" claim that BCAA'S work, "Science" proves they're a waste of money, unless you get the specific BCAA'S that Benny uses…..
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
-
- Dave22reborn
- Cold Hearted SOB
- Join Date: Jan 2005
- Location: Ill.
- Posts: 96,888
- Rep Power: 316,531
-
09-03-2024, 05:56 AM
#177
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Well…. his
hope
is that women can have dicks and bust nuts anyway.
And your argument is that women can have dicks, and bust nuts……
"Do you think S actually felt like that was a sxual thing he was doig? he's like. Only an actual p3do would thik that she thought he was groping her, too."
"Not that it's impossibl to touch a minor inapproriately, but it is true that a 6 year old girl will not recognie someone putting a hand on their chest as roping, whether it is inappropriat or not."
- Jayarbie
https://forum.bodybuilding.com/showthread.phpt=182007113&p=1671975503#post1671975503
- Bushmaster
- Jacques Rhott
-
- Bushmaster
- Jacques Rhott
- Join Date: Jul 2003
- Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
- Posts: 58,660
- Rep Power: 637,616
-
09-03-2024, 07:30 AM
#178
Originally Posted By Bushmaster⏩
Its a pretty good argument I think
Men can’t have babies
Only women can
Women can’t get women pregnant even if they shout “ I’m a man goddam it, science says so”
A women who shouts “I’m a man, science says so” has no way of getting a man pregnant even if as bodhy who enjoys this method, has a turkey baster shoved up his ass
If a 13 yr old (bodhys favorite age) Thai lady boy pegs bodhy and bodhy shouts “I’m a women, science says so” , he still, thankfully won’t get pregnant
So when you total up all these scientific calculations, it would appear that only men can get women pregnant. Not a women who claims to be a man or a man who claims to be a women as Bodhys science professor says….. .
Scubastevo :-What percentage of women have STDs? (serious) If I just wanted to go bareback with any girl that I could get with, what are my chances of ending up bed ridden with STDs?
- freeheeler
- Registered User
-
- freeheeler
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2002
- Location: United States
- Age: 63
- Posts: 8,838
- Rep Power: 83,841
-
09-03-2024, 08:50 AM
#179
OP is a legit homo
09-03-2024, 09:03 AM
#180
Originally Posted By GooBaaa⏩
Needs to be back in the red. Who reps him???
OP is a legit homo
- 6gorillion
- Registered User
-
- 6gorillion
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2023
- Age: 54
- Posts: 3,200
- Rep Power: 64,857
-
Bookmarks
- Digg
- del.icio.us
- StumbleUpon
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts