Forum
»
Should childless people not be able to hold politic office?
- Results 1 to 19 of 19
-
Page 1 of 1
07-13-2021, 12:04 PM
-
#1
- orangetide
- Registered User
-
- orangetide
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2010
- Posts: 10,691
- Rep Power: 35630
-
-
Should childless people not be able to hold politic office?
Thoughts?
For example, childless leaders like merkel have no stake in the future. The consequences of their actions will never be felt by their descendants.
Exceptions could be made if you child died after birth, or if you are infertile due to natural condition not induced by medical procedures.
....but on the contrary, you have families, like we see in the history of california, where the families run various offices for hundreds of years.
For example, childless leaders like merkel have no stake in the future. The consequences of their actions will never be felt by their descendants.
Exceptions could be made if you child died after birth, or if you are infertile due to natural condition not induced by medical procedures.
....but on the contrary, you have families, like we see in the history of california, where the families run various offices for hundreds of years.
07-13-2021, 12:06 PM
-
#2
07-13-2021, 12:11 PM
-
#3
- DrumsNotDead
- Registered User
-
- DrumsNotDead
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jun 2019
- Age: 56
- Posts: 9,649
- Rep Power: 41839
-
-
i actually feel the opposite, all these retards breeding like rabbits and then expect me to foot the bill for their retarded gender fluid ******* offspring....imagine using california as an example of how to run something...
07-13-2021, 12:12 PM
-
#4
07-13-2021, 12:13 PM
-
#5
- yewotm8
- Registered User
-
- yewotm8
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2017
- Age: 56
- Posts: 17,781
- Rep Power: 50628
-
-
The catholic church started rotting because they made it so priests had to be celibate. Why the fuk you would want to be guided by a celibate "father" instead of one with actual experience raising a family and keeping a woman/children in line is beyond me.
07-13-2021, 12:15 PM
-
#6
- yieldtonothing
- make my nephew an egg
-
- yieldtonothing
- make my nephew an egg
- Join Date: Feb 2021
- Posts: 18,906
- Rep Power: 203525
-
-
Op has never read Plato which means he hasn’t even attended community college which means he’s a real shlemazel
07-13-2021, 12:28 PM
-
#7
- redraider86
- Christina Hansen
-
- redraider86
- Christina Hansen
- Join Date: Jun 2011
- Posts: 20,627
- Rep Power: 2064840
-
-
Originally Posted By yewotm8⏩
Forget daughters, this was the ultimate cuckening. Oh, you can read and write? Cool, never reproduce.The catholic church started rotting because they made it so priests had to be celibate. Why the fuk you would want to be guided by a celibate "father" instead of one with actual experience raising a family and keeping a woman/children in line is beyond me.
Train hard, train smart, have fun!
"I'm not autistic- I'm ARTISTIC." - etet1919
07-13-2021, 12:41 PM
-
#8
- orangetide
- Registered User
-
- orangetide
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2010
- Posts: 10,691
- Rep Power: 35630
-
-
Originally Posted By yewotm8⏩
It would have made more sense for them to marry, and have some kind of joint monastery where a nuns' family and preists' family live in different buildings in the same commune. In this situation, preists and nuns should be barred from marrying each other, to avoid some kind of power struggle between groups.The catholic church started rotting because they made it so priests had to be celibate. Why the fuk you would want to be guided by a celibate "father" instead of one with actual experience raising a family and keeping a woman/children in line is beyond me.
07-13-2021, 12:43 PM
-
#9
- orangetide
- Registered User
-
- orangetide
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2010
- Posts: 10,691
- Rep Power: 35630
-
-
Originally Posted By yieldtonothing⏩
Nah i learned useful skills in college.Op has never read Plato which means he hasn’t even attended community college which means he’s a real shlemazel
07-13-2021, 12:45 PM
-
#10
- Muscle2021
- Registered User
-
- Muscle2021
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 12,737
- Rep Power: 73379
-
-
People that should not be in office:
1)don't own property
2)don't have kids
3) are members of the LGBT
4)Liberals
5)Women
1)don't own property
2)don't have kids
3) are members of the LGBT
4)Liberals
5)Women
***NEUTRAL CREW*** ™
07-13-2021, 02:16 PM
-
#11
- orangetide
- Registered User
-
- orangetide
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2010
- Posts: 10,691
- Rep Power: 35630
-
-
Originally Posted By Muscle2021⏩
Property I can see on the basis on of you pay property taxes and you are much more grounded in the area than someone in an apt who can just break their lease and move.People that should not be in office:
1)don't own property
2)don't have kids
3) are members of the LGBT
4)Liberals
5)Women
1)don't own property
2)don't have kids
3) are members of the LGBT
4)Liberals
5)Women
However, the fact that firms like BerkH & BLkrock buy up homes and have subsidiaries that turn whole neighborhoods from homes for SALE into homes fir RENT really makes the amount of future voters in a given area smaller and smaller.
07-13-2021, 02:25 PM
-
#12
- Better Unborn
- ♔ King Rotter ♔
-
- Better Unborn
- ♔ King Rotter ♔
- Join Date: Aug 2003
- Location: United States
- Posts: 26,485
- Rep Power: 181877
-
-
Yeah because gated presidential kids would live in a remotely the same world as average plebs lmao. The country could get nuked and it wouldn't prolly change a damn thing to those blue blood kids.
Interesting idea but overall not a good one imo. Do you want a leader make logical decisions or the emotional "as a mother, ..." ones?
Interesting idea but overall not a good one imo. Do you want a leader make logical decisions or the emotional "as a mother, ..." ones?
(__Y__) Misc Buck Breaker (__Y__)
( o Y o ) Milk Wagon Engineer ( o Y o )
~@( Official Youthful Glow Connoisseur )@~
07-13-2021, 02:26 PM
-
#13
I can see the logic, but seems too discriminatory.
I would be down with a psychological screening to run for/hold public office.
I don't think that psychopaths, sociopaths, people w/serious personality disorders, etc. should be steering the ship.
Don't know that I would exclude all types of mental illness, just the ones that mean you are potentially a selfish cold blooded bastard or broken in such a way that you are unlikely to be reliably functional.
I would be down with a psychological screening to run for/hold public office.
I don't think that psychopaths, sociopaths, people w/serious personality disorders, etc. should be steering the ship.
Don't know that I would exclude all types of mental illness, just the ones that mean you are potentially a selfish cold blooded bastard or broken in such a way that you are unlikely to be reliably functional.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
07-13-2021, 02:26 PM
-
#14
- DrugsToGetBig
- So it begins
-
- DrugsToGetBig
- So it begins
- Join Date: Jun 2012
- Location: New Jersey, United States
- Age: 33
- Height: 6'1"
- Weight: 220 lbs
- Posts: 38,478
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 412225
-
-
i would welcome that with open arms
*Forever Alone Crew*
*Neg FireofAss Crew on SIGHT Crew*
07-13-2021, 02:28 PM
-
#15
- hoganrulz
- mreatassbtchslapr
-
- hoganrulz
- mreatassbtchslapr
- Join Date: Feb 2007
- Posts: 47,761
- Rep Power: 284006
-
-
Works both ways. If you have no children and thus no vested interest in the future you're just in it for a cash grab.
But if you had kids, you'll sell 99% of everything to ensure everything that comes from your ball sack would be God's.
But if you had kids, you'll sell 99% of everything to ensure everything that comes from your ball sack would be God's.
Formerly HandBrah, LipBrah & FootBrah
they call me Don Taters
NYM
<3 Miami Dolphins
WE GONNA WIN THE FUKING SUPERBOWL SOON BAYBEH
Hala Madrid
££££££sports betting crew££££££
This is all OJ's fault
Ass cheeks are the titties of the ass
First I romance the pie maker, then I romance the pie
07-13-2021, 02:29 PM
-
#16
07-13-2021, 02:46 PM
-
#17
- MBisonSon
- Registered User
-
- MBisonSon
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2016
- Posts: 39,767
- Rep Power: 166638
-
-
Originally Posted By katya422⏩
Woah anything else?I can see the logic, but seems too discriminatory.
I would be down with a psychological screening to run for/hold public office.
I don't think that psychopaths, sociopaths, people w/serious personality disorders, etc. should be steering the ship.
Don't know that I would exclude all types of mental illness, just the ones that mean you are potentially a selfish cold blooded bastard or broken in such a way that you are unlikely to be reliably functional.
I would be down with a psychological screening to run for/hold public office.
I don't think that psychopaths, sociopaths, people w/serious personality disorders, etc. should be steering the ship.
Don't know that I would exclude all types of mental illness, just the ones that mean you are potentially a selfish cold blooded bastard or broken in such a way that you are unlikely to be reliably functional.
Next you're gonna say that people bent on starting WW3 shouldn't be president?
Screening? Good idea.
But who in their right mind thinks a sociopath should be in office?
That's like if I said "I don't think midgets should be in the NBA".
No ****, nobody thinks midgets should be in the NBA.
The billionaire and the beggar both have 24 hours in a day.
That's why grandma's apple pie rocks and yours sucks.Originally Posted By Dave22reborn^^^Racist police officer who also cries about how racism doesn't exist, also cries reverse racism and typifies the stupidity of the racist right, referring to black people as "they" and regurgitating racist stereotypes.At least it will thunderstorm tonight, and we know how they feel about water. :)
07-13-2021, 02:55 PM
-
#18
- orangetide
- Registered User
-
- orangetide
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2010
- Posts: 10,691
- Rep Power: 35630
-
-
Originally Posted By Better
First point is moot, because *getting* nuked in not really a decision a single politician could make, and is an extremely unlikely scenario not relevant to those making laws.Yeah because gated presidential kids would live in a remotely the same world as average plebs lmao. The country could get nuked and it wouldn't prolly change a damn thing to those blue blood kids.
Interesting idea but overall not a good one imo. Do you want a leader make logical decisions or the emotional "as a mother, ..." ones?
Interesting idea but overall not a good one imo. Do you want a leader make logical decisions or the emotional "as a mother, ..." ones?
Your second point, yes.
If they would turn down an idea because they, as a parent, could see a law negatively affecting even their OWN, spoiled children, yes.
Obviously at the national level, or as you go up towards the national level, you will find more and more scumbags, and stuff like the idea in thread title may have more impact on local elections.
07-13-2021, 02:57 PM
-
#19
- orangetide
- Registered User
-
- orangetide
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2010
- Posts: 10,691
- Rep Power: 35630
-
-
Originally Posted By hoganrulz⏩
Second point is good.Works both ways. If you have no children and thus no vested interest in the future you're just in it for a cash grab.
But if you had kids, you'll sell 99% of everything to ensure everything that comes from your ball sack would be God's.
But if you had kids, you'll sell 99% of everything to ensure everything that comes from your ball sack would be God's.
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts

