Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Moon Landing 1969 Real or Fake?
  1. Results 271 to 300 of 336
  2. Page 10 of 12
  3. First
  5. 8
  6. 9
  7. 10
  8. 11
  9. 12
  11. Last

Thread: Moon Landing 1969 Real or Fake?

post 1624874541 12-08-2020, 11:12 AM
-
#271
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 56
  6. Posts: 27,840
  7. Rep Power: 194666
Originally Posted By darkninja67⏩
So how long did it take for them to reach the command module from the moon?
Top of my head I think it was two orbits.
U
post 1624875271 12-08-2020, 11:21 AM
-
#272
  1. JStrez
  2. Breaker of Gains
  1. JStrez
  2. Breaker of Gains
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Location: New York, United States
  5. Posts: 9,748
  6. Rep Power: 54369
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
I am not providing a link that water is wet, is H2O and so forth.

This is not a new topic and has been discussed literally for decades. People interested already know what they're talking about. People newly interested can look it up.

I have been reading huge amounts of stuff on my topics since I was a kid and do not repeat research for people on the internet.
I mean if you are going to link an article from like MoonspiracyThoughts. com then I'd say your article is bullchit.

But I have a couple of other questions. Do you think anyone or anything has ever been to the moon? I mean like probes, rovers, etc? Numerous countries have landed things on the moon to collect samples. Also, do you believe in any other highly argued conspiracy theories?
*Mechanical Engineering Crew*
*6'3" Master Race Crew*
*6 Figs Crew*

"Because the thing about repairing, maintaining, and cleaning is it’s not an adventure. There’s no way to do it so wrong you might die. It’s just work. And the bottom line is, some people are okay going to work, and some people … well, some people would rather die. Each of us gets to choose.”
post 1624875721 12-08-2020, 11:25 AM
-
#273
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
If it's so readily available, why can't you find one?

I mean you did find one - that proved the opposite.



Ladies and gentlemen, this is the same poster who suggested I should read up on the subject at hand.
Again, actually "flying" in space has been a huge subject in the media because of depictions of flying in space in movies. There's LOTS of articles over DECADES debunking the science in movies vs what is real.

You don't know anything about the topic because you are some f@cking retard not interested in this subject, and probably no other subject.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1624875971 12-08-2020, 11:27 AM
-
#274
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By 78novacaine⏩
I guess it's just a regional thing then, because the space program as a whole is still a common topic around here, far more so than Christopher Columbus. Hell we are house shopping right now and I just saw a house with one of the selling points being that it's in the same neighborhood a lot of the astronauts lived in during the Apollo era.

And feelings /=/ definitive proof...
That's interesting and tourism must keep it all alive where you are. However, as I've said, given what these people were supposed to do, going to the moon is the most amazing thing ever done by the US or anyone.

However, it is no a national holiday, the astronauts aren't heroes, to the rest of the country, etc.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1624878151 12-08-2020, 11:48 AM
-
#275
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By JStrez⏩
I mean if you are going to link an article from like MoonspiracyThoughts. com then I'd say your article is bullchit.

But I have a couple of other questions. Do you think anyone or anything has ever been to the moon? I mean like probes, rovers, etc? Numerous countries have landed things on the moon to collect samples. Also, do you believe in any other highly argued conspiracy theories?
I was never interested in conspiracy stuff.

I started noticing a lot of this years ago.

When I was a kid, "pictures" from space were awesome, then I learned that they aren't real. They are based on radio signals that an artist imagines what it would look like.

I always thought that space travel was going to happen, until I started read the actual science, and it's not.

The same thing goes for the moon landing, there's a lot of stuff that seems fake about it. As I have said, NASA said they lost the blueprints and there never really was blueprints to begin with. That's because according to them, it was a "seat of your pants" project that they slapped together. As I have said in other posts, the FBI, due to Hoover, was all over EVERYBODY. There is no way in hell that the FBI would let people handle GOING TO THE MOON without knowing every detail.

You can find FBI files on Hollywood stars from back then that are like 4,000 pages. Meanwhile, they just let NASA "build stuff" and didn't worry about sabotage, making a mockery of the US through failure via communist spies, etc they just let the scientists have a good time!

They thought John Lennon was a spy about to bring down the US, but the Apollo Moon Launch, nah, day got dat sheet!

It's a stupid story and so obviously stupid, it's astounding.

The moon rocks being from Earth, is another SUPER STUPID detail.

The reason moon landing conspiracy movies and stuff exists is because other people noticed it too.

The question isn't about shooting something into space, like a probe.

That's like asking if you can drop something into the ocean and will it hit bottom and comparing that to sending people down to the bottom of the ocean.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1624878441 12-08-2020, 11:50 AM
-
#276
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
You have confirmed that my knowledge of the topic at hand vastly exceeds yours.

There is a reason I was requesting a source for that statement of yours - that's because I had a feeling you're full of BS.

Thanks for confirming that I was correct in that regard.
Imagine being you and acting like a child saying he's superior when he knows nothing about something and keeps repeating the same sh!t.

Yesterday a little kid told me Cyberpunk 2077 was no good because he played it.

I didn't tell him it's not out yet and so he couldn't have.

But, that's you, so grow the f@ck up.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1624881371 12-08-2020, 12:15 PM
-
#277
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By BlackJack619⏩
The difference is like 250,000 miles probably more someone do the math for me for reps.

You could also have functional satellites powered by balloons so theres that, nasa happens to be the worlds largest consumer for helium.
You are focused on this distance thing, but there are a few problems here.

You are extrapolating your everyday experience with distance to space, but this is not how any of this works. If you are in the US, and want to go from NY to FL, this will require like twice the fuel (roughly) of going half that distance (which would be what, like to NC?). This is not because the car is in constant motion- Newtons 1st law says that objects naturally do this- it's because of friction and forces acting on the car. In space, you have very little drag and friction.....spacecrafts can coast, and cover all kinds of distance.

During the Apollo 11 mission, the Saturn V stages were to just get the spacecraft to a parking orbit around earth, then execute the translunar injection maneuver to get the craft into an eccentric orbit that would intercept the moon (all this until TLI took a matter ofhours). After the TLI, the craft essentially coasted in its orbit to the moon , as things do in space, and this took a matter ofdays. All that distance you are focused on, is in the latter coasting stage.

None of this is surprising, or hard to believe. You are focused on distance, because you are thinking in earth-terms so much. The Tesla roadster that is orbiting the sun is traveling millions and millions of miles in its orbit- gee, how in the world is it doing this, it's not even powered? this is so much more than that puny earth-moon distance.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1624883221 12-08-2020, 12:29 PM
-
#278
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Interesting story.

I suggest you actually research what you're spouting off about before you start spouting off about it again. You have presented nothing, and I repeat, nothing of substance, in this entire thread. You couldn't even post a source for the most easily proven of your statements - heck, you posted a source that proved the opposite.

LOL at your whole "flying in space" tangent that you're going off about most recently.

The person who is full of BS ITT is you, and everyone knows that.



Which one is it?

Did they lose them?

Or did they never have any?

Read about it, bitch.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1624907741 12-08-2020, 04:27 PM
-
#279
  1. Lunatic
  2. The Cripple
  1. Lunatic
  2. The Cripple
  3. Join Date: Nov 2002
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 57,101
  6. Rep Power: 494160
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
Interesting story.

I suggest you actually research what you're spouting off about before you start spouting off about it again. You have presented nothing, and I repeat, nothing of substance, in this entire thread. You couldn't even post a source for the most easily proven of your statements - heck, you posted a source that proved the opposite.

LOL at your whole "flying in space" tangent that you're going off about most recently.

The person who is full of BS ITT is you, and everyone knows that.



Which one is it?

Did they lose them?

Or did they never have any?

He keeps bringing up irrelevant **** and refuses to accept that he's been wrong multiple times ITT.

HE WAS CAUGHT FRAUDING A WHILE AGO AND HE STILL LIES ABOUT EVERYTHING. ****ing pseudo-intellectual that either deflects, insults, or ignores when confronted about it.
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Read about it, bitch.
YOU POSTED A LINK THAT EXPLAINED EXACTLY WHY THE SATURN V CAN'T BE BUILT TODAY, thinking it said that they lost the blueprints, AND YOU'RE STILL TALKING OUT OF YOUR ASS.
AcetylCoA gets reps

"God your dunce." - Swept

LSU Tigers/Washington Nationals
post 1624911261 12-08-2020, 05:03 PM
-
#280
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Lunatic⏩
HE WAS CAUGHT FRAUDING
Imagine being this delusional and jealous.

That is literally what you are.

You are some tiny loser, likely with no accomplishments, who does not lift, and is probably a homosexual, or nearly so, and likely religious.

All of that and you THINK you know things about an anonymous person on the internet, lol.

Your type is a CONSTANT on the internet since about 1998 when average losers got access.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1624912111 12-08-2020, 05:14 PM
-
#281
  1. Scottybby
  2. Registered User
  1. Scottybby
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Posts: 7,316
  5. Rep Power: 43097
Am I able to look through a telescope rn at the moon and see evidence we've been there?

(just asking)
post 1624912451 12-08-2020, 05:17 PM
-
#282
  1. Brozef
  2. ‎ ‎ ‎
  1. Brozef
  2. ‎ ‎ ‎
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: Maine, United States
  5. Posts: 17,033
  6. Rep Power: 210050
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
I am not providing a link that water is wet, is H2O and so forth.

This is not a new topic and has been discussed literally for decades. People interested already know what they're talking about. People newly interested can look it up.

I have been reading huge amounts of stuff on my topics since I was a kid and do not repeat research for people on the internet.
This reply reeks of BS. The burden of proof is on you. Not being willing to provide an article that at least mentions the information you are referring to is extremely questionable.

If anyone reading this reply disagrees with me, please say so.
post 1624912811 12-08-2020, 05:20 PM
-
#283
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 56
  6. Posts: 27,840
  7. Rep Power: 194666
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
So did they lose the plans, or did they never have any in the first place?
Christ.

It's like you idiots have zero experience ever building anything.

These rockets were built on the fly by hand. Often when they actually tried to build according to the plan they found it wouldn't work and they had to alter it on the fly.

When they did so they'd jot down what they did on a piece of paper.
Nobody took the time to worry about putting as builts together.

If you've ever built a house or done some type of construction you'd know that the blueprints don't always work in real life and you have to figure it out on the spot.
U
post 1624912941 12-08-2020, 05:21 PM
-
#284
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Originally Posted By Scottybby⏩
Am I able to look through a telescope rn at the moon and see evidence we've been there?

(just asking)
No. And this does not change the fact we’ve been to the moon.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1624913011 12-08-2020, 05:22 PM
-
#285
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 56
  6. Posts: 27,840
  7. Rep Power: 194666
Originally Posted By Scottybby⏩
Am I able to look through a telescope rn at the moon and see evidence we've been there?

(just asking)
No because earth bound telescopes don't have the resolution to see things that small.
U
post 1624915181 12-08-2020, 05:49 PM
-
#286
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
TheAdlerian’s posts are a mess and all over the place as usual, but the blueprint thing, whatever this is even referring to, also does not have implication for the fact Apollo went to moon. The evidence we did go to the moon is vast, some of which is linked above.

The blueprint thing

-this mysterious story is not substantiated. There is all kinds of blueprints and documentation of Saturn V still on microfilm and in storage, per NASA.
-There are multiple examples of full, original Saturn V’s on literal display in museums
-No one is trying to build, or would want to build a full saturn v nowadays using 60s technology and parts, requiring 60’s infrastructure among other things, that’s not how it works.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1624915361 12-08-2020, 05:51 PM
-
#287
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  1. leoslayer1
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 56
  6. Posts: 27,840
  7. Rep Power: 194666
Originally Posted By Anachron⏩
You're going after the wrong guy.

But LOL at comparing building a Saturn V to building a house.
There have never been a set of plans by an engineer that has ever worked 100% without some guy making it work.
U
post 1624915491 12-08-2020, 05:52 PM
-
#288
  1. Mult1Tro11
  2. Banned
  1. Mult1Tro11
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 191
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By umop3pisdn⏩
lol at thinking that tinfoil covered play structure made it to the moon
post 1624915701 12-08-2020, 05:55 PM
-
#289
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 17,066
  6. Rep Power: 143443
To those who believe we went to the moon, how old were you when you fully believed the people telling you that we went to the moon?
As
post 1624915741 12-08-2020, 05:55 PM
-
#290
  1. nm1891
  2. Registered User
  1. nm1891
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 9,078
  5. Rep Power: 28909
Originally Posted By Mult1Tro11⏩
lol at thinking that tinfoil covered play structure made it to the moon
Not tinfoil, mylar insulation, but whatever.
S/B/D—185/165/205 (sumo w/ straps)
post 1624915861 12-08-2020, 05:56 PM
-
#291
  1. eod8989
  2. All honked out
  1. eod8989
  2. All honked out
  3. Join Date: Aug 2014
  4. Posts: 58,435
  5. Rep Power: 81966
Originally Posted By Mult1Tro11⏩
lol at thinking that tinfoil covered play structure made it to the moon
LOL at the black curtain in the background
PC specs

i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''



OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
post 1624916601 12-08-2020, 06:05 PM
-
#292
  1. nm1891
  2. Registered User
  1. nm1891
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 9,078
  5. Rep Power: 28909
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
LOL at the black curtain in the background
And what color do you think space should be?
S/B/D—185/165/205 (sumo w/ straps)
post 1624916981 12-08-2020, 06:09 PM
-
#293
  1. Mult1Tro11
  2. Banned
  1. Mult1Tro11
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Dec 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 191
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By nm1891⏩
And what color do you think space should be?
where are the ****ing stars man?
post 1624917081 12-08-2020, 06:11 PM
-
#294
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  1. numberguy12
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2017
  4. Posts: 6,938
  5. Rep Power: 51915
Misc is funny sometimes (not saying the below are universal by any means, and there are indeed rational posters ITT among the nonsense, but the below just seems to be a trend).

-Paranormal, ghosts, etc? heck yea; no skepticism.
-Spirits, demons, etc? heck yea, no skepticism
-God, miracles, NDE religious experiences, etc? no skepticism
-Universe is a giant simulation? no skepticism
-UFOs and aliens flying around the sky? No skepticism....some grainy (debunked) military footage is all that’s needed, case closed.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Moon landings, well documented history, not supernatural, backed by vast evidence? SKEPTICAL TO THE MAX!

(could also replace moon landings here with something like biological evolution). Contrast is hilarious.
∫∫ Mathematics crew ∑∑

♫1:2:3:4 Pythagoras crew ♫ ♫ 🧮

Nullius in verba
post 1624917211 12-08-2020, 06:13 PM
-
#295
  1. eod8989
  2. All honked out
  1. eod8989
  2. All honked out
  3. Join Date: Aug 2014
  4. Posts: 58,435
  5. Rep Power: 81966
Originally Posted By nm1891⏩
And what color do you think space should be?
Bro that is a black curtain in the near distance. Otherwise they are on the edge of the moon.
PC specs

i9 9900k/AMD RX 6800 16 GB/16 GB RAM/LG BX 65'' OLED/Gigabyte GS27QC 27''



OLED Master Race crew
1440p 120+ fps only crew
6'2 master race crew
Audiophile crew
Metal crew
Introvert/INTJ crew
German crew
If you aren't getting stronger you aren't getting bigger crew
post 1624917531 12-08-2020, 06:17 PM
-
#296
  1. Scottybby
  2. Registered User
  1. Scottybby
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2020
  4. Posts: 7,316
  5. Rep Power: 43097
Originally Posted By eod8989⏩
Bro that is a black curtain in the near distance. Otherwise they are on the edge of the moon.
lmfao ded
post 1624917621 12-08-2020, 06:18 PM
-
#297
  1. nm1891
  2. Registered User
  1. nm1891
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 9,078
  5. Rep Power: 28909
Originally Posted By Mult1Tro11⏩
where are the ****ing stars man?
It was the middle of the lunar day and they were using short exposure times to capture what they were trying to take a picture of, the moon and the astronauts on it, this is basic photography.
S/B/D—185/165/205 (sumo w/ straps)
post 1624917911 12-08-2020, 06:21 PM
-
#298
  1. nm1891
  2. Registered User
  1. nm1891
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Posts: 9,078
  5. Rep Power: 28909
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
Misc is funny sometimes (not saying the below are universal by any means, and there are indeed rational posters ITT among the nonsense, but the below just seems to be a trend).

-Paranormal, ghosts, etc? heck yea; no skepticism.
-Spirits, demons, etc? heck yea, no skepticism
-God, miracles, NDE religious experiences, etc? no skepticism
-Universe is a giant simulation? no skepticism
-UFOs and aliens flying around the sky? No skepticism....some grainy (debunked) military footage is all that’s needed, case closed.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Moon landings, well documented history, not supernatural, backed by vast evidence? SKEPTICAL TO THE MAX!

(could also replace moon landings here with something like biological evolution). Contrast is hilarious.
Dont leave out the fact that these same dudes are all self proclaimed MENSA members. The misc is the poster child for the Dunning-Kreuger effect.
S/B/D—185/165/205 (sumo w/ straps)
post 1624918021 12-08-2020, 06:23 PM
-
#299
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  1. BlackJack619
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 17,066
  6. Rep Power: 143443
Originally Posted By numberguy12⏩
Misc is funny sometimes (not saying the below are universal by any means, and there are indeed rational posters ITT among the nonsense, but the below just seems to be a trend).

-Paranormal, ghosts, etc? heck yea; no skepticism.
-Spirits, demons, etc? heck yea, no skepticism
-God, miracles, NDE religious experiences, etc? no skepticism
-Universe is a giant simulation? no skepticism
-UFOs and aliens flying around the sky? No skepticism....some grainy (debunked) military footage is all that’s needed, case closed.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Moon landings, well documented history, not supernatural, backed by vast evidence? SKEPTICAL TO THE MAX!

(could also replace moon landings here with something like biological evolution). Contrast is hilarious.
For the record I am skeptical about everything, especially buying supplement from this website.
As
post 1624918171 12-08-2020, 06:26 PM
-
#300
  1. BroIncorporated
  2. OG Miscer
  1. BroIncorporated
  2. OG Miscer
  3. Join Date: May 2011
  4. Posts: 606
  5. Rep Power: 1607
Originally Posted By Coal
The moon landing was 100% real. I have zero doubts of that.
Question your beliefs.
U aware?
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts