Forum
»
Would You Be Faithful To Your Partner? (Let's see how moral the misc is.) **PICS**
02-20-2019, 08:23 AM
-
#31
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
-
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 14,376
- Rep Power: 59586
-
-
I wouldn't get into a relationship with a person that would deny me such pleasures in life.
So if I were in a relationship, it would be with someone that loved the fact I was having a threesome with 2 lil sloots. Not someone that would be jealous, and hate me for enjoying myself. Someone that enjoyed knowing I was enjoying myself in such a way.
There's a difference between betraying someone you're in a relationship with and sleeping with people that are not in your relationship. I believe in the future people will be more like this. Jealous and controlling people, who claim they "love" their partners will hate this idea though... because their love is true love, right? Not selfish control disguised as love. Nah...
So if I were in a relationship, it would be with someone that loved the fact I was having a threesome with 2 lil sloots. Not someone that would be jealous, and hate me for enjoying myself. Someone that enjoyed knowing I was enjoying myself in such a way.
There's a difference between betraying someone you're in a relationship with and sleeping with people that are not in your relationship. I believe in the future people will be more like this. Jealous and controlling people, who claim they "love" their partners will hate this idea though... because their love is true love, right? Not selfish control disguised as love. Nah...
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
02-20-2019, 08:25 AM
-
#32
- DaveIndeed
- Registered User
-
- DaveIndeed
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Age: 42
- Posts: 2,416
- Rep Power: 8599
-
-
I for real thought the gif of the door opening was a clever shop of the human centipede scene where he opens the door and that there was gonna be a funny gif later.
02-20-2019, 08:27 AM
-
#33
02-20-2019, 08:27 AM
-
#34
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
-
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Posts: 34,506
- Rep Power: 127306
-
-
Originally Posted By FailedPotential⏩
Open relationship or nothing, huh?So if I were in a relationship, it would be with someone that loved the fact I was having a threesome with 2 lil sloots. Not someone that would be jealous, and hate me for enjoying myself. Someone that enjoyed knowing I was enjoying myself in such a way.
There's a difference between betraying someone you're in a relationship with and sleeping with people that are not in your relationship. I believe in the future people will be more like this. Jealous and controlling people, who claim they "love" their partners will hate this idea though... because their love is true love, right? Not selfish control disguised as love. Nah...
There's a difference between betraying someone you're in a relationship with and sleeping with people that are not in your relationship. I believe in the future people will be more like this. Jealous and controlling people, who claim they "love" their partners will hate this idea though... because their love is true love, right? Not selfish control disguised as love. Nah...
Interesting.
If You Don't Like To Talk About Your Feelings, This Might Help...
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178926621
The Most Heartbreaking Thing That I've Learned About 'The Elite'.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178536851
Bitcoin And 'The Elite' - Why Bitcoin Is Not Revolutionary
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=179820783
02-20-2019, 08:27 AM
-
#35
- Hazel1440
- Registered User
-
- Hazel1440
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 70
- Rep Power: 102
-
-
Originally Posted By FailedPotential⏩
It's not about control. It's about loyalty. If a woman gives you 100%, then she deserves it in return. If you give 10% to Girl A and 10% to Girl B, etc., your wife isn't getting 100%.I wouldn't get into a relationship with a person that would deny me such pleasures in life.
So if I were in a relationship, it would be with someone that loved the fact I was having a threesome with 2 lil sloots. Not someone that would be jealous, and hate me for enjoying myself. Someone that enjoyed knowing I was enjoying myself in such a way.
There's a difference between betraying someone you're in a relationship with and sleeping with people that are not in your relationship. I believe in the future people will be more like this. Jealous and controlling people, who claim they "love" their partners will hate this idea though... because their love is true love, right? Not selfish control disguised as love. Nah...
So if I were in a relationship, it would be with someone that loved the fact I was having a threesome with 2 lil sloots. Not someone that would be jealous, and hate me for enjoying myself. Someone that enjoyed knowing I was enjoying myself in such a way.
There's a difference between betraying someone you're in a relationship with and sleeping with people that are not in your relationship. I believe in the future people will be more like this. Jealous and controlling people, who claim they "love" their partners will hate this idea though... because their love is true love, right? Not selfish control disguised as love. Nah...
Some people can't commit, and I get that. But, then you simply have to be upfront about it and accept an open relationship. You get to sleep around, she gets to sleep around, and neither of you gives or receives 100%, if that's what you want. It's not what I'd settle for, but to each their own.
02-20-2019, 08:27 AM
-
#36
- MichelleLnne
- Troll Patrol
-
- MichelleLnne
- Troll Patrol
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Location: Nunya, Bizness USA
- Age: 41
- Posts: 20,901
- Subscribers: 3
- Rep Power: 312235
-
-
Originally Posted By Podunks⏩
When I was younger I used to do door to door sales..and one time I had to pee so bad- I knocked on a door and a pastor answered. Dude refused to let me in to use the bathroom, not that he was obligated to let me but it rubbed me wrong that he was a pastor that wouldn’t let a young girl use his bathroom. He just said he had neighbors and that perception was the truth to people and he wouldn’t let a young girl in his house.. I was upset but I learned everything in life that day.Better safe than sorry imo, but I'm of the same mind. It's too easy for people to misconstrue, or misrepresent a situation, and then you're in dramaville.
Edit-‘some of y’all have made me feel happy for your marriages lol... some of you, I hope don’t get in relationships - or at least get in ones that suit you
Ignore list:
Johnvee73
02-20-2019, 08:27 AM
-
#37
02-20-2019, 08:28 AM
-
#38
- 1slo5oh
- Maximum Gainz
-
- 1slo5oh
- Maximum Gainz
- Join Date: Apr 2010
- Location: Houston, Texas, United States
- Posts: 9,739
- Rep Power: 122987
-
-
I guess cheating just isn't in my DNA... SRS... and not saying this trying to brag but I have literally had it thrown at me on several occasions LOL... the thought of being with another woman other than my wife does absolutely nothing for me... maybe its because I had my fair share of strange before her.. idk
But in regards to Opie... that's gonna be a no from me dog! If anything I would just wonder how these two sloots were trying to scam me.
But in regards to Opie... that's gonna be a no from me dog! If anything I would just wonder how these two sloots were trying to scam me.
6'2" @ 247lbs
02-20-2019, 08:28 AM
-
#39
- demfeelsbro
- Jelqbrah
-
- demfeelsbro
- Jelqbrah
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Posts: 15,441
- Rep Power: 127013
-
-
I would give in to my primal urges ingrained in me for 100,000+ years as opposed to the societal pressures of the past 50 or so years...any one that answers differently is lying to themselves
02-20-2019, 08:30 AM
-
#40
02-20-2019, 08:32 AM
-
#41
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
-
- BetaAsPhuck
- Wage Cuckin' It
- Join Date: Mar 2014
- Posts: 34,506
- Rep Power: 127306
-
-
Originally Posted By EnderG60⏩
So pragmatism is the only thing stopping you?Strange girls, Hell no they arnt coming in. That has wake up missing a kidney written all over it.
Neighborhood girls, still hell no. Too close to home and girls cant keep their mouths shut.
Neighborhood girls, still hell no. Too close to home and girls cant keep their mouths shut.
If You Don't Like To Talk About Your Feelings, This Might Help...
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178926621
The Most Heartbreaking Thing That I've Learned About 'The Elite'.
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=178536851
Bitcoin And 'The Elite' - Why Bitcoin Is Not Revolutionary
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=179820783
02-20-2019, 08:33 AM
-
#42
- peterplsss
- MEMENTO MORI
-
- peterplsss
- MEMENTO MORI
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Age: 33
- Posts: 6,448
- Rep Power: 71589
-
-
Lawd in heaven, srs this one would make me shed a tear deep inside, but I would say no because I'll literally never cheat, I don't care what the scenario is. I would probably call one of my single friends over to "help me out" so someone could at least take advantage of this heavenly scenario....that being said..
If my wife became a kunt and I was planning on breaking up with her/divorcing her soon anyway, I would probably end it with her then and go to town.
If my wife became a kunt and I was planning on breaking up with her/divorcing her soon anyway, I would probably end it with her then and go to town.
***Feeding son only beef jerky and rocks until he is 24 crew***
***Will be asking other parents at preschool meetings if they are jawmaxing their kids too crew***
02-20-2019, 08:34 AM
-
#43
- TBO1313
- Never Registered
-
- TBO1313
- Never Registered
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Posts: 28,898
- Rep Power: 342064
-
-
Begone thots!
I would never cheat on my wife because I gave my word much less with the f'in neighbors. What kind of degenerate has that little self control? If you sex down the neighbor there is no situation in which you come out not being ruined
I would never cheat on my wife because I gave my word much less with the f'in neighbors. What kind of degenerate has that little self control? If you sex down the neighbor there is no situation in which you come out not being ruined
6'2"
OMAD results: 2/15/19-235, 10/13/19-190
OHP-205 Bench- 245 Squat - 405 C&J - 245
2021 Spring cut: 195lbs starting weight
02-20-2019, 08:45 AM
-
#44
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
-
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 14,376
- Rep Power: 59586
-
-
Originally Posted By BetaAsPhuck⏩
More or less, yeah.Open relationship or nothing, huh?
Interesting.
Interesting.
Originally Posted By Hazel1440⏩
You're not understanding me.It's not about control. It's about loyalty. If a woman gives you 100%, then she deserves it in return. If you give 10% to Girl A and 10% to Girl B, etc., your wife isn't getting 100%.
Some people can't commit, and I get that. But, then you simply have to be upfront about it and accept an open relationship. You get to sleep around, she gets to sleep around, and neither of you gives or receives 100%, if that's what you want. It's not what I'd settle for, but to each their own.
Some people can't commit, and I get that. But, then you simply have to be upfront about it and accept an open relationship. You get to sleep around, she gets to sleep around, and neither of you gives or receives 100%, if that's what you want. It's not what I'd settle for, but to each their own.
It would not be disloyal if she was fine with me banging the two sloots, more than that, she'd be HAPPY knowing that I was enjoying myself.
I don't understand your 10% to girl a, 10% to girl b thing...
It's sex.
If a guy was going to spend a night playing poker with the boys, is he therefore not giving 100% of himself to his wife?
Replace the night of poker with the boy, for a night of sex with 2 sloots.
Everyone is fine with a guy spending a night playing poker with the boys... but wait... he's actually having a terrific time plowing the fking liiiiiife outta two sexy sloots? Not on my watch, I'm jealous as fuk and I'm insecure, and I don't trust my partner will stay with me... therefore I don't want him to ever sleep with another woman except me.
You see my point? It comes from insecurity. In a relationship, both should be have a bond that is deeper than sex... a relationship that is not forged by sex.
Marines talk about having a bond with their fellow marines that is even stronger than the bond they have with their significant other... that bond was not forged by sex
If sex is what is holding such a relationship together, a whole fkin life together... then what are we doing here?
If you think about it enough, you'll see how being with someone that denies you these pleasures is an insecure person, who is selfish, and doesn't want to allow you to experience all that life has to offer. And they will use words like "love" to disguise what is really "selfishness and insecurity, and lack of trust that their partner will stay with them"
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
02-20-2019, 08:55 AM
-
#45
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
-
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: United States
- Age: 56
- Posts: 27,840
- Rep Power: 194666
-
-
Originally Posted By FailedPotential⏩
You're not lying. Monogamy stems from insecurity. So does jealousy.More or less, yeah.
You're not understanding me.
It would not be disloyal if she was fine with me banging the two sloots, more than that, she'd be HAPPY knowing that I was enjoying myself.
I don't understand your 10% to girl a, 10% to girl b thing...
It's sex.
If a guy was going to spend a night playing poker with the boys, is he therefore not giving 100% of himself to his wife?
Replace the night of poker with the boy, for a night of sex with 2 sloots.
Everyone is fine with a guy spending a night playing poker with the boys... but wait... he's actually having a terrific time plowing the fking liiiiiife outta two sexy sloots? Not on my watch, I'm jealous as fuk and I'm insecure, and I don't trust my partner will stay with me... therefore I don't want him to ever sleep with another woman except me.
You see my point? It comes from insecurity. In a relationship, both should be have a bond that is deeper than sex... a relationship that is not forged by sex.
Marines talk about having a bond with their fellow marines that is even stronger than the bond they have with their significant other... that bond was not forged by sex
If sex is what is holding such a relationship together, a whole fkin life together... then what are we doing here?
If you think about it enough, you'll see how being with someone that denies you these pleasures is an insecure person, who is selfish, and doesn't want to allow you to experience all that life has to offer. And they will use words like "love" to disguise what is really "selfishness and insecurity, and lack of trust that their partner will stay with them"
You're not understanding me.
It would not be disloyal if she was fine with me banging the two sloots, more than that, she'd be HAPPY knowing that I was enjoying myself.
I don't understand your 10% to girl a, 10% to girl b thing...
It's sex.
If a guy was going to spend a night playing poker with the boys, is he therefore not giving 100% of himself to his wife?
Replace the night of poker with the boy, for a night of sex with 2 sloots.
Everyone is fine with a guy spending a night playing poker with the boys... but wait... he's actually having a terrific time plowing the fking liiiiiife outta two sexy sloots? Not on my watch, I'm jealous as fuk and I'm insecure, and I don't trust my partner will stay with me... therefore I don't want him to ever sleep with another woman except me.
You see my point? It comes from insecurity. In a relationship, both should be have a bond that is deeper than sex... a relationship that is not forged by sex.
Marines talk about having a bond with their fellow marines that is even stronger than the bond they have with their significant other... that bond was not forged by sex
If sex is what is holding such a relationship together, a whole fkin life together... then what are we doing here?
If you think about it enough, you'll see how being with someone that denies you these pleasures is an insecure person, who is selfish, and doesn't want to allow you to experience all that life has to offer. And they will use words like "love" to disguise what is really "selfishness and insecurity, and lack of trust that their partner will stay with them"
U
02-20-2019, 09:10 AM
-
#46
02-20-2019, 09:10 AM
-
#47
- TypeNirvash
- World Warrior
-
- TypeNirvash
- World Warrior
- Join Date: Aug 2012
- Posts: 23,195
- Rep Power: 26070
-
-
Originally Posted By FailedPotential⏩
1) Completely stable, healthy relationshipI wouldn't get into a relationship with a person that would deny me such pleasures in life.
So if I were in a relationship, it would be with someone that loved the fact I was having a threesome with 2 lil sloots. Not someone that would be jealous, and hate me for enjoying myself. Someone that enjoyed knowing I was enjoying myself in such a way.
There's a difference between betraying someone you're in a relationship with and sleeping with people that are not in your relationship. I believe in the future people will be more like this. Jealous and controlling people, who claim they "love" their partners will hate this idea though... because their love is true love, right? Not selfish control disguised as love. Nah...
So if I were in a relationship, it would be with someone that loved the fact I was having a threesome with 2 lil sloots. Not someone that would be jealous, and hate me for enjoying myself. Someone that enjoyed knowing I was enjoying myself in such a way.
There's a difference between betraying someone you're in a relationship with and sleeping with people that are not in your relationship. I believe in the future people will be more like this. Jealous and controlling people, who claim they "love" their partners will hate this idea though... because their love is true love, right? Not selfish control disguised as love. Nah...
2) Open relationship
Pick one
02-20-2019, 09:16 AM
-
#48
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
-
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: United States
- Age: 56
- Posts: 27,840
- Rep Power: 194666
-
-
Originally Posted By Podunks⏩
What does that mean? Can you explain yourself in a full coherent thesis.Open relationships are inherently bad for society, so it will likely never become the norm. That said, the most glaringly obvious reasons to keep your marriage monogamous are:
- Keeping venereal diseases out of the equation
- Keeping pregnancies with others/by others, out of the equation
- Significantly reducing the likelihood of one person becoming more emotionally/physically attached to someone outside the relationship
It's usually the naive who think that 2 people can have an open relationship without one person eventually becoming more attached to an outside agent, than the other.
I've known a few couples over the years who were proponents of open relationships, and all of their relationships failed miserably. It was even more unfortunate when kids were involved, and ended up having to witness the messy fallout firsthand.
Or you can be like this guy:
- Keeping venereal diseases out of the equation
- Keeping pregnancies with others/by others, out of the equation
- Significantly reducing the likelihood of one person becoming more emotionally/physically attached to someone outside the relationship
It's usually the naive who think that 2 people can have an open relationship without one person eventually becoming more attached to an outside agent, than the other.
I've known a few couples over the years who were proponents of open relationships, and all of their relationships failed miserably. It was even more unfortunate when kids were involved, and ended up having to witness the messy fallout firsthand.
Or you can be like this guy:
U
02-20-2019, 09:17 AM
-
#49
- Hazel1440
- Registered User
-
- Hazel1440
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 70
- Rep Power: 102
-
-
Originally Posted By FailedPotential⏩
Maybe to you sex is meaningless, and you value it as much as playing poker. But, it's not meaningless to me. I actually have to have an emotional connection to someone to sleep with them. But, I guess you aren't wired that way. I've never been an instant gratification, life is just about having fun kind of person. I believe in balance and not giving into every little emotional impulse.More or less, yeah.
You're not understanding me.
It would not be disloyal if she was fine with me banging the two sloots, more than that, she'd be HAPPY knowing that I was enjoying myself.
I don't understand your 10% to girl a, 10% to girl b thing...
It's sex.
If a guy was going to spend a night playing poker with the boys, is he therefore not giving 100% of himself to his wife?
Replace the night of poker with the boy, for a night of sex with 2 sloots.
Everyone is fine with a guy spending a night playing poker with the boys... but wait... he's actually having a terrific time plowing the fking liiiiiife outta two sexy sloots? Not on my watch, I'm jealous as fuk and I'm insecure, and I don't trust my partner will stay with me... therefore I don't want him to ever sleep with another woman except me.
You see my point? It comes from insecurity. In a relationship, both should be have a bond that is deeper than sex... a relationship that is not forged by sex.
Marines talk about having a bond with their fellow marines that is even stronger than the bond they have with their significant other... that bond was not forged by sex
If sex is what is holding such a relationship together, a whole fkin life together... then what are we doing here?
If you think about it enough, you'll see how being with someone that denies you these pleasures is an insecure person, who is selfish, and doesn't want to allow you to experience all that life has to offer. And they will use words like "love" to disguise what is really "selfishness and insecurity, and lack of trust that their partner will stay with them"
You're not understanding me.
It would not be disloyal if she was fine with me banging the two sloots, more than that, she'd be HAPPY knowing that I was enjoying myself.
I don't understand your 10% to girl a, 10% to girl b thing...
It's sex.
If a guy was going to spend a night playing poker with the boys, is he therefore not giving 100% of himself to his wife?
Replace the night of poker with the boy, for a night of sex with 2 sloots.
Everyone is fine with a guy spending a night playing poker with the boys... but wait... he's actually having a terrific time plowing the fking liiiiiife outta two sexy sloots? Not on my watch, I'm jealous as fuk and I'm insecure, and I don't trust my partner will stay with me... therefore I don't want him to ever sleep with another woman except me.
You see my point? It comes from insecurity. In a relationship, both should be have a bond that is deeper than sex... a relationship that is not forged by sex.
Marines talk about having a bond with their fellow marines that is even stronger than the bond they have with their significant other... that bond was not forged by sex
If sex is what is holding such a relationship together, a whole fkin life together... then what are we doing here?
If you think about it enough, you'll see how being with someone that denies you these pleasures is an insecure person, who is selfish, and doesn't want to allow you to experience all that life has to offer. And they will use words like "love" to disguise what is really "selfishness and insecurity, and lack of trust that their partner will stay with them"
I don't think monogamy stems from jealousy. I think some people can't commit to just one person, and some people can. It takes a lot of personal strength and morality to commit to one person. If you're open to your wife sleeping around and you doing the same, and it doesn't affect your relationship. Great. Then, it works for you. But, it wouldn't work for me.
02-20-2019, 09:20 AM
-
#50
- StrongFella
- Pointy Nips Of Peace
-
- StrongFella
- Pointy Nips Of Peace
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Location: Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
- Posts: 9,111
- Rep Power: 75685
-
-
Originally Posted By BetaAsPhuck⏩
I try to behave, but in the end I am just too fukkin horny all the damn time.At least you're honest with yourself.
NPC Bodybuilder, former U.S. Navy
***Muay Thai Crew***
***Wrestling Crew***
***Black Crew***
02-20-2019, 09:21 AM
-
#51
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
-
- leoslayer1
- Registered User
- Join Date: Feb 2013
- Location: United States
- Age: 56
- Posts: 27,840
- Rep Power: 194666
-
-
02-20-2019, 09:24 AM
-
#52
- Shortfuze
- "Your one f*ck fantasy"
-
- Shortfuze
- "Your one f*ck fantasy"
- Join Date: Feb 2004
- Location: United States
- Posts: 31,897
- Rep Power: 179945
-
-
Always and forever. Younger guys probably won't understand yet but your spouse is first and foremost your best friend and companion. If you see your spouse first and foremost as a sexual vessel, then you are guaranteed to get bored or have a rocky relationship.
*Simplicity is the key to life*
Thanks ZBlacktt for the mod rep!
Thanks ForumSentinel for the admin rep!
Thanks Gxp23 for the mod rep!
Thanks 400LB Gorilla for the mod rep!
Thanks CountryMike for admin rep!
Thanks Nics1246 for mod rep!
I got married on August 24, 2013!!
ლ(╹◡╹ლ)
02-20-2019, 09:25 AM
-
#53
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
-
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 14,376
- Rep Power: 59586
-
-
Originally Posted By Podunks⏩
Not trying to be a dick, but all of your bolded points are fixed by "Don't sleep with retards, or people that are against birth control."Open relationships are inherently bad for society, so it will likely never become the norm. That said, the most glaringly obvious reasons to keep your marriage monogamous are:
- Keeping venereal diseases out of the equation
- Keeping pregnancies with others/by others, out of the equation
- Significantly reducing the likelihood of one person becoming more emotionally/physically attached to someone outside the relationship
It's usually the naive who think that 2 people can have an open relationship without one person eventually becoming more attached to an outside agent, than the other.
I've known a few couples over the years who were proponents of open relationships, and all of their relationships failed miserably. It was even more unfortunate when kids were involved, and ended up having to witness the messy fallout firsthand.
Or you can be like this guy:
- Keeping venereal diseases out of the equation
- Keeping pregnancies with others/by others, out of the equation
- Significantly reducing the likelihood of one person becoming more emotionally/physically attached to someone outside the relationship
It's usually the naive who think that 2 people can have an open relationship without one person eventually becoming more attached to an outside agent, than the other.
I've known a few couples over the years who were proponents of open relationships, and all of their relationships failed miserably. It was even more unfortunate when kids were involved, and ended up having to witness the messy fallout firsthand.
Or you can be like this guy:
As for the naive people point you made. Simple, don't partner with an unintelligent person. If you're saying open relationships can never work, you're wrong. If you're saying for most people they won't work well, you're right. Most people are weak like that, don't know how else to say it, just weak.
So like non of your points are valid if both individuals in the relationship are "solid people".
As for what makes for a stronger society, you might be right, for now, in this day and age and the momentum that pushes most peoples thoughts/beliefs/way they live. But individuals are individuals, and two smart individuals can be aware that they can do what others cannot. As you say, a lot of people think they can make it work, but couldn't... guess what that means... that THEY were not suitable people for such a relationship, not that such a relationship is not suitable for some people.
Originally Posted By TypeNirvash⏩
You're religious, if I recall properly, right?1) Completely stable, healthy relationship
2) Open relationship
Pick one
2) Open relationship
Pick one
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
02-20-2019, 09:25 AM
-
#54
- Muzzlrpress
- Join Date: Jan 2011
- Location: United States
- Posts: 104,332
- Rep Power: 993953
-
-
Would not let them in. If they did get in and the scenario played out as it did in the OP, I doubt I could fight them off.
Thus, I would not let them in.
Just being honest. Wish I had the mental fortitude most of you seem to have.
Thus, I would not let them in.
Just being honest. Wish I had the mental fortitude most of you seem to have.
I'm back, bitches!
02-20-2019, 09:25 AM
-
#55
02-20-2019, 09:26 AM
-
#56
I had a raging hard-on the whole time watching that movie. The chicks were cute too. huh huh huh
But seriously, my answer is no but the reality might be different. If it was a loving wife/kids then I am 99.9% sure no. If it was serious girlfriend then probably 95% no. But a new girlfriend? Hmmm I probably would cave in.
But seriously, my answer is no but the reality might be different. If it was a loving wife/kids then I am 99.9% sure no. If it was serious girlfriend then probably 95% no. But a new girlfriend? Hmmm I probably would cave in.
EoR is powered by unique Nanomolecular Hyperdispersion Technology. Giving him high bioavailability and myocellular saturation.
02-20-2019, 09:27 AM
-
#57
- FearThisjake
- Registered User
-
- FearThisjake
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2010
- Location: Seattle, Washington, United States
- Posts: 16,746
- Rep Power: 40663
-
-
gonna need more pics to help myself formulate an answer
onion crew
02-20-2019, 09:28 AM
-
#58
- BootneckBrah
- Alpha Kilo
-
- BootneckBrah
- Alpha Kilo
- Join Date: Oct 2013
- Location: Newcastle, United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 12,914
- Rep Power: 70737
-
-
I’d be suspicious immediately.
As soon as the bathroom scene greeted me, I’d be certain it’s a setup.
Plus even if it’s not, it’s not going to end well.
Pass
As soon as the bathroom scene greeted me, I’d be certain it’s a setup.
Plus even if it’s not, it’s not going to end well.
Pass
Per Mare Per Terram crew*
No ********/twitter/oestrogen network crew*
Rugby league crew*
Matchmaker @ 72 virgins dating service crew*
02-20-2019, 09:31 AM
-
#59
- Vexidi
- ( . )( . )
-
- Vexidi
- ( . )( . )
- Join Date: Mar 2012
- Location: Texas, United States
- Age: 48
- Posts: 37,351
- Rep Power: 459730
-
-
Nope, I'd throw 'em a towel and let them use a cordless phone but they're standing on the porch till their ride comes.
Originally Posted By Podunks⏩
Open relationships are inherently bad for society, so it will likely never become the norm. That said, the most glaringly obvious reasons to keep your marriage monogamous are:
- Keeping venereal diseases out of the equation
- Keeping pregnancies with others/by others, out of the equation
- Significantly reducing the likelihood of one person becoming more emotionally/physically attached to someone outside the relationship
It's usually the naive who think that 2 people can have an open relationship without one person eventually becoming more attached to an outside agent, than the other.
I've known a few couples over the years who were proponents of open relationships, and all of their relationships failed miserably. It was even more unfortunate when kids were involved, and ended up having to witness the messy fallout firsthand.
- Keeping venereal diseases out of the equation
- Keeping pregnancies with others/by others, out of the equation
- Significantly reducing the likelihood of one person becoming more emotionally/physically attached to someone outside the relationship
It's usually the naive who think that 2 people can have an open relationship without one person eventually becoming more attached to an outside agent, than the other.
I've known a few couples over the years who were proponents of open relationships, and all of their relationships failed miserably. It was even more unfortunate when kids were involved, and ended up having to witness the messy fallout firsthand.
Originally Posted By TypeNirvash⏩
These. I've witnessed a few IRL and have never seen one work out long term. Relationships are work enough without introducing even more needless drama into them.1) Completely stable, healthy relationship
2) Open relationship
Pick one
2) Open relationship
Pick one
02-20-2019, 09:43 AM
-
#60
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
-
- FailedPotential
- Registered User
- Join Date: Oct 2014
- Posts: 14,376
- Rep Power: 59586
-
-
Originally Posted By Hazel1440⏩
You're right, we all want different thing. I'd argue that most people think similarly to you in regards to this topic due to the momentum of the past, and thought and beliefs that got passed on, rather than actually having thought about it.Maybe to you sex is meaningless, and you value it as much as playing poker. But, it's not meaningless to me. I actually have to have an emotional connection to someone to sleep with them. But, I guess you aren't wired that way. I've never been an instant gratification, life is just about having fun kind of person. I believe in balance and not giving into every little emotional impulse.
I don't think monogamy stems from jealousy. I think some people can't commit to just one person, and some people can. It takes a lot of personal strength and morality to commit to one person. If you're open to your wife sleeping around and you doing the same, and it doesn't affect your relationship. Great. Then, it works for you. But, it wouldn't work for me.
I don't think monogamy stems from jealousy. I think some people can't commit to just one person, and some people can. It takes a lot of personal strength and morality to commit to one person. If you're open to your wife sleeping around and you doing the same, and it doesn't affect your relationship. Great. Then, it works for you. But, it wouldn't work for me.
I mean it's largely religion that has been the cause of monogamy, even if you're not religious, the momentum of the past and your beliefs of growing up in today's world are a result of that past momentum... whether you admit it, or even realise it.
I'm not even trying to sound superior or put anyone down by saying what I'm about to say next, but I'd be willing to bet that people in open relationships are actually more intelligent people on average, compared to people in standard relationships.
Let me give you a scenario -
You're with a guy, you're both married. Happy marriage so far.
Opportunity comes up for him to bang a 10/10 dream girl looks wise, you KNOW for absolute fact that no one else will ever find out that they banged. You KNOW he will come right back to you and play happy family afterwards. He will never contact this woman ever again after having sex with her. (Don't say you can't KNOW. It's a hypothetical, knowing is known.)
He really wants to plow this 10/10.
Do you deny him this opportunity?
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts