Forum
ยป
BREAKING NEWS. Explosion at North korea nuclear test site.
09-03-2017, 12:41 AM
-
#61
- Kane_89
- Registered User
-
- Kane_89
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2008
- Location: Texas, United States
- Posts: 30,291
- Rep Power: 54391
-
-
MIKE TYSON: "When you see me smash somebody's skull, you'll enjoy it."
"I try to catch him right on the tip of the nose, because I try to push the bone into the brain."
"It's ludicrous these mortals even attempt to enter my realm."
"I can sell out Madison Square Garden masturbating"
"I'll f**k you till you love me f**got!"
"I just want to conquer people and their souls"
09-03-2017, 12:45 AM
-
#62
09-03-2017, 12:52 AM
-
#63
Originally Posted By FreedomPenguin⏩
why do we care?
let everyone have nukes. i dont really see a problem,
im sure we have the capabilities to wipe any warhead heading towards america plenty far away from our land.
idc let the other countries kill eachother
tell SK to evac to america,
let NK have SK. dont know why we spend $ to protect it.
let everyone have nukes. i dont really see a problem,
im sure we have the capabilities to wipe any warhead heading towards america plenty far away from our land.
idc let the other countries kill eachother
tell SK to evac to america,
let NK have SK. dont know why we spend $ to protect it.

๐ฎ๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ถ, ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐๐๐๐๐ ๐ ๐๐๐๐๐
โโโโโโ๐งตMake trolls invisible: https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=180234573 โโโโโโ
09-03-2017, 12:56 AM
-
#64
Originally Posted By FreedomPenguin⏩
Probably one of the most retarded posts I've ever read on misc dead srswhy do we care? let everyone have nukes. i dont really see a problem, im sure we have the capabilities to wipe any warhead heading towards america plenty far away from our land. idc let the other countries kill eachother
tell SK to evac to america, let NK have SK. dont know why we spend $ to protect it.
tell SK to evac to america, let NK have SK. dont know why we spend $ to protect it.
$0 or $1 million crypto crew
Ex-OMG crew
09-03-2017, 12:59 AM
-
#65
- BraneyGumble
- Registered User
-
- BraneyGumble
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2013
- Age: 41
- Posts: 25,426
- Rep Power: 248871
-
-
Originally Posted By AndYUKnowThis⏩
Do you, uh, have any idea how a nuclear bomb works? Hate to break it to you, but they do not require any oxygen to explode. They are nuclear. Not chemical. You are aware they were doing nuclear tests in the vacuum of space, right?What I'm saying is, use another smaller missile to detonate it, but have active ingredients to counter act the the enemy's nuke. A nuclear warhead is pretty much just fire right? Well those ingredients should be putting out that fire.
2 nukes are launched, Nuke A is the enemies, Nuke B defense.
-Nuke A is Launched
-Nuke B is Launched
-Both Nukes meet and explode on impact.
-The chemicals in Nuke B counteracts Nuke A by sucking oxygen out the air while also having a fire retardant
-Nuke A is does substantially little to no damage
2 nukes are launched, Nuke A is the enemies, Nuke B defense.
-Nuke A is Launched
-Nuke B is Launched
-Both Nukes meet and explode on impact.
-The chemicals in Nuke B counteracts Nuke A by sucking oxygen out the air while also having a fire retardant
-Nuke A is does substantially little to no damage
09-03-2017, 01:02 AM
-
#66
- Deathstroke
- What about Biden!
-
- Deathstroke
- What about Biden!
- Join Date: Feb 2005
- Location: United States
- Posts: 110,430
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 431363
-
-
NK is having a good time and a celebration right now apparently. Song playing after the broadcast is the rousing "If Korea decides to do something, it does it".
09-03-2017, 01:05 AM
-
#67
- NinjaNoir
- BJJcrewA$$
-
- NinjaNoir
- BJJcrewA$$
- Join Date: Sep 2014
- Location: North Carolina, United States
- Posts: 6,944
- Rep Power: 15683
-
-
Originally Posted By Tickyouup⏩
At the time I posted. no one knew what caused the explosion. It could have been Navy Seals for all we knew.BREAKING NEWS: Bomb caused explosion
should be negged for clickbait and posting cnn
should be negged for clickbait and posting cnn
Arsenal F.C.
09-03-2017, 01:05 AM
-
#68
- kalvinmc
- ( อกเฒ อส อกเฒ )
-
- kalvinmc
- ( อกเฒ อส อกเฒ )
- Join Date: Sep 2015
- Location: Balding, North Carolina, Chad
- Posts: 5,971
- Rep Power: 22988
-
-
Originally Posted By AndYUKnowThis⏩
not sure if srsWhat I'm saying is, use another smaller missile to detonate it, but have active ingredients to counter act the the enemy's nuke. A nuclear warhead is pretty much just fire right? Well those ingredients should be putting out that fire.
2 nukes are launched, Nuke A is the enemies, Nuke B defense.
-Nuke A is Launched
-Nuke B is Launched
-Both Nukes meet and explode on impact.
-The chemicals in Nuke B counteracts Nuke A by sucking oxygen out the air while also having a fire retardant
-Nuke A is does substantially little to no damage
2 nukes are launched, Nuke A is the enemies, Nuke B defense.
-Nuke A is Launched
-Nuke B is Launched
-Both Nukes meet and explode on impact.
-The chemicals in Nuke B counteracts Nuke A by sucking oxygen out the air while also having a fire retardant
-Nuke A is does substantially little to no damage
nukes don't explode on impact and they're not fire lmao
it's a chain reaction that releases massive amounts of energy and it has to be started aka detonated.
also what we call a "nuke" is actually a missile carrying 10 warheads, aka 10 nuclear bombs that will drop to earth with a speed of 8km/s aka 23 times the speed of sound. pretty much impossible to shoot all of them out of the sky
"Sometimes nobody shows up and you automatically win."
27.55lb x 12 alternating bicep curl
220lb x 8 barbell hip thrust
09-03-2017, 01:07 AM
-
#69
- AndYUKnowThis
- Banned
-
- AndYUKnowThis
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Posts: 12,204
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By BraneyGumble⏩
But it mostly consists of fire right? Is there anything that could put that fire out?Do you, uh, have any idea how a nuclear bomb works? Hate to break it to you, but they do not require any oxygen to explode. They are nuclear. Not chemical. You are aware they were doing nuclear tests in the vacuum of space, right?
What's the usual altitude these nukes are destroyed? I consider it weird seeing how powerful they are yet not effecting anything on the ground after blowing up in the air
09-03-2017, 01:08 AM
-
#70
- sumusikoo
- Supreme Master Guardian
-
- sumusikoo
- Supreme Master Guardian
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: Portugal
- Posts: 6,131
- Rep Power: 5634
-
-
Originally Posted By kalvinmc⏩
I'm pretty sure it's not even close to 8km/snot sure if srs
nukes don't explode on impact and they're not fire lmao
it's a chain reaction that releases massive amounts of energy and it has to be started aka detonated.
also what we call a "nuke" is actually a missile carrying 10 warheads, aka 10 nuclear bombs that will drop to earth with a speed of 8km/s aka 23 times the speed of sound. pretty much impossible to shoot all of them out of the sky
nukes don't explode on impact and they're not fire lmao
it's a chain reaction that releases massive amounts of energy and it has to be started aka detonated.
also what we call a "nuke" is actually a missile carrying 10 warheads, aka 10 nuclear bombs that will drop to earth with a speed of 8km/s aka 23 times the speed of sound. pretty much impossible to shoot all of them out of the sky
Sig line can't be a novel
09-03-2017, 01:10 AM
-
#71
Originally Posted By AndYUKnowThis⏩
Fascinating hypothesis.What I'm saying is, use another smaller missile to detonate it, but have active ingredients to counter act the the enemy's nuke. A nuclear warhead is pretty much just fire right? Well those ingredients should be putting out that fire.
2 nukes are launched, Nuke A is the enemies, Nuke B defense.
-Nuke A is Launched
-Nuke B is Launched
-Both Nukes meet and explode on impact.
-The chemicals in Nuke B counteracts Nuke A by sucking oxygen out the air while also having a fire retardant
-Nuke A is does substantially little to no damage
2 nukes are launched, Nuke A is the enemies, Nuke B defense.
-Nuke A is Launched
-Nuke B is Launched
-Both Nukes meet and explode on impact.
-The chemicals in Nuke B counteracts Nuke A by sucking oxygen out the air while also having a fire retardant
-Nuke A is does substantially little to no damage

09-03-2017, 01:13 AM
-
#72
- AndYUKnowThis
- Banned
-
- AndYUKnowThis
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Posts: 12,204
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By kalvinmc⏩
Why do people call them balls of fire then?not sure if srs
nukes don't explode on impact and they're not fire lmao
it's a chain reaction that releases massive amounts of energy and it has to be started aka detonated.
also what we call a "nuke" is actually a missile carrying 10 warheads, aka 10 nuclear bombs that will drop to earth with a speed of 8km/s aka 23 times the speed of sound. pretty much impossible to shoot all of them out of the sky
nukes don't explode on impact and they're not fire lmao
it's a chain reaction that releases massive amounts of energy and it has to be started aka detonated.
also what we call a "nuke" is actually a missile carrying 10 warheads, aka 10 nuclear bombs that will drop to earth with a speed of 8km/s aka 23 times the speed of sound. pretty much impossible to shoot all of them out of the sky
But I get what you're saying in away. So before it's detonated, it's destroyed in mid air. Why is it that the initial explosion doesn't detonate the actual warhead? Almost sounds like shooting a grenade
Originally Posted By Ml16121⏩
Well I don't sit online 14 hours a day like you aluminum foil wearing neckbeards so you'll have to excuse me.Fascinating hypothesis.


09-03-2017, 01:15 AM
-
#73
- kalvinmc
- ( อกเฒ อส อกเฒ )
-
- kalvinmc
- ( อกเฒ อส อกเฒ )
- Join Date: Sep 2015
- Location: Balding, North Carolina, Chad
- Posts: 5,971
- Rep Power: 22988
-
-
Originally Posted By sumusikoo⏩
the LGM 30 Minuteman III has a speed of 15,000 mph at burnout and the warhead will hit speeds similar to orbital velocity aka 18,000 mph while falling back to EarthI'm pretty sure it's not even close to 8km/s
https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/icbm/lgm-30_3.htm
the Chinese DF-41 has a reported speed of 20,000 mph at burnout
which is phucking nuts if you think about it
these warheads are 6 times faster than a bullet
"Sometimes nobody shows up and you automatically win."
27.55lb x 12 alternating bicep curl
220lb x 8 barbell hip thrust
09-03-2017, 01:16 AM
-
#74
- WestAfrica
- Registered User
-
- WestAfrica
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2009
- Location: California, United States
- Posts: 16,712
- Rep Power: 146366
-
-
Originally Posted By AndYUKnowThis⏩
Why not just build a huge flyswatter and swat the nuke out of the sky.It's called a hypothesis you fukn retard. If you're too much of a fuk head to have a modest discussion without insults then don't bother replying
If there's a fire in a room you use a fire extinguisher to put it out.The same thing can be used to put out enemy warheads. Most of you claimed U.S. can't shoot down warheads, I was just theoretically thinking on how to counter those warheads.
If there's a fire in a room you use a fire extinguisher to put it out.The same thing can be used to put out enemy warheads. Most of you claimed U.S. can't shoot down warheads, I was just theoretically thinking on how to counter those warheads.
NYR NYM NYK UCONN Nebraska AS Roma
09-03-2017, 01:25 AM
-
#75
- VolvoCEO
- 5'6" manmore
-
- VolvoCEO
- 5'6" manmore
- Join Date: May 2017
- Location: Australia
- Posts: 671
- Rep Power: 2154
-
-
Originally Posted By kalvinmc⏩
Which is why interception is usually done immediately after the launch or right before reentry when they're at their slowest phase.the LGM 30 Minuteman III has a speed of 15,000 mph at burnout and the warhead will hit speeds similar to orbital velocity aka 18,000 mph while falling back to Earth
https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/icbm/lgm-30_3.htm
the Chinese DF-41 has a reported speed of 20,000 mph at burnout
which is phucking nuts if you think about it
these warheads are 6 times faster than a bullet
https://fas.org/nuke/guide/usa/icbm/lgm-30_3.htm
the Chinese DF-41 has a reported speed of 20,000 mph at burnout
which is phucking nuts if you think about it
these warheads are 6 times faster than a bullet
I'm sure intercepting ICBMs terminally won't have much success rate, factoring into the amount of MIRV, but that also means nuclear capable ICBM is indeed the best war deterrence
09-03-2017, 01:26 AM
-
#76
- AndYUKnowThis
- Banned
-
- AndYUKnowThis
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Posts: 12,204
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By WestAfrica⏩
When you bring up a topic you're unknowledgeable about, I'll insult you instead of educating. K thxWhy not just build a huge flyswatter and swat the nuke out of the sky.
09-03-2017, 01:26 AM
-
#77
- McAngus
- Registered User
-
- McAngus
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 1,221
- Rep Power: 1200
-
-
Originally Posted By Tickyouup⏩
This is a joke right? Nothing confirmed at the moment?BREAKING NEWS: Bomb caused explosion
should be negged for clickbait and posting cnn
should be negged for clickbait and posting cnn
09-03-2017, 01:30 AM
-
#78
09-03-2017, 01:30 AM
-
#79
- kalvinmc
- ( อกเฒ อส อกเฒ )
-
- kalvinmc
- ( อกเฒ อส อกเฒ )
- Join Date: Sep 2015
- Location: Balding, North Carolina, Chad
- Posts: 5,971
- Rep Power: 22988
-
-
Originally Posted By AndYUKnowThis⏩
enriched uranium atoms are kept in 2 separate sub critical masses at opposite ends of the bomb.Why do people call them balls of fire then?
But I get what you're saying in away. So before it's detonated, it's destroyed in mid air. Why is it that the initial explosion doesn't detonate the actual warhead? Almost sounds like shooting a grenade
But I get what you're saying in away. So before it's detonated, it's destroyed in mid air. Why is it that the initial explosion doesn't detonate the actual warhead? Almost sounds like shooting a grenade
once the explosion is desired one of the masses is fired into the other using a small amount of conventional explosive
when the 2 masses meet they form a critical mass and causes a fission chain reaction, splitting the atoms and converting matter into energy
bombing a nuke like you suggested will have the same effect as detonating a dirty bomb
it will spread radioactive material across a large area
there were incidents in the past where nukes were dropped from high altitude and failed to detonate, smashing into the ground. the result was that they disintegrated and spread radioactive material everywhere
"Sometimes nobody shows up and you automatically win."
27.55lb x 12 alternating bicep curl
220lb x 8 barbell hip thrust
09-03-2017, 01:41 AM
-
#80
- AndYUKnowThis
- Banned
-
- AndYUKnowThis
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Posts: 12,204
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By kalvinmc⏩
I thought the nukes went off when intercepted. The process is very strict, so strict that even an outside source wouldn't set it off? Though I see where my theory is flawed, you wouldn't want a warhead going off in the atmosphereenriched uranium atoms are kept in 2 separate sub critical masses at opposite ends of the bomb.
once the explosion is desired one of the masses is fired into the other using a small amount of conventional explosive
when the 2 masses meet they form a critical mass and causes a fission chain reaction, splitting the atoms and converting matter into energy
bombing a nuke like you suggested will have the same effect as detonating a dirty bomb
it will spread radioactive material across a large area
there were incidents in the past where nukes were dropped from high altitude and failed to detonate, smashing into the ground. the result was that they disintegrated and spread radioactive material everywhere
once the explosion is desired one of the masses is fired into the other using a small amount of conventional explosive
when the 2 masses meet they form a critical mass and causes a fission chain reaction, splitting the atoms and converting matter into energy
bombing a nuke like you suggested will have the same effect as detonating a dirty bomb
it will spread radioactive material across a large area
there were incidents in the past where nukes were dropped from high altitude and failed to detonate, smashing into the ground. the result was that they disintegrated and spread radioactive material everywhere
09-03-2017, 01:42 AM
-
#81
09-03-2017, 01:53 AM
-
#82
- BraneyGumble
- Registered User
-
- BraneyGumble
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2013
- Age: 41
- Posts: 25,426
- Rep Power: 248871
-
-
Originally Posted By AndYUKnowThis⏩
If there is no oxygen, then there can be no fire, you are correct about that, however, based on how nuclear weapons are operated, there are far simpler solutions than "just suck away the atmosphere around it."But it mostly consists of fire right? Is there anything that could put that fire out?
What's the usual altitude these nukes are destroyed? I consider it weird seeing how powerful they are yet not effecting anything on the ground after blowing up in the air
What's the usual altitude these nukes are destroyed? I consider it weird seeing how powerful they are yet not effecting anything on the ground after blowing up in the air
I think you are confusing "the nuke gets destroyed" with "the nuke goes off". You could go to town on a nuke with a tank or a flamethrower or a good old hammer, or you could drop it from the air, and it still won't go off. Yes, there will be radiation, but no, there won't be any chain reaction, mushroom cloud etc. Modern nukes are VERY stable constructs, with strict arming sequences. They are far more complicated than a ball of uranium with some C4 attached to it.
They have to be. You start banging on an old WW2 bomb/mine with a hammmer and you, and maybe your nearby buddies can go boom. Or the regular bombs/missiles on an airplane carrying them gets hit or just crashes. The ppl on the plane and at the crash site go boom, not much else. If nukes worked the same way, then in the case of a plane crash you could say goodbye to whole cities.
Long story short, you can shoot down nuclear missiles with regular missiles and they still won't activate.
09-03-2017, 01:55 AM
-
#83
09-03-2017, 01:56 AM
-
#84
- AndrewPham
- Banned
-
- AndrewPham
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Location: Vietnam
- Age: 33
- Posts: 1,034
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Pretty sure NK will not nuke SK under any circumstance.
1. NK wants to unify the country, by nuking they'll make SK inhabitable.
2. Radiation will affect NK and probably China & Russia too.
NK might nuke Japan (or the US) tho.
1. NK wants to unify the country, by nuking they'll make SK inhabitable.
2. Radiation will affect NK and probably China & Russia too.
NK might nuke Japan (or the US) tho.
09-03-2017, 02:08 AM
-
#85
- AndYUKnowThis
- Banned
-
- AndYUKnowThis
- Banned
- Join Date: Feb 2014
- Posts: 12,204
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By BraneyGumble⏩
Well damn. Myron technological advancement. Gonna get a nuke to display in my new apartment.If there is no oxygen, then there can be no fire, you are correct about that, however, based on how nuclear weapons are operated, there are far simpler solutions than "just suck away the atmosphere around it."
I think you are confusing "the nuke gets destroyed" with "the nuke goes off". You could go to town on a nuke with a tank or a flamethrower or a good old hammer, or you could drop it from the air, and it still won't go off. Yes, there will be radiation, but no, there won't be any chain reaction, mushroom cloud etc. Modern nukes are VERY stable constructs, with strict arming sequences. They are far more complicated than a ball of uranium with some C4 attached to it.
They have to be. You start banging on an old WW2 bomb/mine with a hammmer and you, and maybe your nearby buddies can go boom. Or the regular bombs/missiles on an airplane carrying them gets hit or just crashes. The ppl on the plane and at the crash site go boom, not much else. If nukes worked the same way, then in the case of a plane crash you could say goodbye to whole cities.
Long story short, you can shoot down nuclear missiles with regular missiles and they still won't activate.
I think you are confusing "the nuke gets destroyed" with "the nuke goes off". You could go to town on a nuke with a tank or a flamethrower or a good old hammer, or you could drop it from the air, and it still won't go off. Yes, there will be radiation, but no, there won't be any chain reaction, mushroom cloud etc. Modern nukes are VERY stable constructs, with strict arming sequences. They are far more complicated than a ball of uranium with some C4 attached to it.
They have to be. You start banging on an old WW2 bomb/mine with a hammmer and you, and maybe your nearby buddies can go boom. Or the regular bombs/missiles on an airplane carrying them gets hit or just crashes. The ppl on the plane and at the crash site go boom, not much else. If nukes worked the same way, then in the case of a plane crash you could say goodbye to whole cities.
Long story short, you can shoot down nuclear missiles with regular missiles and they still won't activate.
09-03-2017, 02:17 AM
-
#86
- McAngus
- Registered User
-
- McAngus
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
- Age: 42
- Posts: 1,221
- Rep Power: 1200
-
-
Originally Posted By AndrewPham⏩
Well that makes it even easier to go to bed now, thanks for the nightmares. Also saw this article lolPretty sure NK will not nuke SK under any circumstance.
1. NK wants to unify the country, by nuking they'll make SK inhabitable.
2. Radiation will affect NK and probably China & Russia too.
NK might nuke Japan (or the US) tho.
1. NK wants to unify the country, by nuking they'll make SK inhabitable.
2. Radiation will affect NK and probably China & Russia too.
NK might nuke Japan (or the US) tho.
Nation threatens an electromagnetic pulse attack
https://www.wsj.com/article_email/no...zA2MjgwMTI4Wj/
Lights out the whole nation, imagine that! The first few days there will be neighborhood bbqs, but that will end quick.
09-03-2017, 02:17 AM
-
#87
- hydraides
- Registered User
-
- hydraides
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2010
- Age: 37
- Posts: 5,501
- Rep Power: 5165
-
-
Wow what will be Trumps reaction to this.
ALso to view the the earthquake which was caused by the nuclear weapon please visitwww.livehazards.com
ALso to view the the earthquake which was caused by the nuclear weapon please visitwww.livehazards.com
1st Class Degree Crew (4.0 GPA Crew)
www.livehazards.com
9-5 Dead End job crew
09-03-2017, 02:19 AM
-
#88
- AndrewPham
- Banned
-
- AndrewPham
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2015
- Location: Vietnam
- Age: 33
- Posts: 1,034
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By McAngus⏩
Seeing that you're from Seattle, good night sweet pupper. Time to pack and move to the midwest boyo.Well that makes it even easier to go to bed now, thanks for the nightmares. Also saw this article lol
Nation threatens an electromagnetic pulse attack
https://www.wsj.com/article_email/no...zA2MjgwMTI4Wj/
Lights out the whole nation, imagine that! The first few days there will be neighborhood bbqs, but that will end quick.
Nation threatens an electromagnetic pulse attack
https://www.wsj.com/article_email/no...zA2MjgwMTI4Wj/
Lights out the whole nation, imagine that! The first few days there will be neighborhood bbqs, but that will end quick.
09-03-2017, 02:24 AM
-
#89
- nzgs
- who is john galt?
-
- nzgs
- who is john galt?
- Join Date: Nov 2008
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 14,238
- Rep Power: 17400
-
-
Originally Posted By FreedomPenguin⏩
Because your economy depends on south east asia.Say what you want, we definitely have anti nuclear capabilities. I dont particularly care about other nations. Every nation should defend their own borders. Sorry, just dont see the point of fighting and protecting other peoples shytholes.
Because shooting down a nuclear warhead isn't that easy and missile defence tests often fail
Because letting a socialist dictatorship arm itself without restraint will eventually lead to a greater threat than you face today.
At some point someone has to say enough is enough with NK and China instead of treating them like perennial victims as the left likes to do.
09-03-2017, 03:37 AM
-
#90
- zknarc
- Registered User
-
- zknarc
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2016
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 16,421
- Rep Power: 44912
-
-
Originally Posted By Lawlstud⏩
Sadly this is pretty common here, a place where people think the moon landing is is fake and the earth is flatSaid like someone who is severely uneducated.
If you can't handle me when I'm incel, you don't deserve me when I'm chad
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts

