Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » If you don't believe in climate change, please step into this thread and explain why.
  1. Results 301 to 330 of 359
  2. Page 11 of 12
  3. First
  5. 9
  6. 10
  7. 11
  8. 12
  10. Last

Thread: If you don't believe in climate change, please step into this thread and explain why.

post 1476079991 12-22-2016, 10:50 AM
-
#301
  1. Kalmah6661
  2. Banned
  1. Kalmah6661
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 8,245
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By KingSWRV⏩
Do you???

lollll
Learn how to read, retard:

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
post 1476080631 12-22-2016, 10:55 AM
-
#302
  1. GaloisTheory
  2. Registered User
  1. GaloisTheory
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2014
  4. Posts: 13,915
  5. Rep Power: 83343
Science is a liberal conspiracy when it conflicts with my political beliefs.
Physics crew
post 1476082481 12-22-2016, 11:11 AM
-
#303
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
Actually the onus is on the people bringing forth the data to prove it's true. Proving a negative is impossible, which is why you can never disprove God either: You can't prove a negative. You have no evidence they're telling the truth, and you have no way to validate that the "science is sound" because you don't even understand the science in the 1st place.
I asked you what evidence you would need to see to be convinced and you didnt say anything about the science. All you said was "taxes and liberals" fuk off
post 1476082641 12-22-2016, 11:12 AM
-
#304
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By GaloisTheory⏩
Science is a liberal conspiracy when it conflicts with my political beliefs.
lmao this
post 1476082831 12-22-2016, 11:14 AM
-
#305
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By KingSWRV⏩
1. 97% agrees with what exactly? What statement? That if I pee in the ocean I am affecting the ocean?

WHAT EXACTLY DO 97% AGREE ON???? WHAT IS THE EXACT THESIS?

Because
-97% agree we are destroying the earth
is different than
-97% agree we have some effect on the earth on some level weather consequential or not.


Do 97% of scientists agree that we have at least a .0000000000001 effect on SOMETHING. Well yeah, but thats meaningless.


2. As for the second bolded part this isn't a fuking movie plot. This is what people mean when they say you think with your emotions like a ho, not logic or sound reasoning.

You know how I know you have a generic brand of brain?
97% of scientist agree that man made climate change is significantly hurting the planet and we need to stop it


Movie plot? You're the one believing in a mass conspiracy spanning the entire planet, scientists, activists, researchers and governments.
post 1476085011 12-22-2016, 11:34 AM
-
#306
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
97% of scientist agree that man made climate change is significantly hurting the planet and we need to stop it
False
post 1476086161 12-22-2016, 11:44 AM
-
#307
  1. ectobruh
  1. ectobruh
  3. Join Date: Feb 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Weight: 180 lbs
  6. Posts: 19,988
  7. Rep Power: 98282
Post deleted by user
FLAT: 225x15 INCLINE DB 100x15 incline bench 225x8 deadlift: [RETIRED!! OUTTA HERE] FS: 225X14
post 1476087071 12-22-2016, 11:52 AM
-
#308
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Kalmah6661⏩
Learn how to read, retard:

http://climate.nasa.gov/scientific-consensus/
That shows they believe the climate is changing.

Doesn't say they believe the earth will end.

99% of scientists dont believe in Catastrophic Man-Made Global Warming
post 1476100121 12-22-2016, 02:01 PM
-
#309
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By KingSWRV⏩
That shows they believe the climate is changing.

Doesn't say they believe the earth will end.

99% of scientists don’t believe in Catastrophic Man-Made Global Warming
negged for statistics with nothing backing it up.

Cite your fuking sources or GTFO
post 1476101491 12-22-2016, 02:12 PM
-
#310
  1. PKneyr
  2. Registered User
  1. PKneyr
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Posts: 10,091
  5. Rep Power: 6786
Originally Posted By al****orilla⏩
you're seriously a fuking idiot.




























SERIOUSLY.
Explain yourself then since you have superior intellect.
All you retards saying 97% of scientists this and that, yet you don't post any proof that climate change is man made.
post 1476104571 12-22-2016, 02:38 PM
-
#311
  1. Kalmah6661
  2. Banned
  1. Kalmah6661
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 8,245
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By KingSWRV⏩
That shows they believe the climate is changing.

Doesn't say they believe the earth will end.

99% of scientists don’t believe in Catastrophic Man-Made Global Warming
There! You just said it. You accept man-made climate change.

The argument isn't about whether or not scientists think doomsday is approaching........

Although, it will happen sooner or later if we continue our current path.

Saying "man-made climate change" is different from "catastrophic man-made climate change" is just semantics, chief. You lost.
post 1476104761 12-22-2016, 02:40 PM
-
#312
  1. Kalmah6661
  2. Banned
  1. Kalmah6661
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 8,245
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By KingSWRV⏩
False
Lmao. How is it false? You just acknowledged it as fact after reading the figure from NASA.

How far is your head in the sand now? 6 feet?
post 1476112211 12-22-2016, 03:49 PM
-
#313
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
negged for statistics with nothing backing it up.

Cite your fuking sources or GTFO
Google 30,000 climate change declaration lmaoooo
post 1476112781 12-22-2016, 03:53 PM
-
#314
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  5. Posts: 34,072
  6. Rep Power: 206818
Originally Posted By Kalmah6661⏩
There! You just said it. You accept man-made climate change.
He didn't say that at all. He said that the scientists claim to believe it. For someone who likes to denigrate people based on intelligence, and claiming to have intellectual high road in this thread, you seem to lack a certain rudimentary level of reading comprehension. No wonder you have to take the word of climate-change proponents at face value. If you can't read basic English, I'm not surprised that the topic of anthropogenic climate change is beyond your scope.

That, or you're simply being a disingenuous prick.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."

-Hercules

Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
post 1476113321 12-22-2016, 03:57 PM
-
#315
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
negged for statistics with nothing backing it up.

Cite your fuking sources or GTFO


2:30-6:00 covers all the facts of that "research" so you can better understand the context.

Pay close attention to the 2 questions that were asked.

Two very simple a broad questions, having NOTHING to doCatastrophic Man-Made Global Warming

A lot of you noob pro-climate ppl don't even understand EXACTLY what you're arguing about.
post 1476113801 12-22-2016, 04:01 PM
-
#316
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Kalmah6661⏩
There! You just said it. You accept man-made climate change.

The argument isn't about whether or not scientists think doomsday is approaching........

Although, it will happen sooner or later if we continue our current path.

Saying "man-made climate change" is different from "catastrophic man-made climate change" is just semantics, chief. You lost.
lol...

Do you have any evidence of that?
post 1476116271 12-22-2016, 04:21 PM
-
#317
  1. infinit
  2. Registered User
  1. infinit
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2014
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 4,466
  7. Rep Power: 11079
again
Originally Posted By KingSWRV⏩
Hmm now show the same years on the South Pole.

Spoiler: the opposite is happening

Good luck with your pseudo-science in the future

We literally have peer reviewed papers from the past that say the ice caps would be melted by now lmaooooo

Strong grasp of reality
Yep and here you go.


And erm no, there were about 3-4 people who said it would be gone by 2016. The IPCC predicted it would be ice free by around 2050. And the way it is going, that seems pretty likely to be correct.
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
That would have been nice but still a flawed point even if I hadn't already posted a video showing it up until this year.
Originally Posted By al****orilla⏩
this sums this thread perfectly.

also

"Alex jones, Breitbar news, INFOWARS, ect says that climate change is bs"

while others are like

"scientific proof point 1, 2, 3"

typical response

Fuking liberals.
Lmao, I know right.


Teh **** are we still all banging on about 97% for. I already explained that regardless of if you exclude the 97% study for methodology errors there is still a swarm of studies giving similar findings:http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showth...post1475976151
post 1476116571 12-22-2016, 04:24 PM
-
#318
  1. CranberryPerry
  2. Registered User
  1. CranberryPerry
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 31
  6. Rep Power: 0
I think everyone believes in it. Most just don't care
post 1476138301 12-22-2016, 07:44 PM
-
#319
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By CranberryPerry⏩
I think everyone believes in it. Most just don't care
Believe what exactly?

Nobody even knows what they are really even arguing about specifically.
post 1476139201 12-22-2016, 07:53 PM
-
#320
  1. Prose Edda
  2. Kiwi
  1. Prose Edda
  2. Kiwi
  3. Join Date: Feb 2008
  4. Location: New Zealand
  5. Posts: 4,680
  6. Rep Power: 34170
Not a single scientist was seen in this 11 page thread. Enjoy your uneducated blog theories.
___________________

"In the darksome night of despair, my eye turneth expectant and full of hope to the morn of Thy boundless favor and at the hour of dawn my drooping soul is refreshed and strengthened in remembrance of Thy beauty and perfection." - `Abdu'l-Bahá
post 1476186461 12-23-2016, 08:09 AM
-
#321
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  1. jamesbwbevis
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 18,281
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By KingSWRV⏩
Believe what exactly?

Nobody even knows what they are really even arguing about specifically.
how many fukcing times does it have to be said


We are arguing whether or not human fossil fuel activity has a significant impact on the climate change that is destroying the planet
post 1476195161 12-23-2016, 09:30 AM
-
#322
  1. annasmith7
  2. Banned
  1. annasmith7
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2016
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 119
  6. Rep Power: 0
You fools who believe in a hoax make me laugh.
post 1476195471 12-23-2016, 09:32 AM
-
#323
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  1. KingSWRV
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Nov 2014
  4. Posts: 24,817
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By jamesbwbevis⏩
how many fukcing times does it have to be said


We are arguing whether or not human fossil fuel activity has a significant impact on the climate change that is destroying the planet
Define "significant impact"

Define "destroying the planet"

Specifically in detail pls.
post 1476196831 12-23-2016, 09:45 AM
-
#324
  1. BFast55
  2. Registered User
  1. BFast55
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Location: Houston, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 21,674
  6. Rep Power: 89831
Unusually cold winter = global warming
Unusually warm winter = global warming

Pick one. You can't have it both ways.
***Alabama Crimson Tide***

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Vince Lombardi
post 1476197131 12-23-2016, 09:48 AM
-
#325
  1. Kalmah6661
  2. Banned
  1. Kalmah6661
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 8,245
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By BFast55⏩
Unusually cold winter = global warming
Unusually warm winter = global warming

Pick one. You can't have it both ways.
Global warming (climate change) can cause extreme temperature variations on both ends of the spectrum.

"Global warming" is referred to climate change now because people couldn't grasp this concept. Some things are counter-intuitive, like evolution.
post 1476197401 12-23-2016, 09:52 AM
-
#326
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  5. Posts: 34,072
  6. Rep Power: 206818
Originally Posted By BFast55⏩
Unusually cold winter = global warming
Unusually warm winter = global warming

Pick one. You can't have it both ways.
Shh, you're being racist and oppressing minorities when you question fevered leftist dream-hoaxes.
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."

-Hercules

Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
post 1476198111 12-23-2016, 09:58 AM
-
#327
  1. BFast55
  2. Registered User
  1. BFast55
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Location: Houston, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 21,674
  6. Rep Power: 89831
https://www.nasa.gov/feature/goddard...er-than-losses
According to the new analysis of satellite data, the Antarctic ice sheet showed a net gain of 112 billion tons of ice a year from 1992 to 2001. That net gain slowed to 82 billion tons of ice per year between 2003 and 2008.
#hatefacts
***Alabama Crimson Tide***

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Vince Lombardi
post 1476198341 12-23-2016, 09:59 AM
-
#328
  1. BFast55
  2. Registered User
  1. BFast55
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Location: Houston, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 21,674
  6. Rep Power: 89831
Originally Posted By InstantLoser⏩
Shh, you're being racist and oppressing minorities when you question fevered leftist dream-hoaxes.
Right you are. I'll check my privileged now. #hatefacts
***Alabama Crimson Tide***

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Vince Lombardi
post 1476199001 12-23-2016, 10:06 AM
-
#329
  1. BFast55
  2. Registered User
  1. BFast55
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Location: Houston, Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 21,674
  6. Rep Power: 89831
Originally Posted By Kalmah6661⏩
Global warming (climate change) can cause extreme temperature variations on both ends of the spectrum.

"Global warming" is referred to climate change now because people couldn't grasp this concept. Some things are counter-intuitive, like evolution.
No. enough people became skeptical about Al Gore telling us in 2005 that there would be no ice caps in 10 years. What do you do when you agenda isn't palatable any more? You change it to a more vague, less arguable term. Very common political tactic.
***Alabama Crimson Tide***

"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity." - Vince Lombardi
post 1476199381 12-23-2016, 10:10 AM
-
#330
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  1. InstantLoser
  2. #1 Pimp Korea
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: Louisville, Kentucky, United States
  5. Posts: 34,072
  6. Rep Power: 206818
Originally Posted By BFast55⏩
No. enough people became skeptical about Al Gore telling us in 2005 that there would be no ice caps in 10 years. What do you do when you agenda isn't palatable any more? You change it is a more vague, less arguable term. Very common political tactic.
Clearly you're a misogynist. Don't you know that Global "Warming" makes temperatures drop, which is akin to air conditioning the whole planet? If temps rise instead, they'll have to turn up the AC! DON'T YOU KNOW THAT AIR CONDITIONING OPPRESSES THE WIMMINS?!?
"That boulder is too large. I could lift a smaller one."

-Hercules

Starting Weight (July 2018) - 362
Current Weight (July 2019) - 268
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts