Forum
»
If you don't believe in climate change, please step into this thread and explain why.
12-21-2016, 10:52 AM
-
#61
- NickelArse
- beast mode
-
- NickelArse
- beast mode
- Join Date: May 2009
- Location: Adelaide, Australia
- Posts: 3,640
- Rep Power: 30610
-
-
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
comparing cancer to climate change lmfaoscientists are making billions and billions for saying climate change is real?
get out of here, you could say this about anything.
brb they say cancer is complicated to get more funding
brb anything that needs funding is just to get more funding
These people are looking at the data which says we are fuking over the planet, and the only people denying it have vested interests like Oil companies and their lobbyists
get out of here, you could say this about anything.
brb they say cancer is complicated to get more funding
brb anything that needs funding is just to get more funding
These people are looking at the data which says we are fuking over the planet, and the only people denying it have vested interests like Oil companies and their lobbyists
insta www.instagram.com/strongbanter
lifting log https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=164163411
12-21-2016, 10:54 AM
-
#62
- UberAlles
- Registered User
-
- UberAlles
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2009
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 4,164
- Rep Power: 14621
-
-
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
so show me the evidence. show me the peer reviewed journals broSo 2 climate skeptics were tied to oil, ergo climate change = real.
Just lol @ you.
Just lol @ you.
it's fine to reject scientific consensusif you can provide your own peer reviewed researchwhich of course you can't, because lib-lib-liberalsss!!!


12-21-2016, 10:55 AM
-
#63
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
[QUOTE=UberAlles post_id=1475944831]so show me the evidence. show me the peer reviewed journals bro
it's fine to reject scientific consensus[b]if you can provide your own peer reviewed research[/b]which of course you can't, because lib-lib-liberalsss!!!
[img]https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screenshot1919.jpg/img]
[img]http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/11/4/048002/downloadHRFigure/figure/erlaa1c48f1/img][/QUOTE]Now align those 97% with their political affiliation...
Here's the funny thing: You're a fukcing sheep. You aren't a climate scientist. You don't understand ANY of the data. You're just parroting what you've read because it fits your particular agenda of the week. You probably think men & women are identical too and biology has no basis in gender.
lol. Just lol.
it's fine to reject scientific consensus[b]if you can provide your own peer reviewed research[/b]which of course you can't, because lib-lib-liberalsss!!!
[img]https://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2010/08/screenshot1919.jpg/img]
[img]http://iopscience.iop.org/1748-9326/11/4/048002/downloadHRFigure/figure/erlaa1c48f1/img][/QUOTE]Now align those 97% with their political affiliation...
Here's the funny thing: You're a fukcing sheep. You aren't a climate scientist. You don't understand ANY of the data. You're just parroting what you've read because it fits your particular agenda of the week. You probably think men & women are identical too and biology has no basis in gender.
lol. Just lol.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
12-21-2016, 10:56 AM
-
#64
- RobParks2M
- mad hatter
-
- RobParks2M
- mad hatter
- Join Date: Nov 2016
- Posts: 17,300
- Rep Power: 92038
-
-
Originally Posted By ironicinori⏩
Can you explain to me how the elemental make up of rocks can tell me what the temperature was on March 13th in the year 100? LMAOThey definitely can tell what the temps were in past ages by the ice layers,chemical composition of rocks, etc.
But that makes it even more stupid to think that the 100 years of human industry is causing climate change, when the same chit was happening naturally 10,000 years ago.
But that makes it even more stupid to think that the 100 years of human industry is causing climate change, when the same chit was happening naturally 10,000 years ago.
The thing about "climate change" is the amount of hypocrisy that goes into it from those who push it. If you want to believe that it is all done by man then feel free to be 1 less existing man contributing to it. Either off yourself or get rid of any fossil fuel use(cars, heat, or plastic). Stop living in a home made of wood or using any other wood products(because cutting down trees is bad for the environment). Only sources of fuel can be manpower, solar power, or wind power(using animals is cruel). Only sources of food you are allowed to eat are plants(highly controversial though, because studies have shown plants too have feelings).
Also, like others have said, there is an incredible amount of bias in "Academia" these days. If there isn't money to study something then it doesn't get studied so if you funnel a bunch of money into proving something there is always a way to show statistically that it exists or doesn't exist. Not saying that is the case for climate stuff. Just saying that is how it goes.
I have no problem with limiting pollution, recycling, or saving the rainforests, but don't tell to do it in the name of climate change.
Fitness connoisseur
0.4 mg of party's over wake the FK up!
"the personification of greatness"
12-21-2016, 10:57 AM
-
#65
- Fist-Of-Freedom
- misc realist
-
- Fist-Of-Freedom
- misc realist
- Join Date: Feb 2009
- Location: United States
- Age: 83
- Posts: 18,977
- Rep Power: 16346
-
-
Your mind is now open.
☰☰☰☰☰☰☰☰LOOK UP☰☰☰☰☰☰☰☰☰☰☰☰☰✈
12-21-2016, 11:02 AM
-
#66
12-21-2016, 11:05 AM
-
#67
- UberAlles
- Registered User
-
- UberAlles
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2009
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 4,164
- Rep Power: 14621
-
-
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
it's a very simple process, carbon dioxide and methane trap infrared light in the atmosphere. co2 and methane are both byproducts of industrial processes, and things like automotive emissions etc.Now align those 97% with their political affiliation...
Here's the funny thing: You're a fukcing sheep. You aren't a climate scientist. You don't understand ANY of the data. You're just parroting what you've read because it fits your particular agenda of the week. You probably think men & women are identical too and biology has no basis in gender.
lol. Just lol.
Here's the funny thing: You're a fukcing sheep. You aren't a climate scientist. You don't understand ANY of the data. You're just parroting what you've read because it fits your particular agenda of the week. You probably think men & women are identical too and biology has no basis in gender.
lol. Just lol.
see you can't provide any evidence to refute the claims such as asingle peer reviewed journal, so you're reduced to throwing out non sequitrs in a vain attempt to attack me
truly pathetic, but i can expect no less from some random fat neckbeard who thinks scientific consensus is a matter of "politics" lmfao
12-21-2016, 11:08 AM
-
#68
- 97Camry4Lyfe
- Registered Sik Kunt
-
- 97Camry4Lyfe
- Registered Sik Kunt
- Join Date: Jul 2015
- Posts: 2,452
- Rep Power: 2271
-
-
Originally Posted By All-Star11⏩
i didn't think the misc could be this dumb. ALL IT TAKES IS ONE ****ING GOOGLE SEARCH TO SEE THIS IS REAL BUT YOURE TO FUKING STUPID TO UNDERSTAND THIS CHIT IS REAL BECAUSE YOU LIVE IN A ****ING BUBBLE. HERE IS YOUR EVIDENCE AGAINST CLIMATE CHANGEfirst it was global warming...
oops it's actually colder this year than last
now it's climate change...
broad way of saying things arent the same. "look at this graph I made. 10,000 years ago the average temperature was this and now its this. you wot mate??" we had brah's 10,000 years ago taking accurate temperatures?
yah ok brah...
Here. take my carbon tax. tax that by another 13% and go fix climate change. fukking Trudeau and his liberal douche army
oops it's actually colder this year than last
now it's climate change...
broad way of saying things arent the same. "look at this graph I made. 10,000 years ago the average temperature was this and now its this. you wot mate??" we had brah's 10,000 years ago taking accurate temperatures?
yah ok brah...
Here. take my carbon tax. tax that by another 13% and go fix climate change. fukking Trudeau and his liberal douche army

And read this to understand how scientists measure climate change but your tiny brain probably couldn't understand it anyways so i doubt you'd even try. And before you give me a come-back, please provide evidence rather than "herp derp but it was cold yesterday so how can there be global warming, herp derp"
http://www.powerhousemuseum.com/ecol...limate-change/
12-21-2016, 11:10 AM
-
#69
- MuckSnapper
- Bearded Princess
-
- MuckSnapper
- Bearded Princess
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Posts: 17,959
- Rep Power: 46739
-
-
Like OP, I try to keep an open mind to any information (whilst leaning on the 97% consensus side)
but I will say there were some interesting points brought up and well articulated by posters like nzgs and a few others.
but I will say there were some interesting points brought up and well articulated by posters like nzgs and a few others.
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
With this logic why do youopposethe possibility so much though? Meaning you don't understand the data either - so if the 97% of scientists who DO understand it, why not go with pascals wager on this?Now align those 97% with their political affiliation...
Here's the funny thing: You're a fukcing sheep. You aren't a climate scientist. You don't understand ANY of the data. You're just parroting what you've read because it fits your particular agenda of the week. You probably think men & women are identical too and biology has no basis in gender.
lol. Just lol.
Here's the funny thing: You're a fukcing sheep. You aren't a climate scientist. You don't understand ANY of the data. You're just parroting what you've read because it fits your particular agenda of the week. You probably think men & women are identical too and biology has no basis in gender.
lol. Just lol.
There is no thing without nothing.
_____________________________________
MCC TAutist dicord: https://discord.gg/nX2fBRu
12-21-2016, 11:10 AM
-
#70
Originally Posted By Ratfish⏩
This... China and India don't give a ****.for one thing, it's absolutely unstoppable. just lol @ thinking we're gonna convince china to go green.
i don't give a fukk about co2 but cutting down on all of the other toxic chit that comes from energy inefficiency is awesome.
i don't give a fukk about co2 but cutting down on all of the other toxic chit that comes from energy inefficiency is awesome.
12-21-2016, 11:11 AM
-
#71
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
Originally Posted By UberAlles⏩
I understand what they're claiming causes climate change. What isn't in evidence, is that it actually does.it's a very simple process, carbon dioxide and methane trap infrared light in the atmosphere. co2 and methane are both byproducts of industrial processes, and things like automotive emissions etc.
see you can't provide any evidence to refute the claims such as asingle peer reviewed journal, so you're reduced to throwing out non sequitrs in a vain attempt to attack me
truly pathetic, but i can expect no less from some random fat neckbeard who thinks scientific consensus is a matter of "politics" lmfao
see you can't provide any evidence to refute the claims such as asingle peer reviewed journal, so you're reduced to throwing out non sequitrs in a vain attempt to attack me
truly pathetic, but i can expect no less from some random fat neckbeard who thinks scientific consensus is a matter of "politics" lmfao
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
12-21-2016, 11:13 AM
-
#72
12-21-2016, 11:14 AM
-
#73
- triglyceride
- ⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝ ⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠
-
- triglyceride
- ⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠⎝ ⎠⎝⎠⎝⎠
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: United States Virgin Islands
- Posts: 20,523
- Rep Power: 55095
-
-
cuz is cold outside yo
12-21-2016, 11:14 AM
-
#74
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
[QUOTE=Nicro327 post_id=1475947331]I wonder what the climate is like in Kentucky
[img]https://media.giphy.com/media/EVRrpBIFQSZWg/giphy.gif/img][/QUOTE]Fukc off.
[img]https://media.giphy.com/media/EVRrpBIFQSZWg/giphy.gif/img][/QUOTE]Fukc off.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
12-21-2016, 11:16 AM
-
#75
12-21-2016, 11:17 AM
-
#76
- SwayWay
- Registered User
-
- SwayWay
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Age: 42
- Posts: 6,877
- Rep Power: 11083
-
-
For anyone who drinks the right wing climate change denier kool-aid. Do something for me, book a trip to Beijing and stay there for one week.... then come back and tell man made pollution HAS no effect on the environment. When you're coughing up your lungs you'll be thanking gawd for the EPA and regulations to keep the air and environment clean. 100% guarantee it.
12-21-2016, 11:18 AM
-
#77
- 11lemon11
- Registered User
-
- 11lemon11
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Posts: 2,122
- Rep Power: 3280
-
-
Originally Posted By UberAlles⏩
The people who question man made climate change don't question the science of the greenhouse effect. They question the role it plays on the earth's climate.it's a very simple process, carbon dioxide and methane trap infrared light in the atmosphere. co2 and methane are both byproducts of industrial processes, and things like automotive emissions etc.
see you can't provide any evidence to refute the claims such as asingle peer reviewed journal, so you're reduced to throwing out non sequitrs in a vain attempt to attack me
truly pathetic, but i can expect no less from some random fat neckbeard who thinks scientific consensus is a matter of "politics" lmfao
see you can't provide any evidence to refute the claims such as asingle peer reviewed journal, so you're reduced to throwing out non sequitrs in a vain attempt to attack me
truly pathetic, but i can expect no less from some random fat neckbeard who thinks scientific consensus is a matter of "politics" lmfao
12-21-2016, 11:18 AM
-
#78
- faxanadu
- Registered User
-
- faxanadu
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2009
- Location: Texas, United States
- Posts: 13,123
- Rep Power: 54413
-
-
Loaded topic. Everyone believes in climate change. It's whether man has a major influence is the question.
Human CO2 emissions are a tiny percentage of what the earth does naturally in the Oceans, Volcanos, etc.
Throw in the effects of the sun and we amount to nothing.
If i remember correctly the earth was drastically hotter during the Triassic and early periods.
Human CO2 emissions are a tiny percentage of what the earth does naturally in the Oceans, Volcanos, etc.
Throw in the effects of the sun and we amount to nothing.
If i remember correctly the earth was drastically hotter during the Triassic and early periods.
"There's a fine line between salvation and drinking poison in the jungle." -Gym Jones
"The soul becomes dyed with the color of its thoughts." - Marcus Aurelius
?start=(#seconds)
TAMU Corps
Skydiving
Great Divide Mountain Bike Route (Jasper AB to Juarez MX) 2014
Appalachian Trail 2013
12-21-2016, 11:19 AM
-
#79
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
Originally Posted By SwayWay⏩
A localized effect like smog =/= world-wide temperature altering climate change.For anyone who drinks the right wing climate change denier kool-aid. Do something for me, book a trip to Beijing and stay there for one week.... then come back and tell man made pollution HAS no effect on the environment. When you're coughing up your lungs you'll be thanking gawd for the EPA and regulations to keep the air and environment clean. 100% guarantee it.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
12-21-2016, 11:19 AM
-
#80
- jamesbwbevis
- Banned
-
- jamesbwbevis
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 18,281
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By NickelArse⏩
I didnt compare cancer and climate change, I was comparing the need for funding across various problems facing the world. You could say "they only believe that to get more funding" about anything that is getting more funding.comparing cancer to climate change lmfao
12-21-2016, 11:19 AM
-
#81
12-21-2016, 11:20 AM
-
#82
- jamesbwbevis
- Banned
-
- jamesbwbevis
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 18,281
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By faxanadu⏩
I like how you sighted your sources.Loaded topic. Everyone believes in climate change. It's whether man has a major influence is the question.
Human CO2 emissions are a tiny percentage of what the earth does natural in the Oceans, Volcanos, etc.
Throw in the effects of the sun and we amount to nothing.
If i remember correctly the earth was drastically hotter during the Triassic and early periods.
Human CO2 emissions are a tiny percentage of what the earth does natural in the Oceans, Volcanos, etc.
Throw in the effects of the sun and we amount to nothing.
If i remember correctly the earth was drastically hotter during the Triassic and early periods.
who are they? Let me guess, alex jones, joe rogan, and a few oil companies
12-21-2016, 11:21 AM
-
#83
- RobParks2M
- mad hatter
-
- RobParks2M
- mad hatter
- Join Date: Nov 2016
- Posts: 17,300
- Rep Power: 92038
-
-
Originally Posted By AcetylCoA⏩
Lmao as if anyone would actually be insulted by you Mr. FA aspiring tradie. You've been on a bodybuilding website for 2 years and haven't even worked out for 3 months yet.Hurr durr I'm a miscer and I believe in titties and guns but not climate change derp
Fitness connoisseur
0.4 mg of party's over wake the FK up!
"the personification of greatness"
12-21-2016, 11:21 AM
-
#84
- UberAlles
- Registered User
-
- UberAlles
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2009
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 4,164
- Rep Power: 14621
-
-
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
okay, well how about you test it yourself?I understand what they're claiming causes climate change. What isn't in evidence, is that it actually does.
jesus christ, politicizing scientific fact is retarded
12-21-2016, 11:21 AM
-
#85
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
-
- InstantLoser
- #1 Pimp Korea
- Join Date: Jan 2013
- Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
- Posts: 34,072
- Rep Power: 206818
-
-
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
Cited. C'mon James boyo.I like how you sighted your sources.
who are they? Let me guess, alex jones, joe rogan, and a few oil companies
who are they? Let me guess, alex jones, joe rogan, and a few oil companies
Originally Posted By UberAlles⏩
You should probably Google the word "fact". If man-made climate change were a "fact" we wouldn't be having this discussion.okay, well how about you test it yourself?
jesus christ, politicizing scientific fact is retarded
jesus christ, politicizing scientific fact is retarded
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."
-Hercules
Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
12-21-2016, 11:23 AM
-
#86
- Kalmah6661
- Banned
-
- Kalmah6661
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Age: 38
- Posts: 8,245
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
So many retards in this thread who think they know more than 97% of climate scientists. Jesus Christ.
You guys need to learn more science. This is embarrassing to read.
You guys need to learn more science. This is embarrassing to read.
12-21-2016, 11:23 AM
-
#87
- Roccabjj
- Registered User
-
- Roccabjj
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2011
- Age: 31
- Posts: 25
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By neuron⏩
Climate doesn't change daily, temperature does.Climate changes daily. Just not anthropogenically. Its a myth propagated by the left in order to obtain more control.
Climate change is real. Yes climate changes in a cyclical fashion over geological time. The issue lies in the fact that it hasn't changed this fast in history and the cause is anthropomorphic.
12-21-2016, 11:24 AM
-
#88
- skier!
- Rhodium Membership
-
- skier!
- Rhodium Membership
- Join Date: Apr 2007
- Location: United States
- Posts: 4,699
- Rep Power: 55381
-
-
Any "scientist" that knows anything about statistical design of experiments understands there is no way that IF the planet is warming, it can be determined that it is from carbon vs other factors such as solar activity.
Also, old temperature data was taken using inferior measurement devices compared to current methods.
Way too much noise to be making billion to trillion dollar decisions.
If all of the oil and natural gas in the US was produced in NY and CA rather than the Balkans, OK, and TX, "climate change" would not exist.
Also, old temperature data was taken using inferior measurement devices compared to current methods.
Way too much noise to be making billion to trillion dollar decisions.
If all of the oil and natural gas in the US was produced in NY and CA rather than the Balkans, OK, and TX, "climate change" would not exist.
12-21-2016, 11:24 AM
-
#89
- UberAlles
- Registered User
-
- UberAlles
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2009
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 4,164
- Rep Power: 14621
-
-
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
evolution is a fact, people still dispute it. it doesn't change that some people, yourself included are just straight retardedCited. C'mon James boyo.
You should probably Google the word "fact". If man-made climate change were a "fact" we wouldn't be having this discussion.
You should probably Google the word "fact". If man-made climate change were a "fact" we wouldn't be having this discussion.
12-21-2016, 11:25 AM
-
#90
- Kalmah6661
- Banned
-
- Kalmah6661
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Age: 38
- Posts: 8,245
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
That's an incorrect assumption. People still discuss evolution, and that's 100% fact. Only ignorant retards with no understanding of scientific consensus think man-made climate change isn't real. The republicans have done a good job of herding the sheep into the pen on this one.Cited. C'mon James boyo.
You should probably Google the word "fact".If man-made climate change were a "fact" we wouldn't be having this discussion.
You should probably Google the word "fact".If man-made climate change were a "fact" we wouldn't be having this discussion.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
