A lot of it is frustrating because of all the constant excuses people make for the Muslim religion while vilifying Christians for not doing even a tenth of what people have done in the Muslim religion.

Not to mention, most 'secular' Muslims support sharia on the down low.

@JB05, dude youre getting killed throughout this post by smarter people than you. you havent come up with anything relevant.

Islam is a destroyer of cultures and civilizations. From the Byzantine empire, Persia and many of what is today Russia to the iminent fall of Europe today.

It takes a blind fool not to see over a thousand years of destruction and cultures destroyed by this plague.

It's a shame he condoned and legalized slavery under islamic law, kept slaves himself, and advocated that his companions rape slaves...



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DR7_YQ53lfI

From the man in the video...

To the Muslims claiming I’m wrong for using the word “rape” in the video, as the Islamic Sources didn’t actually use the word “rape”. My response is: well I could have used the words “sexual assault” but I chose “rape” for the following reasons. Think about it, there is more than one way to rape a woman.

A woman could be physically forced to have sex or she could be psychologically forced to have sex due to some kind of traumatic circumstances, similar to the women whom I mentioned in my video. Women who had been taken as war captives, women who had witnessed the horrors of battle, women who had just witnessed their husbands being defeated in war by Muslim soldiers, women who were worrying about the safety of their husbands who themselves had been taken captive.

Ibn Katheer in his commentary on the Qur’an stated these Muslim soldiers wanted to have sex with these female captives. Perhaps these women had heard about those evil plans? Just imagine what they were going through? In this kind of situation starting a new marriage life with strange enemy soldiers would be the last thing such women would desire.

Listen, I’m no psychologist, but common sense dictates that in a situation like that such women would have been emotionally or physiologically incapacitated. Such female victims of Islamic Jihad would be incapable of giving any sane honest consent to have sexual intercourse with any man other than her already existing husband.

So there you have it, now you know why I used the word “rape” in my video. I believe it accurately describes the situation. When you force a divorce upon a terrified physiologically incapacitated woman and then you try to marry her to have sex with her, than I say that such a sexual encounter is not a valid marriage at all, but is basically rape. You don't need to say the word "rape" to convey the same meaning.

I'm curious how feminists would react to this.

https://wikiislam.net/wiki/Qur'an,_H...holars:Slavery

Why do you support the practice of slavery, and sexual slavery Whitecl4ws?

PLEASE SHARE THE VIDEO I POSTED FAR AND WIDE, ANTI-ISLAM BRAHS! PLEASE SHOW IT TO FEMALES AND FEMINISTS ESPECIALLY.

Wrong:





The Muslim death toll is in the hundreds of millions, along with the tens of millions of blacks you not only enslaved, but castrated so they couldn't reproduce (there's a reason Mohammad called them raisin heads right?)



/\ That's Islamic colonialism, don't be mad that for 1300 years of efforts, you failed at colonizing Europe and within 8 battles, you got BTFO....you still spread your filthy death cult by the sword to many nations (which are all ****holes now), but it is not for Europe and it never will be.

then dont come here then

There's been abortion doctors killed in the name of Christianity, but when things like that happen we tend to say they weren't in fact a Christian because a true Christian wouldn't do that. Christianity is awful, but it used to be f*cking awful just like Islam is now. I can't stand any of these stupid books.

A lot of them are doing it in the name of being FA. Should we ban FAs?

Or should we focus on punishing the negative behavior of individuals instead of trying to ban ideas?

Glad to know I have you cheering me on from the sidelines <3

wouldnt sharia LAW be a law system in which religion dictates law and government? thats against our constitution. srperation of church and state

islamic terrorism is different.

- it is a meta threat. it isnt just individuals, its a large part of the largest relgion on earth. it is an actual army fighting western pillars.

- the motive and the perpetrator are clear

- the constitution doesnt apply to foreign nationals so i say ban entrance of people from sharia controlled nations

Came into this thread to start dropping some knowledge about the Quran and taqiyya and the slow march of the goal of global Islam by any and all means necessary.

Leaving satisfied that somebody else is already doing it, thanks for saving me the frustration.

Who am I going to trust?

A miscer who is barely 30 years old?

Or hundreds of historical years, where Islam has conquered countries through "convert or die" campaigns.

Time to take Ron Paul out of your sig then

About the age of aysha,http://www.muslim.org/islam/aisha-age.htm, it doesn't historically make sense that she was 6 years old for many reasons, also about the propagation of the religion, the people that died to the sword were people who directly opposed the aspect of islam as a whole and didn't let it be, those who surrenderd weren't harmed and women and kids weren't touched, also that death toll is reversible too, many muslims died to the sword of those who didn't want that religion and finally, it was the norm to have slaves at the time, and their owner could do anything they wanted with them, it was a rule that was added to islam to generalize that aspect, I'm not very fonded in Islam but I know that in the reign of the prophet, that was how it was, after that, i dont really know. Finally, ccastrate? raisin heads? Never heard of that, he certainly had slaves and he treated them very well, he didnt try to abolish slavery but he certainly encouraged others to free their slaves,
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Isla...27s_traditions

You talk about that death toll like it was just us, certainly 1300 years of wars would have a big death toll

I would like you to get me that quote from our "manual"

I hope I can clear misconsceptions and hopefully make you view people like me differently from those goat fu*ers

Except Islam is different, isn't it?




"As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness:

United States — Muslim 1.0%
Australia — Muslim 1.5%
Canada — Muslim 1.9%
China — Muslim 1%-2%
Italy — Muslim 1.5%
Norway — Muslim 1.8%

At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs:

Denmark — Muslim 2%
Germany — Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom — Muslim 2.7%
Spain — Muslim 4%
Thailand — Muslim 4.6%

From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.

They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves — along with threats for failure to comply. (United States ).

France — Muslim 8%
Philippines — Muslim 5%
Sweden — Muslim 5%
Switzerland — Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands — Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad &Tobago — Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions ( Paris –car-burnings) . Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats ( Amsterdam – Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana — Muslim 10%
India — Muslim 13.4%
Israel — Muslim 16%
Kenya — Muslim 10%
Russia — Muslim 10-15%

After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning:

Ethiopia — Muslim 32.8%

At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare:

Bosnia — Muslim 40%
Chad — Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon — Muslim 59.7%

From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels:

Albania — Muslim 70%
Malaysia — Muslim 60.4%
Qatar — Muslim 77.5%
Sudan — Muslim 70%

After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide:

Bangladesh — Muslim 83%
Egypt — Muslim 90%
Gaza — Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia — Muslim 86.1%
Iran — Muslim 98%
Iraq — Muslim 97%
Jordan — Muslim 92%
Morocco — Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan — Muslim 97%
Palestine — Muslim 99%
Syria — Muslim 90%
Tajikistan — Muslim 90%
Turkey — Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates — Muslim 96%

100% will usher in the peace of ‘Dar-es-Salaam’ — the Islamic House of Peace — there’s supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim:

Afghanistan — Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia — Muslim 100%
****lia — Muslim 100%
Yemen — Muslim 99.9%

Of course, that’s not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons."

http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/2...errorism_Islam


So is it really "just an insignificant minority"?

No. And I expect you to have fukk all as a response because you're wrong.

Islam is the best.

/thread

[QUOTE=NVious post_id=1453055753]Wrong:

[img]http://i.imgur.com/gzj4iR6.jpg[img]

[img]http://i.imgur.com/GchIdeC.jp[/img]

The Muslim death toll is in the hundreds of millions, along with the tens of millions of blacks you not only enslaved, but castrated so they couldn't reproduce (there's a reason Mohammad called them raisin heads right?)

youtube]I_To-cV94Bo[/youtube]

/\ That's Islamic colonialism, don't be mad that for 1300 years of efforts, you failed at colonizing Europe and within 8 battles, you got BTFO....you still spread your filthy death cult by the sword to many nations (which are all ****holes now), but it is not for Europe and it never will be.[/QUOTE]Aside from banging an underage girl, he also rode across the sky on a winged donkey-unicorn with a female head. Not even going to defend Islam here, but I will point out that taking anything a holy text says as sacred is a bit ludicrous when stuff like this exists.

[URL=http://www.harekrsna.de/artikel/islam-al-buraq.htm]http://www.harekrsna.de/artikel/islam-al-buraq.htm[/URL]

Also, to bring to light the absurdities.. you really don't need to point out any strange shyt in the text when there are people who subscribe to the religion that are[i]willing to kill others because they drew a cartoon[/i].

[b][i]WILLING TO KILL PEOPLE OVER A CARTOON[/i][/b]

it's a strange world out there boyos

We all remember what happened the last time the crown and the faith allied..

lmao at a society that has a bunch of different laws based on what religion you are

The law should be the law, religion has no place in it

sounds ****ing fantastic

If sharia law is implemented it makes sense that more people would convert to islam. jews and christians receive half the compensation a muslim would receive and others like hindus receive 1/16th! fuk outta here with that made up number BS thats some bullchit

liberal cucks (H clinton etc)
islam

pick 1

The author's impression of sharia law does not represent what other muslims in middle east and europe think sharia law is.