Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » were "neanderthal" the same as humans?
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 45
  2. Page 1 of 2
  3. 1
  4. 2
  6. Last

Thread: were "neanderthal" the same as humans?

post 1635715563 04-08-2021, 07:39 AM
-
#1
  1. Rexcalibr
  2. Handsome Rex
  1. Rexcalibr
  2. Handsome Rex
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Location: Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 12,314
  6. Rep Power: 17506

were "neanderthal" the same as humans?

i heard they are a completly different species , theyr not human


-best poster of 2017 (haters are jealous as fuk lol ya'll can't see me i stay crispy)
post 1635715733 04-08-2021, 07:42 AM
-
#2
  1. MetroBrah
  1. MetroBrah
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 60,357
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 490957
They were not human. But were close enough to interbreed with caucs and asians.
post 1635715863 04-08-2021, 07:45 AM
-
#3
  1. DickHancock
  2. Wage Cuckin' It
  1. DickHancock
  2. Wage Cuckin' It
  3. Join Date: Mar 2021
  4. Posts: 3,372
  5. Rep Power: 11176
contrary to popular belief they are actually more intelligent than humans, they have bigger brain masses but outnumbered by low IQ retards homo sapiens
post 1635716953 04-08-2021, 08:00 AM
-
#4
  1. Dogkrack
  2. Banned
  1. Dogkrack
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2019
  4. Posts: 14,820
  5. Rep Power: 0
interbreeding with them is the reason some races have advantage in intelligence
post 1635717383 04-08-2021, 08:06 AM
-
#5
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 8,657
  5. Rep Power: 21095
Originally Posted By Rexcalibr⏩
i heard they are a completly different species , theyr not human


Recreations like this are misinformation based on the imagination of the artist because there are no bones for soft tissue. They always give them wrinkly features and flat noses. They likely had long straight noses.



They also try to make neanderthals seem short. Male neanderthal skeletons are 170-180 cm tall. Human males from the same era were 160 cm. If neanderthals were fed a modern diet they'd be 6'4-6'8.

post 1635717463 04-08-2021, 08:07 AM
-
#6
  1. Rexcalibr
  2. Handsome Rex
  1. Rexcalibr
  2. Handsome Rex
  3. Join Date: Mar 2014
  4. Location: Ontario, Canada
  5. Posts: 12,314
  6. Rep Power: 17506
Originally Posted By DickHancock⏩
contrary to popular belief they are actually more intelligent than humans, they have bigger brain masses but outnumbered by low IQ retards homo sapiens
they have bigger brains but theyr not intelligent. human have smaller but more complex brains
-best poster of 2017 (haters are jealous as fuk lol ya'll can't see me i stay crispy)
post 1635717583 04-08-2021, 08:09 AM
-
#7
  1. HYDRAE
  2. Verified ✔
  1. HYDRAE
  2. Verified ✔
  3. Join Date: Dec 2009
  4. Posts: 16,247
  5. Rep Power: 67827
Originally Posted By DickHancock⏩
contrary to popular belief they are actually more intelligent than humans, they have bigger brain masses but outnumbered by low IQ retards homo sapiens
This. Homosapiens were likely just more aggressive and violent, as still is evident today.
“The Misc. is a stone-faced Uncle Sam with Popeye’s forearms and a cocked pistol in each hand. It’s a screeching bald eagle with a foreign Bad Thing in its talons. It’s everything that defines America’s bro culture, magnified and weaponized. But it’s deeper than that.“
post 1635717643 04-08-2021, 08:10 AM
-
#8
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 8,657
  5. Rep Power: 21095
Originally Posted By Rexcalibr⏩
they have bigger brains but theyr not intelligent. human have smaller but more complex brains
Asians have the largest brains of all modern humans. You do the math.
post 1635717963 04-08-2021, 08:15 AM
-
#9
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 8,657
  5. Rep Power: 21095
More accurate neanderthal models







post 1635718043 04-08-2021, 08:17 AM
-
#10
  1. MetroBrah
  1. MetroBrah
  3. Join Date: Mar 2010
  4. Posts: 60,357
  5. Subscribers: 3
  6. Rep Power: 490957
^dam. I know a lot of boios that look like that. Interesting.
post 1635718603 04-08-2021, 08:26 AM
-
#11
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  1. chaunce54
  2. Platinum User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2010
  4. Age: 50
  5. Posts: 32,523
  6. Rep Power: 202517
^^Former 300+lb Crew^^

WWPB2D

Nothing worthwile is ever easy.

The beatings will continue until morale improves.
post 1635718913 04-08-2021, 08:31 AM
-
#12
  1. WoWzerzzzz
  2. Banned
  1. WoWzerzzzz
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 2,910
  6. Rep Power: 0
They are the same as us we just think we got smarter
post 1635719483 04-08-2021, 08:41 AM
-
#13
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2020
  4. Posts: 27,464
  5. Rep Power: 171374
Yes human, or most of us wouldn't have some of their DNA in us. Physically superior for sure. Even though shorter, they could run faster than us homo sapiens, had more dense bones, were definitely stronger. They had larger brains but their brains were interconnected differently. No way to confirm they were more or less intelligent. They were around a lot longer than us modern human have been so far. It seems they had weaker immune systems, which could be what made them go extinct. There weren't nearly as many of them when they and us homo sapiens existed at the same time.

If I remember correctly, Native Americans and Northern Europeans have the highest prevalence of Neanderthal DNA.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
post 1635720013 04-08-2021, 08:47 AM
-
#14
  1. DickHancock
  2. Wage Cuckin' It
  1. DickHancock
  2. Wage Cuckin' It
  3. Join Date: Mar 2021
  4. Posts: 3,372
  5. Rep Power: 11176
Originally Posted By Rexcalibr⏩
they have bigger brains but theyr not intelligent. human have smaller but more complex brains
how these scientist know we have more complex brain , lol these scientists are obviously coping, they can't accept there are creatures more intelligent than men
post 1635720053 04-08-2021, 08:48 AM
-
#15
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 8,657
  5. Rep Power: 21095
Originally Posted By frankdtank20⏩
YEven though shorter, they could run faster than us homo sapiens
New evidence some were 175 cm, the same height as modern day American males. That means with a modern diet they would have been 6'4.

https://www.newscientist.com/article...-than-thought/
post 1635720133 04-08-2021, 08:50 AM
-
#16
  1. pwoL
  2. Registered User
  1. pwoL
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Posts: 10,971
  5. Rep Power: 52106
They were smarter srs. Homos were much much more social and able to work together, and they used that to their advantage and won out.
post 1635720713 04-08-2021, 08:57 AM
-
#17
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By Rexcalibr⏩
i heard they are a completly different species , theyr not human
They were human and modern humans have genetics in common with them. So, they were able to breed with modern humans a long time ago, and that couldn't happen if it they weren't the same.

It's stupid that people can see the reproduction images and not know that.

If you posted a pic of a white person and a black person NOW they look like two different species. However, they aren't and can have kids. Neanderthals were a type of white person adapted to a cold climate.

The reason they were said to be a different species is because of dumb conclusions from "science". In addition, the Nazis believed that jews were human Neanderthal hybrids. So, there was likely a push to deny that's real and say they're a different species, etc.

If you look at the pics, they are obviously human.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1635720803 04-08-2021, 09:00 AM
-
#18
  1. Kev1972
  2. Registered User
  1. Kev1972
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Location: Big Arm, Montana, United States
  5. Posts: 49,924
  6. Rep Power: 287644
Their society was lost to neanderthal guilt and reparations.
Motorcycle crew
Army veteran crew
One Meal a day crew
post 1635721333 04-08-2021, 09:07 AM
-
#19
  1. MrQuint
  2. Registered User
  1. MrQuint
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 5,981
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 72952
Originally Posted By Rexcalibr⏩
they have bigger brains but theyr not intelligent. human have smaller but more complex brains
You start the post asking if they were the same which implies you know little about them. 30 minutes later you're explaining differences in brain size and intelligence? lmao
Here's to swimmin' with bow-legged women.
Vybz Kartel crew
post 1635721933 04-08-2021, 09:13 AM
-
#20
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Isn't producing viable offspring who can also reproduce the biological definition of a species? Wouldn't this make them the same species as us?
post 1635722273 04-08-2021, 09:16 AM
-
#21
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 8,657
  5. Rep Power: 21095
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
Isn't producing viable offspring who can also reproduce the biological definition of a species? Wouldn't this make them the same species as us?
There are different definitions of "species".

"A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which any two individuals of the appropriate sexes or mating types can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual reproduction. Other ways of defining species include their karyotype, DNA sequence, morphology, behaviour or ecological niche."

Since neanderthals had a distinct morphology, skeletal structure, DNA sequence, and ecological niche they were classified as a separate species. Their behavior was likely different too.
post 1635722293 04-08-2021, 09:16 AM
-
#22
  1. maori-rap
  2. Dos hand signal
  1. maori-rap
  2. Dos hand signal
  3. Join Date: Sep 2004
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 43
  6. Posts: 27,400
  7. Subscribers: 2
  8. Rep Power: 157903
Originally Posted By dusky99⏩
More accurate neanderthal models







Okay, so that model isn't a million miles from the modern day Caucasian. But you are still talking about thousands upon thousands of years of evolution, especially mentally.

Evolution is a VERY slow process. How long did it take to for "humans" to truly evolve from apes?
Cook the man some eggs!
post 1635722443 04-08-2021, 09:18 AM
-
#23
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
Isn't producing viable offspring who can also reproduce the biological definition of a species? Wouldn't this make them the same species as us?
Yes.

A long time ago it was thought black and white people were a near species and would have sterile kids, like mules. A donkey and a horse has a sterile mule.

That's where the term "Mulatto" came from. That baby is a "Mule" is what it means. However, that was totally incorrect.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1635722603 04-08-2021, 09:19 AM
-
#24
  1. Vpac
  2. Das it mane
  1. Vpac
  2. Das it mane
  3. Join Date: Aug 2010
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 2,418
  6. Rep Power: 2193
If they were so much smarter why they did go extinct?
post 1635722643 04-08-2021, 09:20 AM
-
#25
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  1. dusky99
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2012
  4. Posts: 8,657
  5. Rep Power: 21095
Originally Posted By maori-rap⏩
Okay, so that model isn't a million miles from the modern day Caucasian. But you are still talking about thousands upon thousands of years of evolution, especially mentally.

Evolution is a VERY slow process. How long did it take to for "humans" to truly evolve from apes?
I remember reading that scientists believe the split between African homo sapiens and neanderthals was about 800,000 years ago.
post 1635722973 04-08-2021, 09:24 AM
-
#26
  1. koloxid
  2. Registered Loser
  1. koloxid
  2. Registered Loser
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 16,496
  6. Rep Power: 9434
Originally Posted By Vpac⏩
If they were so much smarter why they did go extinct?
You are being lied to

Native Europeans (Nordics and similar) are the descendents of neanderthals. We didnt go extinct we have just more admixture with modern humans
<Made by Koloxoid>
post 1635723003 04-08-2021, 09:25 AM
-
#27
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  1. PenorBrahNoHomo
  2. R1b
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Posts: 28,218
  6. Rep Power: 130149
Originally Posted By dusky99⏩
There are different definitions of "species".

"A species is often defined as the largest group of organisms in which any two individuals of the appropriate sexes or mating types can produce fertile offspring, typically by sexual reproduction. Other ways of defining species include their karyotype, DNA sequence, morphology, behaviour or ecological niche."

Since neanderthals had a distinct morphology, skeletal structure, DNA sequence, and ecological niche they were classified as a separate species. Their behavior was likely different too.
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
Yes.

A long time ago it was thought black and white people were a near species and would have sterile kids, like mules. A donkey and a horse has a sterile mule.

That's where the term "Mulatto" came from. That baby is a "Mule" is what it means. However, that was totally incorrect.
So by these other definitions, different types of modern human could be considered different species.
post 1635724213 04-08-2021, 09:41 AM
-
#28
  1. northernlights7
  2. Banned
  1. northernlights7
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2013
  4. Posts: 24,527
  5. Rep Power: 24
Originally Posted By TheAdlerian⏩
They were human and modern humans have genetics in common with them. So, they were able to breed with modern humans a long time ago, and that couldn't happen if it they weren't the same.

It's stupid that people can see the reproduction images and not know that.

If you posted a pic of a white person and a black person NOW they look like two different species. However, they aren't and can have kids. Neanderthals were a type of white person adapted to a cold climate.

The reason they were said to be a different species is because of dumb conclusions from "science". In addition, the Nazis believed that jews were human Neanderthal hybrids. So, there was likely a push to deny that's real and say they're a different species, etc.

If you look at the pics, they are obviously human.
What are you blathering on about, exactly? Modern science *does* consider neanderthals to be a species, or at least a subspecies (that exact part isn't 100% decided) of "human". Your entire post amounted to a strange attempt at virtue signaling over a totally bullchit premise you suggested.
post 1635725303 04-08-2021, 09:54 AM
-
#29
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By PenorBrahNoHomo⏩
So by these other definitions, different types of modern human could be considered different species.
No, my point was it was thought white and black people were close species and have sterile kids like a donkey and horse. But, they have normal kids, so they are the same species.

Humans are like dogs in that they come in many varieties but are still dogs.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
post 1635725473 04-08-2021, 09:57 AM
-
#30
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  1. TheAdlerian
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 44,596
  5. Rep Power: 96349
Originally Posted By northernlights7⏩
What are you blathering on about, exactly? Modern science *does* consider neanderthals to be a species, or at least a subspecies (that exact part isn't 100% decided) of "human". Your entire post amounted to a strange attempt at virtue signaling over a totally bullchit premise you suggested.
What you wrote there was bizarre.

Two animals can't be a different species if they can have babies that can procreate.

So, I don't care what some person calls Neanderthals. There's no such thing as "Neanderthals" that's a made up term. They were people, they had babies with other people, and that's the story.

Just because some moron gave them a special name and so on means nothing.
If you want to ask me a question:

Ask: TheAdlerian

http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=150655983&p=1000366043#post1000366043

Read my science fiction novel:

http://www.amazon.com/Echelon-Adlerian-ebook/dp/B00RCFFTKC/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1419640250&sr=8-1&keywords=Echelon+the+adlerian
  1. Page 1 of 2
  2. 1
  3. 2
  5. Last
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts