Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Should childless people not be able to hold politic office?
  1. Results 1 to 19 of 19
post 1642761203 07-13-2021, 12:04 PM
-
#1
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 10,691
  5. Rep Power: 35630

Should childless people not be able to hold politic office?

Thoughts?

For example, childless leaders like merkel have no stake in the future. The consequences of their actions will never be felt by their descendants.

Exceptions could be made if you child died after birth, or if you are infertile due to natural condition not induced by medical procedures.

....but on the contrary, you have families, like we see in the history of california, where the families run various offices for hundreds of years.
post 1642761413 07-13-2021, 12:06 PM
-
#2
  1. Yoopwat
  2. Registered User
  1. Yoopwat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2011
  4. Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
  5. Age: 40
  6. Posts: 9,230
  7. Rep Power: 16588
Agreed, incels and Baren Karen’s have no place pretending to be leaders.
post 1642761673 07-13-2021, 12:11 PM
-
#3
  1. DrumsNotDead
  2. Registered User
  1. DrumsNotDead
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 9,649
  6. Rep Power: 41839
i actually feel the opposite, all these retards breeding like rabbits and then expect me to foot the bill for their retarded gender fluid ******* offspring....imagine using california as an example of how to run something...
post 1642761783 07-13-2021, 12:12 PM
-
#4
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  1. wincel
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Aug 2016
  4. Location: Chad
  5. Posts: 64,937
  6. Rep Power: 0
post 1642761913 07-13-2021, 12:13 PM
-
#5
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  1. yewotm8
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Sep 2017
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 17,781
  6. Rep Power: 50628
The catholic church started rotting because they made it so priests had to be celibate. Why the fuk you would want to be guided by a celibate "father" instead of one with actual experience raising a family and keeping a woman/children in line is beyond me.
post 1642762063 07-13-2021, 12:15 PM
-
#6
  1. yieldtonothing
  2. make my nephew an egg
  1. yieldtonothing
  2. make my nephew an egg
  3. Join Date: Feb 2021
  4. Posts: 18,906
  5. Rep Power: 203525
Op has never read Plato which means he hasn’t even attended community college which means he’s a real shlemazel
post 1642762813 07-13-2021, 12:28 PM
-
#7
  1. redraider86
  2. Christina Hansen
  1. redraider86
  2. Christina Hansen
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Posts: 20,627
  5. Rep Power: 2064840
Originally Posted By yewotm8
The catholic church started rotting because they made it so priests had to be celibate. Why the fuk you would want to be guided by a celibate "father" instead of one with actual experience raising a family and keeping a woman/children in line is beyond me.
Forget daughters, this was the ultimate cuckening. Oh, you can read and write? Cool, never reproduce.
Train hard, train smart, have fun!

"I'm not autistic- I'm ARTISTIC." - etet1919
post 1642763783 07-13-2021, 12:41 PM
-
#8
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 10,691
  5. Rep Power: 35630
Originally Posted By yewotm8
The catholic church started rotting because they made it so priests had to be celibate. Why the fuk you would want to be guided by a celibate "father" instead of one with actual experience raising a family and keeping a woman/children in line is beyond me.
It would have made more sense for them to marry, and have some kind of joint monastery where a nuns' family and preists' family live in different buildings in the same commune. In this situation, preists and nuns should be barred from marrying each other, to avoid some kind of power struggle between groups.
post 1642763953 07-13-2021, 12:43 PM
-
#9
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 10,691
  5. Rep Power: 35630
Originally Posted By yieldtonothing
Op has never read Plato which means he hasn’t even attended community college which means he’s a real shlemazel
Nah i learned useful skills in college.
post 1642764143 07-13-2021, 12:45 PM
-
#10
  1. Muscle2021
  2. Registered User
  1. Muscle2021
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2021
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 12,737
  6. Rep Power: 73379
People that should not be in office:
1)don't own property
2)don't have kids
3) are members of the LGBT
4)Liberals
5)Women
***NEUTRAL CREW*** ™
post 1642770253 07-13-2021, 02:16 PM
-
#11
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 10,691
  5. Rep Power: 35630
Originally Posted By Muscle2021
People that should not be in office:
1)don't own property
2)don't have kids
3) are members of the LGBT
4)Liberals
5)Women
Property I can see on the basis on of you pay property taxes and you are much more grounded in the area than someone in an apt who can just break their lease and move.

However, the fact that firms like BerkH & BLkrock buy up homes and have subsidiaries that turn whole neighborhoods from homes for SALE into homes fir RENT really makes the amount of future voters in a given area smaller and smaller.
post 1642770843 07-13-2021, 02:25 PM
-
#12
  1. Better Unborn
  2. ♔ King Rotter ♔
  1. Better Unborn
  2. ♔ King Rotter ♔
  3. Join Date: Aug 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 26,485
  6. Rep Power: 181877
Yeah because gated presidential kids would live in a remotely the same world as average plebs lmao. The country could get nuked and it wouldn't prolly change a damn thing to those blue blood kids.


Interesting idea but overall not a good one imo. Do you want a leader make logical decisions or the emotional "as a mother, ..." ones?
(__Y__) Misc Buck Breaker (__Y__)
( o Y o ) Milk Wagon Engineer ( o Y o )
~@( Official Youthful Glow Connoisseur )@~
post 1642770943 07-13-2021, 02:26 PM
-
#13
  1. katya422
  1. katya422
  2. Join Date: Dec 2011
  3. Location: United States
  4. Posts: 34,673
  5. Rep Power: 372543
I can see the logic, but seems too discriminatory.

I would be down with a psychological screening to run for/hold public office.

I don't think that psychopaths, sociopaths, people w/serious personality disorders, etc. should be steering the ship.

Don't know that I would exclude all types of mental illness, just the ones that mean you are potentially a selfish cold blooded bastard or broken in such a way that you are unlikely to be reliably functional.
INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew
post 1642770963 07-13-2021, 02:26 PM
-
#14
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  1. DrugsToGetBig
  2. So it begins
  3. Join Date: Jun 2012
  4. Location: New Jersey, United States
  5. Age: 33
  6. Height: 6'1"
  7. Weight: 220 lbs
  8. Posts: 38,481
  9. Subscribers: 4
  10. Rep Power: 412225
i would welcome that with open arms
*Forever Alone Crew*
*Neg FireofAss Crew on SIGHT Crew*
post 1642771113 07-13-2021, 02:28 PM
-
#15
  1. hoganrulz
  2. mreatassbtchslapr
  1. hoganrulz
  2. mreatassbtchslapr
  3. Join Date: Feb 2007
  4. Posts: 47,761
  5. Rep Power: 284006
Works both ways. If you have no children and thus no vested interest in the future you're just in it for a cash grab.

But if you had kids, you'll sell 99% of everything to ensure everything that comes from your ball sack would be God's.
Formerly HandBrah, LipBrah & FootBrah
they call me Don Taters
NYM
<3 Miami Dolphins
WE GONNA WIN THE FUKING SUPERBOWL SOON BAYBEH
Hala Madrid
££££££sports betting crew££££££
This is all OJ's fault
Ass cheeks are the titties of the ass
First I romance the pie maker, then I romance the pie
post 1642771153 07-13-2021, 02:29 PM
-
#16
  1. mesobuild
  2. Premium User
  1. mesobuild
  2. Premium User
  3. Join Date: May 2020
  4. Posts: 17,953
  5. Rep Power: 44402
No. They're the equivalent of Saint Floyd who runs off on his children.
post 1642772423 07-13-2021, 02:46 PM
-
#17
  1. MBisonSon
  2. Registered User
  1. MBisonSon
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2016
  4. Posts: 39,767
  5. Rep Power: 166638
Originally Posted By katya422
I can see the logic, but seems too discriminatory.

I would be down with a psychological screening to run for/hold public office.

I don't think that psychopaths, sociopaths, people w/serious personality disorders, etc. should be steering the ship.

Don't know that I would exclude all types of mental illness, just the ones that mean you are potentially a selfish cold blooded bastard or broken in such a way that you are unlikely to be reliably functional.
Woah anything else?

Next you're gonna say that people bent on starting WW3 shouldn't be president?

Screening? Good idea.

But who in their right mind thinks a sociopath should be in office?

That's like if I said "I don't think midgets should be in the NBA".

No ****, nobody thinks midgets should be in the NBA.
The billionaire and the beggar both have 24 hours in a day.

That's why grandma's apple pie rocks and yours sucks.
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
At least it will thunderstorm tonight, and we know how they feel about water. :)
^^^Racist police officer who also cries about how racism doesn't exist, also cries reverse racism and typifies the stupidity of the racist right, referring to black people as "they" and regurgitating racist stereotypes.
post 1642773193 07-13-2021, 02:55 PM
-
#18
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 10,691
  5. Rep Power: 35630
Originally Posted By Better
Yeah because gated presidential kids would live in a remotely the same world as average plebs lmao. The country could get nuked and it wouldn't prolly change a damn thing to those blue blood kids.


Interesting idea but overall not a good one imo. Do you want a leader make logical decisions or the emotional "as a mother, ..." ones?
First point is moot, because *getting* nuked in not really a decision a single politician could make, and is an extremely unlikely scenario not relevant to those making laws.

Your second point, yes.

If they would turn down an idea because they, as a parent, could see a law negatively affecting even their OWN, spoiled children, yes.

Obviously at the national level, or as you go up towards the national level, you will find more and more scumbags, and stuff like the idea in thread title may have more impact on local elections.
post 1642773363 07-13-2021, 02:57 PM
-
#19
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  1. orangetide
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2010
  4. Posts: 10,691
  5. Rep Power: 35630
Originally Posted By hoganrulz
Works both ways. If you have no children and thus no vested interest in the future you're just in it for a cash grab.

But if you had kids, you'll sell 99% of everything to ensure everything that comes from your ball sack would be God's.
Second point is good.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts