Forum
»
Police in Canada can now demand breath samples in bars, at home
01-10-2019, 07:18 PM
-
#61
01-10-2019, 07:22 PM
-
#62
- kingofturtles
- Registered User
-
- kingofturtles
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 8,206
- Rep Power: 56520
-
-
Originally Posted By AlwaysFocus⏩
Lmao. No. Stop talking. I am tempted to neg you for even posting thisThe scenario is, somebody gets mad at you for whatever reason, a percieved cut off or whatever, calls the cops on you reports your license plate, you go home start watching hockey or football game with a couple brewskis/cocktails and boom DUI
www.miscers.com
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=177185321 ~ WoW Classic <MISCERS> guild horde thread GTFIH
320 bench press
1000lbs club at 190ish lbs
Chargers, Angels, Lakers, Canucks.
01-10-2019, 07:26 PM
-
#63
- kingofturtles
- Registered User
-
- kingofturtles
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 8,206
- Rep Power: 56520
-
-
Whoever wrote that article has literally zero clue and should be fired on the spot for that article.
www.miscers.com
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=177185321 ~ WoW Classic <MISCERS> guild horde thread GTFIH
320 bench press
1000lbs club at 190ish lbs
Chargers, Angels, Lakers, Canucks.
01-10-2019, 07:30 PM
-
#64
- getbig_ttt
- Team Rewarding
-
- getbig_ttt
- Team Rewarding
- Join Date: Aug 2008
- Location: Canada
- Age: 38
- Posts: 10,005
- Rep Power: 33950
-
-
Originally Posted By kingofturtles⏩
Not only this, but if the police comes knocking at your door, simply don't answer.They can stop you and demand that you give a breath sample. They will do this while you are in your car. Tbh, they always could have done this. All they needed was suspicion and you were forced to blow. Very easy to “make up” suspicion if the cop was a pig.
Never ever will you be made to blow “2 hours after your in your house”. Stop spewing nonsense. They wouldn’t even make you blow 2 mins after you entered your house because you need to have continuity of the person the whole time to prove they haven’t drank anything in between driving and the test.
Your totally reading into this wrong and have no idea how the law works.
Never ever will you be made to blow “2 hours after your in your house”. Stop spewing nonsense. They wouldn’t even make you blow 2 mins after you entered your house because you need to have continuity of the person the whole time to prove they haven’t drank anything in between driving and the test.
Your totally reading into this wrong and have no idea how the law works.
Originally Posted By SWDeath⏩
In Ontario, we buy beer the Beer Store or the LCBO, and from a few authorized grocery stores. We pay a deposit on all alcohol containers (bottles, cans, wine bags, etc) and we return it the beer store to get our money back.You guys return bottles to the beer store??
Explain this.
Explain this.
Bums make a killing from this
how can she neg... HOW CAN SHE NEG!!! HOW?!
01-10-2019, 09:17 PM
-
#65
- AlwaysFocus
- Registered AI
-
- AlwaysFocus
- Registered AI
- Join Date: Sep 2016
- Location: BC, Canada
- Posts: 43,341
- Rep Power: 354666
-
-
Originally Posted By kingofturtles⏩
Lmao. No. Stop talking. I am tempted to neg you for even posting this
Originally Posted By kingofturtles⏩
I took the scenario from the article. Are you saying that the article is not true and that those laws do not exist? Why is there more than one article on this? Why is there an active outrage on this?Whoever wrote that article has literally zero clue and should be fired on the spot for that article.
Strong anger over facts.
And just lol if you dont think this wont get abused.
It will be a different kind of "swatted" where instead of calling in a made up story of person with a gun in their home threatening their family and then their house gets raided now you can call in a suspected drunk driver when you know theyve gone home to watch the hockey game with a 12 case. And now somebody who doesnt drink and drive is in trouble because somebody doesnt like them.
Its a dumb law change and is going to cost an innocent person legal fees.
01-10-2019, 09:32 PM
-
#66
- ANIMALISTIKZ
- Banned
-
- ANIMALISTIKZ
- Banned
- Join Date: Nov 2006
- Location: Ontario, Canada
- Posts: 16,508
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By startingat56⏩
"beautiful Mississauga"OK people .... behave
the change in the law allows a cop to demand a breath sample from anyone pulled over for any reason, unlike before when they had to have reasonable suspicion to request a breath sample. This removes the gray area of why the breath sample was requested, which got some cases thrown out by good lawyers. If you get pulled over for a broken tail light, you can be asked to take a breath sample, and if you refuse, you get a charge equivalent to DUI
I'm OK with this as people who drink and drive are effen ashpoles
the ability to convict someone two hours later, after they have left the vehicle, would be tested in court and fail.
the change in the law allows a cop to demand a breath sample from anyone pulled over for any reason, unlike before when they had to have reasonable suspicion to request a breath sample. This removes the gray area of why the breath sample was requested, which got some cases thrown out by good lawyers. If you get pulled over for a broken tail light, you can be asked to take a breath sample, and if you refuse, you get a charge equivalent to DUI
I'm OK with this as people who drink and drive are effen ashpoles
the ability to convict someone two hours later, after they have left the vehicle, would be tested in court and fail.
01-10-2019, 09:36 PM
-
#67
- Itouchyou
- IknowagoodthreadwhenIsee1
-
- Itouchyou
- IknowagoodthreadwhenIsee1
- Join Date: Sep 2009
- Posts: 8,023
- Rep Power: 58432
-
-
I've already given plenty of female cops a sample of my breath, if you know what I mean.
You have been touched.
I am the reason your girlfriend pauses between texts.
I am the guy in your wife's apple watch.
01-10-2019, 09:51 PM
-
#68
01-10-2019, 10:03 PM
-
#69
- Coachbombay
- Killer boots, man!
-
- Coachbombay
- Killer boots, man!
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Location: Rack City, Bitch, Canada
- Age: 39
- Posts: 4,363
- Rep Power: 30298
-
-
Exception
(4) No person commits an offence under subsection (3) if
(a) they consumed the drug or the alcohol or both after ceasing to operate a motor vehicle or vessel, or after ceasing to operate or assist in the operation of an aircraft or railway equipment or after ceasing to have the care or control of a motor vehicle, a vessel, an aircraft or railway equipment; and
(b) after ceasing the activities described in paragraph (a), they had no reasonable expectation that they would be required to provide a sample of a bodily substance.
So you shouldn't be convicted over nothing, but you will still lose your license for 3 months, vehicle for 3 days, and have breathalizer ignition installed when charged, not when convicted.(4) No person commits an offence under subsection (3) if
(a) they consumed the drug or the alcohol or both after ceasing to operate a motor vehicle or vessel, or after ceasing to operate or assist in the operation of an aircraft or railway equipment or after ceasing to have the care or control of a motor vehicle, a vessel, an aircraft or railway equipment; and
(b) after ceasing the activities described in paragraph (a), they had no reasonable expectation that they would be required to provide a sample of a bodily substance.
They got little baby legs that stand so low
you got to pick 'em up just to say hello.
01-10-2019, 10:15 PM
-
#70
- outfoxxed
- Registered User
-
- outfoxxed
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2010
- Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
- Posts: 22,267
- Rep Power: 86921
-
-
Originally Posted By JoeDelts⏩
Dude probably got hit with a hit and run thoughAny lawyer would be able to shred a drunk driving charge based on blowing over at home. Someone did tell me a story once about a guy who was driving after drinking and got into an accident. I don't remember the details of the accident (if there was even another car involved or if he just hit a road sign or something) but supposedly he took off and went home and started drinking. The cops came to his house and he answered the door with a drink in his hand and admitted it was him. He told them he was so shaken he had a few drinks to calm his nerves but he was sober when he was driving and they couldn't prove he wasn't. I'd guess this law was meant to prevent people gaming the system like this.
01-10-2019, 10:16 PM
-
#71
- kingofturtles
- Registered User
-
- kingofturtles
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 8,206
- Rep Power: 56520
-
-
Originally Posted By AlwaysFocus⏩
Yes. I am saying that article and that scenario is 100% false. There is no way ever that a police officer will demand a breath sample from you in your house because of an erratic driving complaint, or any type ofI took the scenario from the article. Are you saying that the article is not true and that those laws do not exist? Why is there more than one article on this? Why is there an active outrage on this?
Strong anger over facts.
And just lol if you dont think this wont get abused.
It will be a different kind of "swatted" where instead of calling in a made up story of person with a gun in their home threatening their family and then their house gets raided now you can call in a suspected drunk driver when you know theyve gone home to watch the hockey game with a 12 case. And now somebody who doesnt drink and drive is in trouble because somebody doesnt like them.
Its a dumb law change and is going to cost an innocent person legal fees.
Strong anger over facts.
And just lol if you dont think this wont get abused.
It will be a different kind of "swatted" where instead of calling in a made up story of person with a gun in their home threatening their family and then their house gets raided now you can call in a suspected drunk driver when you know theyve gone home to watch the hockey game with a 12 case. And now somebody who doesnt drink and drive is in trouble because somebody doesnt like them.
Its a dumb law change and is going to cost an innocent person legal fees.
Complaint. If the article is saying this then the article is 100% wrong. An officer needs continuity either from himself or witnesses that alcohol was not added after the driving occurred.
Yes, you can charge someone with impaired driving (bc doesn’t even do this anymore, they don’t really go criminal code anymore) if you belive they have driven a vehicle
While intoxicated within the last 3 hours, but unless there is 100% continuity of the driver and they did not consume anything after driving it won’t work.
Here’s a question. Even if this WAS possible. How do you prove the guy who opens the door was even driving?
www.miscers.com
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=177185321 ~ WoW Classic <MISCERS> guild horde thread GTFIH
320 bench press
1000lbs club at 190ish lbs
Chargers, Angels, Lakers, Canucks.
01-10-2019, 10:26 PM
-
#72
- MajorTendonitis
- Join Date: Jan 2016
- Location: East Kootenays BC
- Age: 65
- Height: 5'8"
- Weight: 241 lbs
- Posts: 42,079
- Subscribers: 8
- Rep Power: 719802
-
-
I’m starting a new program called DAM . Drunk drivers against morbidly obese mothers with to much time on there fkng hands
Back with my Fam
01-10-2019, 10:27 PM
-
#73
- MyGhettoFantasy
- Registered User
-
- MyGhettoFantasy
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Age: 42
- Posts: 12,838
- Rep Power: 162504
-
-
Originally Posted By TBO1313⏩
Lol sucks, huh? Maybe no one should be using force of law to **** with people enjoying their drug of choice in the privacy of their own home.So Trudeau wants to legalize green plants but if your caught drinking at your house you could be arrested????
Shoe is on the other foot up someone else's ass now.
The closer we approach the uncertainty of life's ending the more we wish to trade all of the things we have acquired in exchange for all of the things we have lost: wealth for youth, knowledge for fresh curiosity, resignation for hope. We'd trade our wisdom for new experiences, but it is wisdom that will teach us that at the end of the road the only new experience is death.
01-10-2019, 10:27 PM
-
#74
- TheIronAsylum
- Registered User
-
- TheIronAsylum
- Registered User
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Posts: 15,935
- Rep Power: 89558
-
-
bro canada is run by cuck sjws who have no clue about anything wouldnt expect any less
01-10-2019, 10:32 PM
-
#75
- MajorTendonitis
- Join Date: Jan 2016
- Location: East Kootenays BC
- Age: 65
- Height: 5'8"
- Weight: 241 lbs
- Posts: 42,079
- Subscribers: 8
- Rep Power: 719802
-
-
I know a guy in town who quit drinking ten years ago. I seen him in the bar at around midnight , and he was playing Keno for something to do.
He was drinking orange juice , and at around 2am the cops banged on his door wanting a breath sample.
He’s like wtf ? And the cops were like , well we seen your truck parked in front of the bar .
He explained to the officers that he was bored and comes down to the bar to play keno on occasion, even though he doesn’t drink .
He never got an impaired obviously, but it’s just the thought of some cops getting you out of bed and hassling you in the middle of the night
He was drinking orange juice , and at around 2am the cops banged on his door wanting a breath sample.
He’s like wtf ? And the cops were like , well we seen your truck parked in front of the bar .
He explained to the officers that he was bored and comes down to the bar to play keno on occasion, even though he doesn’t drink .
He never got an impaired obviously, but it’s just the thought of some cops getting you out of bed and hassling you in the middle of the night
Back with my Fam
01-10-2019, 10:34 PM
-
#76
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
-
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 24,590
- Rep Power: 86323
-
-
I would imagine the intent of this is to prevent the cases where they follow a drunk driver home, and he runs into his house. Previously there was nothing the police could do.
01-10-2019, 10:35 PM
-
#77
01-10-2019, 10:36 PM
-
#78
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
-
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 24,590
- Rep Power: 86323
-
-
Originally Posted By Sikhveins⏩
What is wrong with cutting down and penalizing texting and driving? Do you have a better suggestion, or do you think that using a cell phone while driving is OK?Just saw a video of cops in Van in buses spying on drivers and notifying back up which car to pull over. They got a soccer mom in a minivan for texting n driving.
Jeez seems really invasive, I thought we had it bad in Washington.
Jeez seems really invasive, I thought we had it bad in Washington.
01-10-2019, 10:38 PM
-
#79
- kingofturtles
- Registered User
-
- kingofturtles
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 8,206
- Rep Power: 56520
-
-
Originally Posted By Frank
Yes there was. It’s called fresh pursuit. An officer can go into any residence if they are following someone who committed a crime and they run inside the house. It’s not like a safe zone like ppl think.I would imagine the intent of this is to prevent the cases where they follow a drunk driver home, and he runs into his house. Previously there was nothing the police could do.
www.miscers.com
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=177185321 ~ WoW Classic <MISCERS> guild horde thread GTFIH
320 bench press
1000lbs club at 190ish lbs
Chargers, Angels, Lakers, Canucks.
01-10-2019, 10:39 PM
-
#80
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
-
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 24,590
- Rep Power: 86323
-
-
Originally Posted By engj⏩
If you sideswiped a parked car on the way home from the pub, its reasonable to think that you might be breathalyzed.What is being referred to here is S.320.14 C.C., the offence for impaired driving, and in this case through the mechanism of 'over 80'.
It's illegal to be over 80 within two hours after driving, butNOT if you consumed the alcohol after driving, you had no reasonable expectation that you would be required to provide a breath sample, and your BAC is consistent with alcohol consumed post driving. It was introduced in response to a few high profile cases where people had hit and run while drunk, raced home and started pounding alcohol 'to calm myself after the accident' to avoid conviction.
So if you did nothing wrong and had no reason to be suspected, you can legally take shots in your garage after stepping out of your car. Still complete bullsh*t because it puts the onus on the accused to prove he had no reasonable expectation to be breathalyzed within 2 hrs of driving.
In 4 years Liberals have killed the rights to probable cause, fair disclosure in court (C51), and now presumption of innocence.
And the same morons cheering this stuff called Harper the Fascist.
It's illegal to be over 80 within two hours after driving, butNOT if you consumed the alcohol after driving, you had no reasonable expectation that you would be required to provide a breath sample, and your BAC is consistent with alcohol consumed post driving. It was introduced in response to a few high profile cases where people had hit and run while drunk, raced home and started pounding alcohol 'to calm myself after the accident' to avoid conviction.
So if you did nothing wrong and had no reason to be suspected, you can legally take shots in your garage after stepping out of your car. Still complete bullsh*t because it puts the onus on the accused to prove he had no reasonable expectation to be breathalyzed within 2 hrs of driving.
In 4 years Liberals have killed the rights to probable cause, fair disclosure in court (C51), and now presumption of innocence.
And the same morons cheering this stuff called Harper the Fascist.
01-10-2019, 10:43 PM
-
#81
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
-
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 24,590
- Rep Power: 86323
-
-
Originally Posted By getbig_ttt⏩
we have privatized bottle depots in AB, In SK I believe it was run by the provincial government, and usually employed mentally challenged/handicapped people. I preferred taking my bottles to SARCAN in SK TBH. I feel I get ripped off (and probably am) in AB.Not only this, but if the police comes knocking at your door, simply don't answer.
In Ontario, we buy beer the Beer Store or the LCBO, and from a few authorized grocery stores. We pay a deposit on all alcohol containers (bottles, cans, wine bags, etc) and we return it the beer store to get our money back.
Bums make a killing from this
In Ontario, we buy beer the Beer Store or the LCBO, and from a few authorized grocery stores. We pay a deposit on all alcohol containers (bottles, cans, wine bags, etc) and we return it the beer store to get our money back.
Bums make a killing from this
01-10-2019, 10:44 PM
-
#82
- TheJediBrah
- One with the Force
-
- TheJediBrah
- One with the Force
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Posts: 15,289
- Rep Power: 25168
-
-
Originally Posted By AlwaysFocus⏩
Not sure if srs. You really have that hard a time comprehending that media might be reported something inaccurately?I took the scenario from the article. Are you saying that the article is not true and that those laws do not exist? Why is there more than one article on this? Why is there an active outrage on this?
Strong anger over facts.
Strong anger over facts.
01-10-2019, 10:50 PM
-
#83
- AlwaysFocus
- Registered AI
-
- AlwaysFocus
- Registered AI
- Join Date: Sep 2016
- Location: BC, Canada
- Posts: 43,341
- Rep Power: 354666
-
-
Originally Posted By TheJediBrah⏩
Nope. But the guy who replied to me thought I made it up. The laws changed. Police can be *******s. I just thought Id make the OP to aware others on the law change.Not sure if srs. You really have that hard a time comprehending that media might be reported something inaccurately?
01-10-2019, 10:52 PM
-
#84
- AlwaysFocus
- Registered AI
-
- AlwaysFocus
- Registered AI
- Join Date: Sep 2016
- Location: BC, Canada
- Posts: 43,341
- Rep Power: 354666
-
-
Originally Posted By Frank
kinda creepy that somebody who upholds the law stands inside of a public bus staring into people's vehicles. I mean at this point why not just have a government camera installed into your vehicle to make sure you dont pick your nose?What is wrong with cutting down and penalizing texting and driving? Do you have a better suggestion, or do you think that using a cell phone while driving is OK?
01-10-2019, 10:54 PM
-
#85
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
-
- Frank Drebin
- Cutting
- Join Date: Jul 2007
- Location: Canada
- Posts: 24,590
- Rep Power: 86323
-
-
Originally Posted By AlwaysFocus⏩
Creepy? Do you get creeped out when someone sitting on a bus looks at you?kinda creepy that somebody who upholds the law stands inside of a public bus staring into people's vehicles. I mean at this point why not just have a government camera installed into your vehicle to make sure you dont pick your nose?
01-10-2019, 10:55 PM
-
#86
- kingofturtles
- Registered User
-
- kingofturtles
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jul 2012
- Posts: 8,206
- Rep Power: 56520
-
-
Originally Posted By AlwaysFocus⏩
Where did I say you made it up? Assuming your talking about me.Nope. But the guy who replied to me thought I made it up. The laws changed. Police can be *******s. I just thought Id make the OP to aware others on the law change.
www.miscers.com
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=177185321 ~ WoW Classic <MISCERS> guild horde thread GTFIH
320 bench press
1000lbs club at 190ish lbs
Chargers, Angels, Lakers, Canucks.
01-10-2019, 10:56 PM
-
#87
- AlwaysFocus
- Registered AI
-
- AlwaysFocus
- Registered AI
- Join Date: Sep 2016
- Location: BC, Canada
- Posts: 43,341
- Rep Power: 354666
-
-
Originally Posted By Frank
no but i get creeped out if somebody is standing in a position for the purpose of staring into my vehicle to make sure I dont text and drive. If they were staring at me like these pigs do Id get creeped out.Creepy? Do you get creeped out when someone sitting on a bus looks at you?
Its fukkin weird. Its one thing to stand at the intersection outside.
01-10-2019, 11:08 PM
-
#88
Just so laughable how these ideas are even presented with a straight face let alone passed to law. SMFH.
EoR is powered by unique Nanomolecular Hyperdispersion Technology. Giving him high bioavailability and myocellular saturation.
01-10-2019, 11:17 PM
-
#89
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
-
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 14,376
- Rep Power: 59586
-
-
Originally Posted By EoR⏩
ThisJust so laughable how these ideas are even presented with a straight face let alone passed to law. SMFH.
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
01-12-2019, 08:27 AM
-
#90
- getbig_ttt
- Team Rewarding
-
- getbig_ttt
- Team Rewarding
- Join Date: Aug 2008
- Location: Canada
- Age: 38
- Posts: 10,005
- Rep Power: 33950
-
-
Originally Posted By Frank
Yes, the Beer Store in Ontario is a private corporation and the LCBO is a crown corporation. I think they should force grocery stores to accept the empties back. Either way, I live in a big city and there's always someone looking in my recycle bin.we have privatized bottle depots in AB, In SK I believe it was run by the provincial government, and usually employed mentally challenged/handicapped people. I preferred taking my bottles to SARCAN in SK TBH. I feel I get ripped off (and probably am) in AB.
how can she neg... HOW CAN SHE NEG!!! HOW?!
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts