Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum ยป If you don't believe in climate change, please step into this thread and explain why.
  1. Results 181 to 210 of 359
  2. Page 7 of 12
  3. First
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  11. Last

Thread: If you don't believe in climate change, please step into this thread and explain why.

post 1475961841 12-21-2016, 01:06 PM
-
#181
  1. Kalmah6661
  2. Banned
  1. Kalmah6661
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 8,245
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
Well thats why we need to compare the science and determine who's right.

Where is the evidence you believe in?

Hint, if its from oil company lobbyists it's probably not the most trustworthy.


What again does the left gain from getting people to take steps to combat climate change?
The left has nothing to gain by making the earth more inhabitable for future generations. It's a nonsensical argument by derp conservatives.

There's more money in clean energy ideas than oil.
post 1475962021 12-21-2016, 01:07 PM
-
#182
  1. Kalmah6661
  2. Banned
  1. Kalmah6661
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 8,245
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By KingSWRV⏩
Ok now pull up research on the statistics that show how many people who are "scientists" are also liberals.

How many of them DONT have a hidden agenda?

How can you research that?
Lol the anti-intellectual conservatives have shown up in droves.

Anyone who is smart and knowledgeable is their enemy and automatically a liberal.
post 1475962041 12-21-2016, 01:07 PM
-
#183
  1. MuckSnapper
  2. Bearded Princess
  1. MuckSnapper
  2. Bearded Princess
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Posts: 17,959
  5. Rep Power: 46739
Originally Posted By Kalmah6661⏩
The left has nothing to gain by making the earth more inhabitable for future generations. It's a nonsensical argument by derp conservatives.

There's more money in clean energy ideas than oil.
They scream conspiracy yet do climate (acknowledgers?) keep using the oil companies conspiracy as an argument? No.

Because skepticism does not build good arguments.
There is no thing without nothing.

_____________________________________


MCC TAutist dicord: https://discord.gg/nX2fBRu
post 1475962341 12-21-2016, 01:10 PM
-
#184
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
Look at this hilarious ****:

-If it's from oil lobbyists it's not reliable
-If it's from carbon-credit pushing *******'s, it's 100% fact and we dare not question it
Ok, lets use our brains for a second. The carbon credit only exists as an idea because left to our own devices WE WILL NOT CHANGE OUR WAYS. Thats it. If there wasnt a collective action problem, there would be no carbon tax. What we need to do is turn green and stop burning carbon, but we wont unless it hurts us in some way. So, carbon tax. Has nothing to do with the legitimacy of man made climate change

Oil companies on the other hand will die and lose riches if we move away from carbon as a society.

herp derp
post 1475962681 12-21-2016, 01:12 PM
-
#185
  1. MuckSnapper
  2. Bearded Princess
  1. MuckSnapper
  2. Bearded Princess
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Posts: 17,959
  5. Rep Power: 46739
Originally Posted By Adnim⏩
Higher taxes and bigger government. Same reason obamacare exists. They're also big on identity politics (aka throwing out ad hominem attacks as the basis of their arguments). So it's another way for them to take the 'moral high ground'.





kindly fuk off. You have no argument except: "ur dum-dum cuz u dis-uh-gree wif me"
you wot m8? He's put forth solid arguments

I'd still like you to quote where you elaborate on how the consensus is calculated (not being facetious, actually curious)
There is no thing without nothing.

_____________________________________


MCC TAutist dicord: https://discord.gg/nX2fBRu
post 1475962861 12-21-2016, 01:13 PM
-
#186
  1. MrDeafMuscle
  2. Token Deaf Guy
  1. MrDeafMuscle
  2. Token Deaf Guy
  3. Join Date: May 2011
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 7,232
  6. Rep Power: 12459
I liked how people skipped over my statement which holds more value than anything in this thread.


It is real and all you have to do is be a south born and raised 30 years old and remember how it used to be when you were 10.
post 1475963031 12-21-2016, 01:14 PM
-
#187
  1. MuckSnapper
  2. Bearded Princess
  1. MuckSnapper
  2. Bearded Princess
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Posts: 17,959
  5. Rep Power: 46739
Originally Posted By MrDeafMuscle⏩
I liked how people skipped over my statement which holds more value than anything in this thread.


It is real and all you have to do is be a south born and raised 30 years old and remember how it used to be when you were 10.
That seems kind of anecdotal though, that's the problem.
There is no thing without nothing.

_____________________________________


MCC TAutist dicord: https://discord.gg/nX2fBRu
post 1475963061 12-21-2016, 01:14 PM
-
#188
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  5. Posts: 34,072
  6. Rep Power: 206818
Originally Posted By Adnim⏩
Higher taxes and bigger government. Same reason obamacare exists. They're also big on identity politics (aka throwing out ad hominem attacks as the basis of their arguments). So it's another way for them to take the 'moral high ground'.
Like I pointed out. Anyone in this thread who even questions their God of climate change is immediately branded an idiot. Kalamah does nothing but claim all conservatives are intellectually devoid of merit. Odd, considering plenty of engineering/STEM brahs here on the Misc are conservatives. I guess STEMmies are morons.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."

-Hercules

Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
post 1475963581 12-21-2016, 01:17 PM
-
#189
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Adnim⏩
Higher taxes and bigger government. Same reason obamacare exists. They're also big on identity politics (aka throwing out ad hominem attacks as the basis of their arguments). So it's another way for them to take the 'moral high ground'.
how does going green automatically result in higher taxes and a bigger government?

the only reason it is happening is because people arent changing
post 1475963691 12-21-2016, 01:18 PM
-
#190
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
Like I pointed out. Anyone in this thread who even questions their God of climate change is immediately branded an idiot. Kalamah does nothing but claim all conservatives are intellectually devoid of merit. Odd, considering plenty of engineering/STEM brahs here on the Misc are conservatives. I guess STEMmies are morons.
when you ignore mountains of scientific evidence without providing disputing evidence of your own, you're an idiot I'm sorry.
post 1475963781 12-21-2016, 01:19 PM
-
#191
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By MrDeafMuscle⏩
I liked how people skipped over my statement which holds more value than anything in this thread.


It is real and all you have to do is be a south born and raised 30 years old and remember how it used to be when you were 10.
because we have already accepted that it's real, the only debate is the cause
post 1475963961 12-21-2016, 01:20 PM
-
#192
  1. MuckSnapper
  2. Bearded Princess
  1. MuckSnapper
  2. Bearded Princess
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Posts: 17,959
  5. Rep Power: 46739
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
when you ignore mountains of scientific evidence without providing disputing evidence of your own, you're an idiot I'm sorry.
Idiot or severely stubborn.


I'm just not buying into the whole "conspiracy" as an argument. It doesn't conclude that itisn'ta conspiracy - but there needs to be wayyy more compelling evidence if they're gonna go that route.


Just sounds like some chit Rush Limtards would say
There is no thing without nothing.

_____________________________________


MCC TAutist dicord: https://discord.gg/nX2fBRu
post 1475964101 12-21-2016, 01:22 PM
-
#193
  1. KILLdante
  2. but please, call me chr-
  1. KILLdante
  2. but please, call me chr-
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Posts: 16,612
  5. Rep Power: 27502
I used to believe climate change was a serious issue that needed immediate attention...

...then I grew up.
"What country can preserve its liberties if their rulers are not warned from time to time that their people preserve the spirit of resistance. Let them take arms." - Thomas Jefferson
post 1475964261 12-21-2016, 01:23 PM
-
#194
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  5. Posts: 34,072
  6. Rep Power: 206818
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
when you ignore mountains of scientific evidence without providing disputing evidence of your own, you're an idiot I'm sorry.
Cool story brah. We both know I'm not an idiot, I just don't trust anything from a certain political persuasion. I may be a lot of things, but an idiot isn't one of them. Healthy (even unhealthy) skepticism is a sign of intelligence, not stupidity. Blindly following what you're told? That's another story. You say there's "evidence" but since you're not qualified to discern whether or not that evidence is legitimate, and you're just blindly believing it "on faith" (as other climate change supporters in this thread have admitted to doing) because "surely those scientists can't have an agenda and would never lie", well... You get the idea. You're the one going on faith. You're the one believing without being able to verify your evidence.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."

-Hercules

Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
post 1475964471 12-21-2016, 01:24 PM
-
#195
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By MuckSnapper⏩
Idiot or severely stubborn.


I'm just not buying into the whole "conspiracy" as an argument. It doesn't conclude that itisn'ta conspiracy - but there needs to be wayyy more compelling evidence if they're gonna go that route.


Just sounds like some chit Rush Limtards would say
There claim is that because we need regulations and taxes to promote change, it's a conspiracy.



Ignoring the basic reasoning that follows from the assumption that man made climate change is real(true) and nobody will do anything about it UNLESS there were regulations and taxes(true).

By the way, I'm a far right conservative. I dont care about climate change because I will be dead before the impact occurs. But to deny this is legit, with all of the science behind it, is moronic
post 1475964671 12-21-2016, 01:26 PM
-
#196
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
when you ignore mountains of scientific evidence without providing disputing evidence of your own, you're an idiot I'm sorry.
There is no evidence that we are hurting the planet lolll

Why is the O-zone layer healing *******https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=...-oYn9wVwnvQtLA

Show evidence at which point climate has changed "TOO MUCH"

WHERE IS THE THRESHOLD FROM WHEN WE GO FROM

OK THE EARTH CAN HANDLE THIS

TO

OK WE WENT TOO FAR CUT DOWN EMISSIONS!!


who the fuk has provided such assessments!!??????????

There is no such data or info!!!!!!!! ITS ALL ABSTRACT COMPLAINING.

You guys are all a bunch of liberal retards.

What iS YOU HIDDEN MOTIVE YOU ABSOLUTELY MENTALLY DAMAGD CUCKS.

There is no evidence for any of this chit you dumb fuks.

Just idiotic neo-hippy emotional reactions because you have low self esteem and you hate people of the earth.
post 1475965131 12-21-2016, 01:28 PM
-
#197
  1. infinit
  2. Registered User
  1. infinit
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2014
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 4,466
  7. Rep Power: 11079
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
Cool story brah. We both know I'm not an idiot, I just don't trust anything from a certain political persuasion. I may be a lot of things, but an idiot isn't one of them. Healthy (even unhealthy) skepticism is a sign of intelligence, not stupidity. Blindly following what you're told? That's another story. You say there's "evidence" but since you're not qualified to discern whether or not that evidence is legitimate, and you're just blindly believing it "on faith" (as other climate change supporters in this thread have admitted to doing) because "surely those scientists can't have an agenda and would never lie", well... You get the idea. You're the one going on faith. You're the one believing without being able to verify your evidence.
Except you have made yourself sound like an idiot. If all these scientists are liberals who are just putting out **** to further their agenda then prove it. Show us what sloppy mistakes they have made in their papers to make the evidence fit what they want it to say, explain to us what is actually happening instead with the evidence to show it. But you can't.
post 1475965191 12-21-2016, 01:29 PM
-
#198
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
Cool story brah. We both know I'm not an idiot, I just don't trust anything from a certain political persuasion. I may be a lot of things, but an idiot isn't one of them. Healthy (even unhealthy) skepticism is a sign of intelligence, not stupidity. Blindly following what you're told? That's another story. You say there's "evidence" but since you're not qualified to discern whether or not that evidence is legitimate, and you're just blindly believing it "on faith" (as other climate change supporters in this thread have admitted to doing) because "surely those scientists can't have an agenda and would never lie", well... You get the idea. You're the one going on faith. You're the one believing without being able to verify your evidence.
I have looked at the science and it makes sense to me as far as I can understand it.

These scientists have nothing to gain whatsoever. they and the liberals are just trying to prevent the planet from being destroyed because they give a s*it, while the conservatives just want to put profit over everything and let the world burn. thats what it comes down to, and you're an idiot if you cant see that
post 1475965491 12-21-2016, 01:31 PM
-
#199
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  5. Posts: 34,072
  6. Rep Power: 206818
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
I have looked at the science and it makes sense to me as far as I can understand it.

These scientists have nothing to gain whatsoever. they and the liberals are just trying to prevent the planet from being destroyed because they give a s*it, while the conservatives just want to put profit over everything and let the world burn. thats what it comes down to, and you're an idiot if you cant see that
I don't agree with your interpretation of data you admittedly have little to no understanding of, ergo I'm the idiot.

Originally Posted By infinit⏩
Except you have made yourself sound like an idiot. If all these scientists are liberals who are just putting out **** to further their agenda then prove it. Show us what sloppy mistakes they have made in their papers to make the evidence fit what they want it to say, explain to us what is actually happening instead with the evidence to show it. But you can't.
You can't prove anything either. All you have is data from questionable sources that you can't even interpret because you're not a fukcing environmental scientist.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."

-Hercules

Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
post 1475965961 12-21-2016, 01:34 PM
-
#200
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
I don't agree with your interpretation of data you admittedly have little to no understanding of, ergo I'm the idiot.





You can't prove anything either. All you have is data from questionable sources that you can't even interpret because you're not a fukcing environmental scientist.
What evidence would you need to see to believe it?
post 1475966051 12-21-2016, 01:35 PM
-
#201
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By infinit⏩
Except you have made yourself sound like an idiot. If all these scientists are liberals who are just putting out **** to further their agenda then prove it. Show us what sloppy mistakes they have made in their papers to make the evidence fit what they want it to say, explain to us what is actually happening instead with the evidence to show it. But you can't.
What evidence????

NOBODY IS SAYING THERE ISNT A TINY TINY EFFECT.

All the evidence says that.

That is not evidence for a problem or epidemic.

Its literally just a basic simple fact.

If you pee in the ocean the statement "humans are affecting the oceans" is true.

You can poll 1000 scientists to say, "is there pee in the ocean?"

yes there is!

SCIENTIFIC CONCENSUS!!!

Spoiler!
ok... but how much? and how does it affect us, if at all?
post 1475966141 12-21-2016, 01:36 PM
-
#202
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
What evidence would you need to see to believe it?
To believe what???!!!!
post 1475966331 12-21-2016, 01:37 PM
-
#203
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  5. Posts: 34,072
  6. Rep Power: 206818
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
What evidence would you need to see to believe it?
Hard to say. Again, if the whole carbon credit/push to tax people for using fossil fuels was 100% dropped, it'd help.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."

-Hercules

Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
post 1475966621 12-21-2016, 01:39 PM
-
#204
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By KingSWRV⏩
To believe what???!!!!
to believe that man made climate change is causing the destruction of the planet,

by the way, the evidence is that CO2 levels only started rising dramatically when humans started burning fossil fuels like crazy. unless there is a better explanation, thats the cause.
post 1475966871 12-21-2016, 01:41 PM
-
#205
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
Hard to say. Again, if the whole carbon credit/push to tax people for using fossil fuels was 100% dropped, it'd help.
have you ever heard of a collective action problem? Its when nobody has an incentive to do the right thing.

thats all the carbon tax is, it is simply to force countries, businesses, and people to do the right thing. Without a carbon tax, why would anyone go green for the sake of a future generation they dont care about?

they wouldnt. it is not a conspiracy man
post 1475966891 12-21-2016, 01:41 PM
-
#206
  1. infinit
  2. Registered User
  1. infinit
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2014
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 4,466
  7. Rep Power: 11079
Originally Posted By KingSWRV⏩
What evidence????

NOBODY IS SAYING THERE ISNT A TINY TINY EFFECT.

All the evidence says that.

That is not evidence for a problem or epidemic.

Its literally just a basic simple fact.

If you pee in the ocean the statement "humans are affecting the oceans" is true.

You can poll 1000 scientists to say, "is there pee in the ocean?"

yes there is!

SCIENTIFIC CONCENSUS!!!

Spoiler!
ok... but how much? and how does it affect us, if at all?
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/
http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/sotc/snow_extent.html
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11676/su...ast-2000-years
post 1475966971 12-21-2016, 01:42 PM
-
#207
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  5. Posts: 34,072
  6. Rep Power: 206818
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
to believe that man made climate change is causing the destruction of the planet
Well that's a huge leap of faith there buckaroo. Even if we can all come to the consensus that A) Man-made climate change exists, and B) There are negative effects as a result, it's a huge stretch to leap to C) These negative effects will result in the destruction of the planet.
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
have you ever heard of a collective action problem? Its when nobody has an incentive to do the right thing.

thats all the carbon tax is, it is simply to force countries, businesses, and people to do the right thing. Without a carbon tax, why would anyone go green for the sake of a future generation they dont care about?

they wouldnt. it is not a conspiracy man
Again, you're stating your definition of doing the "right thing" when you admittedly don't even understand the data you've looked at. If you don't have a certainty of what the cause of the problem is (assuming a problem even exists, which you can't be sure of), you also can't be sure of the correct course of action to solve that problem.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."

-Hercules

Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
post 1475967261 12-21-2016, 01:43 PM
-
#208
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
to believe that man made climate change is causing the destruction of the planet,

by the way, the evidence is that CO2 levels only started rising dramatically when humans started burning fossil fuels like crazy. unless there is a better explanation, thats the cause.
What do you mean destruction???

Like how?

And what time frames?

What is the estimated damage over time? And to what degree?

What exactly is supposed to happen? and why?

When?

And how much can we do, while still functioning as a healthy economy?

How will future exponential over-population human race deal with this?

How do you calculate such things?

Or have you not actually figured any of this out, just complaining about abstract emotionally loaded concepts?
post 1475967881 12-21-2016, 01:48 PM
-
#209
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By infinit⏩
https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/wg2/
http://nsidc.org/cryosphere/sotc/snow_extent.html
https://www.nap.edu/catalog/11676/su...ast-2000-years
Not one thesis was seen that day.
post 1475967961 12-21-2016, 01:48 PM
-
#210
  1. GimpManlet
  2. glovebrah
  1. GimpManlet
  2. glovebrah
  3. Join Date: Feb 2014
  4. Posts: 2,359
  5. Rep Power: 11611
I'm climate agnostic.

The only agencies with access to the real data are NASA/NOAA/IPCC and they've been proven to be frauding with unmotivated changes to the sensor bias values. Temperature data is presented as hard fact, but the reality is that any effects we are discussing and setting policy for is created by these agencies. We are acting on theory, not on data. And the people who make the theory are getting paid proportionally to the size of the problem.
Old numbers, not as strong now :(
standing overhead press: 154 lbs
30deg incline bench press: 225 lbs
barbell reverse lunge: 269 lbs
weighted pullup: 261 lbs (total)
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts