Forum
»
How does it feel knowing the foundation of your math is arbitrary
03-28-2026, 03:42 PM
-
#1
How does it feel knowing the foundation of your math is arbitrary
When you push on maths foundation and corner them they eventually fall back behind the buzzwords of “consistency” and “utility” to defend the bullshit but those words are meaningless
1. Anything can be consistent with arbitrary rules
2. Just because something was built with current math doesn’t mean it used it’s current axiom, people used to correctly navigate ships thinking earth was the center of the world.
arbitrary: decisions, actions, or rules based on random choice, personal whim, or impulse rather than reason, logic, or a system.
1. Anything can be consistent with arbitrary rules
2. Just because something was built with current math doesn’t mean it used it’s current axiom, people used to correctly navigate ships thinking earth was the center of the world.
arbitrary: decisions, actions, or rules based on random choice, personal whim, or impulse rather than reason, logic, or a system.
03-28-2026, 03:45 PM
-
#2
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
-
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Uganda
- Height: 6'1"
- Weight: 232 lbs
- Posts: 7,692
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 119606
-
-
Be specific when you say mathematics. What exactly are you talking about specifically? There's nothing arbitrary about basic mathematics.
El Bonobo
Incel crusher
03-28-2026, 03:45 PM
-
#3
So we got these plebs running around in circles of a trapped maze of a false axiom lmao. Running around in their own shit like cattle. Running around in delusion For 5,000 years
We brainwash them since birth to believe the map is the territory
We brainwash them since birth to believe the map is the territory
03-28-2026, 03:46 PM
-
#4
Originally Posted By Bonobo⏩
Exactly what I said. Your foundation of math is arbitrary bullshit and I just proved it
Be specific when you say mathematics. What exactly are you talking about specifically? There's nothing arbitrary about basic mathematics.
03-28-2026, 03:48 PM
-
#5
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
-
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Uganda
- Height: 6'1"
- Weight: 232 lbs
- Posts: 7,692
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 119606
-
-
Originally Posted By Gesten1⏩
So when a plane is landing on a runway using electronic guidance the mathematics they use to calculate where to land is arbitrary?
Exactly what I said. Your foundation of math is arbitrary bullshit and I just proved it
El Bonobo
Incel crusher
03-28-2026, 03:57 PM
-
#6
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
-
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Cajun Country
- Age: 40
- Height: 5'7"
- Weight: 185 lbs
- Posts: 52,647
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 418919
-
-
It’s gets a lot more weird than that.
I advise destroying all attachments and understandings of the nature of reality.
I advise destroying all attachments and understandings of the nature of reality.
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“
PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
03-28-2026, 03:58 PM
-
#7
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
-
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Uganda
- Height: 6'1"
- Weight: 232 lbs
- Posts: 7,692
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 119606
-
-
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
Thats called eating a bag of shrooms
It’s gets a lot more weird than that.
I advise destroying all attachments and understandings of the nature of reality.
I advise destroying all attachments and understandings of the nature of reality.
El Bonobo
Incel crusher
03-28-2026, 04:04 PM
-
#8
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
-
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Cajun Country
- Age: 40
- Height: 5'7"
- Weight: 185 lbs
- Posts: 52,647
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 418919
-
-
Originally Posted By Bonobo⏩
An amazing teacher.
Thats called eating a bag of shrooms
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“
PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
03-28-2026, 04:14 PM
-
#9
03-28-2026, 04:15 PM
-
#10
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
How do you people feel that 1x1=1, and groups exist no where in raw concrete reality?
It’s gets a lot more weird than that.
I advise destroying all attachments and understandings of the nature of reality.
I advise destroying all attachments and understandings of the nature of reality.
Math is suppose to model reality, yet your starting foundational operation maps absolutely nothing. It models fiction
03-28-2026, 04:19 PM
-
#11
03-28-2026, 04:21 PM
-
#12
Originally Posted By ymer⏩
Never said I have a problem with a map
So is language, yet here you are using it to convey your ideas.
I have a problem with a map that maps fiction
And unfortunately your foundation of math maps fiction. Your starting operation 1x1=1 and “groups” exist no where in raw concrete reality. They exist no where on the territory
03-28-2026, 04:21 PM
-
#13
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
-
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Uganda
- Height: 6'1"
- Weight: 232 lbs
- Posts: 7,692
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 119606
-
-
Originally Posted By Gesten1⏩
Already addressed how utility is meaningless with the ship example
Just because something was built with current math doesn’t mean it used it’s current axiom, people used to correctly navigate ships thinking earth was the center of the world.
The "Earth was the center of the world....." did you mean universe?
They navigated the Earth using astronomy and that astronomy is precise. Whether or not they thought the Earth was the center of the universe had no impact on the actual navigation. Acceleration for a free falling object is 9.8 meters per second and whether I think that's caused by the mass of the Earth or pixie dust is irrelevant. The calculation is still the same irrespective of what I thought. Your point is invalid
El Bonobo
Incel crusher
03-28-2026, 04:22 PM
-
#14
- N0rds
- "7'7" Norwegian chad with blonde hair blue eyes immigrant and a btc billionaire" -Tranny Maria
-
- N0rds
- "7'7" Norwegian chad with blonde hair blue eyes immigrant and a btc billionaire" -Tranny Maria
- Join Date: May 2012
- Location: AntiTranny Aktion
- Height: 6'6"
- Posts: 32,432
- Subscribers: 7
- Rep Power: 449511
-
-
Originally Posted By Gesten1⏩
When you push on maths foundation and corner them they eventually fall back behind the buzzwords of “consistency” and “utility” to defend the bullshit but those words are meaningless
1. Anything can be consistent with arbitrary rules
2. Just because something was built with current math doesn’t mean it used it’s current axiom, people used to correctly navigate ships thinking earth was the center of the world.
arbitrary: decisions, actions, or rules based on random choice, personal whim, or impulse rather than reason, logic, or a system.
1. Anything can be consistent with arbitrary rules
2. Just because something was built with current math doesn’t mean it used it’s current axiom, people used to correctly navigate ships thinking earth was the center of the world.
arbitrary: decisions, actions, or rules based on random choice, personal whim, or impulse rather than reason, logic, or a system.

"Boss not feel good please use sick day" - low IQ tranny.
"Send him to Phaggy_Cholo"
03-28-2026, 04:25 PM
-
#15
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
-
- Ironmanlet
- Adamantium User
- Join Date: Aug 2009
- Location: Cajun Country
- Age: 40
- Height: 5'7"
- Weight: 185 lbs
- Posts: 52,647
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 418919
-
-
Originally Posted By Gesten1⏩
I acknowledge any time any language has been used to describe the nature of reality that description is not even close.
How do you people feel that 1x1=1, and groups exist no where in raw concrete reality?
Math is suppose to model reality, yet your starting foundational operation maps absolutely nothing. It models fiction
Math is suppose to model reality, yet your starting foundational operation maps absolutely nothing. It models fiction
I accepted this a long time ago.
I think most people are simply concerned with short term survival/satisfaction goals for this conversation to even matter
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“
PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
03-28-2026, 04:26 PM
-
#16
- MustardTiger17
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Location: United States
- Posts: 38,603
- Subscribers: 7
- Rep Power: 238919
-
-
Mathematics are 100 percent fake
Not in the AM
03-28-2026, 04:27 PM
-
#17
Originally Posted By Ironmanlet⏩
Math used to model reality 5,000 years ago before reification was introduced
I acknowledge any time any language has been used to describe the nature of reality that description is not even close.
I accepted this a long time ago.
I think most people are simply concerned with short term survival/satisfaction goals for this conversation to even matter
I accepted this a long time ago.
I think most people are simply concerned with short term survival/satisfaction goals for this conversation to even matter
The problem is one of the ones in 1x1=1 does not exist in raw concrete reality, and neither do groups.
The operation is an abstract describing an abstract concept
Your own logic says an abstract describing an abstract is delusion. Your own logic is calling your starting foundational operation delusion
“in logic once abstractions only define other abstractions, the system is no longer a map it’s a self referential delusion”
I just gave you 3 flaws and fallacys of your foundation of math that can not be refuted. Your logic calls it delusion. It contradicts against logic
& I can give you a 4th one how it contradicts against laws of physics
03-28-2026, 05:20 PM
-
#18
03-28-2026, 05:21 PM
-
#19
03-28-2026, 05:32 PM
-
#20
- headturner1
- User title
-
- headturner1
- User title
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Location: Washington, United States
- Age: 18
- Height: 6'5"
- Weight: 282 lbs
- Posts: 22,839
- Subscribers: 9
- Rep Power: 318202
-
-
Originally Posted By fate0311⏩
You’re one to talk chit for brains.
shutup wincel you fucking autist
Negged at 100% x 100% = 100%
03-28-2026, 06:27 PM
-
#21
03-28-2026, 07:09 PM
-
#22
03-28-2026, 07:13 PM
-
#23
- GaryRidgway
- Join Date: Apr 2013
- Posts: 46,867
- Subscribers: 11
- Rep Power: 334052
-
-
Feels bad
Beer is my brush and the road is my canvas
03-28-2026, 07:41 PM
-
#24
03-28-2026, 08:01 PM
-
#25
Originally Posted By Bonobo⏩
you just proved my point. whether they thought earth was center had no impact on navigation. The calculation is the same regardless
The "Earth was the center of the world....." did you mean universe?
They navigated the Earth using astronomy and that astronomy is precise. Whether or not they thought the Earth was the center of the universe had no impact on the actual navigation. Acceleration for a free falling object is 9.8 meters per second and whether I think that's caused by the mass of the Earth or pixie dust is irrelevant. The calculation is still the same irrespective of what I thought. Your point is invalid
They navigated the Earth using astronomy and that astronomy is precise. Whether or not they thought the Earth was the center of the universe had no impact on the actual navigation. Acceleration for a free falling object is 9.8 meters per second and whether I think that's caused by the mass of the Earth or pixie dust is irrelevant. The calculation is still the same irrespective of what I thought. Your point is invalid
03-28-2026, 08:02 PM
-
#26
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
-
- Bonobo
- Autist Whisperer
- Join Date: Jan, 2026
- Location: Uganda
- Height: 6'1"
- Weight: 232 lbs
- Posts: 7,692
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 119606
-
-
Originally Posted By Gesten1⏩
You just proved my point. The math is a math, and it's not subjective
you just proved my point. whether they thought earth was center had no impact on navigation. The calculation remains the same regardless
El Bonobo
Incel crusher
03-28-2026, 08:17 PM
-
#27
Originally Posted By Bonobo⏩
Wrong. That doesn’t follow. I gave you the ship example but you ignored it. The ship example proves the same math can be used within a wrong foundation and still work. Utility doesn’t prove objectivity
You just proved my point. The math is a math, and it's not subjective
03-28-2026, 08:21 PM
-
#28
Originally Posted By Gesten1⏩
So, op, I was thinking… what if the world was actually flat and everyone has been LYING to me my whole life?!? And only me and a few chosen people are special enough to see the truth that no one else can see (no cult).
you just proved my point. whether they thought earth was center had no impact on navigation. The calculation is the same regardless
03-28-2026, 08:23 PM
-
#29
- explosiveMidget
- Always creepin never sleepin
-
- explosiveMidget
- Always creepin never sleepin
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Location: IRELAND
- Age: 35
- Height: 5'6"
- Weight: 203 lbs
- Posts: 29,062
- Subscribers: 11
- Rep Power: 280904
-
-
how could math be real when ur numbers aren't real
03-28-2026, 08:29 PM
-
#30
Originally Posted By explosiveMidget⏩
Numbers ain’t real. They’re abstractions describing concrete matter
how could math be real when ur numbers aren't real
The problem is when abstractions are describing abstract concepts. Ie: 1x1=1
Addition is fine
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
