Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum ยป Misc Firearms crew LXX: Hold my beer a SEC. Georgia blew a 20-7 lead
  1. Results 7051 to 7080 of 8121
  2. Page 236 of 271
  3. First
  5. 234
  6. 235
  7. 236
  8. 237
  9. 238
  11. Last

Thread: Misc Firearms crew LXX: Hold my beer a SEC. Georgia blew a 20-7 lead

post 1544924171 02-26-2018, 12:18 PM
-
#7051
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 22,120
  6. Rep Power: 89692
Originally Posted By Farley1324⏩
"attempted" ban. Is this bump stock ban going to be "attempted"?

Obama and Trump don't rule on SCOTUS cases. Sure, it's theoretically better to have Trump nominate judges than Obama, but on gun control legislation, regulations, orders...what did Obama do, again? What is Trump trying to do?
An attempt being failed doesn't negate the attempt...

How can you even play this card? OBAMA DID NOMINATE MERRICK. TRUMP DID NOMINATE GORSUCH.

The liberals almost took away your right to bare arms 4v5. You really going to let them review DC vs Heller with a 5v4?

SCOTUS shutting down gun bans is by far the strongest play gun rights people have. That path is through the POTUS.

Overturn Heller and every liberal bastion be it city, county, state, or town would be free to regulate civilian ownership of guns. That is game set match.
post 1544924301 02-26-2018, 12:19 PM
-
#7052
  1. mm394006
  2. Registered User
  1. mm394006
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 5,416
  7. Rep Power: 43207
Originally Posted By R3L3NTL3SS⏩
So at 240 lbs my fitness pal has me on like a 2600 cal/ day plan to lose 1lb/wk. Seems high, no? Every day I'm left with like 600-800 calories because I can't seem to fill it with chit that doesn't have tons of carbs.
I'm around that weight and cut ~0.5lb/wk at just under 3000 cals/day
I also eat a very high protein/relatively low carb diet, so I'm not sure how that factors in.
*MFC*
post 1544924411 02-26-2018, 12:20 PM
-
#7053
  1. Farley1324
  2. I can do this all day
  1. Farley1324
  2. I can do this all day
  3. Join Date: Mar 2008
  4. Location: Cumming, Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 151,489
  6. Rep Power: 564644
Originally Posted By Austanian⏩
An attempt being failed doesn't negate the attempt...
A "success" is far more impact-full than a failed attempt
Originally Posted By Austanian⏩
How can you even play this card? OBAMA DID NOMINATE MERRICK. TRUMP DID NOMINATE GORSUCH.

The liberals almost took away your right to bare arms 4v5. You really going to let them review DC vs Heller with a 5v4?

SCOTUS shutting down gun bans is by far the strongest play gun rights people have. That path is through the POTUS.

Overturn Heller and every liberal bastion be it city, county, state, or town would be free to regulate civilian ownership of guns. That is game set match.
And it was SCOTUS that did that, not Trump.

If Trump was in the vote he'd probably **** us all
post 1544924671 02-26-2018, 12:22 PM
-
#7054
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 22,120
  6. Rep Power: 89692
Originally Posted By R3L3NTL3SS⏩
So at 240 lbs my fitness pal has me on like a 2600 cal/ day plan to lose 1lb/wk. Seems high, no? Every day I'm left with like 600-800 calories because I can't seem to fill it with chit that doesn't have tons of carbs.
MFP uses averages... If you have a quick or slow metabolism things will very.

However, if you are running a 1100 to 1300 cal a day deficit and you aren't on the verge of turning to cannibalism it tells me you are probably counting wrong.
post 1544924771 02-26-2018, 12:23 PM
-
#7055
  1. residesinAZ
  2. Registered User
  1. residesinAZ
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2014
  4. Posts: 10,579
  5. Rep Power: 35906
Originally Posted By R3L3NTL3SS⏩
So at 240 lbs my fitness pal has me on like a 2600 cal/ day plan to lose 1lb/wk. Seems high, no? Every day I'm left with like 600-800 calories because I can't seem to fill it with chit that doesn't have tons of carbs.
High activity level? It has me at 2450 at 250 lbs, I just put lightly active. I do BJJ 3-4 times a week and not much else.
post 1544925191 02-26-2018, 12:28 PM
-
#7056
  1. R3L3NTL3SS
  2. Is a Czechnologist.
  1. R3L3NTL3SS
  2. Is a Czechnologist.
  3. Join Date: May 2011
  4. Posts: 37,632
  5. Rep Power: 170298
Originally Posted By residesinAZ⏩
High activity level? It has me at 2450 at 250 lbs, I just put lightly active. I do BJJ 3-4 times a week and not much else.
I put lightly active but I walk about ~3 miles a day here at the shop and ~1 hour at gym every morning which is split to about 30 minutes of lifting (push/pull/legs) and 30 minutes of cardio.
post 1544925341 02-26-2018, 12:29 PM
-
#7057
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 22,120
  6. Rep Power: 89692
Originally Posted By Farley1324⏩
A "success" is far more impact-full than a failed attempt


And it was SCOTUS that did that, not Trump.

If Trump was in the vote he'd probably **** us all
Who nominated a pro-gun swing vote and who nominated an anti-gun swing vote? Trump did that and Obama did that.

Also I do agree that Trump would probably fuk us all. Not immediately, but he is impulsive as fuk and doesn't think through the moves.


Doesn't change the game. You give liberals a 5v4 advantage in the SCOTUS and you are done. Not sure how that is debatable. Merrick's record was clear on how he felt and the liberal judges openly talked about their intention to review DC vs Heller.

This seems like me not giving a coach the win because he didn't score any baskets.
post 1544928551 02-26-2018, 12:53 PM
-
#7058
  1. mm394006
  2. Registered User
  1. mm394006
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 5,416
  7. Rep Power: 43207
Originally Posted By R3L3NTL3SS⏩
I put lightly active but I walk about ~3 miles a day here at the shop and ~1 hour at gym every morning which is split to about 30 minutes of lifting (push/pull/legs) and 30 minutes of cardio.
Those guidelines are all just a general averaged baseline. Your body will tell you what you need to maintain or lose a certain amount of weight per week. Once you figure that out on you own you can program the app to tailor to what you need to hit to work for you.

It won't tell you what to do, but it will help you keep track once you do know what you need to do.
*MFC*
post 1544928561 02-26-2018, 12:53 PM
-
#7059
  1. SpeedCheeser
  2. 4doorsmorewhores
  1. SpeedCheeser
  2. 4doorsmorewhores
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 15,626
  6. Rep Power: 147987
If Trump does this, he will definitely have had a far greater (negative) impact on the 2A than Obama ever did. What's scary, if it actually goes through, is the precedent being set in the President being able to simply ban something unilaterally because he says so. At the same time, we can't kid ourselves that he wasn't by far the better choice, and the SC nomination was absolutely necessary. Even if he gets his bump fire stock ban through, if he gets to nominate another judge we might wind up ahead anyway.
Misc Firearms Crew

Official Supp. Misc Beer Crew

RIP YGST
post 1544929591 02-26-2018, 01:04 PM
-
#7060
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 22,120
  6. Rep Power: 89692
Originally Posted By SpeedCheeser⏩
If Trump does this, he will definitely have had a far greater (negative) impact on the 2A than Obama ever did. What's scary, if it actually goes through, is the precedent being set in the President being able to simply ban something unilaterally because he says so. At the same time, we can't kid ourselves that he wasn't by far the better choice, and the SC nomination was absolutely necessary. Even if he gets his bump fire stock ban through, if he gets to nominate another judge we might wind up ahead anyway.
Not seeing the "Far Greater" past EOs against guns have already been used. Precedence is already there.

Should be illegal, but it is there.

However, as lefties know EOs can be revoked with the stroke of a pen... Unless you can find a lib judge to "stop it" temporarily.

What is lasting is the SCOTUS picks. Those aren't things you get to undo.
post 1544930251 02-26-2018, 01:11 PM
-
#7061
  1. JMath
  2. .
  1. JMath
  2. .
  3. Join Date: Oct 2008
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Posts: 16,265
  6. Rep Power: 111818
Originally Posted By Austanian⏩
Not seeing the "Far Greater" past EOs against guns have already been used. Precedence is already there.

Should be illegal, but it is there.

However, as lefties know EOs can be revoked with the stroke of a pen... Unless you can find a lib judge to "stop it" temporarily.

What is lasting is the SCOTUS picks. Those aren't things you get to undo.
Hopefully RBG leaves sooner, rather than later than. If the D's get control of the Senate in November, they're not approving a Trump nominated pro-gun justice. He will have to do the same thing with his nominee as he's doing now with guns...concede ground, which will lead to a far more middle of the road candidate than we got with Gorsuch. Almost anyone we get though would still be an improvement over RBG though. lol.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.

Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
post 1544931151 02-26-2018, 01:21 PM
-
#7062
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 22,120
  6. Rep Power: 89692
Originally Posted By JMath⏩
Hopefully RBG leaves sooner, rather than later than. If the D's get control of the Senate in November, they're not approving a Trump nominated pro-gun justice. He will have to do the same thing with his nominee as he's doing now with guns...concede ground, which will lead to a far more middle of the road candidate than we got with Gorsuch. Almost anyone we get though would still be an improvement over RBG though. lol.
That is my thought... Long term it is important, but unlike previously this isn't the swing vote and virtually any pick with be better than RBG.

And while guns are the most important issue I actually prefer the moderate judges on some of the other issues. Your "side" isn't always right when it comes to the constitution. I prefer the Roberts of the world.
post 1544932761 02-26-2018, 01:36 PM
-
#7063
  1. taf1968
  2. RIP GST
  1. taf1968
  2. RIP GST
  3. Join Date: Dec 2007
  4. Location: Littleton, Colorado, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 36,424
  7. Rep Power: 251035
The big differences now are that you have an actual Republican president leading the charge on gun control and floating trial balloons (and threatening actual unilateral action). And any Republican politician will now get savaged for not only being against "doing something" but also "opposing commonsense measures that their own president came up with". That's unheard of when it comes to 2A rights.

Trump, I think, is probbaly trying to play the middle and trying to take an issue away from the left to some degree . . . but I don't think he has a clue that those people will never be satisfied and they will never support him. Meanwhile, he's throwing his base under a gigantic bus and they aren't going to forgive it.
*MFC Elder Statesmen Cabinet Crew*

**Distal Bicep Rupture Crew (Feb 2013)** -- recovery log: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=151942933
**Extreme Dips Crew** - http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=136113651
post 1544933391 02-26-2018, 01:42 PM
-
#7064
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 22,120
  6. Rep Power: 89692
Originally Posted By taf1968⏩
The big differences now are that you have an actual Republican president leading the charge on gun control and floating trial balloons (and threatening actual unilateral action). And any Republican politician will now get savaged for not only being against "doing something" but also "opposing commonsense measures that their own president came up with". That's unheard of when it comes to 2A rights.

Trump, I think, is probbaly trying to play the middle and trying to take an issue away from the left to some degree . . . but I don't think he has a clue that those people will never be satisfied and they will never support him. Meanwhile, he's throwing his base under a gigantic bus and they aren't going to forgive it.
Well we need to remember Trump isn't really a republican. Just an independent that ran under that platform.

You are right that the left will never be placated. However, using a device most gun owners view as completely idiotic isn't the worst play. Even the NRA is okay playing this card. (Not that I agree with everything they say, but they are the biggest gun rights representative.) DOING IT THROUGH EO is bad news though.

HOWEVER, when push comes to shove... The dems are going to trot out some anti-gun fanatic and Trump will once again look like a gun lovers dream in comparison.
post 1544933661 02-26-2018, 01:45 PM
-
#7065
  1. RThoe
  2. Registered User
  1. RThoe
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2009
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 16,475
  6. Rep Power: 189443
Originally Posted By SpeedCheeser⏩
If Trump does this, he will definitely have had a far greater (negative) impact on the 2A than Obama ever did. What's scary, if it actually goes through, is the precedent being set in the President being able to simply ban something unilaterally because he says so. At the same time, we can't kid ourselves that he wasn't by far the better choice, and the SC nomination was absolutely necessary. Even if he gets his bump fire stock ban through, if he gets to nominate another judge we might wind up ahead anyway.
Yeah, we literally fought against Obama for eight years to not do anything, and now a republican is going to do it in a quarter of that time. And not just do it, but literally be the tip of the spear for it. Pathetic. The age restriction will be one of the worst anti-gun bills we've seen yet. That is such a massive step back it makes me sick.

If Trump does this, he will lose my vote in 2020. He will have to do a HELL of a lot before then in order to get that vote back.

(I know my vote means fuk all anyway)
Misc Firearms Crew
11B Crew
Beat LA
MAGA
post 1544935251 02-26-2018, 02:01 PM
-
#7066
  1. potatoe
  2. ohaidar
  1. potatoe
  2. ohaidar
  3. Join Date: Sep 2006
  4. Location: Spokane, Washington, United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 16,947
  7. Rep Power: 36932
Originally Posted By Farley1324⏩
The silver lining would be aslightlyreduced chance of collateral damage to things other than bump stocks

But the giant ominous anvil shaped cloud would be one more layer peeled away + the precedent of POTUS just bypassing Congress to ban via executive order... you know...that thing all the Chicken Littles kept saying Obama would do
If he sets that precedent you may as well get rid of congress. Self generated authority to ban things? No thanks. Of course the left who have been screeming tyranny for over a year now won't care because its something they don't like.
post 1544935561 02-26-2018, 02:03 PM
-
#7067
  1. SpeedCheeser
  2. 4doorsmorewhores
  1. SpeedCheeser
  2. 4doorsmorewhores
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Location: Texas, United States
  5. Posts: 15,626
  6. Rep Power: 147987
Originally Posted By RThoe⏩
Yeah, we literally fought against Obama for eight years to not do anything, and now a republican is going to do it in a quarter of that time. And not just do it, but literally be the tip of the spear for it. Pathetic. The age restriction will be one of the worst anti-gun bills we've seen yet. That is such a massive step back it makes me sick.

If Trump does this, he will lose my vote in 2020. He will have to do a HELL of a lot before then in order to get that vote back.

(I know my vote means fuk all anyway)
At least you can vote in the primary. That's where it will count anyway. Because let's be honest, we'll most likely vote for just about anyone, including Trump, who runs with an R next to their name vs virtually anyone that will go up there with a D.
Misc Firearms Crew

Official Supp. Misc Beer Crew

RIP YGST
post 1544936111 02-26-2018, 02:09 PM
-
#7068
  1. taf1968
  2. RIP GST
  1. taf1968
  2. RIP GST
  3. Join Date: Dec 2007
  4. Location: Littleton, Colorado, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 36,424
  7. Rep Power: 251035
Originally Posted By Austanian⏩
Well we need to remember Trump isn't really a republican. Just an independent that ran under that platform.

You are right that the left will never be placated. However, using a device most gun owners view as completely idiotic isn't the worst play. Even the NRA is okay playing this card. (Not that I agree with everything they say, but they are the biggest gun rights representative.) DOING IT THROUGH EO is bad news though.

HOWEVER, when push comes to shove... The dems are going to trot out some anti-gun fanatic and Trump will once again look like a gun lovers dream in comparison.
Trump also wants to raise the age for long guns to 21 from 18.
*MFC Elder Statesmen Cabinet Crew*

**Distal Bicep Rupture Crew (Feb 2013)** -- recovery log: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=151942933
**Extreme Dips Crew** - http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=136113651
post 1544936411 02-26-2018, 02:12 PM
-
#7069
  1. RThoe
  2. Registered User
  1. RThoe
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2009
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 16,475
  6. Rep Power: 189443
Originally Posted By SpeedCheeser⏩
At least you can vote in the primary. That's where it will count anyway. Because let's be honest, we'll most likely vote for just about anyone, including Trump, who runs with an R next to their name vs virtually anyone that will go up there with a D.
If Trump does nothing to earn back my vote should he lose it, I won't vote for him. I'd vote third party of write in. I'll always vote, though.

I'm not naive, I know that third party/write in has zero chance, just like I know my vote has zero chance of mattering while in CA, but I still take my right to vote very seriously and will always participate.
Misc Firearms Crew
11B Crew
Beat LA
MAGA
post 1544936471 02-26-2018, 02:13 PM
-
#7070
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  1. Austanian
  2. IDDQD
  3. Join Date: Jul 2009
  4. Location: Coeur D Alene, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 22,120
  6. Rep Power: 89692
Originally Posted By taf1968⏩
Trump also wants to raise the age for long guns to 21 from 18.
That's a no go for me... (Unless 21 is the new age of adult for EVERYTHING including selective service.)

Legal consistency is important to me. I can't say I like 18 year olds voting on chit they know nothing about.
post 1544936641 02-26-2018, 02:15 PM
-
#7071
  1. rahfulz
  2. Registered User
  1. rahfulz
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Age: 33
  5. Posts: 8,115
  6. Rep Power: 88796
https://www.nraila.org/articles/2018...nesday-hearing

Remember me when I'm gone
MFC
Fishing crew
post 1544936861 02-26-2018, 02:18 PM
-
#7072
  1. mm394006
  2. Registered User
  1. mm394006
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2008
  4. Location: Ohio, United States
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 5,416
  7. Rep Power: 43207
Originally Posted By Austanian⏩
That's a no go for me... (Unless 21 is the new age of adult for EVERYTHING including selective service.)

Legal consistency is important to me. I can't say I like 18 year olds voting on chit they know nothing about.
I'm sure liberals would prefer to keep the legality consistent across the military too. BRB you can join the military at 18, but you don't get your gun until you are 21. Have fun in Afghanistan boys.

#onelessgun #thinkaboutthechildren
*MFC*
post 1544936901 02-26-2018, 02:19 PM
-
#7073
  1. taf1968
  2. RIP GST
  1. taf1968
  2. RIP GST
  3. Join Date: Dec 2007
  4. Location: Littleton, Colorado, United States
  5. Age: 58
  6. Posts: 36,424
  7. Rep Power: 251035
If you want to get your blood pressure up . . . watch the Florida Senate livestream for the gun control bills:

https://thefloridachannel.org/
*MFC Elder Statesmen Cabinet Crew*

**Distal Bicep Rupture Crew (Feb 2013)** -- recovery log: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=151942933
**Extreme Dips Crew** - http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=136113651
post 1544937881 02-26-2018, 02:29 PM
-
#7074
  1. Vayne
  2. I just want to pew pew
  1. Vayne
  2. I just want to pew pew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 19,668
  6. Rep Power: 49395
If I want my blood pressure up I just start snorting beta alanine..
I never try anything I just do it!
post 1544937971 02-26-2018, 02:29 PM
-
#7075
  1. CdtCox
  2. inb4 stats
  1. CdtCox
  2. inb4 stats
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: North Carolina, United States
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 17,576
  7. Rep Power: 76007
lol women

https://www.********.com/theaafnatio...9587482674730/

They almost got got. Shoot the ******* until he is no longer a threat
"Take a course in good water and air; and in the eternal youth of Nature you may renew your own. Go quietly, alone; no harm will befall you." -John Muir

"Give me Liberty or give me Death"- Patrick Henry

"I'm here to operate."- GST
post 1544938031 02-26-2018, 02:30 PM
-
#7076
  1. CdtCox
  2. inb4 stats
  1. CdtCox
  2. inb4 stats
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Location: North Carolina, United States
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 17,576
  7. Rep Power: 76007
Originally Posted By RThoe⏩
If Trump does nothing to earn back my vote should he lose it, I won't vote for him. I'd vote third party of write in. I'll always vote, though.

I'm not naive, I know that third party/write in has zero chance, just like I know my vote has zero chance of mattering while in CA, but I still take my right to vote very seriously and will always participate.
happy birthday gay boi
"Take a course in good water and air; and in the eternal youth of Nature you may renew your own. Go quietly, alone; no harm will befall you." -John Muir

"Give me Liberty or give me Death"- Patrick Henry

"I'm here to operate."- GST
post 1544938141 02-26-2018, 02:31 PM
-
#7077
  1. tunejunkie
  2. Registered User
  1. tunejunkie
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 8,677
  6. Rep Power: 58060
Originally Posted By taf1968⏩
If you want to get your blood pressure up . . . watch the Florida Senate livestream for the gun control bills:

https://thefloridachannel.org/
why did you do this to me?

fuking entitled whiney bitches in the crowd screaming like the cnn town hall... man fuk these kids
post 1544938251 02-26-2018, 02:33 PM
-
#7078
  1. Farley1324
  2. I can do this all day
  1. Farley1324
  2. I can do this all day
  3. Join Date: Mar 2008
  4. Location: Cumming, Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 151,489
  6. Rep Power: 564644
Originally Posted By taf1968⏩
If you want to get your blood pressure up . . . watch the Florida Senate livestream for the gun control bills:

https://thefloridachannel.org/
Challenge accepted









Oh god dammit


This woman going on and on hasn't presented one god damn thing of substance. But...all that feelings
post 1544938361 02-26-2018, 02:35 PM
-
#7079
  1. RThoe
  2. Registered User
  1. RThoe
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2009
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 16,475
  6. Rep Power: 189443
Originally Posted By taf1968⏩
If you want to get your blood pressure up . . . watch the Florida Senate livestream for the gun control bills:

https://thefloridachannel.org/
This was literally me

Originally Posted By CdtCox⏩
happy birthday gay boi
hehe Ty men
Misc Firearms Crew
11B Crew
Beat LA
MAGA
post 1544938481 02-26-2018, 02:37 PM
-
#7080
  1. Farley1324
  2. I can do this all day
  1. Farley1324
  2. I can do this all day
  3. Join Date: Mar 2008
  4. Location: Cumming, Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 151,489
  6. Rep Power: 564644
17 year old who will be of voting age by the time they run for reelection is up now

He lived a half an hour away from Sandy Hook

He tried to kill himself in November because he was scared. What are we going to do to protect him? He needs assault rifles to be banned so he can be safe where he his. He wants them to look at his scars and look at his face and tell him what they are going to do.




He found a new outlet than death, and it is to fight for what he believes in, so he can be safe.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts