Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum ยป Women graduates 'desperately' freeze eggs over 'lack of men'
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 143
  2. Page 3 of 5
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  9. 5
  11. Last

Thread: Women graduates 'desperately' freeze eggs over 'lack of men'

post 1510794091 07-05-2017, 01:56 PM
-
#61
  1. thigoonar
  2. Registered User
  1. thigoonar
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 3,659
  5. Rep Power: 9006
Originally Posted By AceRok⏩
You can absolutely get a donor who is an Ivy League graduate, 6'6 master race, athlete sperm donor if they wanted. So, are they expecting to find that on their own at 50 and raise children at that age?Why not just pay a clinic and get it done and over with. If they only care about having kids with top genetics, that's the solution a Yale graduate can afford.
Because they are holding out for marriage with a man that is educated, rich and good looking enough. It's delusional on their part to think they can get a better man at that age though.
Still looking for a crew... crew

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=169710413
post 1510794171 07-05-2017, 01:57 PM
-
#62
  1. CodyZellery
  2. Almost Chad
  1. CodyZellery
  2. Almost Chad
  3. Join Date: Jul 2015
  4. Age: 33
  5. Posts: 12,737
  6. Rep Power: 70131
Originally Posted By Tornach⏩
Outside of Westernized countries it's easy.
It's the norm.
Women will marry before the age of 25 (at the latest).

These societies value women's youth over everything else.
The body difference between a 20yo and 30yo female is drastic. Won't even go to 35-40.
5'10 176lbs
No hymen no diamond
post 1510794321 07-05-2017, 01:58 PM
-
#63
  1. AceRok
  2. Registered User
  1. AceRok
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Miami, Florida, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 5,116
  7. Rep Power: 11086
Originally Posted By I3igAl⏩
Thought the same really a smart decision. No more biological clock ticking, can settle down whenever you want.
So, if it takes her until age of 50 to find "the one", does she want to spend from age of 50 to age 68 raising a child? There's a reason the biological clock is there, and it's not just about having a healthy child but to raise one at the right time.
post 1510794361 07-05-2017, 01:59 PM
-
#64
  1. numb3rrs
  2. Banned
  1. numb3rrs
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2016
  4. Posts: 2,083
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By AceRok⏩
So, if it takes her until age of 50 to find "the one", does she want to spend from age of 50 to age 68 raising a child? There's a reason the biological clock is there, and it's not just about having a healthy child but to raise one at the right time.
Same goes for men?
post 1510794461 07-05-2017, 01:59 PM
-
#65
  1. thigoonar
  2. Registered User
  1. thigoonar
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 3,659
  5. Rep Power: 9006
Originally Posted By AngusPeppered⏩
Standards too high, could easily find a good guy but still trying to play the game like when they were younger hoping to land 10k/day Chad not realizing their value has gone down

Most are bitter or aggressive and like to blame their problems on men or other copes
This.
Still looking for a crew... crew

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=169710413
post 1510794561 07-05-2017, 02:00 PM
-
#66
  1. AceRok
  2. Registered User
  1. AceRok
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2011
  4. Location: Miami, Florida, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 5,116
  7. Rep Power: 11086
Originally Posted By numb3rrs⏩
Same goes for men?
I don't want to be raising kids when my AARP membership kicks in, no.
post 1510794891 07-05-2017, 02:04 PM
-
#67
  1. putitinputin
  2. Banned
  1. putitinputin
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Posts: 63
  5. Rep Power: 0
Even if they freeze their eggs and wait for Prince Charming well into their 40s they still have no value.
post 1510794961 07-05-2017, 02:05 PM
-
#68
  1. I3igAl
  2. Registered User
  1. I3igAl
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2014
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 17,088
  6. Rep Power: 52211
Originally Posted By AceRok⏩
So, if it takes her until age of 50 to find "the one", does she want to spend from age of 50 to age 68 raising a child? There's a reason the biological clock is there, and it's not just about having a healthy child but to raise one at the right time.
That would obviously be stupid.

But if she gets a kid in her mid thirties, she will still be young and fit and can do so without significantly increasing the risk of having a disabled child.
post 1510794971 07-05-2017, 02:05 PM
-
#69
  1. nzgs
  2. who is john galt?
  1. nzgs
  2. who is john galt?
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 14,238
  6. Rep Power: 17400
Utterly pathetic. Is there anything more useless than a single post-wall female?
post 1510795001 07-05-2017, 02:05 PM
-
#70
  1. wampa
  1. wampa
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 32,307
  5. Rep Power: 377535
Adoption is also an option for them. There are orphans out there that need a good home.
post 1510795151 07-05-2017, 02:06 PM
-
#71
  1. Omnivium
  1. Omnivium
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 19,694
  6. Rep Power: 80934
Originally Posted By PimpinisEasy⏩
We wont beat feminism by debates, or reports, we will beat them by not marrying them.
This. Women aren't interested in logic and reasoning, so we'll just have to boycott marriage until they learn the hard way. Plus marriage laws are a joke anyway
post 1510795361 07-05-2017, 02:08 PM
-
#72
  1. NotANun21
  2. One Of Our Top Posters!
  1. NotANun21
  2. One Of Our Top Posters!
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 22,904
  7. Rep Power: 24318
Originally Posted By Tornach⏩
You want a child act like a mother not a man.


Womenz should be popping out kids from the age of 18 onwards...


That's what nature intended.
With each and every child the woman would learn more and gain more experience. So each successive child will be more and more successful in life.
Women are waiting too long.
30 years old - You'll be 49 by the time your first child is 18.
If we're talking about what nature intended I think we'd be looking at starting families a lot earlier than 18...

Things change to suit the current societies we live in... and with technology and exponential overpopulation it's even happening on a generation by generation basis now, people aren't making families and if they do they wait until really late
If I laugh, I rep

(All of the posts made by this user account are to be considered satirical in nature and do not necessarily reflect the views, ideologies, opinions or intentions of any person or persons using the account)
post 1510795581 07-05-2017, 02:11 PM
-
#73
  1. aranadiscoteca
  2. Registered User
  1. aranadiscoteca
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Posts: 10,200
  5. Rep Power: 40578
Isn't the divorce rate like 60% these days?

Also how many of those that remain married are actually happy and not just still together for the kids/out of convenience? Assume half of the remaining 40%.

It really doesn't seem worth the risk for a 20% chance of a happy marriage.
post 1510798631 07-05-2017, 02:44 PM
-
#74
  1. numb3rrs
  2. Banned
  1. numb3rrs
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2016
  4. Posts: 2,083
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By nzgs⏩
Utterly pathetic. Is there anything more useless than a single post-wall female?
A post wall male who is delusional and doesn't think men hit a wall when in reality older men are gross nasty
post 1510799811 07-05-2017, 02:57 PM
-
#75
  1. SuperHercules
  1. SuperHercules
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Height: 6'5"
  5. Posts: 32,559
  6. Subscribers: 6
  7. Rep Power: 572176
Ugly women with unrealistic standards. If they were attractive, they'd have their pick
post 1510799891 07-05-2017, 02:58 PM
-
#76
  1. nzgs
  2. who is john galt?
  1. nzgs
  2. who is john galt?
  3. Join Date: Nov 2008
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 14,238
  6. Rep Power: 17400
Originally Posted By numb3rrs⏩
A post wall male who is delusional and doesn't think men hit a wall when in reality older men are gross nasty
It's autistic to project female sexual value onto men. Let's just pretend that the internet isn't full of sites hooking up young women with successful middle-aged men.

Men don't have a wall because we start off being disposable. The wall is unique to females and they ignore the concept at their peril.
post 1510800061 07-05-2017, 02:59 PM
-
#77
  1. DanielleGreen
  2. Registered User
  1. DanielleGreen
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 8,537
  5. Rep Power: 40009
Originally Posted By Ml16121⏩
Just read about the male/female ratio and dating scene in Denver. What a fukin nightmare. That's enough to make move to another city, srs. Rather pay high rent in a city with high female ratio than live as an incel in a city with perpetual sausage parties. I've found that 90% of the formula to smashing sloots/finding a oneitis is proximity and opportunity. Even Chad fails in a bar full of other Chads and 1-2 sloots.
I notice that a lot (not all) would rather go hiking/skiing/outdoor stuff than commit to a relationship, at least in Colorado.
post 1510800361 07-05-2017, 03:02 PM
-
#78
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 36,839
  5. Rep Power: 86393
They're too busy being trannies

Ayeee..whichever way you cut it its feminism
post 1510800681 07-05-2017, 03:05 PM
-
#79
  1. Maatkarah
  2. Why so serious?
  1. Maatkarah
  2. Why so serious?
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Location: Herts. UK, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 3,032
  6. Rep Power: 10074
Originally Posted By numb3rrs⏩
Fertility doesn't begin to decline until 27 and it's only slightly. It doesn't go off the hill until 35/37. Women should be relatively financially stable by like 23. Don't see the problem with finding a guy around then and having kids between 27 and early 30's. My mom had me at 36 and I came out normal.
It doesn't even go off the hill at 35/37 - the % of 35-39 women who'll be pregnant within a year of trying is in the 90's.

A poster on here who works in the fertility field said his experience was that most women in their late 30's and early 40's got pregnant with minimal intervention, and that he felt 45 was the drop-off age .. my experience and observation would tie with that.

People have a totally skewed idea of womens' fertility window because most of our Mum's got married young, had kids young and then used very extreme forms on contraception - like sterilization - to avoid having more. Left to nature they'll keep having them til mid-40's (unless they have srs fertility issues - that would have affected them younger too). When I was a teenager two women I knew (two kinda air-heady women tbh) fell pregnant at 45 cause they thought they were gettin past it and weren't careful).
Simple minds need simple answers.
post 1510802101 07-05-2017, 03:18 PM
-
#80
  1. zknarc
  2. Registered User
  1. zknarc
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2016
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 16,421
  6. Rep Power: 44912
Originally Posted By Maatkarah⏩
It doesn't even go off the hill at 35/37 - the % of 35-39 women who'll be pregnant within a year of trying is in the 90's.

A poster on here who works in the fertility field said his experience was that most women in their late 30's and early 40's got pregnant with minimal intervention, and that he felt 45 was the drop-off age .. my experience and observation would tie with that.

People have a totally skewed idea of womens' fertility window because most of our Mum's got married young, had kids young and then used very extreme forms on contraception - like sterilization - to avoid having more. Left to nature they'll keep having them til mid-40's (unless they have srs fertility issues - that would have affected them younger too). When I was a teenager two women I knew (two kinda air-heady women tbh) fell pregnant at 45 cause they thought they were gettin past it and weren't careful).
They may be able to get preggo but run a high risk of birth defects.
If you can't handle me when I'm incel, you don't deserve me when I'm chad
post 1510802681 07-05-2017, 03:22 PM
-
#81
  1. cookiefiend
  2. Registered User
  1. cookiefiend
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Posts: 28,875
  5. Rep Power: 143505
Originally Posted By numb3rrs⏩
Fertility doesn't begin to decline until 27 and it's only slightly. It doesn't go off the hill until 35/37. Women should be relatively financially stable by like 23. Don't see the problem with finding a guy around then and having kids between 27 and early 30's. My mom had me at 36 and I came out normal.
You being normal doesn't change the stats
post 1510803081 07-05-2017, 03:25 PM
-
#82
  1. Maatkarah
  2. Why so serious?
  1. Maatkarah
  2. Why so serious?
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Location: Herts. UK, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 3,032
  6. Rep Power: 10074
Originally Posted By zknarc⏩
They may be able to get preggo but run a high risk of birth defects.
Higher but not high - that tends to be poorly understood & blown out of proportion too.
The majority of women who have kids up to early 40's will have no issues.
Simple minds need simple answers.
post 1510804181 07-05-2017, 03:36 PM
-
#83
  1. Atem69
  2. Fuk ur lyfe
  1. Atem69
  2. Fuk ur lyfe
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Posts: 2,377
  5. Rep Power: 4007
Originally Posted By Maatkarah⏩
Higher but not high - that tends to be poorly understood & blown out of proportion too.
The majority of women who have kids up to early 40's will have no issues.
the risk of serious birth defects sure but the risk of autism and things like that actually rise dramatically after mid 30s

My mother had 3 kids myself included in her earlier 30s and tried to have another kid twice after she turned 40 both were miscarriages
No porn crew
Sugar walls only crew
INTJ crew
Fuk ur lyfe crew
Fcking people in the ass to assert my dominance since 2014 crew
post 1510804321 07-05-2017, 03:37 PM
-
#84
  1. Tuksonrider
  2. Registered User
  1. Tuksonrider
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2013
  4. Location: Arizona, United States
  5. Age: 54
  6. Posts: 11,943
  7. Rep Power: 137229
Originally Posted By Maatkarah⏩
Higher but not high - that tends to be poorly understood & blown out of proportion too.
The majority of women who have kids up to early 40's will have no issues.
There is the use of surrogates. Then there are host of other issues, but that tends to deal more with legal and emotional issues, rather than biological ones.

The thing older women who tend to hold off on family and children so late in the game, is that many men stop playing that game after 30-35. The pool is slim pickings for women trying to tie down a man who is post 35, unless they are FA who are truly desperate for any type of human contact. Real, prime, grade-A Chads, I'm sure.
I'm not blessed with riches, but I am rich with blessings.
Thank you, LORD, my God.
IG: Tuksonrider
post 1510805001 07-05-2017, 03:44 PM
-
#85
  1. thigoonar
  2. Registered User
  1. thigoonar
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 3,659
  5. Rep Power: 9006
Originally Posted By Omnivium⏩
This. Women aren't interested in logic and reasoning, so we'll just have to boycott marriage until they learn the hard way. Plus marriage laws are a joke anyway

Originally Posted By nzgs⏩
It's autistic to project female sexual value onto men. Let's just pretend that the internet isn't full of sites hooking up young women with successful middle-aged men.

Men don't have a wall because we start off being disposable. The wall is unique to females and they ignore the concept at their peril.
This.
Originally Posted By Maatkarah⏩
It doesn't even go off the hill at 35/37 - the % of 35-39 women who'll be pregnant within a year of trying is in the 90's.

A poster on here who works in the fertility field said his experience was that most women in their late 30's andearly 40's got pregnant with minimal intervention, and that he felt 45 was the drop-off age .. my experience and observation would tie with that.
Most women aged 40+struggleto get pregnant.

Also, a 40 year old woman is over13 timesmore likely to have a kid with Down's syndrome compared to a 20 year old female.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1136/jms.9.1.2
Still looking for a crew... crew

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=169710413
post 1510805041 07-05-2017, 03:44 PM
-
#86
  1. NotANun21
  2. One Of Our Top Posters!
  1. NotANun21
  2. One Of Our Top Posters!
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 35
  6. Posts: 22,904
  7. Rep Power: 24318
Originally Posted By zknarc⏩
They may be able to get preggo but run a high risk of birth defects.
This

I can't remember the stats so I'll just make them up, but I'm sure it was after 30 the chances of having a child with downs or autism doubles after 40 it's as much as 10x higher
If I laugh, I rep

(All of the posts made by this user account are to be considered satirical in nature and do not necessarily reflect the views, ideologies, opinions or intentions of any person or persons using the account)
post 1510805401 07-05-2017, 03:47 PM
-
#87
  1. Maatkarah
  2. Why so serious?
  1. Maatkarah
  2. Why so serious?
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Location: Herts. UK, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 3,032
  6. Rep Power: 10074
Originally Posted By Atem69⏩
the risk of serious birth defects sure but the risk of autism and things like that actually rise dramatically after mid 30s

My mother had 3 kids myself included in her earlier 30s and tried to have another kid twice after she turned 40 both were miscarriages
Know next to nothing about autism and age tbh - saw it mentioned somewhere re. age of mother and father but would need to read up on it.

Your Mum may have had 2 unsuccessful pregnancies after 40 but that's not necessarily the norm; plus I've known women who've had miscarriages at all ages inc. early 20's - apparently something like 1 in 3 pregnancies end in miscarriage (some so early the mother doesn't even realise it's a miscarriage).
Simple minds need simple answers.
post 1510805501 07-05-2017, 03:47 PM
-
#88
  1. belfatlosngain
  2. Registered User
  1. belfatlosngain
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2013
  4. Age: 34
  5. Posts: 353
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By TugOfPeace⏩
Mind blown. Holy moly
what indian dating app brah wanna try it for lols
post 1510806041 07-05-2017, 03:53 PM
-
#89
  1. LegDayLol
  2. Registered User
  1. LegDayLol
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2017
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 5,248
  6. Rep Power: 18084
What rich, well educated man would want a baby-desperate feminist with no home making skills well past her prime with 100k+ miles on the cock meter?


Lol at modern feminists, they've made they're beds now they have to lay in it (alone).
I identify as a chad with a jawline so chiseled it can cut diamond, don't assume my genetics

The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time in now
post 1510806171 07-05-2017, 03:54 PM
-
#90
  1. Maatkarah
  2. Why so serious?
  1. Maatkarah
  2. Why so serious?
  3. Join Date: Feb 2016
  4. Location: Herts. UK, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 3,032
  6. Rep Power: 10074
Originally Posted By thigoonar⏩
Most women aged 40+struggleto get pregnant.
I was quoting a poster on here who related his personal experience working in the field. I don't know what the figures are for 40+ women, only that in 35-39 - 85-90% successful falling pregnant within a year.
Originally Posted By thigoonar⏩
Also, a 40 year old woman is over13 timesmore likely to have a kid with Down's syndrome compared to a 20 year old female.
http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1136/jms.9.1.2
Risk of Down's for mother aged 40 is 1 in 100 - so 99/100 kids born to 40 yr old mothers do not have Downs. Stats and risks can be represented in v different ways.

(Also father's age matters - post 39/40 ability to get woman pregnant, risk of miscarriage and risk of birth defects are all worse ... UK & US fertility clinics have now stopped accepting > 39/40 yr old sperm).

This does not of course mean they can't and don't get women pregnant - and that the kids aren't fine; this similarly illustrates the fallacy of sweeping generalisations re. stats.
Simple minds need simple answers.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts