Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» If a girl is 100% against abortion, and the guy is 100% for aborting,
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 132
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. 5
  8. Last
post 1582803351 06-26-2019, 01:15 PM
-
#61
  1. mstatefan91
  2. I occasionally lift heavy
  1. mstatefan91
  2. I occasionally lift heavy
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 8,448
  5. Rep Power: 23101
Originally Posted By outfoxxed
next thing you know, you'll tell us that blowing your load in a girl during her period isn't effective birth control
I mean if you are willing to put your penor in that bloody mess then you've already made some life decisions that I never would..
S/B/D: 485/305/500 lbs

Journal: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=173558951
post 1582803911 06-26-2019, 01:23 PM
-
#62
  1. RedRusty
  2. Redheaded Stepchild
  1. RedRusty
  2. Redheaded Stepchild
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Posts: 8,932
  5. Rep Power: 113848
Originally Posted By KirkMcquest
Well when people cant see why something like this is wrong it usually helps to reverse the situation and put them in the other persons shoes; Suppose the man had total, unilateral control on whether or not you had an abortion. If he chose to have the baby, you would be forced, for the rest of your life, to take responsibility for it. If you wanted the baby and he chose to abort, you would have no power to stop him from taking that away from you. How does that make you feel, still not seeing the "wrong"?
Obviously there is a chance I would feel differently. That's not how it works, though. That's not how it will ever work unless they invent some way for men to get pregnant.
Currently: Marathon training (Run with Hal - Advanced I); The Work/Body Beast hybrid

Next race: Ohio 10K - September 12, 2021
post 1582803921 06-26-2019, 01:23 PM
-
#63
  1. Bingu
  2. Registered User
  1. Bingu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 6,022
  6. Rep Power: 24261
Originally Posted By Omnivium
I'm 100% against abortion, I think it's murdering children for convenience and all that, but let's just play devil's advocate

In a sick twisted world where abortion is an option, here's how it should go down:
-both parents should have a say whether their kid lives or dies
-if either parent wants the kid to live, then the kid lives
-if one parent chooses life and one chooses death, the one who chose life is fully responsible for the kid. They get 100% custody, and they can choose if they want to give it up for adoption or not
Great post. Thanks brah. repped
To be a rock, and not to roll

Hey, I believe in God, man. I've seen him, I've felt his power. He plays drums for Led Zeppelin and his name is John Bonham, baby!
post 1582803941 06-26-2019, 01:24 PM
-
#64
  1. Frank Drebin
  2. Cutting
  1. Frank Drebin
  2. Cutting
  3. Join Date: Jul 2007
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 24,590
  6. Rep Power: 86323
Originally Posted By KirkMcquest
Illogical example. In the appendectomy example it's just the man's body that is involved. In a pregnancy the man is legally tied to the choice of whether or not to abort AND there is a third life involved as well. Its not just about the women's life and should not just be her choice.
Abortion shouldn't be viewed as a form of birth control. If a man does not want to have a child there are many steps he can take before an abortion. If he's foolish enough to let it get to that point, then I'm sorry to say no, you can't tell a woman to get an abortion.

Have you thought about the the impact of society your scenario would bring? No, you haven't.
post 1582804431 06-26-2019, 01:31 PM
-
#65
  1. Bingu
  2. Registered User
  1. Bingu
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 6,022
  6. Rep Power: 24261
Originally Posted By Frank
Abortion shouldn't be viewed as a form of birth control. If a man does not want to have a child there are many steps he can take before an abortion. If he's foolish enough to let it get to that point, then I'm sorry to say no, you can't tell a woman to get an abortion.

Have you thought about the the impact of society your scenario would bring? No, you haven't.
There would be a lot less fatherless children. A lot less women unable to attain their personal goals do to the responsibility of raising a child when they are not ready. A lot less unwanted children born in impoverished areas.

I could probably think of a lot more positives but feel free to share some negatives.
To be a rock, and not to roll

Hey, I believe in God, man. I've seen him, I've felt his power. He plays drums for Led Zeppelin and his name is John Bonham, baby!
post 1582804961 06-26-2019, 01:37 PM
-
#66
  1. Frank Drebin
  2. Cutting
  1. Frank Drebin
  2. Cutting
  3. Join Date: Jul 2007
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 24,590
  6. Rep Power: 86323
Originally Posted By Bingu
There would be a lot less fatherless children. A lot less women unable to attain their personal goals do to the responsibility of raising a child when they are not ready. A lot less unwanted children born in impoverished areas.

I could probably think of a lot more positives but feel free to share some negatives.
As I was typing that out the thought crossed my mind that the burden of single motherhood may encourage women to be more proactive with birth control, so you have a point.

Side question, lets say you give up parental rights at 22. Now, you're 35 and your 13 year old son wants to know his dad. And as a father yourself to your own children you've matured and wants to know your illegitimate child, but you were able to skip out on all financial responsibility for the first 13 years of his childs life. What then.
post 1582805721 06-26-2019, 01:48 PM
-
#67
  1. LegDayLol
  2. Registered User
  1. LegDayLol
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2017
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 5,248
  6. Rep Power: 18084
Should have rubbered up then! Now he has to man up...or let another kid go fatherless and have a statistically high chance of turning into a degenerate.
I identify as a chad with a jawline so chiseled it can cut diamond, don't assume my genetics

The best time to plant a tree is 20 years ago, the second best time in now
post 1582805871 06-26-2019, 01:50 PM
-
#68
  1. mstatefan91
  2. I occasionally lift heavy
  1. mstatefan91
  2. I occasionally lift heavy
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 8,448
  5. Rep Power: 23101
Originally Posted By Frank
As I was typing that out the thought crossed my mind that the burden of single motherhood may encourage women to be more proactive with birth control, so you have a point.

Side question, lets say you give up parental rights at 22. Now, you're 35 and your 13 year old son wants to know his dad. And as a father yourself to your own children you've matured and wants to know your illegitimate child, but you were able to skip out on all financial responsibility for the first 13 years of his childs life. What then.
This type of hypothetical is not really hypothetical. It happens all of the time. Just go talk to people.
S/B/D: 485/305/500 lbs

Journal: http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=173558951
post 1582806681 06-26-2019, 02:04 PM
-
#69
  1. MuzzieChik786
  2. Registered User
  1. MuzzieChik786
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2013
  4. Posts: 28,332
  5. Rep Power: 273734
Originally Posted By TBO1313
The people that run things doesn't want paternal involvement they just want fathers separated from their money. Women, on the whole, make better consumers than me do because they are more susceptible to societal pressure and feel more of a need to fit in and belong. But it isn't just men they're after they're also after women and do everything they can to belittle traditional female roles and try to push women into masculine pursuits. If people are never fulfilled they are always going to be searching for the one thing to make them feel complete and sadly, these days it tends to be commercial products. I agree with you but there is less than a 0% chance of any of that happening
As stated, I'm an idealist.

Agreed on your analysis of our current state.
Thus let me live, unseen, unknown;
Thus unlamented let me die;
Steal from the world, and not a stone
Tell where I lie.

2/17/15 - Dunk Tank Results: 15% bf (Omron said 18.6%) - 123.4 lbs LBM
post 1582806901 06-26-2019, 02:07 PM
-
#70
  1. Vhagar
  2. Forever Santa
  1. Vhagar
  2. Forever Santa
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 34,158
  5. Rep Power: 456085
Originally Posted By DrewDarden
No the willingness to abort the baby shouldn't absolve him of his choice to get her pregnant in the first place.

Sorry.
Such retarded logic
Originally Posted By Frank
Abortion shouldn't be viewed as a form of birth control. If a man does not want to have a child there are many steps he can take before an abortion. If he's foolish enough to let it get to that point, then I'm sorry to say no, you can't tell a woman to get an abortion.

Have you thought about the the impact of society your scenario would bring? No, you haven't.
But it’s cool that women get to make that choice?
post 1582807021 06-26-2019, 02:09 PM
-
#71
  1. TBO1313
  2. Never Registered
  1. TBO1313
  2. Never Registered
  3. Join Date: Dec 2013
  4. Posts: 28,898
  5. Rep Power: 342064
Originally Posted By MuzzieChik786
As stated, I'm an idealist.

Agreed on your analysis of our current state.
I try my best to be an optimist as much as possible but I have a nasty habit of falling back into my old routine of complaining about why things can't be done. If being an idealist comes natural to you then I envy you greatly
6'2"

OMAD results: 2/15/19-235, 10/13/19-190

OHP-205 Bench- 245 Squat - 405 C&J - 245

2021 Spring cut: 195lbs starting weight
post 1582807141 06-26-2019, 02:11 PM
-
#72
  1. ContrarianIndi
  2. ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
  1. ContrarianIndi
  2. ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Posts: 4,699
  5. Rep Power: 14697
If a man forcefully aborts the child without the mother's consent by doing a stomach punch, or the classic stair push, it's a murder. If the mother aborts the child, it's a medical procedure. Strong double standards
I wish Hillary would violate me like she violated federal law
<>< Christian ><>
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
libertarian
post 1582807191 06-26-2019, 02:12 PM
-
#73
  1. RobParks2M
  2. mad hatter
  1. RobParks2M
  2. mad hatter
  3. Join Date: Nov 2016
  4. Posts: 17,300
  5. Rep Power: 92038
Originally Posted By DrewDarden
No the willingness to abort the baby shouldn't absolve him of his choice to get her pregnant in the first place.

Sorry.
So no matter what he now has to pay child support amirite? Even if he has split custody 50/50 huh?
Fitness connoisseur
0.4 mg of party's over wake the FK up!
"the personification of greatness"
post 1582807331 06-26-2019, 02:14 PM
-
#74
  1. MuzzieChik786
  2. Registered User
  1. MuzzieChik786
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2013
  4. Posts: 28,332
  5. Rep Power: 273734
Originally Posted By TBO1313
I try my best to be an optimist as much as possible but I have a nasty habit of falling back into my old routine of complaining about why things can't be done. If being an idealist comes natural to you then I envy you greatly
The interesting thing is that we live in an era where minority rules. So if we had enough men demanding their right to object to an abortion (because it is their right), things would change. It's beginning, but not at a fast enough pace or in enough of a volume to prompt change.
Originally Posted By ContrarianIndi
If a man forcefully aborts the child without the mother's consent by doing a stomach punch, or the classic stair push, it's a murder. If the mother aborts the child, it's a medical procedure. Strong double standards
Except for one thing. In your former scenario, both parties are still involved. In today's abortion scenario, one party's rights are trampled on because of aperception of authoritywhen it comes to the physical body.
Thus let me live, unseen, unknown;
Thus unlamented let me die;
Steal from the world, and not a stone
Tell where I lie.

2/17/15 - Dunk Tank Results: 15% bf (Omron said 18.6%) - 123.4 lbs LBM
post 1582807421 06-26-2019, 02:15 PM
-
#75
  1. Frank Drebin
  2. Cutting
  1. Frank Drebin
  2. Cutting
  3. Join Date: Jul 2007
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 24,590
  6. Rep Power: 86323
Originally Posted By Vhagar
But it’s cool that women get to make that choice?
I'm not sure how to define my stance on abortion. I'm very much against it in most cases but I don't think it should be illegal - only discouraged I guess.
post 1582807621 06-26-2019, 02:19 PM
-
#76
  1. MuzzieChik786
  2. Registered User
  1. MuzzieChik786
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2013
  4. Posts: 28,332
  5. Rep Power: 273734
Originally Posted By Frank
I'm not sure how to define my stance on abortion. I'm very much against it in most cases but I don't think it should be illegal - only discouraged I guess.
Agreed, abortion should not be illegal. Because horrible people roam this earth and rape and incest occurs. Also, health conditions. In those scenarios, abortion should be encouraged.
Thus let me live, unseen, unknown;
Thus unlamented let me die;
Steal from the world, and not a stone
Tell where I lie.

2/17/15 - Dunk Tank Results: 15% bf (Omron said 18.6%) - 123.4 lbs LBM
post 1582807801 06-26-2019, 02:21 PM
-
#77
  1. ContrarianIndi
  2. ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
  1. ContrarianIndi
  2. ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Posts: 4,699
  5. Rep Power: 14697
Originally Posted By MuzzieChik786
Agreed, abortion should not be illegal. Because horrible people roam this earth and rape and incest occurs. Also, health conditions. In those scenarios, abortion should be encouraged.
What about the remaining 98.5% of abortions that are not a result of rape/incest?
I wish Hillary would violate me like she violated federal law
<>< Christian ><>
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
libertarian
post 1582807831 06-26-2019, 02:22 PM
-
#78
  1. ComaVision
  2. Registered User
  1. ComaVision
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 2,456
  6. Rep Power: 19707
I wonder how many people in this thread would feel differently if they knocked up a chick by accident via broken condom or bish lying about BC or whatever.
post 1582808031 06-26-2019, 02:25 PM
-
#79
  1. blackflgst
  1. blackflgst
  2. Join Date: Jan 2010
  3. Location: Florida, United States
  4. Posts: 4,174
  5. Rep Power: 17383
I love how these threads bring out all the people from the r&p section
post 1582808241 06-26-2019, 02:27 PM
-
#80
  1. Vhagar
  2. Forever Santa
  1. Vhagar
  2. Forever Santa
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 34,158
  5. Rep Power: 456085
Originally Posted By MuzzieChik786
The interesting thing is that we live in an era where minority rules. So if we had enough men demanding their right to object to an abortion (because it is their right), things would change. It's beginning, but not at a fast enough pace or in enough of a volume to prompt change.
Straight men don’t get news coverage for their movements
post 1582808471 06-26-2019, 02:30 PM
-
#81
  1. FailedPotential
  2. Registered User
  1. FailedPotential
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2014
  4. Posts: 14,376
  5. Rep Power: 59586
First of all, there are no real responsibilities, in the sense that someone must do something. If there's a guy that doesn't think he is responsible for the off-spring, and society and law says he is. Who's right? If you're high IQ you'll realise it's just matter of opinion.

People use that word to draw conclusions, they create a framework that suits their position, then say "This is way he IS responsible for the potential baby"... but all they've done is created a framework that supports that, without realising they've created that framework.
Fak U say? Cheeky kent ya, i'll fakin fak ya, ya lil sloot
post 1582808951 06-26-2019, 02:37 PM
-
#82
  1. MuzzieChik786
  2. Registered User
  1. MuzzieChik786
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2013
  4. Posts: 28,332
  5. Rep Power: 273734
Originally Posted By ContrarianIndi
What about the remaining 98.5% of abortions that are not a result of rape/incest?
I see a multi-step process in dealing with those. Step #1 is already complete:

1) Provide sufficient means to prevent pregnancy. This exists in the form of condoms, birth control, morning after pill etc. You'd have to be a completely selfish idiot to still be able to impregnate/get pregnant in a developed country.

2)Charge both partiesfor abortions. No the state shouldn't pay for it. You two made the baby, you two are financially responsible for getting rid of it. I'm hoping this would discourage people from getting pregnant and having abortions.

3) Prevent incarcerated people from having babies. True story: my best friend did foster to adopt of a brother and sister. Both their parents were in jail. Yesterday, my friend found out that there are two more kids born within the last year by the same people. One of them still incarcerated. I don't really have a plan on how to address this other than sterilize repeat offenders.

4) Educate people to seek sterilization (vasectomy/tubes tied) if they don't ever plan on having kids. This would prevent "accidents" and unwanted babies in the foster care system.
Originally Posted By Vhagar
Straight men don’t get news coverage for their movements
If enough do it, yes they will. But men are their kinds' worst enemies. By belittling them for speaking out.
Thus let me live, unseen, unknown;
Thus unlamented let me die;
Steal from the world, and not a stone
Tell where I lie.

2/17/15 - Dunk Tank Results: 15% bf (Omron said 18.6%) - 123.4 lbs LBM
post 1582809101 06-26-2019, 02:40 PM
-
#83
  1. psychosylocibin
  2. Registered User
  1. psychosylocibin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2007
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 3,653
  7. Rep Power: 10708
Originally Posted By ContrarianIndi
If a man forcefully aborts the child without the mother's consent by doing a stomach punch, or the classic stair push, it's a murder. If the mother aborts the child, it's a medical procedure. Strong double standards
This one makes me completely and utterly furious.

I understand that a women has full reproductive rights, since she needs control over her body and there is no clearly defined point in utero at which a human fetus is considered a legal human. once that human becomes viable its life takes precedent and it needs support - hence the financial support.

however, suddenly, that fetus is now a viable human when another party chooses to destroy it.

its a legal argument based on the opinion of the women, not any facts.
-Max Squat drops from 415 to 200 after going 1 degree past 90 degree knee bend crew.
post 1582809211 06-26-2019, 02:41 PM
-
#84
  1. GolfPants
  2. Registered Miscer
  1. GolfPants
  2. Registered Miscer
  3. Join Date: Jul 2008
  4. Posts: 16,671
  5. Rep Power: 70847
Completely agree.

Not saying it's a good thing but as long as women are allowed to abort children that men want to have, men should be allowed to 'financially abort' children that women want to have.

I don't accept the herp derp argument of 'well he shouldn't have stuck his wee wee in her then'. Perhaps that's true but It takes 2 to tango. The secks was agreed to by both parties. How the pregnancy is handled should also be agreed on by both parties. And if an agreement can't be reached, both parties should have as close to the same options as possible. Just my opinion.
I call it "Celebration". It's sexual, and violent...

New Jersey Crew (732)
post 1582809891 06-26-2019, 02:51 PM
-
#85
  1. JStrez
  2. Breaker of Gains
  1. JStrez
  2. Breaker of Gains
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Posts: 9,748
  6. Rep Power: 54369
When you play adult games you get adult problems. If you knock a girl up, you are responsible for the child regardless. That's like driving the getaway car but saying you didn't rob the bank.

Be a ****ing man and take care of your problems. Only punk ass bitches abandon their child.
*Mechanical Engineering Crew*
*6'3" Master Race Crew*
*6 Figs Crew*

"Because the thing about repairing, maintaining, and cleaning is it’s not an adventure. There’s no way to do it so wrong you might die. It’s just work. And the bottom line is, some people are okay going to work, and some people … well, some people would rather die. Each of us gets to choose.”
post 1582810191 06-26-2019, 02:55 PM
-
#86
  1. krs128
  2. Registered User
  1. krs128
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Location: Buffalo, New York, United States
  5. Posts: 7,371
  6. Rep Power: 10479
Originally Posted By Bingu
There would be a lot less fatherless children. A lot less women unable to attain their personal goals do to the responsibility of raising a child when they are not ready. A lot less unwanted children born in impoverished areas.

I could probably think of a lot more positives but feel free to share some negatives.
why ever use condoms as a guy when you can say "naw abort it" and be 100% free of all personal responsibility.
post 1582810211 06-26-2019, 02:55 PM
-
#87
  1. Vhagar
  2. Forever Santa
  1. Vhagar
  2. Forever Santa
  3. Join Date: Dec 2012
  4. Posts: 34,158
  5. Rep Power: 456085
Originally Posted By JStrez
When you play adult games you get adult problems. If you knock a girl up, you are responsible for the child regardless. That's like driving the getaway car but saying you didn't rob the bank.

Be a ****ing man and take care of your problems. Only punk ass bitches abandon their child.
Fatherless children rates drop to 0 after this prophet speaks lol
Originally Posted By krs128
why ever use condoms as a guy when you can say "naw abort it" and be 100% free of all personal responsibility.
Because women already have this option
post 1582811081 06-26-2019, 03:09 PM
-
#88
  1. SaviorSelfJT
  2. clownslayer
  1. SaviorSelfJT
  2. clownslayer
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Posts: 12,855
  5. Rep Power: 166618
Originally Posted By RedRusty
Don't want the chance of a baby, don't have sex.
Are you pro choice? Hypocritical if so, since "a baby is not a punishment for sex" is exactly what the pro choice crowd is yelling.
Best lifts:
Bench press: 315x5
Squat: 465x1
Strict press: 205x5
Deadlift: 405x13 (conv tap'n'go with straps)
post 1582811221 06-26-2019, 03:11 PM
-
#89
  1. gamehendge
  2. Registered User
  1. gamehendge
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2015
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 564
  6. Rep Power: 620
Originally Posted By KirkMcquest
Yeah but thats not the way the law works. In reality, if the woman wants an abortion she gets one whether the man objects or not. So, as it stands the man has NO reproductive rights whatsoever. You cant have it both ways. If we are talking about what is RIGHT then either both have reproductive rights or nobody does.
I feel as if the woman doesnt want an abortion but the guy does, then he should be able to choose his total involvement in the childs life, this includes financially.
post 1582811401 06-26-2019, 03:14 PM
-
#90
  1. gamehendge
  2. Registered User
  1. gamehendge
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2015
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 564
  6. Rep Power: 620
Originally Posted By krs128
why ever use condoms as a guy when you can say "naw abort it" and be 100% free of all personal responsibility.
Stds and stis.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts