Thread: GDP ordered to pay $13m to women
01-02-2020, 06:12 PM
-
#31
01-02-2020, 06:15 PM
-
#32
- RocknRollMuscle
- Registered User
-
- RocknRollMuscle
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
- Posts: 25,599
- Rep Power: 44521
-
-
i can't believe incels are stil payin for porn. Have they not heard of tubes? lol @ going to websites to subscribe to porn. What are we, 2003?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-fu...iting-22-women
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-fu...iting-22-women
Weight Loss: Go carnivore or keto/low carb. Create calorie deficit. Buy packaged healthy meals if needed. Meat is good and heals, stop being lied to.
Youtube Dr. Shawn Baker to change your life today.
01-02-2020, 06:17 PM
-
#33
01-02-2020, 06:20 PM
-
#34
- quadfecta
- Registered User
-
- quadfecta
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2015
- Age: 36
- Posts: 23,282
- Rep Power: 100308
-
-
Originally Posted By RocknRollMuscle⏩
To be fair GDP did a decent job keeping the full vids of the hottest girls off free sites. Couldn’t view them in 4K without subscribing anyway. They marketed their brand well to the coom connoisseur, just did a mediocre job of covering their asses in the metoo erai can't believe incels are stil payin for porn. Have they not heard of tubes? lol @ going to websites to subscribe to porn. What are we, 2003?
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-fu...iting-22-women
https://www.thedailybeast.com/the-fu...iting-22-women
01-02-2020, 06:21 PM
-
#35
- RocknRollMuscle
- Registered User
-
- RocknRollMuscle
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2013
- Location: Los Angeles, California, United States
- Posts: 25,599
- Rep Power: 44521
-
-
Originally Posted By quadfecta⏩
i'm sure feds are now gonna keep him in prison on those trumped up child porn charges - until he hands over all the money and they'll drop the charges. If u want exampels of justice corruption - there you go.To be fair GDP did a decent job keeping the full vids of the hottest girls off free sites. Couldn’t view them in 4K without subscribing anyway. They marketed their brand well to the coom connoisseur, just did a mediocre job of covering their asses in the metoo era
hope he gets a good lawyer who celebrates hannukah.
Weight Loss: Go carnivore or keto/low carb. Create calorie deficit. Buy packaged healthy meals if needed. Meat is good and heals, stop being lied to.
Youtube Dr. Shawn Baker to change your life today.
01-02-2020, 06:29 PM
-
#36
- TimeTravelerBro
- Registered User
-
- TimeTravelerBro
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2016
- Posts: 7,078
- Rep Power: 31384
-
-
Lmao those sloots willingly went out there, signed a contract, verbally consented, and fuked on camera.
And then they won in court lmao
Women are always favored in court.
And then they won in court lmao
Women are always favored in court.
01-02-2020, 06:32 PM
-
#37
01-02-2020, 06:32 PM
-
#38
- Critter5592
- That's the arm I fap with
-
- Critter5592
- That's the arm I fap with
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Posts: 33,809
- Rep Power: 354322
-
-
Originally Posted By TheRougarou646⏩
play stupid games, win 13 million?Play stupid games
Uncontrollable behavior with some psychopathic tendencies
01-02-2020, 06:34 PM
-
#39
Originally Posted By Mercworx⏩
What some of them did to their souls was no fukin good. I can't imagine being brain dead enough to think that was a good idea.
Originally Posted By Legz422⏩
And yet they're all millionaires now. Getting railed straight to the bank while you're working 9/5.You have to be a legit moron to do that. You'd also have to be a complete moron to think that no one would ever find out.
01-02-2020, 06:45 PM
-
#40
Originally Posted By Slurgie⏩
Well they're not millionaires yet. Hopefully it gets overturned.And yet they're all millionaires now. Getting railed straight to the bank while you're working 9/5.
~ In a world where you can be anything, be kind ~
01-02-2020, 06:48 PM
-
#41
- Briangumble
- I run the Misc
-
- Briangumble
- I run the Misc
- Join Date: Oct 2005
- Posts: 10,812
- Rep Power: 13997
-
-
So how did GDP lose the lawsuit? Unless there was evidence that they lied or or "tricked" the girls, how could they lose the lawsuit?
01-02-2020, 06:49 PM
-
#42
- TheRougarou646
- Banned
-
- TheRougarou646
- Banned
- Join Date: Jan 2017
- Posts: 3,866
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
Originally Posted By Critter5592⏩
Or lose 13 million.play stupid games, win 13 million?
They ran a shady af business and it caught up with them.
01-02-2020, 06:56 PM
-
#43
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
Originally Posted By Briangumble⏩
Reading the article op posted, judge sounds like a massive white knight. I would also guess courts hate porn type companies and think they are almost predatorySo how did GDP lose the lawsuit? Unless there was evidence that they lied or or "tricked" the girls, how could they lose the lawsuit?
I mean.. Some of the practices are a bit shady BUT you still signed on for the porn. It even says they say theyll be distributed on the internet, the girls KNEW it would get around.
Unless they fuken had a gun to their head to sign the contract..i dont get it. Signing a contract that doesnt disclose the exact whereabouts of where its released is shady but it is not kidnapping them and forcing them to sign the contract against their will
The bishes clearly thought the $$ was better than the risk.
And then are rewarded more (possibly)
If gdp really leaked the info i would say they should get compensation but not 100k worth
01-02-2020, 07:01 PM
-
#44
- HomerJThompson
- Registered User
-
- HomerJThompson
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Age: 50
- Posts: 13,602
- Rep Power: 21472
-
-
"The women – who shot videos for San Diego-based GirlsDoPorn when they were 18-23 years old – claimed in a 2016 lawsuit they were duped into filming based on the lie the videos were for a private collector or to be sold on DVDs overseas and would never appear online."
They were ok being whores as long as it was not public but just used for private purposes. Having said that, gdp did lie so they get whats coming to them.
They were ok being whores as long as it was not public but just used for private purposes. Having said that, gdp did lie so they get whats coming to them.
01-02-2020, 07:15 PM
-
#45
- VTheKing
- Allied Allies Alliance
-
- VTheKing
- Allied Allies Alliance
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: British Columbia, Canada
- Age: 34
- Posts: 28,869
- Rep Power: 81290
-
-
You guys are trying too hard to be based black pillers here, might want to read the court documents first before having strong opinions. GDP did a lot of things that are sleazy even considering the industry they're in:
-The actresses were made to sign documents right before the shooting and pressured them to sign as fast as possible, which was GDP's way of saying they "consented" to online distribution. GDP deliberately obfuscated the fact the videos would be widely distributed online and actively lied about the purposes of the "consent" document. Evidently in a court of law, this doesn't pass the sniff test.
-GDP and the sites they promote on were never even mentioned in the hurried documents, which enhances the former's point.
-They broadly used the likeness of the actresses in affiliate marketing and posted clips in free porn sites, which is pretty obvious evidence GDP never intended to protect the actresses' privacy in spite of documented promises that the videos would neither be distributed online nor seen in America.
-They moved money offshore in an attempt to dodge any financial liability.
-The actresses were made to sign documents right before the shooting and pressured them to sign as fast as possible, which was GDP's way of saying they "consented" to online distribution. GDP deliberately obfuscated the fact the videos would be widely distributed online and actively lied about the purposes of the "consent" document. Evidently in a court of law, this doesn't pass the sniff test.
-GDP and the sites they promote on were never even mentioned in the hurried documents, which enhances the former's point.
-They broadly used the likeness of the actresses in affiliate marketing and posted clips in free porn sites, which is pretty obvious evidence GDP never intended to protect the actresses' privacy in spite of documented promises that the videos would neither be distributed online nor seen in America.
-They moved money offshore in an attempt to dodge any financial liability.
So how did GDP lose the lawsuit? Unless there was evidence that they lied or or "tricked" the girls, how could they lose the lawsuit?
There was exhausting evidence the actresses were tricked, which is why GDP lost.Go Canucks Go!
Mais notre monde érodé restera le même
Et demain toi et moi serons partis
01-02-2020, 07:16 PM
-
#46
Originally Posted By Slurgie⏩
And yet they're all millionaires now. Getting railed straight to the bank while you're working 9/5.
Originally Posted By Briangumble⏩
did u read the article? its all laid out.So how did GDP lose the lawsuit? Unless there was evidence that they lied or or "tricked" the girls, how could they lose the lawsuit?
also, they won 150k each. not millions each.
Discipline is the bridge between goal and accomplishment
For the wretched of the earth, they are everywhere
01-02-2020, 07:30 PM
-
#47
- mcdojo
- Registered User
-
- mcdojo
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Age: 36
- Posts: 19,514
- Rep Power: 42360
-
-
Originally Posted By MYOFIBRAH⏩
$150k was just punitive. The also won a share of $9m compensatory damges. So each person will get like $500k each.did u read the article? its all laid out.
also, they won 150k each. not millions each.
also, they won 150k each. not millions each.
However whether thy will get is another matter. Further not sure how payment will work , when right now only 22 people joined the lawsuit. Im sure the other 500 + girls are going to now say they were also tricked. Thats going to be a small amount of money shared by all of them, from whatever they can recover from gsp.
The gdp mastermind also went into hiding, meanwhile his workers are rotting in jail.
01-02-2020, 07:37 PM
-
#48
- propreffered7
- Registered User
-
- propreffered7
- Registered User
- Join Date: Mar 2010
- Posts: 36,839
- Rep Power: 86393
-
-
Originally Posted By VTheKing⏩
What do you mean by "tricked"?You guys are trying too hard to be based black pillers here, might want to read the court documents first before having strong opinions. GDP did a lot of things that are sleazy even considering the industry they're in:
-The actresses were made to sign documents right before the shooting and pressured them to sign as fast as possible, which was GDP's way of saying they "consented" to online distribution. GDP deliberately obfuscated the fact the videos would be widely distributed online and actively lied about the purposes of the "consent" document. Evidently in a court of law, this doesn't pass the sniff test.
-GDP and the sites they promote on were never even mentioned in the hurried documents, which enhances the former's point.
-They broadly used the likeness of the actresses in affiliate marketing and posted clips in free porn sites, which is pretty obvious evidence GDP never intended to protect the actresses' privacy in spite of documented promises that the videos would neither be distributed online nor seen in America.
-They moved money offshore in an attempt to dodge any financial liability.
There was exhausting evidence the actresses were tricked, which is why GDP lost.
-The actresses were made to sign documents right before the shooting and pressured them to sign as fast as possible, which was GDP's way of saying they "consented" to online distribution. GDP deliberately obfuscated the fact the videos would be widely distributed online and actively lied about the purposes of the "consent" document. Evidently in a court of law, this doesn't pass the sniff test.
-GDP and the sites they promote on were never even mentioned in the hurried documents, which enhances the former's point.
-They broadly used the likeness of the actresses in affiliate marketing and posted clips in free porn sites, which is pretty obvious evidence GDP never intended to protect the actresses' privacy in spite of documented promises that the videos would neither be distributed online nor seen in America.
-They moved money offshore in an attempt to dodge any financial liability.
There was exhausting evidence the actresses were tricked, which is why GDP lost.
Nah. These girls knew it was porn. Youre getting mixed up in the supposed distribution and not the entire premise. The most nefarious thing they did there was their original ad didnt specify porn. This gave them a wider net and audience. After that they were told it was porn. This was over the phone though.
Ive read the court documents. The article in the op even states that their video was to be distributed online
Enright found a reference at the bottom of the second page to “online purposes” was not an appropriate disclosure the videos were made to be posted online.
Mmkay enright. So what exactly is online purposes?Regarding, "likeness" youre pretending gdp didnt film them. I cant discern whether the article suggests the judge RULED, based on his interpretation of the contract after the fact - that it didnt accurately convey how theyd be distributed once they signed the contracts - or whether hes saying the actual gdp contract didnt give gdp rights to their likeness. Dunno there
But i do know gdp cant really control affiliates nor how they disperse their stuff. Though they could eliminate rule breakers the damage was prob. Already done
The judge is such a wk:
As for staged interviews of the models prior to shooting the porn flicks where the women were coached to act “flirty and perky” or risk not getting paid, Enright said those not undermine the women’s fraud claims.
Oh the horror. They were told to be flirty and perky or else risk the 5k dollars or less..but still went through with it anyway. But alas they still risked their reputation for 5k dollars or lessAt the end of the day, i think gdp was probably shady. However, NOT on the extreme end. Like kidnapping and stuff. And i find it a bit ridiculous the girls sign a contract to do porn and are rewarded a lot of $$ for risks they mostly knew about. Some details were amiss sure; its the difference between saying online vs. Specifying the exact website. But they knew
01-02-2020, 07:38 PM
-
#49
- mcdojo
- Registered User
-
- mcdojo
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Age: 36
- Posts: 19,514
- Rep Power: 42360
-
-
Alao if youre interested someone started uploading some of these firls video on the hub again. Some of the vids are titled by which 'jane doe' number they are.
Jane doe 1 is the lawyer graduate (not working tho) that started recruited all the other girls to build the class action.
She came back for a second scene and got DP.
Jane doe 1 is the lawyer graduate (not working tho) that started recruited all the other girls to build the class action.
She came back for a second scene and got DP.
01-02-2020, 07:46 PM
-
#50
- Blasting
- Eatin ass and takin names
-
- Blasting
- Eatin ass and takin names
- Join Date: Jan 2019
- Posts: 7,909
- Rep Power: 59653
-
-
They were also promised their names would never be associated with the videos.
In reality, GirlsDoPorn never revealed the name of the website the videos were being produced for and several in the company were in on the scheme: owner Michael Pratt, videographer Matthew Wolfe, actor Andre Garcia and administrative assistantValorie Moser.
Any relation to Veronica?In reality, GirlsDoPorn never revealed the name of the website the videos were being produced for and several in the company were in on the scheme: owner Michael Pratt, videographer Matthew Wolfe, actor Andre Garcia and administrative assistantValorie Moser.
Horny.
01-02-2020, 07:48 PM
-
#51
- Cadet4life
- B- grad student
-
- Cadet4life
- B- grad student
- Join Date: Dec 2009
- Posts: 5,727
- Rep Power: 27080
-
-
Originally Posted By mcdojo⏩
going to check for research purposes.Alao if youre interested someone started uploading some of these firls video on the hub again. Some of the vids are titled by which 'jane doe' number they are.
Jane doe 1 is the lawyer graduate (not working tho) that started recruited all the other girls to build the class action.
She came back for a second scene and got DP.
Jane doe 1 is the lawyer graduate (not working tho) that started recruited all the other girls to build the class action.
She came back for a second scene and got DP.
be the turtle in the race.
01-02-2020, 07:52 PM
-
#52
- HomerJThompson
- Registered User
-
- HomerJThompson
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2012
- Age: 50
- Posts: 13,602
- Rep Power: 21472
-
-
Originally Posted By Kiop⏩
This is why i still misc, there are still gems like this that make me lol
01-02-2020, 07:57 PM
-
#53
- nnodcvcker
- Cope killer
-
- nnodcvcker
- Cope killer
- Join Date: Jul 2017
- Posts: 4,689
- Rep Power: 14584
-
-
Once again reinforcing the notion of daughter or abortion.
Life is on easy mode for so many girls
Life is on easy mode for so many girls
Black Pill crew
Insomniac Crew
HTC
Half body crew
I am not an incel, nor identify as one. I am simply here to have a good time discussing. My posts that may come off as offensive are all satirical and they have no harmful intent.
01-02-2020, 07:57 PM
-
#54
- Kev1972
- Registered User
-
- Kev1972
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2013
- Location: Big Arm, Montana, United States
- Posts: 49,924
- Rep Power: 287644
-
-
Fuk might fly to New Zealand and pull a dog the bounty hunter and bring that fugitive kunt to justice. Get some easy reward money. He looks like a total cuck *******.
Motorcycle crew
Army veteran crew
One Meal a day crew
01-02-2020, 07:58 PM
-
#55
01-02-2020, 08:05 PM
-
#56
Originally Posted By VTheKing⏩
Not according to the GDP videos. They always have this 30 minute long chit chat about their entire lives before they start having sex. "I'm majoring in this. My boyfriend doesn't know I'm here etc."There was exhausting evidence the actresses were tricked, which is why GDP lost.
There's the nerdy looking girl with the glasses spanking her ass and giggles like she likes it and wants it.
At the end of the video, the dude and cameraman always asks her what she thinks of the video before she takes a shower. "What do you think of your first adult video?"
90% of GDP vids are that Miss Colorado chick
"Tricked" my a**. Lawyers/judges are retards.
Financial Freedom/Passive Income Crew
Entrepreneur Crew
MMA Crew
Cinematographer Crew
Photographer Crew
Ski/Snowboard Crew
Guns Crew
01-02-2020, 08:06 PM
-
#57
- Workout4ever
- Join Date: Apr 2009
- Location: Miami, Florida, United States
- Age: 33
- Posts: 43,720
- Rep Power: 58689
-
-
i'm not a sl00t or anything... but $13m is $13m
01-02-2020, 08:08 PM
-
#58
Originally Posted By mcdojo⏩
Damn that one sloot going into law caused all this.Jane doe 1 is the lawyer graduate (not working tho) that started recruited all the other girls to build the class action
I guess this is how the site got the best girls.
01-02-2020, 08:10 PM
-
#59
- Tomohokk
- Registered User
-
- Tomohokk
- Registered User
- Join Date: Apr 2011
- Age: 38
- Posts: 7,123
- Rep Power: 22563
-
-
Not only do they get some good dicking on cam, get a bit of the fame they wanted, now they've been awarded milions?
Fuk this ghey earth
LOL is each sloot gonna have like $10 each? There's 1000s of these chicks and a lot of them come back for more.
Fuk this ghey earth
LOL is each sloot gonna have like $10 each? There's 1000s of these chicks and a lot of them come back for more.
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
...............................R.I.P.................................
.............Aziz "Zyzz" Sergeyevich Shavershian.........
.................₪₪₪₪₪₪1989-2011₪₪₪₪₪₪.............
▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬ஜ۩۞۩ஜ▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬▬
01-02-2020, 09:06 PM
-
#60
- VTheKing
- Allied Allies Alliance
-
- VTheKing
- Allied Allies Alliance
- Join Date: Jun 2009
- Location: British Columbia, Canada
- Age: 34
- Posts: 28,869
- Rep Power: 81290
-
-
Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩
The entire premise of the court case is based on what exactly the actresses consented to and how GDP represented/conducted themselves, not whether they were "tricked" into doing porn. The fact they did porn to be distributed in some manner is evidently never contested, seeing as all actresses knew they would be performing on camera.What do you mean by "tricked"?
Nah. These girls knew it was porn. Youre getting mixed up in the supposed distribution and not the entire premise. The most nefarious thing they did there was their original ad didnt specify porn. This gave them a wider net and audience. After that they were told it was porn. This was over the phone though.
Ive read the court documents. The article in the op even states that their video was to be distributed online
Nah. These girls knew it was porn. Youre getting mixed up in the supposed distribution and not the entire premise. The most nefarious thing they did there was their original ad didnt specify porn. This gave them a wider net and audience. After that they were told it was porn. This was over the phone though.
Ive read the court documents. The article in the op even states that their video was to be distributed online
Mmkay enright. So what exactly is online purposes?
Regarding, "likeness" youre pretending gdp didnt film them. I cant discern whether the article suggests the judge RULED, based on his interpretation of the contract after the fact - that it didnt accurately convey how theyd be distributed once they signed the contracts - or whether hes saying the actual gdp contract didnt give gdp rights to their likeness. Dunno there
But i do know gdp cant really control affiliates nor how they disperse their stuff. Though they could eliminate rule breakers the damage was prob. Already done
Again, the issue was never about being on camera. How GDP used the actresses' likeliness is crucial in establishing that they never intended to keep documented promises of limiting distribution of the videos to non-American audiences.Regarding, "likeness" youre pretending gdp didnt film them. I cant discern whether the article suggests the judge RULED, based on his interpretation of the contract after the fact - that it didnt accurately convey how theyd be distributed once they signed the contracts - or whether hes saying the actual gdp contract didnt give gdp rights to their likeness. Dunno there
But i do know gdp cant really control affiliates nor how they disperse their stuff. Though they could eliminate rule breakers the damage was prob. Already done
The judge is such a wk:
Oh the horror. They were told to be flirty and perky or else risk the 5k dollars or less..but still went through with it anyway. But alas they still risked their reputation for 5k dollars or less
At the end of the day, i think gdp was probably shady. However, NOT on the extreme end. Like kidnapping and stuff. And i find it a bit ridiculous the girls sign a contract to do porn and are rewarded a lot of $$ for risks they mostly knew about. Some details were amiss sure; its the difference between saying online vs. Specifying the exact website. But they knew
Missing the point yet again. What the judge says is that the acting in the videos do not diminish their claims in the suit - as in, if an actress in a GDP video says "oh I can't wait for GDP to show everyone in the world how I suck dick", it has no bearing on whether she consented to worldwide distribution of her videos or how GDP represented themselves before getting her on camera. Of course, if you ever browsed a GDP thread or comments section you'd notice how many people actually believed the acting to approximate reality.Oh the horror. They were told to be flirty and perky or else risk the 5k dollars or less..but still went through with it anyway. But alas they still risked their reputation for 5k dollars or less
At the end of the day, i think gdp was probably shady. However, NOT on the extreme end. Like kidnapping and stuff. And i find it a bit ridiculous the girls sign a contract to do porn and are rewarded a lot of $$ for risks they mostly knew about. Some details were amiss sure; its the difference between saying online vs. Specifying the exact website. But they knew
And the suit is entirely based on the matter of distribution consent and how GDP represented themselves, not whether GDP did "bad stuff" and to what extent. This is fundamentally a fraud case, not sexual crime.
Not according to the GDP videos. They always have this 30 minute long chit chat about their entire lives before they start having sex. "I'm majoring in this. My boyfriend doesn't know I'm here etc."
There's the nerdy looking girl with the glasses spanking her ass and giggles like she likes it and wants it.
At the end of the video, the dude and cameraman always asks her what she thinks of the video before she takes a shower. "What do you think of your first adult video?"
90% of GDP vids are that Miss Colorado chick
"Tricked" my a**. Lawyers/judges are retards.
Yeah, judges and lawyers who don't take porn acting as literal evidence in court are the retards here. Are you preparing a class action suit against Johnny Sins for all the sausage pizzas he never delivered?There's the nerdy looking girl with the glasses spanking her ass and giggles like she likes it and wants it.
At the end of the video, the dude and cameraman always asks her what she thinks of the video before she takes a shower. "What do you think of your first adult video?"
90% of GDP vids are that Miss Colorado chick
"Tricked" my a**. Lawyers/judges are retards.
Go Canucks Go!
Mais notre monde érodé restera le même
Et demain toi et moi serons partis
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
