Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » U.S. Navy SEALS go full into cuck-mode
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 117
  2. Page 3 of 4
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: U.S. Navy SEALS go full into cuck-mode

post 1618098651 10-01-2020, 05:52 AM
-
#61
  1. moosik85
  2. Registered User
  1. moosik85
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Posts: 14,890
  5. Rep Power: 81638
Originally Posted By JaySultan⏩
No they shouldn’t *******. No women can have my back during wartime...

Women are physically inferior and Will never be men.

I wish i was Born in the 50’s when women were women and men were men.
Brainwashing women into thinking being feminine and graceful is bad is one of the greatest ills the merchant class has ever committed
Plant the trees in whose shade your grandchildren will play
post 1618098941 10-01-2020, 06:01 AM
-
#62
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 51,859
  5. Rep Power: 0
I said it before that the reason the far left has stopped attacking the military is that it has already submitted to cultural marxism.

This is why we have seen this year them attacking conservative traditional organizations like local and state police departments and NASCAR.

This is also why you dont see any real talk about federal law enforcement by the far left. The federal level has already been taken over and in fact you have the head of the FBI supporting them saying ANTIFA has no organization at all which is absurd.
post 1618098961 10-01-2020, 06:02 AM
-
#63
  1. Atrnmike
  2. I'm not 50
  1. Atrnmike
  2. I'm not 50
  3. Join Date: Jul 2020
  4. Posts: 2,156
  5. Rep Power: 12233
Originally Posted By usapump⏩
where is your trident or qualifications, op?



show us your credentials *******
post 1618101781 10-01-2020, 06:56 AM
-
#64
  1. Devils
  2. Registered User
  1. Devils
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2007
  4. Location: Perth, WA, Australia
  5. Posts: 20,607
  6. Rep Power: 70397
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
Can't wait until female and tranny SEALS are staging amphibious assaults and kicking down doors on cishet chitlords for hate crimes. Such progress, much equality.
Finally I can experience my dream of identifying as an Apache Assault helicopter
post 1618102211 10-01-2020, 07:02 AM
-
#65
  1. Jax05
  2. Tuna, No Crust
  1. Jax05
  2. Tuna, No Crust
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Posts: 26,055
  5. Rep Power: 91463
'warrior' and 'citizen'


ay lmao...sounds like something people in Crossfit gym would call each other
Don't hit at all if it is honorably possible to avoid hitting; but never hit softly.
post 1618102361 10-01-2020, 07:04 AM
-
#66
  1. manletstrength
  2. Going beyond my limits
  1. manletstrength
  2. Going beyond my limits
  3. Join Date: Jan 2019
  4. Posts: 5,196
  5. Rep Power: 26827
More like "hoe" and "sloot"
Training Log:
https://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=180254293&p=1640414853#post1640414853

I will always follow my own path and stay true to myself and my heart, to do what I feel is right
post 1618104351 10-01-2020, 07:35 AM
-
#67
  1. lightsarefallin
  2. Nukem
  1. lightsarefallin
  2. Nukem
  3. Join Date: Oct 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 57,269
  6. Rep Power: 504833
"Warrior"

fkng lol. what is this, middle school?

Just like the guitarist of U2 still calling himself "the edge." That's juvenile schit.

Couldn't find a better term?
*Look at reflection in car window and flex every time crew*
*Use half the roll to wipe after a poo crew*
*Fart in the gym and blame rotten smell on faulty ventilation crew*
*Fart at home and blame it on the dog crew*
*Watch neutron-star density poop mock me as water flushes around it and it stays put crew*
*Drive 2 minutes in the summer and back of shirt gets completely wet crew*
*Coffee black as midnight on a moonless night crew*
*Fat shame my cat on a daily basis crew*
post 1618104851 10-01-2020, 07:43 AM
-
#68
  1. HYDRAE
  2. Verified ✔
  1. HYDRAE
  2. Verified ✔
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Posts: 16,247
  5. Rep Power: 67827
Originally Posted By ErnieMccracken⏩
It's a little cringe, but not NEARLY as much as a bunch of self described alpha males who shamelessly parrot each other's political views, grow the same shaggy soup catcher beards, and get the same basic bitch full sleeve tatts. They are all the same damn guy.
LOL truth but you forgot about the stupid nine line tee shirts. I'm not sure which "uniform" conformity is stronger - sorority girls, cross fit *******s, or grunts.
“The Misc. is a stone-faced Uncle Sam with Popeye’s forearms and a cocked pistol in each hand. It’s a screeching bald eagle with a foreign Bad Thing in its talons. It’s everything that defines America’s bro culture, magnified and weaponized. But it’s deeper than that.“
post 1618105541 10-01-2020, 07:51 AM
-
#69
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,149
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 120668
Originally Posted By ChernobylResist⏩
how does that make me a cuck? Israeli Special Forces is arguably on par operationally to American/British Special Operation Forces, and they have a ton of female members. If they can pass, they should be able to serve, dickhead.
Agreed. If they can pass and have successful missions I don't see why not. Let em join.
post 1618105721 10-01-2020, 07:54 AM
-
#70
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,149
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 120668
Originally Posted By MEDITATE⏩
As one ex-seal or special operator miscer once said ..... he's fine with all that sh!t aslong as they have their own platoons/squads operating seperatley
No they shouldn't stay seperate. Keep men and women units together if you ask me
post 1618105841 10-01-2020, 07:55 AM
-
#71
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By Devils⏩
Finally I can experience my dream of identifying as an Apache Assault helicopter
The year is 2030, miscers have finally pooled enough cash and resources to realise their dreams of owning their very own misc island. This doesn't sit well with the NWO, who send out their crack Citizen Warrior TransFem SEAL team to vanquish the miscers. The Citizen Warriors land on the beach in the dead of night, while miscers are having a beach bonfire party. The miscers posted on watch got bored and are too busy fapping over hnnnnggggg threads to notice. The Citizen Warriors storm the beach and kill several miscers before they can begin to fight back. Suddenly over the tops of the palm trees rises Devils, magnificent in his final Apache form. He rains down fire from his 30mm cannons and AMG-114 hellfire missiles on the Citizen Warriors, obliterating them all in seconds. LooksMaximus has had his legs blown off, but he drags his torso across the sand to sniff the crotch of one of the dead SEALS. "Pungent..." he says with his dying breath. Misc Island is saved.
post 1618106441 10-01-2020, 08:03 AM
-
#72
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,149
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 120668
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
Yes, because of what Ernie said. Even if she was the very best, better than all the men, I would reject her because what matters more than any one individual's ability isunit cohesion.



Generals these days are cucked political appointments.
This is silly. Who says women can't be cohesive with men? What you all fell to realize is that until we allow the 'experiment' of women in men's units, they'll keep pushing for bs. Just do it already and we'll see if it works or not.
post 1618106551 10-01-2020, 08:04 AM
-
#73
  1. Muzzlrpress
  1. Muzzlrpress
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 104,332
  6. Rep Power: 993953
Originally Posted By wincel⏩
I feel like using the term "warrior" is really cheesy. First of all, it sort of extols war itself. And war is when you have run out of solutions. I like "peacekeeping forces", "operatives", "agents", etc. They should really use the word "defender" or "guard", but the truth is the US military mainly exists for attacking and not defending. Second of all, it creates images of some medieval era dude with a sword or axe rushing at you. It's hardly the same thing. It just sounds really stupid imo. Hurr durr I is a warrior. Hurr durr. Warfighter sounds better, but even that is just making it sound like they only exist for the purpose of war. Special forces agent or operative sounds much more professional. Words like warrior are cringe af. The word soldier carries with it some dignity and modernization as well and evokes different pictures than "warrior". Airman, soldier, sailor, etc all sound better than "warrior". Words like servicemen and servicewomen also emphasis the importance that the military exists to SERVE the people. These are good words to use imo.
Military exists to literally kill our enemies, hence warrior. Fuk that romantic defend us chit. They are funded for one purpose; killing the enemy before they kill us. They're killers and damn good at it. Don't be ashamed to call it what it is. If they weren't warriors killing those we needed killed, we'd be screwed.
I'm back, bitches!
post 1618106601 10-01-2020, 08:04 AM
-
#74
  1. Ironmanlet
  2. Adamantium User
  1. Ironmanlet
  2. Adamantium User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2009
  4. Location: Cajun Country
  5. Age: 40
  6. Height: 5'7"
  7. Weight: 185 lbs
  8. Posts: 52,449
  9. Subscribers: 4
  10. Rep Power: 417657
It was bound to happen eventually.

With females being allowed in exclusively combat roles like infantry, and the first few females graduating Ranger School the past couple years, this was imminent.
“The stories and information posted here are artistic works of fiction and falsehood. Only a fool would take anything posted here as fact.“

PS: Don't eat poop, just don't let the idea of it stop you from living life to its fullest.
post 1618106961 10-01-2020, 08:09 AM
-
#75
  1. KathleenRyan
  2. lol
  1. KathleenRyan
  2. lol
  3. Join Date: Jun 2017
  4. Posts: 4,576
  5. Rep Power: 33569
drvillain PM's mods to do his bidding - CONFIRMED.
post 1618107111 10-01-2020, 08:11 AM
-
#76
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey⏩
This is silly. Who says women can't be cohesive with men? What you all fell to realize is that until we allow the 'experiment' of women in men's units, they'll keep pushing for bs. Just do it already and we'll see if it works or not.
People who know have already told you. It doesn't work.

Maybe you can have a go at this, seeing as the other ******* disappeared and wouldn't tell me.
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
Give me one good reason, not ideological belief in equality, why letting women into the infantry with men is a good idea.
post 1618107621 10-01-2020, 08:16 AM
-
#77
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,149
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 120668
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
People who know have already told you. It doesn't work.

Maybe you can have a go at this, seeing as the other ******* disappeared and wouldn't tell me.
People who know have told me? So they have first hand experienced it not working?

My opinion on the matter is just let it happen already. It may work, it may not work. Solid hard evidence will change the minds of the elites pushing this if it doesn't work.

I don't see why you're acting like an angry ******* on the matter. Some people learn by theory, other's learn by hands on.
post 1618107761 10-01-2020, 08:18 AM
-
#78
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey⏩
People who know have told me? So they have first hand experienced it not working?

My opinion on the matter is just let it happen already. It may work, it may not work. Solid hard evidence will change the minds of the elites pushing this if it doesn't work.
Yes.

Give me one good reason, not ideological belief in equality, why letting women into the infantry with men is a good idea.
post 1618108051 10-01-2020, 08:22 AM
-
#79
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,149
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 120668
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
Yes.

Give me one good reason, not ideological belief in equality, why letting women into the infantry with men is a good idea.
The U.S. Government hasn't seen illegible effects and women joining provides more cannon fodder, that's why it's a good idea. Military is Government property, let them run it how they want. If they fail mission after mission like you all claim, the U.S. government will step in.

For example, if women units fail to kill Bin Laden three times, they'll step in. Hell if you ask me I suspect women probably aren't getting the real dangerous missions. How many dangerous missions have they been on?
post 1618108721 10-01-2020, 08:32 AM
-
#80
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey⏩
The U.S. Government hasn't seen illegible effects and women joining provides more cannon fodder, that's why it's a good idea. Military is Government property, let them run it how they want. If they fail mission after mission like you all claim, the U.S. government will step in.

For example, if women units fail to kill Bin Laden three times, they'll step in. Hell if you ask me I suspect women probably aren't getting the real dangerous missions. How many dangerous missions have they been on?
The people in charge are ideological and aren't doing this for practical reasons like you seem to think. They don't care about results otherwise they wouldn't do this.
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey⏩
I don't see why you're acting like an angry ******* on the matter. Some people learn by theory, other's learn by hands on.
It's always people on the sidelines with no skin in the game who think this is a good idea. If I have to go to war I don't want any fuking women there getting in the way.
post 1618108991 10-01-2020, 08:35 AM
-
#81
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Posts: 63,702
  5. Rep Power: 567598
If you're such a snowflake that you're going to get triggered over "gender pronouns", then you certainly don't belong out on the field in any SEAL operations/missions...and lol @ women being SEALs.
post 1618109171 10-01-2020, 08:37 AM
-
#82
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,149
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 120668
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
The people in charge are ideological and aren't doing this for practical reasons like you seem to think. They don't care about results otherwise they wouldn't do this.



It's always people on the sidelines with no skin in the game who think this is a good idea. If I have to go to war I don't want any fuking women there getting in the way.
LOL if you think the U.S. Government, the same government that's hell bent on maintaining control over certain foreign territories and governments, will allow their military to crumble. If the inclusion of women leads to a crumbling military they'll adjust. Truth is, until you have your own country, you have no say in what they U.S. Government decides.

What's funny about this entire thread, is that I believe the elite have never allowed women into top priority missions and theoretically will never allow women into those roles. All this **** we're reading about is nothing but feel good material.
post 1618109871 10-01-2020, 08:48 AM
-
#83
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey⏩
LOL if you think the U.S. Government, the same government that's hell bent on maintaining control over certain foreign territories and governments, will allow their military to crumble. If the inclusion of women leads to a crumbling military they'll adjust. Truth is, until you have your own country, you have no say in what they U.S. Government decides.

What's funny about this entire thread, is that I believe the elite have never allowed women into top priority missions and theoretically will never allow women into those roles. All this **** we're reading about is nothing but feel good material.
It's a bigger issue than just this thread, or just the USA. Women are allowed in normal combat infantry roles here now. I'm no SF operator, I'm just a rifleman but the lives of normal soldiers like me are at stake too and if we go to war with women in tow, we are far more likely to die as a result. It actually matters to some of us, who aren't just keyboard warriors.
post 1618110351 10-01-2020, 08:53 AM
-
#84
  1. nin-com-poop
  2. Banned
  1. nin-com-poop
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Posts: 9,214
  5. Rep Power: 0
So is this the start of affirmative action for selection? If anyone thinks this is a good idea they haven't seen the well known class 234 docuseries.
post 1618110651 10-01-2020, 08:57 AM
-
#85
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,149
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 120668
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
It's a bigger issue than just this thread, or just the USA. Women are allowed in normal combat infantry roles here now. I'm no SF operator, I'm just a rifleman but the lives of normal soldiers like me are at stake too and if we go to war with women in tow, we are far more likely to die as a result. It actually matters to some of us, who aren't just keyboard warriors.
Read the bold. Women aren't getting the big dangerous missions like you all make it seem like. As far as normal infantry, I mean how hard is that role? Minimum requirements seem to be walking around with 50lbs of equipment and a rifle. Look at how many no experience jackass 18-21 year olds been infantry. Your life isn't in anymore dangerous with women and I'm willing to bet most women will be in 'support' roles.
post 1618111001 10-01-2020, 09:01 AM
-
#86
  1. Merc009
  2. Broscience Engineer
  1. Merc009
  2. Broscience Engineer
  3. Join Date: May 2011
  4. Location: Boise, Idaho, United States
  5. Age: 33
  6. Posts: 18,007
  7. Rep Power: 31601
-Some people say good things come to those who wait, truth is, good things come to those who work..... who work later.....who work harder...... who are willing to go further than anyone else to get them. If you're waiting for good things to come to you, you'll be waiting for a pretty long time.

-I'd rather live life saying "I failed" than "I could have"
post 1618111301 10-01-2020, 09:04 AM
-
#87
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 51,859
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey⏩
Read the bold.Women aren't getting the big dangerous missions like you all make it seem like. As far as normal infantry, I mean how hard is that role? Minimum requirements seem to be walking around with 50lbs of equipment and a rifle. Look at how many no experience jackass 18-21 year olds been infantry. Your life isn't in anymore dangerous with women and I'm willing to bet most women will be in 'support' roles.
This makes no sense when the units are integrated
post 1618111401 10-01-2020, 09:05 AM
-
#88
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  1. MikeLowrrrey
  3. Join Date: Jul 2018
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 35,149
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 120668
Originally Posted By elterrible987⏩
This makes no sense when the units are integrated
Got any sources on integrated units going on top priority missions?
post 1618111651 10-01-2020, 09:09 AM
-
#89
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  1. ppscalzo
  2. Hairier than a gorilla
  3. Join Date: Jun 2014
  4. Location: ON, Canada
  5. Age: 34
  6. Posts: 3,159
  7. Rep Power: 10769
Didnt they lower physical testing requirments for females in the military a few years back?
*Would give it all up to be a monk crew*

PRs
DL: 565
S: 495
B: 405
post 1618111691 10-01-2020, 09:10 AM
-
#90
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  1. elterrible987
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jan 2010
  4. Posts: 51,859
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By MikeLowrrrey⏩
Got any sources on integrated units going on top priority missions?
Burden of proof is on you, youre the one with the claim that they segregate risk based on gender in the unit. The units are integrated and females are displacing males, that creates a massive liability and risk to the male soldiers around them. They are also in situations where they could be ambushed at any time. The entire idea of a combat unit is for them to be ready to fight when they are in a warzone. You have the claim that there are "safer" combat roles with females in place, burden of proof is on you to show us what these safer combat missions and roles are.


devils advocate - lets say you were actually right and that integrated units were limited in their use for safety reasons, then female soldiers would be a terrible value proposition for the military. They displace men from training schools, cost the same salary and benefits while only being used for limited roles and infact under your theory limit entire units of mostly men to reduced combat roles, effectively reducing the ability of the entire US military on a whole. If you are right they should be banned immediately.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts