Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» GDP ordered to pay $13m to women
  1. Results 31 to 60 of 173
  2. First
  3. 1
  4. 2
  5. 3
  6. 4
  7. Last
post 1594768821 01-02-2020, 06:12 PM
-
#31
  1. iloveus
  2. snailsrus
  1. iloveus
  2. snailsrus
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 33,694
  5. Rep Power: 105430
Originally Posted By propreffered7
none of her info was leaked.
This is 2020.
Financial Freedom/Passive Income Crew
Entrepreneur Crew
MMA Crew
Cinematographer Crew
Photographer Crew
Ski/Snowboard Crew
Guns Crew
post 1594769011 01-02-2020, 06:15 PM
-
#32
  1. RocknRollMuscle
  2. Registered User
  1. RocknRollMuscle
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
  5. Posts: 25,599
  6. Rep Power: 44521
i can't believe incels are stil payin for porn. Have they not heard of tubes? lol @ going to websites to subscribe to porn. What are we, 2003?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-fu...iting-22-women
Weight Loss: Go carnivore or keto/low carb. Create calorie deficit. Buy packaged healthy meals if needed. Meat is good and heals, stop being lied to.

Youtube Dr. Shawn Baker to change your life today.
post 1594769141 01-02-2020, 06:17 PM
-
#33
  1. Shysty021
  2. Registered User
  1. Shysty021
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: North Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 26,058
  6. Rep Power: 209290
Originally Posted By savageoldman
- make a terrible mistake
- blame someone else
- sue them
- make millions

lol smh
I wish I had a vagina
post 1594769331 01-02-2020, 06:20 PM
-
#34
  1. quadfecta
  2. Registered User
  1. quadfecta
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 23,282
  6. Rep Power: 100308
Originally Posted By RocknRollMuscle
i can't believe incels are stil payin for porn. Have they not heard of tubes? lol @ going to websites to subscribe to porn. What are we, 2003?

https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-fu...iting-22-women
To be fair GDP did a decent job keeping the full vids of the hottest girls off free sites. Couldn’t view them in 4K without subscribing anyway. They marketed their brand well to the coom connoisseur, just did a mediocre job of covering their asses in the metoo era
post 1594769421 01-02-2020, 06:21 PM
-
#35
  1. RocknRollMuscle
  2. Registered User
  1. RocknRollMuscle
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2013
  4. Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
  5. Posts: 25,599
  6. Rep Power: 44521
Originally Posted By quadfecta
To be fair GDP did a decent job keeping the full vids of the hottest girls off free sites. Couldn’t view them in 4K without subscribing anyway. They marketed their brand well to the coom connoisseur, just did a mediocre job of covering their asses in the metoo era
i'm sure feds are now gonna keep him in prison on those trumped up child porn charges - until he hands over all the money and they'll drop the charges. If u want exampels of justice corruption - there you go.

hope he gets a good lawyer who celebrates hannukah.
Weight Loss: Go carnivore or keto/low carb. Create calorie deficit. Buy packaged healthy meals if needed. Meat is good and heals, stop being lied to.

Youtube Dr. Shawn Baker to change your life today.
post 1594769891 01-02-2020, 06:29 PM
-
#36
  1. TimeTravelerBro
  2. Registered User
  1. TimeTravelerBro
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Posts: 7,078
  5. Rep Power: 31384
Lmao those sloots willingly went out there, signed a contract, verbally consented, and fuked on camera.

And then they won in court lmao

Women are always favored in court.
post 1594770091 01-02-2020, 06:32 PM
-
#37
  1. Kiop
  2. ™gif me so i can gif you©
  1. Kiop
  2. ™gif me so i can gif you©
  3. Join Date: Nov 2015
  4. Posts: 55,724
  5. Rep Power: 222392
Originally Posted By Dontoewsmebro
The Companies make up artist name was Valorie Moser.
post 1594770111 01-02-2020, 06:32 PM
-
#38
  1. Critter5592
  2. That's the arm I fap with
  1. Critter5592
  2. That's the arm I fap with
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Posts: 33,809
  5. Rep Power: 354322
Originally Posted By TheRougarou646
Play stupid games
play stupid games, win 13 million?
Uncontrollable behavior with some psychopathic tendencies
post 1594770231 01-02-2020, 06:34 PM
-
#39
  1. Slurgie
  2. Registered User
  1. Slurgie
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2011
  4. Posts: 14,790
  5. Rep Power: 41523
Originally Posted By Mercworx
What some of them did to their souls was no fukin good. I can't imagine being brain dead enough to think that was a good idea.
Originally Posted By Legz422
You have to be a legit moron to do that. You'd also have to be a complete moron to think that no one would ever find out.
And yet they're all millionaires now. Getting railed straight to the bank while you're working 9/5.
post 1594770771 01-02-2020, 06:45 PM
-
#40
  1. Legz422
  1. Legz422
  2. Join Date: Sep 2017
  3. Age: 57
  4. Posts: 45,719
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 626374
Originally Posted By Slurgie
And yet they're all millionaires now. Getting railed straight to the bank while you're working 9/5.
Well they're not millionaires yet. Hopefully it gets overturned.
~ In a world where you can be anything, be kind ~
post 1594770941 01-02-2020, 06:48 PM
-
#41
  1. Briangumble
  2. I run the Misc
  1. Briangumble
  2. I run the Misc
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Posts: 10,812
  5. Rep Power: 13997
So how did GDP lose the lawsuit? Unless there was evidence that they lied or or "tricked" the girls, how could they lose the lawsuit?
post 1594771011 01-02-2020, 06:49 PM
-
#42
  1. TheRougarou646
  2. Banned
  1. TheRougarou646
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 3,866
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Critter5592
play stupid games, win 13 million?
Or lose 13 million.

They ran a shady af business and it caught up with them.
post 1594771461 01-02-2020, 06:56 PM
-
#43
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 36,839
  5. Rep Power: 86393
Originally Posted By Briangumble
So how did GDP lose the lawsuit? Unless there was evidence that they lied or or "tricked" the girls, how could they lose the lawsuit?
Reading the article op posted, judge sounds like a massive white knight. I would also guess courts hate porn type companies and think they are almost predatory

I mean.. Some of the practices are a bit shady BUT you still signed on for the porn. It even says they say theyll be distributed on the internet, the girls KNEW it would get around.

Unless they fuken had a gun to their head to sign the contract..i dont get it. Signing a contract that doesnt disclose the exact whereabouts of where its released is shady but it is not kidnapping them and forcing them to sign the contract against their will

The bishes clearly thought the $$ was better than the risk.

And then are rewarded more (possibly)

If gdp really leaked the info i would say they should get compensation but not 100k worth
post 1594771751 01-02-2020, 07:01 PM
-
#44
  1. HomerJThompson
  2. Registered User
  1. HomerJThompson
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 13,602
  6. Rep Power: 21472
"The women – who shot videos for San Diego-based GirlsDoPorn when they were 18-23 years old – claimed in a 2016 lawsuit they were duped into filming based on the lie the videos were for a private collector or to be sold on DVDs overseas and would never appear online."

They were ok being whores as long as it was not public but just used for private purposes. Having said that, gdp did lie so they get whats coming to them.
post 1594772591 01-02-2020, 07:15 PM
-
#45
  1. VTheKing
  2. Allied Allies Alliance
  1. VTheKing
  2. Allied Allies Alliance
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: British Columbia, Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 28,869
  7. Rep Power: 81290
You guys are trying too hard to be based black pillers here, might want to read the court documents first before having strong opinions. GDP did a lot of things that are sleazy even considering the industry they're in:

-The actresses were made to sign documents right before the shooting and pressured them to sign as fast as possible, which was GDP's way of saying they "consented" to online distribution. GDP deliberately obfuscated the fact the videos would be widely distributed online and actively lied about the purposes of the "consent" document. Evidently in a court of law, this doesn't pass the sniff test.

-GDP and the sites they promote on were never even mentioned in the hurried documents, which enhances the former's point.

-They broadly used the likeness of the actresses in affiliate marketing and posted clips in free porn sites, which is pretty obvious evidence GDP never intended to protect the actresses' privacy in spite of documented promises that the videos would neither be distributed online nor seen in America.

-They moved money offshore in an attempt to dodge any financial liability.
So how did GDP lose the lawsuit? Unless there was evidence that they lied or or "tricked" the girls, how could they lose the lawsuit?
There was exhausting evidence the actresses were tricked, which is why GDP lost.
Go Canucks Go!



Mais notre monde érodé restera le même
Et demain toi et moi serons partis
post 1594772631 01-02-2020, 07:16 PM
-
#46
  1. MYOFIBRAH
  2. mL/kg/min
  1. MYOFIBRAH
  2. mL/kg/min
  3. Join Date: May 2012
  4. Posts: 7,154
  5. Rep Power: 39290
Originally Posted By Slurgie
And yet they're all millionaires now. Getting railed straight to the bank while you're working 9/5.
Originally Posted By Briangumble
So how did GDP lose the lawsuit? Unless there was evidence that they lied or or "tricked" the girls, how could they lose the lawsuit?
did u read the article? its all laid out.

also, they won 150k each. not millions each.
Discipline is the bridge between goal and accomplishment

For the wretched of the earth, they are everywhere
post 1594773481 01-02-2020, 07:30 PM
-
#47
  1. mcdojo
  2. Registered User
  1. mcdojo
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 19,514
  6. Rep Power: 42360
Originally Posted By MYOFIBRAH
did u read the article? its all laid out.

also, they won 150k each. not millions each.
$150k was just punitive. The also won a share of $9m compensatory damges. So each person will get like $500k each.

However whether thy will get is another matter. Further not sure how payment will work , when right now only 22 people joined the lawsuit. Im sure the other 500 + girls are going to now say they were also tricked. Thats going to be a small amount of money shared by all of them, from whatever they can recover from gsp.

The gdp mastermind also went into hiding, meanwhile his workers are rotting in jail.
post 1594773801 01-02-2020, 07:37 PM
-
#48
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  1. propreffered7
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 36,839
  5. Rep Power: 86393
Originally Posted By VTheKing
You guys are trying too hard to be based black pillers here, might want to read the court documents first before having strong opinions. GDP did a lot of things that are sleazy even considering the industry they're in:

-The actresses were made to sign documents right before the shooting and pressured them to sign as fast as possible, which was GDP's way of saying they "consented" to online distribution. GDP deliberately obfuscated the fact the videos would be widely distributed online and actively lied about the purposes of the "consent" document. Evidently in a court of law, this doesn't pass the sniff test.

-GDP and the sites they promote on were never even mentioned in the hurried documents, which enhances the former's point.

-They broadly used the likeness of the actresses in affiliate marketing and posted clips in free porn sites, which is pretty obvious evidence GDP never intended to protect the actresses' privacy in spite of documented promises that the videos would neither be distributed online nor seen in America.

-They moved money offshore in an attempt to dodge any financial liability.




There was exhausting evidence the actresses were tricked, which is why GDP lost.
What do you mean by "tricked"?

Nah. These girls knew it was porn. Youre getting mixed up in the supposed distribution and not the entire premise. The most nefarious thing they did there was their original ad didnt specify porn. This gave them a wider net and audience. After that they were told it was porn. This was over the phone though.

Ive read the court documents. The article in the op even states that their video was to be distributed online
Enright found a reference at the bottom of the second page to “online purposes” was not an appropriate disclosure the videos were made to be posted online.
Mmkay enright. So what exactly is online purposes?

Regarding, "likeness" youre pretending gdp didnt film them. I cant discern whether the article suggests the judge RULED, based on his interpretation of the contract after the fact - that it didnt accurately convey how theyd be distributed once they signed the contracts - or whether hes saying the actual gdp contract didnt give gdp rights to their likeness. Dunno there

But i do know gdp cant really control affiliates nor how they disperse their stuff. Though they could eliminate rule breakers the damage was prob. Already done

The judge is such a wk:
As for staged interviews of the models prior to shooting the porn flicks where the women were coached to act “flirty and perky” or risk not getting paid, Enright said those not undermine the women’s fraud claims.
Oh the horror. They were told to be flirty and perky or else risk the 5k dollars or less..but still went through with it anyway. But alas they still risked their reputation for 5k dollars or less

At the end of the day, i think gdp was probably shady. However, NOT on the extreme end. Like kidnapping and stuff. And i find it a bit ridiculous the girls sign a contract to do porn and are rewarded a lot of $$ for risks they mostly knew about. Some details were amiss sure; its the difference between saying online vs. Specifying the exact website. But they knew
post 1594773821 01-02-2020, 07:38 PM
-
#49
  1. mcdojo
  2. Registered User
  1. mcdojo
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2010
  4. Age: 36
  5. Posts: 19,514
  6. Rep Power: 42360
Alao if youre interested someone started uploading some of these firls video on the hub again. Some of the vids are titled by which 'jane doe' number they are.

Jane doe 1 is the lawyer graduate (not working tho) that started recruited all the other girls to build the class action.

She came back for a second scene and got DP.
post 1594774271 01-02-2020, 07:46 PM
-
#50
  1. Blasting
  2. Eatin ass and takin names
  1. Blasting
  2. Eatin ass and takin names
  3. Join Date: Jan 2019
  4. Posts: 7,909
  5. Rep Power: 59653
They were also promised their names would never be associated with the videos.

In reality, GirlsDoPorn never revealed the name of the website the videos were being produced for and several in the company were in on the scheme: owner Michael Pratt, videographer Matthew Wolfe, actor Andre Garcia and administrative assistantValorie Moser.
Any relation to Veronica?
Horny.
post 1594774411 01-02-2020, 07:48 PM
-
#51
  1. Cadet4life
  2. B- grad student
  1. Cadet4life
  2. B- grad student
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Posts: 5,727
  5. Rep Power: 27080
Originally Posted By mcdojo
Alao if youre interested someone started uploading some of these firls video on the hub again. Some of the vids are titled by which 'jane doe' number they are.

Jane doe 1 is the lawyer graduate (not working tho) that started recruited all the other girls to build the class action.

She came back for a second scene and got DP.
going to check for research purposes.
be the turtle in the race.
post 1594774741 01-02-2020, 07:52 PM
-
#52
  1. HomerJThompson
  2. Registered User
  1. HomerJThompson
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2012
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 13,602
  6. Rep Power: 21472
Originally Posted By Kiop
This is why i still misc, there are still gems like this that make me lol
post 1594775031 01-02-2020, 07:57 PM
-
#53
  1. nnodcvcker
  2. Cope killer
  1. nnodcvcker
  2. Cope killer
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Posts: 4,689
  5. Rep Power: 14584
Once again reinforcing the notion of daughter or abortion.
Life is on easy mode for so many girls
Black Pill crew
Insomniac Crew
HTC
Half body crew
I am not an incel, nor identify as one. I am simply here to have a good time discussing. My posts that may come off as offensive are all satirical and they have no harmful intent.
post 1594775041 01-02-2020, 07:57 PM
-
#54
  1. Kev1972
  2. Registered User
  1. Kev1972
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Location: Big Arm, Montana, United States
  5. Posts: 49,924
  6. Rep Power: 287644
Fuk might fly to New Zealand and pull a dog the bounty hunter and bring that fugitive kunt to justice. Get some easy reward money. He looks like a total cuck *******.
Motorcycle crew
Army veteran crew
One Meal a day crew
post 1594775141 01-02-2020, 07:58 PM
-
#55
  1. iloveus
  2. snailsrus
  1. iloveus
  2. snailsrus
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 33,694
  5. Rep Power: 105430
Originally Posted By MYOFIBRAH
also, they won 150k each.
Financial Freedom/Passive Income Crew
Entrepreneur Crew
MMA Crew
Cinematographer Crew
Photographer Crew
Ski/Snowboard Crew
Guns Crew
post 1594775531 01-02-2020, 08:05 PM
-
#56
  1. iloveus
  2. snailsrus
  1. iloveus
  2. snailsrus
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 33,694
  5. Rep Power: 105430
Originally Posted By VTheKing
There was exhausting evidence the actresses were tricked, which is why GDP lost.
Not according to the GDP videos. They always have this 30 minute long chit chat about their entire lives before they start having sex. "I'm majoring in this. My boyfriend doesn't know I'm here etc."

There's the nerdy looking girl with the glasses spanking her ass and giggles like she likes it and wants it.

At the end of the video, the dude and cameraman always asks her what she thinks of the video before she takes a shower. "What do you think of your first adult video?"

90% of GDP vids are that Miss Colorado chick

"Tricked" my a**. Lawyers/judges are retards.
Financial Freedom/Passive Income Crew
Entrepreneur Crew
MMA Crew
Cinematographer Crew
Photographer Crew
Ski/Snowboard Crew
Guns Crew
post 1594775641 01-02-2020, 08:06 PM
-
#57
  1. Workout4ever
  1. Workout4ever
  2. Join Date: Apr 2009
  3. Location: Miami, Florida, United States
  4. Age: 33
  5. Posts: 43,720
  6. Rep Power: 58689
i'm not a sl00t or anything... but $13m is $13m
post 1594775781 01-02-2020, 08:08 PM
-
#58
  1. Humungus
  2. Lord of Ruin
  1. Humungus
  2. Lord of Ruin
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Posts: 8,065
  5. Rep Power: 50189
Originally Posted By mcdojo
Jane doe 1 is the lawyer graduate (not working tho) that started recruited all the other girls to build the class action
Damn that one sloot going into law caused all this.

I guess this is how the site got the best girls.
post 1594775901 01-02-2020, 08:10 PM
-
#59
  1. Tomohokk
  2. Registered User
  1. Tomohokk
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2011
  4. Age: 38
  5. Posts: 7,123
  6. Rep Power: 22563
Not only do they get some good dicking on cam, get a bit of the fame they wanted, now they've been awarded milions?

Fuk this ghey earth

LOL is each sloot gonna have like $10 each? There's 1000s of these chicks and a lot of them come back for more.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
...............................R.I.P.................................
.............Aziz "Zyzz" Sergeyevich Shavershian.........
.................₪₪₪₪₪₪1989-2011₪₪₪₪₪₪.............
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
post 1594778931 01-02-2020, 09:06 PM
-
#60
  1. VTheKing
  2. Allied Allies Alliance
  1. VTheKing
  2. Allied Allies Alliance
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: British Columbia, Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 28,869
  7. Rep Power: 81290
Originally Posted By propreffered7
What do you mean by "tricked"?

Nah. These girls knew it was porn. Youre getting mixed up in the supposed distribution and not the entire premise. The most nefarious thing they did there was their original ad didnt specify porn. This gave them a wider net and audience. After that they were told it was porn. This was over the phone though.

Ive read the court documents. The article in the op even states that their video was to be distributed online
The entire premise of the court case is based on what exactly the actresses consented to and how GDP represented/conducted themselves, not whether they were "tricked" into doing porn. The fact they did porn to be distributed in some manner is evidently never contested, seeing as all actresses knew they would be performing on camera.

Mmkay enright. So what exactly is online purposes?

Regarding, "likeness" youre pretending gdp didnt film them. I cant discern whether the article suggests the judge RULED, based on his interpretation of the contract after the fact - that it didnt accurately convey how theyd be distributed once they signed the contracts - or whether hes saying the actual gdp contract didnt give gdp rights to their likeness. Dunno there

But i do know gdp cant really control affiliates nor how they disperse their stuff. Though they could eliminate rule breakers the damage was prob. Already done
Again, the issue was never about being on camera. How GDP used the actresses' likeliness is crucial in establishing that they never intended to keep documented promises of limiting distribution of the videos to non-American audiences.
The judge is such a wk:

Oh the horror. They were told to be flirty and perky or else risk the 5k dollars or less..but still went through with it anyway. But alas they still risked their reputation for 5k dollars or less

At the end of the day, i think gdp was probably shady. However, NOT on the extreme end. Like kidnapping and stuff. And i find it a bit ridiculous the girls sign a contract to do porn and are rewarded a lot of $$ for risks they mostly knew about. Some details were amiss sure; its the difference between saying online vs. Specifying the exact website. But they knew
Missing the point yet again. What the judge says is that the acting in the videos do not diminish their claims in the suit - as in, if an actress in a GDP video says "oh I can't wait for GDP to show everyone in the world how I suck dick", it has no bearing on whether she consented to worldwide distribution of her videos or how GDP represented themselves before getting her on camera. Of course, if you ever browsed a GDP thread or comments section you'd notice how many people actually believed the acting to approximate reality.

And the suit is entirely based on the matter of distribution consent and how GDP represented themselves, not whether GDP did "bad stuff" and to what extent. This is fundamentally a fraud case, not sexual crime.
Not according to the GDP videos. They always have this 30 minute long chit chat about their entire lives before they start having sex. "I'm majoring in this. My boyfriend doesn't know I'm here etc."

There's the nerdy looking girl with the glasses spanking her ass and giggles like she likes it and wants it.

At the end of the video, the dude and cameraman always asks her what she thinks of the video before she takes a shower. "What do you think of your first adult video?"

90% of GDP vids are that Miss Colorado chick

"Tricked" my a**. Lawyers/judges are retards.
Yeah, judges and lawyers who don't take porn acting as literal evidence in court are the retards here. Are you preparing a class action suit against Johnny Sins for all the sausage pizzas he never delivered?
Go Canucks Go!



Mais notre monde érodé restera le même
Et demain toi et moi serons partis
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts