We've already gone over that multiple times.

The whole reason why we can't post direct studies, is because there isn't much funding for 5G studies.

Are you content with them rolling out 5G cell towers without a consensus of studies regarding safety? That is the whole point of the documentary, and people's concerns.

I genuinely am baffled why you guys are OK with the rollouot, without a consensus regarding safety. (I've posted the video 3 times, where under oath to a senate hearing leaders of telecommunication companies say that they aren't funding independent studies into 5G studies.)

Your first study

Klaus Buchner - MEP of the green-conservative ecological democratic party
Horst Eger - Could find ONLY 4 papers from him, all either from the year 2004 or co-authoring? some random foreign language papers. All about cell phone towers.[/quote]

OK.

[QUOTE]B. Blake Levitt - Postgrad in Essay writing, bachelors degree in who the fuk knows.[/QUOTE]Fair point, however she is a respected expert in the field of EMF...[i]

"Ms. Levitt’s work is referenced in numerous government publications and other resources on EMF. She has appeared in four documentaries; has helped several congressional offices write legislation for energy research appropriations and land-use issues pertaining to antenna and tower siting. At the invitation of U.S. Senators Patrick Leahy, James Jeffords and other legislators, she has participated in congressional briefings on the environmental effects of ******t energy exposures in 2000 and 2007. In May 2002, she was an invited speaker at the Royal College of Physicians, London, UK, on the environmental effects of nonionizing radiation."

[URL=http://www.blakelevitt.com/]http://www.blakelevitt.com/[/URL]


Here she is addressing a US congressional staff meeting. Called in as an expert to address them...

[youtube]https://www.youtube.com/embed/00CBHFoL5Hw[/youtube]

[URL=https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00CBHFoL5Hw]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=00CBHFoL5Hw[/URL]

Here she is coauthoring a review of studies with scientist Henry Lai...

[i][b]Biological effects from exposure to electromagnetic radiation emitted by cell tower base stations and other antenna arrays[/b][/i]

[URL=https://www.researchgate.net/publication/233593841_Biological_effects_from_exposure_to_electromagnetic_radiation_emitted_by_cell_tower_base_stations_and_other_antenna_arrays]https://www.researchgate.net/publica...antenna_arrays[/URL]

You can dismiss her, and just focus on him.


[/i]
[QUOTE]You reckon she knows more than actual scientists working in the field for 30+ years each?[/QUOTE]You seem to be trying to insinuate that all scientists are against her conclusion that high EMF exposure is harmful to human health, when there clearly are scientists who do believe that high EMF exposure is harmful.

Your are aware that there are scientists who agree with her conclusion?

[QUOTE]Your last study

[URL=https://oem.bmj.com/content/57/4/258]https://oem.bmj.com/content/57/4/258[/URL]

Can't find a single place where they concluded that 5g towers cause depression and cause suicides[/QUOTE]Strawman, or you didn't read my post properly.

[QUOTE]First of all younger workers more vulnerable? So cumulative effect of EMF is where exactly?[/QUOTE]If foot workers are more at risk of suicide, where is the proof that over-exposure to HARMFUL sun rays isn't the cause? When they are outside? [/quote]

Fair point, seems unlikely, based on the use of UV light to improve moods. (Over exposure to UV light of course, does increase the risk of skin cancer.)

There are some studies concluding that UV light creates a better moods...

[URL=https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/phpp.12396]https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/...111/phpp.12396[/URL]

[URL=https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1578079]https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1578079[/URL]

I can't find anything concluding that UV light exposure creates depressive and suidicidal tendencies.

The papers specifically says (without caution) that a higher rate low frequency electomagnetic exposure radiation is the likely cause. You literally just quoted where they wrote that.

[QUOTE]These questions aren't even addressing the fact that the study is useless in terms of 5g.[/QUOTE]The issue of the lack of funding for studies directly about 5G, has been addressed numerous times ITT.

The response to that seems to be:[i]"Whilst it's true that telecommunication companies under oath to the senate have said that they aren't funding independant research into 5G safety, I don't see why that is cause for concern. So, I support the 5G rollout across the nation."[/i]

Your stance could be...[i]"Whilst I don't believe that anything that you posted is valid, I do not agree with a national rollout of 5G, without a consensus regarding it's safety."[/i]

The whole point of the documentary is...[b][i]We need to be prudent about this rollout, and to be skeptical of the motives behind this rollout.[/i] [/b]


A genuine question...

[i][b]What would it require for you to conclude that a rollout of 5G towers across the nation, without studies regarding it's safety, is a bad idea?[/b][/i]

Tbh, most threads deviate from the original point and become dick measuring contest where the sole goal is to ‘win’. I’m not saying you’re wrong or right about this 5g chit (as I haven’t read any of it), i’m merely suggesting the intention of most replies is largely about proving you wrong.

What do you think this thread is about?

Do you think the videos (I'm guessing you didn't watch them, I don't think very few miscers have watched them, despite voicing disagreement with them) are claiming that 5G cause COVID 19?You are describing telecommunication companies.

For the forth time, here they are under oath to the senate, stating that they haven't funded any studies to check 5G safety.



https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ekNC0J3xx1w

Are you OK with them experimenting on the public?

Do you have no concerns regarding the affects that playing near cell towers will have on children?

(In case you don't know, it is a fact that more cell base stations, and small cell towers need to be built in residential areas. Meaning more cell towers outside of homes and schools.)

What honest argument can you give me, that you think it's a good idea to simply trust that those corporations care about our health?

Do you know about the history of the tobacco industry? How they (verified by the way) tried to cover up the harmful effects of first and second hand cigarette smoking?


Dramatizaton about the cover up...




We also know that the sugar industry attempted a cover up, about the harmful effects regarding heart disease...




50 Years Ago, Sugar Industry Quietly Paid Scientists To Point Blame At Fat

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-...=1588427170442


So why blindly trust telecommuncation companies, after they admit that they haven't funded any checks into safety?

Seriously, seeing as what we know about how the tobacco industry and sugar industry operated, how can you be so trusting that telecommunication companies care about our health over profit?

No need to prove him "wrong" as onus is on him. We are just proving his tactics to be insufficient.

I think you are probably right.

Please reply to my last post to you.

I'm genuinely interested in your response to the questions I posed to you.

I've called you out in the incel thread, that all you do is post sarcastic and belittling posts to them. Then I noticed that's all you do on the misc, to everyone.

This thread title is a call to watch the documentary, you openly said that you refuse to do that so I don't what your intention is ITT.

If you don't want to watch it, then you don't want to watch it.

If I write cliffnotes, all that will happen is you will likely just posing a sarcastic or ridiculing response regarding the cliffnotes (again, I've noticed how you post on the misc). Waste of time.

I already know what kind of response I will get from you...

So 5G rolls out,
Kills all it's customers,
Telecoms make bank from killing everyone?

U wot m8? I guess the US military should just bring 5G to the middle east and that'll solve all our problems

at this point you are only wasting energy by constantly replying to them.

it's funny how the people that think they are the smartest in this thread are the usual disabled suspects.

Noone has claimed that.

A generally lowered immune system =/= death.

We know - even shown in the mainstream - that tobacco and sugar companies covered up the research showing the harm(if you think I'm lying, then I invite you to do some research, there was a coverup by the companies in those industries).

Meanwhile telecommunicaton companies have said on television, under oath, that they haven't funded any research into 5G safety... And yet some miscers still support 5G cell towers being built in residential areas.

exactly for that reason retarded inbred.

False. Telcom CEOs, members of boards, all of the stakeholders families, all politicians, presidents, celebrities and businessmen, billionaires and athletes who live near the towers are killed as well. That's their big plot, to commit suicide through 5g because the hunger for greed is stronger than their will to live. They would rather watch their grandchildren die of horrible deaths before stopping 5g from rolling out and not making that sweet moolah.

It's really amazing to me how we're starting to become so technologically advanced that people are rejecting it out of fear.

I wonder if there were fringe weirdos with every major leap in technology.

Electricity in your house causes polio do your research!

Wats with the technicians rushing to erect these 5g weapons while everyone is in lockdown? Faster internet is NOT an essential.

In some ways I wish I was this dumb and saw everything in black and white as you do. Critical thinking not even once.

This is a summary of where we are in the conversation...

5G documentary + BetaAsPhuck:We need to stop the rollout of 5G, because there are possible long term health risks, due High EMF exposure - caused by the frequencies of 5G and the building of cell towers in residential areas.

Some miscers:There are no direct studies concluding that 5G causes harm.

5G documentary + BetaAsPhuck:Here is a video, showing telecommunication companies under oath to the US senate, that they haven't funded any independent studies into the safety of 5G.

Some miscers: There are no direct studies concluding that 5G causes harm.

5G documentary + BetaAsPhuck:Yes, that's because they admitted under oath that they haven't given scientists the access to their 5G tech, and nor the funding, to carry out independant studies into the safety of the cell towers and the frequency.

Some miscers:There are no direct studies concluding that 5G causes harm.

5G Trojan Horse documentary + BetaAsPhuck:OK, well here are some studies concluding that high EMF exposure is a risk to health.

Some miscers:There are no direct studies concluding that 5G causes harm.

5G Trojan Horse documentary + BetaAsPhuck:OK, well we've already explained that telecommunication companies are under oath saying that they haven't given the tech to independent scientists to verify it's safety. So there won't be any direct studies.

Some miscers:There are no direct studies concluding that 5G causes harm.

5G Trojan Horse documentary documentary + BetaAsPhuck:Well, we have have seen that the tobacco industry and sugar industry actively covered up and paid of researchers into the harms of tobacco and sugar. That was exposed in the mainstream press. So, why aren't we concerned that the telecommunication companies aren't putting profit over people.

Some miscers:There are no direct studies concluding that 5G causes harm.

5G Trojan Horse documentary + BetaAsPhuck:OK, well surely you aren't nonchalant about your children or relatives children playing near cell towers, that have to be built around homes and schools to provide nationwide access to 5G?

Some miscers:There are no direct studies concluding that 5G causes harm.

5G Trojan Horse documentary + BetaAsPhuck:OK, so why are you against halting the rollout of 5G, before we have a consensus regarding it's safety in the scientific community? Surely, you don't support experimenting with the health of the publc?

Some miscers:There are no direct studies concluding that 5G causes harm.

The Truth Is Out There:


Spoiler!

That doesn't require 5G, that can be done by improving broadband internet speeds without wifi.

They could put the money into improving existing infrastructure, if your justification is improving the internet speeds of at home workers.

What 5G would allow companies to do, is to make faster communication between smart devices. That is not necessary for at home workers.

Ur not going to stop it. Just do your best with what you have. The whole activism thing doesnt work unless you have big media

If there is a nationwide rollout, then it's inescapable. Our choice is taken away.What are you basing that on?

Brussels has 5g now, that was just a politician appeasing to the demand of anti antennae warriors

You aren’t gonna stop the roll out of 5g because it’s already billions deep and rolled out

Because it was already concluded that it is safe by the global organizations that ensure things are safe.

Fukn lmao you guys are pathetic, no one believed your stupid conspiracy theories so now you’re acting like it’s about health concerns that simply don’t exist

Yea, imagine.
I'm repping him for it when i'm off spread, I'm sure plenty of others will too since he isn't lying at all in that post, and you've clearly been defeated by logic since you had to resort to personal implications that OP has too much time on his hands, to try and 'win'. Pathetic.

they don't
and the video wasn't strictly about brussels it's about the guy explaining what 5G actually is cause a lot of people still don't know what 5G is and sometimes 4G is being marketed as 5 while it isnt.


https://www.brusselstimes.com/all-ne...r-5g-roll-out/

The only people that will rep him are you and the other 5 conspiracy theorist uneducated and misinformed miscers, the rest of us have common sense and logic

Show us the 5G studies.

Also which global organization are you talking about?

The WHO? You trust the WHO after everything we know regarding their collusion with China and exclusion of Taiwan?

The ICNIRP which has been shown to be as corrupt as the WHO?
"n 2014 the WHO launched a draft of a Monograph on RF fields and health for public comments. It turned out that five of the six members of the Core Group in charge of the draft are affiliated with International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP), an industry loyal NGO, and thus have a serious conflict of interest."


https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5504984/

You can read the rest of the article, to further see how corrupt the WHO and ICNIRP are.

I seriously can't believe there are people who still trust the WHO.


A global organization called International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC) concluded that radiofrequency radiation is a possible carcinogen. Maybe we should listen to them, before we increase the amount of radiofrequency radiation that we are exposing the population to.

Oh look its theFRAUDwho:

- Claimed to be a radiologist and was later outed as a liar
-LITERALLY GETS PAIDto install 5g towers
- Has literally no knowledge of how these system work. You're the equivalent of the car driver, not the engineers who designed and built the car.

Just lmao @ believing anything you say, fraud.

Brussels did the same thing with 4g and guess who’s full on 4g now, and yes Brussels has 1 active 5g site and as the article states, many more on the way.

and you didn't watch the video but you responded based on the title.


4G is a completely different frequency range than 5G you should have known that since you claim to be the expert on the subject pole climber.

Lmao at still thinking radiologist has anything to do with radio and cell towers, this is how I know you’re dumb.
You literally have to understand how these systems work to be able to install them, they are complex installs that your simple mind can’t comprehend.