Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Humanity makes me sick. This is what would happen within days of being nuked.
  1. Results 151 to 180 of 278
  2. First
  3. 4
  4. 5
  5. 6
  6. 7
  7. 8
  8. Last
post 1519174921 09-12-2017, 10:06 AM
-
#151
  1. Condyle
  2. Banned
  1. Condyle
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 4,712
  6. Rep Power: 0
This is why the instant the mushroom cloud clears, you get the *fuk* away from the places people are. You get somewhere with water, and you sort out food but you do it the places people aren't. The places people are won't have food, they will have people so unless the food is resupplied, what they have is an excellent chance of violent death beginning 48hrs max after the event and continuing for a few hundred years into the future.

This is much easier in Australia, where I'm in a capital city now and can think of a few ways to find myself absolutely alone within three hours max.
post 1519175151 09-12-2017, 10:08 AM
-
#152
  1. Tomohokk
  2. Registered User
  1. Tomohokk
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2011
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 7,123
  6. Rep Power: 22563
Originally Posted By PaddleBunt
The pictures of looter all seem to have something in common....



I just can't quite place it...
They dwell in urban areas, and they are also delinquent looking youths...
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
...............................R.I.P.................................
.............Aziz "Zyzz" Sergeyevich Shavershian.........
.................₪₪₪₪₪₪1989-2011₪₪₪₪₪₪.............
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
post 1519176391 09-12-2017, 10:19 AM
-
#153
  1. MNGA1
  2. Registered User
  1. MNGA1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2017
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 870
  6. Rep Power: 5266
Look, my point was simply that in order of preferred scenarios it goes like this

1) You have a gun and none or very few other people have one.

2) You dont have a gun but neither does 99% of the rest of the population.

3) You have a gun and so does almost everyone else.

I am not disputing that guns are a tremendous advantage when chit goes down. However, I would prefer to be unarmed in the UK vs being armed in the USA, simply because killing people with guns is so ridicolously easy compared to with blunt trauma or a knife=greater chance of dying before being able to evacuate out of a hot zone/when getting supplies or whatever.

So in that regard European gun laws are better, however I understand the point you US brahs are making. When every thug is armed you need to be as well. Vicious cycle and I suspect there are simply too many guns in circulation in the US atm. Disarming the law abiding population is not feasible.
post 1519176481 09-12-2017, 10:19 AM
-
#154
  1. iifymbro
  2. Registered User
  1. iifymbro
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 21,395
  7. Rep Power: 112562
Originally Posted By Ikeman83
Here's a (partial) family photo. LOL if you think ghetto looters are going to be pillaging the American middle class.




Not sure if serious. Society has collapsed to such a degree that people are killing other people for food and you think that the normal "self-defense" shooting rules are going to apply? HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHHAHAHAHAHAHA.

Sure, New York, DC, Chicago, LA, and San Fran are all going to look like Mad Max, but you're drunk if that's how you think the burbs and rural areas would be.
Can confirm, ghetto looters moving out into rural 'murica looking for easy pickings will get wiped out

**MFC**
**Barbara Palvin is my 10/10 crew**
post 1519177111 09-12-2017, 10:25 AM
-
#155
  1. pogioli4
  2. Registered User
  1. pogioli4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Age: 32
  5. Posts: 5,878
  6. Rep Power: 16920
Originally Posted By BustaCapp
No, you'd just get murdered even quicker by a gang of thugs with guns.
gang of looters better come with a tank then cuz we've got an arsenal large enough to keep our whole block safe for life which includes a .308 custom made "Sniper Rifle" that's good out to 1,000yds for any half-decent shot
40: 4.3s
400m: 50.4s
800m: 1:58.2s

Pro-Tip: always double check for errors when you post on forums.
post 1519178141 09-12-2017, 10:37 AM
-
#156
  1. ZenBowman
  2. Registered User
  1. ZenBowman
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2006
  4. Posts: 46,541
  5. Rep Power: 1174427
Originally Posted By faxanadu
Read first and second page.... wtf kind of logic is:

You're better off without a gun vs. looters

Absolutely wrong. Humans are predatory animals and are proven to go after what they perceive to be the easiest targets. A dude strapped to the hilt is not an easier target than rot-n-crotch feminist anti-gun SJWs. Simply walking down the street with your shoulders back and head up makes you far less likely to be assaulted than someone with slumped shoulders moping around.
People refuse to learn the lessons of history.

Socialism and crime go hand in hand.

Self-reliance & an attitude of protective manhood prevent crime.
When all that says 'it is good' has been debunked, what says 'I want' remains.

- CS Lewis
post 1519178321 09-12-2017, 10:39 AM
-
#157
  1. ZenBowman
  2. Registered User
  1. ZenBowman
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2006
  4. Posts: 46,541
  5. Rep Power: 1174427
Originally Posted By MNGA1
Look, my point was simply that in order of preferred scenarios it goes like this

1) You have a gun and none or very few other people have one.

2) You dont have a gun but neither does 99% of the rest of the population.

3) You have a gun and so does almost everyone else.
No. Without a gun, a mob of riotous looters can easily sack your house, even if they are unarmed.

When you are armed, you can reasonably fight back. Look at what Korean shopkeepers did during the LA Riots.
I am not disputing that guns are a tremendous advantage when chit goes down. However, I would prefer to be unarmed in the UK vs being armed in the USA, simply because killing people with guns is so ridicolously easy compared to with blunt trauma or a knife=greater chance of dying before being able to evacuate out of a hot zone/when getting supplies or whatever.

So in that regard European gun laws are better, however I understand the point you US brahs are making. When every thug is armed you need to be as well. Vicious cycle and I suspect there are simply too many guns in circulation in the US atm. Disarming the law abiding population is not feasible.
Wrong again. If any thug is armed, you are in trouble.

LOL @ thinking criminals in Europe don't have arms, just LOL. The mafia in Europe is just as well or better armed than any street gang in the United States. So are the thousands of Jihadis in every European city.
When all that says 'it is good' has been debunked, what says 'I want' remains.

- CS Lewis
post 1519178621 09-12-2017, 10:43 AM
-
#158
  1. Ikeman83
  2. It's not the gun, stupid.
  1. Ikeman83
  2. It's not the gun, stupid.
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Location: Newport, Rhode Island, United States
  5. Posts: 40,274
  6. Rep Power: 276405
Originally Posted By MNGA1
Look, my point was simply that in order of preferred scenarios it goes like this

1) You have a gun and none or very few other people have one.

2) You dont have a gun but neither does 99% of the rest of the population.

3) You have a gun and so does almost everyone else.

I am not disputing that guns are a tremendous advantage when chit goes down. However, I would prefer to be unarmed in the UK vs being armed in the USA, simply because killing people with guns is so ridicolously easy compared to with blunt trauma or a knife=greater chance of dying before being able to evacuate out of a hot zone/when getting supplies or whatever.

So in that regard European gun laws are better, however I understand the point you US brahs are making. When every thug is armed you need to be as well. Vicious cycle and I suspect there are simply too many guns in circulation in the US atm. Disarming the law abiding population is not feasible.
Here's the problem with your reasoning. You keep imagining that you're up against one guy with a knife or club. You're not. You're up against five guys with knives and clubs.

I'd rather be in the US with rifles against criminal gangs armed almost certainly with handguns than in the UK armed with a stick against criminal gangs armed with sticks.
Florida Crew as of 3/21

What part of "Shall Not Be Infringed" are you having trouble with?

Misc Firearms Crew
post 1519178901 09-12-2017, 10:47 AM
-
#159
  1. Ikeman83
  2. It's not the gun, stupid.
  1. Ikeman83
  2. It's not the gun, stupid.
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Location: Newport, Rhode Island, United States
  5. Posts: 40,274
  6. Rep Power: 276405
Originally Posted By iifymbro
Can confirm, ghetto looters moving out into rural 'murica looking for easy pickings will get wiped out

You can't blame the UK guys for not understanding the wide disparity of force between your average middle class homeowner compared to the average street gang. These guys are picturing Fudds with pump shotguns shooting at hordes of criminals armed with Uzis, when in reality it's middle-class families with AR15s and scoped bolt-guns against criminals with $200 hi-points.
Florida Crew as of 3/21

What part of "Shall Not Be Infringed" are you having trouble with?

Misc Firearms Crew
post 1519179481 09-12-2017, 10:52 AM
-
#160
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 27,975
  6. Rep Power: 143687
these idiots don't know how to fish?

they are a freaking island surrounded by water. there is so much seafood to eat......
Ave Christus Rex

Toxic Masculinity crew.
Pureblood crew.
Wholesome crew.
post 1519180091 09-12-2017, 10:57 AM
-
#161
  1. BetaNerd
  2. No Longer A White Knight
  1. BetaNerd
  2. No Longer A White Knight
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Posts: 875
  5. Rep Power: 619
Originally Posted By BustaCapp
and then they may spare your life.
Sometimes I forget how stupid some people are.

Guys guys, there are laws against guns in the UK. Even law breaking thugs and gangsters abide by these laws. You have nothing to fear.

Sometimes all you need is sometime to tell you, "We're all gonna make it brah."

First mod neg: "I hope you get doxxed" - BOZZ
post 1519180841 09-12-2017, 11:03 AM
-
#162
  1. MNGA1
  2. Registered User
  1. MNGA1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2017
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 870
  6. Rep Power: 5266
Originally Posted By ZenBowman
No. Without a gun, a mob of riotous looters can easily sack your house, even if they are unarmed.

When you are armed, you can reasonably fight back. Look at what Korean shopkeepers did during the LA Riots.
Right, that is why my nr 1 preferred scenario was to have a gun, while none or few other had one. I would rather be confronted with a mob of unarmed riotous looters with neither of us having guns than have a gun myself but be confronted with 10+ people also having one. In the former case escape is at least more of an option.

Originally Posted By ZenBowman
Wrong again. If any thug is armed, you are in trouble.

LOL @ thinking criminals in Europe don't have arms, just LOL. The mafia in Europe is just as well or better armed than any street gang in the United States. So are the thousands of Jihadis in every European city.
No Jihadis in Europe are apparently not well armed since the most recent attacks in Britain were carried out with knives and vehicles. You dont think they would use guns if they had access to them?

Dont doubt that many of the criminal networks posess guns, but I stand by my argument. The chance of running into a russian mobster with an AK-74 in Britain after a doomsday scenario is alot less likely than being confronted with someone carrying a gun in the US.
post 1519181031 09-12-2017, 11:05 AM
-
#163
  1. mikebadg3
  1. mikebadg3
  2. Join Date: Jul 2014
  3. Posts: 20,555
  4. Rep Power: 129799
logic doesnt exist in this thread

except for the last few posts
post 1519181201 09-12-2017, 11:07 AM
-
#164
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 27,975
  6. Rep Power: 143687
Zenbowman mod negged me for saying the island looters should learn how to fish and go catch some seafood.

Or is it because I called the looters idiots?


Who knows! Zenbowman only does. He can use his mod negs as he feels like apparently.
Ave Christus Rex

Toxic Masculinity crew.
Pureblood crew.
Wholesome crew.
post 1519181231 09-12-2017, 11:07 AM
-
#165
  1. EmmaW4tson
  2. Banned
  1. EmmaW4tson
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 14,340
  6. Rep Power: 0
ITT posters from 'murica are posting their set ups and 1 guy posts his wifes' builder kit.

And heres me in the UK with a simple combat knife hidden away, that if used in self defence would get me 15-20 if the criminal fuk dies. I wonder which countries are going to be taken by Islam and criminal cartels in the coming decades?
post 1519181441 09-12-2017, 11:09 AM
-
#166
  1. MNGA1
  2. Registered User
  1. MNGA1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2017
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 870
  6. Rep Power: 5266
Originally Posted By Ikeman83
Here's the problem with your reasoning. You keep imagining that you're up against one guy with a knife or club. You're not. You're up against five guys with knives and clubs.

I'd rather be in the US with rifles against criminal gangs armed almost certainly with handguns than in the UK armed with a stick against criminal gangs armed with sticks.
In my mind both of those situations are messed up, but atleast with clubs and knives you could outrun them and hide.

Also, you are not in the US up against only criminals with handguns, it is equally like you'd be confronted by people armed with assault rifles or submachine guns such as yourself. That is the point I am trying to make here. Less guns in the population as a whole=less chance of getting shot when chit goes down.
post 1519181841 09-12-2017, 11:12 AM
-
#167
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  1. BustaCapp
  2. Delivering Negs
  3. Join Date: Dec 2002
  4. Location: Merseyside, The North, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 27,158
  6. Rep Power: 346296
Originally Posted By ZenBowman
A group of 6 will be sufficient for the modern United Kingdom.
LMFAO you must never have been to the United Kingdom.

There are so little guns here it's unbelievable. Criminals literally struggle to get hold of them and when they do, they are usually re-activated, rusty old WW2 revolvers or sawn off shotguns.

Unlike the USA where M60's and miniguns can be bought on a street corner by ANYONE.

I would hate to live in a post apocalyptic USA. It would be an absolute bloodbath.
fist yourself
post 1519182121 09-12-2017, 11:15 AM
-
#168
  1. Bulkytheboot
  2. Registered User
  1. Bulkytheboot
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2006
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 3,586
  6. Rep Power: 1982
Originally Posted By MNGA1
In my mind both of those situations are messed up, but atleast with clubs and knives you could outrun them and hide.

Also, you are not in the US up against only criminals with handguns, it is equally like you'd be confronted by people armed with assault rifles or submachine guns such as yourself. That is the point I am trying to make here. Less guns in the population as a whole=less chance of getting shot when chit goes down.
As seen in this thread, it's too late for that in the U.S., every idiot has a gun.
post 1519182171 09-12-2017, 11:16 AM
-
#169
  1. mikebadg3
  1. mikebadg3
  2. Join Date: Jul 2014
  3. Posts: 20,555
  4. Rep Power: 129799
Originally Posted By BustaCapp
LMFAO you must never have been to the United Kingdom.

There are so little guns here it's unbelievable. Criminals literally struggle to get hold of them and when they do, they are usually re-activated, rusty old WW2 revolvers or sawn off shotguns.

Unlike the USA where they can be bought on a street corner by ANYONE.

I would hate to live in a post apocalyptic USA. It would be an absolute bloodbath.
your so wrong dude
how old are you? i assume your fully grown, maybe educated and schooling. apparently have a kid too.
You realize you have to be able to pass a NICS background check to be able to purchase a weapon right?
On top of that most states you have to have a CPL to conceal a pistol. So no. there's a process that you have to go through to be able to purchase a weapon
The ignorance is strong in this thread
post 1519182291 09-12-2017, 11:17 AM
-
#170
  1. iifymbro
  2. Registered User
  1. iifymbro
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 21,395
  7. Rep Power: 112562
Originally Posted By Ikeman83
You can't blame the UK guys for not understanding the wide disparity of force between your average middle class homeowner compared to the average street gang. These guys are picturing Fudds with pump shotguns shooting at hordes of criminals armed with Uzis, when in reality it's middle-class families with AR15s and scoped bolt-guns against criminals with $200 hi-points.
Yep, and the law abiding AR-15 owners also have way more experience and skill, most of those inner city thugs haven't even shot a gun before or more then a few times.
**MFC**
**Barbara Palvin is my 10/10 crew**
post 1519182491 09-12-2017, 11:19 AM
-
#171
  1. Bulkytheboot
  2. Registered User
  1. Bulkytheboot
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2006
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 3,586
  6. Rep Power: 1982
Originally Posted By mikebadg3
your so wrong dude
how old are you? i assume your fully grown, maybe educated and schooling. apparently have a kid too.
You realize you have to be able to pass a NICS background check to be able to purchase a weapon right?
On top of that most states you have to have a CPL to conceal a pistol. So no. there's a process that you have to go through to be able to purchase a weapon
The ignorance is strong in this thread
Lmao so sheltered.
post 1519183231 09-12-2017, 11:24 AM
-
#172
  1. Geno
  2. The Big Bad Wolf
  1. Geno
  2. The Big Bad Wolf
  3. Join Date: Sep 2004
  4. Posts: 18,954
  5. Rep Power: 29068
Very sad.
post 1519183361 09-12-2017, 11:25 AM
-
#173
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  1. CalmWind
  2. Yeshua is Messiah
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 27,975
  6. Rep Power: 143687
So I call the looters idiots and I wonder why they don't go FISHING FOR FOOD on an ISLAND....




and ZENBOWMAN THE MODERATOR NEGS ME for that. Erases 700 points of reputation from my profile.



This is the 3rd or 4th time he does this to me. The last time, he mod negged me because I said "liberals should be deported to Canada"
Ave Christus Rex

Toxic Masculinity crew.
Pureblood crew.
Wholesome crew.
post 1519183721 09-12-2017, 11:29 AM
-
#174
  1. Bulkytheboot
  2. Registered User
  1. Bulkytheboot
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2006
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 3,586
  6. Rep Power: 1982
Originally Posted By iifymbro
Yep, and the law abiding AR-15 owners also have way more experience and skill, most of those inner city thugs haven't even shot a gun before or more then a few times.
Would love to see the experience and skill when 10 loaded goons raid your place.
post 1519183991 09-12-2017, 11:31 AM
-
#175
  1. mikebadg3
  1. mikebadg3
  2. Join Date: Jul 2014
  3. Posts: 20,555
  4. Rep Power: 129799
Originally Posted By Bulkytheboot
Would love to see the experience and skill when 10 loaded goons raid your place.
criminals hit soft targets. if they encounter staunch opposition they retreat. how's this difficult to comprehend? Even in a life or death situation they will avoid the shepherd so they can target sheep.

What's more important to someone, some food or their life? if they can go the next house over which doesn't have weapons but food which house will they choose, the one with guns or no weapons?
post 1519184071 09-12-2017, 11:32 AM
-
#176
  1. Ikeman83
  2. It's not the gun, stupid.
  1. Ikeman83
  2. It's not the gun, stupid.
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Location: Newport, Rhode Island, United States
  5. Posts: 40,274
  6. Rep Power: 276405
Originally Posted By MNGA1
Right, that is why my nr 1 preferred scenario was to have a gun, while none or few other had one. I would rather be confronted with a mob of unarmed riotous looters with neither of us having guns than have a gun myself but be confronted with 10+ people also having one. In the former case escape is at least more of an option.





No Jihadis in Europe are apparently not well armed since the most recent attacks in Britain were carried out with knives and vehicles. You dont think they would use guns if they had access to them?

Dont doubt that many of the criminal networks posess guns, but I stand by my argument. The chance of running into a russian mobster with an AK-74 in Britain after a doomsday scenario is alot less likely than being confronted with someone carrying a gun in the US.
People are starving to death and killing each other over food, and you think they're going to let you live?

I would rather be armed facing a criminal with a gun than unarmed facing a mob with sticks.

I would much rather be armed with a rifle facing criminals armed with handguns than unarmed facing a mob with sticks.

I would much, much rather be armed with a rifle that I've spent years training with and thousands of rounds of ammo facing criminals who turn their pistols sideways for no reason at all than be unarmed facing a mob with sticks.
Originally Posted By MNGA1
In my mind both of those situations are messed up, but atleast with clubs and knives you could outrun them and hide.

Also, you are not in the US up against only criminals with handguns, it is equally like you'd be confronted by people armed with assault rifles or submachine guns such as yourself. That is the point I am trying to make here. Less guns in the population as a whole=less chance of getting shot when chit goes down.
The ones with the modern rifles are the ones with a stake in preserving society, because generally speaking, middle class families in the US have children. Preserving/restoring order is going to be number one on the minds of any community based around nuclear families.

Families based around crime, welfare checks, and single mothers, not so much.
Originally Posted By BustaCapp
LMFAO you must never have been to the United Kingdom.

There are so little guns here it's unbelievable. Criminals literally struggle to get hold of them and when they do, they are usually re-activated, rusty old WW2 revolvers or sawn off shotguns.

Unlike the USA where M60's and miniguns can be bought on a street corner by ANYONE.

I would hate to live in a post apocalyptic USA. It would be an absolute bloodbath.
Holy LOL @ the Bold. That was worth a chuckle. Post-apocalyptic USA would be a bloodbath for sure though, only the ones bleeding would be the criminals.
Florida Crew as of 3/21

What part of "Shall Not Be Infringed" are you having trouble with?

Misc Firearms Crew
post 1519184191 09-12-2017, 11:33 AM
-
#177
  1. Bulkytheboot
  2. Registered User
  1. Bulkytheboot
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2006
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 3,586
  6. Rep Power: 1982
Originally Posted By mikebadg3
criminals hit soft targets. if they encounter staunch opposition they retreat. how's this difficult to comprehend? Even in a life or death situation they will avoid the shepherd so they can target sheep.

What's more important to someone, some food or their life? if they can go the next house over which doesn't have weapons but food which house will they choose, the one with guns or no weapons?
in this situation food is life. how is that difficult to comprehend?
post 1519184261 09-12-2017, 11:33 AM
-
#178
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  1. Cleveland33
  2. Registered Gooner
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Location: Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
  5. Posts: 66,951
  6. Rep Power: 497612
Originally Posted By iifymbro
Yep, and the law abiding AR-15 owners also have way more experience and skill, most of those inner city thugs haven't even shot a gun before or more then a few times.
This again.

I'll have to think about it, but I might actually PREFER that the street gangs arm themselves with fully auto Uzis and even AKs - let them spray and pray.

Meanwhile my cousins and uncles are taking head shots from a few hundred yards away with a 7mm or .30-06.
post 1519184561 09-12-2017, 11:36 AM
-
#179
  1. Ikeman83
  2. It's not the gun, stupid.
  1. Ikeman83
  2. It's not the gun, stupid.
  3. Join Date: Aug 2012
  4. Location: Newport, Rhode Island, United States
  5. Posts: 40,274
  6. Rep Power: 276405
Originally Posted By Bulkytheboot
Would love to see the experience and skill when 10 loaded goons raid your place.
Let's see, which experience is going to be more awful:

1. My wife and I with ARs loaded up with 30-rd mags if they get in the house and scoped .308s before they get to the house vs 10 goons who probably have pistols.
2. My wife and I with a kitchen knife or stick vs 10 goons with sticks and knives.


I'll take situation 1.
Florida Crew as of 3/21

What part of "Shall Not Be Infringed" are you having trouble with?

Misc Firearms Crew
post 1519184831 09-12-2017, 11:38 AM
-
#180
  1. Bulkytheboot
  2. Registered User
  1. Bulkytheboot
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2006
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 3,586
  6. Rep Power: 1982
Originally Posted By Ikeman83
Let's see, which experience is going to be more awful:

1. My wife and I with ARs loaded up with 30-rd mags if they get in the house and scoped .308s before they get to the house vs 10 goons who probably have pistols.
2. My wife and I with a kitchen knife or stick vs 10 goons with sticks and knives.


I'll take situation 1.
Lmfao if you think "thugs" only have pistols.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts