Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» gun owners, question
  1. Results 1 to 24 of 24
post 1643655293 07-26-2021, 03:50 PM
-
#1
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 28,227
  6. Rep Power: 123665

gun owners, question

till i bought my recent sig i was only ever aware of the weaver stance. which of the two do you prefer?

scenarios now come to mind where i can see the other being appropriate but from an offensive posture . can someone give me a good example of how the weaver stance is inferior ?

(note- i would have named the other stance but i cant remember what its called so just left it blank)
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
post 1643655343 07-26-2021, 03:51 PM
-
#2
  1. Antoine99
  2. Registered User
  1. Antoine99
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 14,302
  6. Rep Power: 82218
Center axis relock

It's always funny to see people that take like a PERFECT stance on a shooting range and think that they are ready. You should be able to move, shoot from awkward positions, bring your gun in closer if you are in a closed space like a home, etc.
Would kick em in the nuts
post 1643655463 07-26-2021, 03:54 PM
-
#3
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 28,227
  6. Rep Power: 123665
Originally Posted By Antoine99
Center axis relock

It's always funny to see people that take like a PERFECT stance on a shooting range and think that they are ready. You should be able to move, shoot from awkward positions, bring your gun in closer if you are in a closed space like a home, etc.
that is what i meant, screw the range, i meant in an everyday life scenario. the range is only good for so much
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
post 1643655523 07-26-2021, 03:55 PM
-
#4
  1. helpmee
  2. Registered User
  1. helpmee
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2011
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 25,329
  6. Rep Power: 51912
After you get down safety/drawing/not sweeping people take a "tactical" / advanced class where you move.
I am in a commie state and plenty of options here.
Stance shooting paper in a lane is only so useful
**Black out tape over all laptop/cell phone cameras so gov cant spy on me fapping crew**
post 1643655573 07-26-2021, 03:56 PM
-
#5
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 28,227
  6. Rep Power: 123665
Originally Posted By helpmee
After you get down safety/drawing/not sweeping people take a "tactical" / advanced class where you move.
I am in a commie state and plenty of options here.
Stance shooting paper in a lane is only so useful
uh huh
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
post 1643655793 07-26-2021, 04:00 PM
-
#6
  1. helpmee
  2. Registered User
  1. helpmee
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2011
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 25,329
  6. Rep Power: 51912
Originally Posted By latverian41
uh huh
My home defense choice is an AK.
A Russian group travels the country teaching the class
Hardest class I have taken but learned to be pretty functional

I have taken handgun courses (sig) as well.
**Black out tape over all laptop/cell phone cameras so gov cant spy on me fapping crew**
post 1643656803 07-26-2021, 04:17 PM
-
#7
  1. Antoine99
  2. Registered User
  1. Antoine99
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 14,302
  6. Rep Power: 82218
Originally Posted By latverian41
that is what i meant, screw the range, i meant in an everyday life scenario. the range is only good for so much
Yeah. It seems like CAR feels so much more natural your hands naturally want to tilt like that.
Would kick em in the nuts
post 1643657003 07-26-2021, 04:20 PM
-
#8
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 28,227
  6. Rep Power: 123665
Originally Posted By Antoine99
Yeah. It seems like CAR feels so much more natural your hands naturally want to tilt like that.
im not qualified to even say bro
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
post 1643657143 07-26-2021, 04:23 PM
-
#9
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Sacramento, California, United States
  5. Posts: 47,223
  6. Rep Power: 275363
I've shot more isosceles in the last few years, sometimes with my head forward sometimes upright.

I'm not convinced it matters much. I've seen so many great shooters use a variety of stances. I mainly use it because it's very comfortable and makes swapping targets a breeze. The cue to bring the sights to your eyes is nice too.
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω
Pre-Med crew
★ NUFC ☆
₪ DEFQON.1 AUSTRALIA 2016 ₪
177 lbs | O: 165 /// B: 275 /// S: 335 /// D: 390
post 1643657343 07-26-2021, 04:27 PM
-
#10
  1. bigcat3655
  2. Registered User
  1. bigcat3655
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2017
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 10,214
  6. Rep Power: 87942
Weaver is most comfortable for me being cross eye dominant
post 1643657383 07-26-2021, 04:27 PM
-
#11
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 28,227
  6. Rep Power: 123665
Originally Posted By CaliSuperSport
I've shot more isosceles in the last few years, sometimes with my head forward sometimes upright.

I'm not convinced it matters much. I've seen so many great shooters use a variety of stances. I mainly use it because it's very comfortable and makes swapping targets a breeze. The cue to bring the sights to your eyes is nice too.
after so long do you even need that? its not text book thats for sure
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
post 1643659213 07-26-2021, 05:03 PM
-
#12
  1. LinuxJon
  1. LinuxJon
  2. Join Date: Apr 2014
  3. Location: California, United States
  4. Posts: 49,073
  5. Rep Power: 325966
Originally Posted By CaliSuperSport
I've shot more isosceles in the last few years, sometimes with my head forward sometimes upright.

I'm not convinced it matters much.
This. You want to pick one foundational position that feels natural and that you can default to. But the odds are that in a critical situation, you won't have time to settle into it anyway.

Shooting IDPA & USPSA really opens your eyes to how little stance matters to a proficient pistol shooter, and how little you think about it when you're trying to move and put shots on target.
480s / 370b / 495d / 235 x 2 SOHP

Trump 2020
DeSantis 2024
Catbrah 2032

Misc Firearms Crew
Misc Wristwatch Crew
Will sell wife's foot pics for watch/gun money crew
Definitely not a fed crew
post 1643659463 07-26-2021, 05:07 PM
-
#13
  1. shmobin
  2. Registered User
  1. shmobin
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 10,877
  6. Rep Power: 68142
Originally Posted By CaliSuperSport
I've shot more isosceles in the last few years, sometimes with my head forward sometimes upright.

I'm not convinced it matters much. I've seen so many great shooters use a variety of stances. I mainly use it because it's very comfortable and makes swapping targets a breeze. The cue to bring the sights to your eyes is nice too.
All of this. It is way more important that you use the correct eye.
post 1643659733 07-26-2021, 05:11 PM
-
#14
  1. OGmuffDiver
  2. Unregistered Gynecologist
  1. OGmuffDiver
  2. Unregistered Gynecologist
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Posts: 1,379
  5. Rep Power: 6742
Most of the guys here have given solid advice already. It's not so much sticking to a specific stance, it's consistent mechanical movement. Shooting stances are taught to create a baseline or instill fundamentals. Train on dynamic stances while emphasizing consistent point of contact with the firearm, and you get better from there.
Former USAF Crew
Firearms Crew
Metalhead Crew
HTC Crew
Mod-Negged Crew
post 1643660303 07-26-2021, 05:25 PM
-
#15
  1. Dogkrack
  2. Banned
  1. Dogkrack
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Jun 2019
  4. Posts: 14,820
  5. Rep Power: 0
iso if you have plates; weaver if you want your heart and both lungs punctured in one shot
post 1643662283 07-26-2021, 06:02 PM
-
#16
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  1. guest89
  2. Forever aBOARD
  3. Join Date: Sep 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 41,701
  6. Rep Power: 170156
Try both. See which feels more natural. Both have their pro's and cons. I use whatever feels right at the time/kind of a hybrid. The idea that one is completely superior to the other is flawed.

Originally Posted By LinuxJon
This. You want to pick one foundational position that feels natural and that you can default to. But the odds are that in a critical situation, you won't have time to settle into it anyway.

Shooting IDPA & USPSA really opens your eyes to how little stance matters to a proficient pistol shooter, and how little you think about it when you're trying to move and put shots on target.
Yeah funny to see guys shooting off balance, sometimes with the trailing feet only having toes on the ground. Leaning over, etc.
Originally Posted By Dogkrack
iso if you have plates; weaver if you want your heart and both lungs punctured in one shot
The weaver stance isn't that pronounced and is closer to what you'd use with a rifle anyways.
post 1643662583 07-26-2021, 06:08 PM
-
#17
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 28,227
  6. Rep Power: 123665
Originally Posted By guest89
Try both. See which feels more natural. Both have their pro's and cons. I use whatever feels right at the time/kind of a hybrid. The idea that one is completely superior to the other is flawed.




Yeah funny to see guys shooting off balance, sometimes with the trailing feet only having toes on the ground. Leaning over, etc.



The weaver stance isn't that pronounced and is closer to what you'd use with a rifle anyways.
closer to what you would use with a rifle? you are going to go with an offensive with what? what you said makes little sense to me, count it up to my stupidity i guess
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
post 1643662903 07-26-2021, 06:13 PM
-
#18
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  1. gluon
  2. rapscallion
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Age: 37
  5. Posts: 9,323
  6. Rep Power: 29058
Originally Posted By CaliSuperSport
I've shot more isosceles in the last few years, sometimes with my head forward sometimes upright.

I'm not convinced it matters much. I've seen so many great shooters use a variety of stances. I mainly use it because it's very comfortable and makes swapping targets a breeze. The cue to bring the sights to your eyes is nice too.
weaver for my semi but for shooting revolvers anything other than isosceles feels weird
post 1643663233 07-26-2021, 06:20 PM
-
#19
  1. Archangel_Lost
  2. Attention K-Mart shoppers
  1. Archangel_Lost
  2. Attention K-Mart shoppers
  3. Join Date: Aug 2003
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 58,036
  6. Rep Power: 148333
Don’t ask misc, go to a shooting course where you’ll put thousands of rounds in variable positions.
Lifts:
Squat: 460x1
Bench: 400x1
Deadlift: 575x1
OHP: 250x2
Weight: 180 lbs.

Don't have heroes; look up to no one. Because as long as someone's leading the way, the best you'll ever be is second.
post 1643663243 07-26-2021, 06:20 PM
-
#20
  1. LukeLissen
  2. 📶 🔌🔋 99%
  1. LukeLissen
  2. 📶 🔌🔋 99%
  3. Join Date: Mar 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 27,092
  6. Rep Power: 192151
The Weaver stance is for Fudds and communists and corny people.

Isosceles is what those who know WTF they're doing do. Nobody who's anybody in the shooting world or professional training does Weaver stance anymore.


but if you've trained many times using Weaver over many years and aren't going to put in the work to train differently, then by all means keep using Weaver instead of screwing up trying something new when the SHTF.
post 1643664403 07-26-2021, 06:39 PM
-
#21
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Sacramento, California, United States
  5. Posts: 47,223
  6. Rep Power: 275363
Originally Posted By latverian41
after so long do you even need that? its not text book thats for sure
Need what, the cue? I mean you should always bring the sights to your eyes, rather than the reverse. I guess the exception is when you have a forward posture, I've seen plenty of guys do that, I think it's usually when they're trying really hard to stay tight and fast.

Another tip is to practice with both eyes open. Dat dere peripheral vision & situational awareness.
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω
Pre-Med crew
★ NUFC ☆
₪ DEFQON.1 AUSTRALIA 2016 ₪
177 lbs | O: 165 /// B: 275 /// S: 335 /// D: 390
post 1643666233 07-26-2021, 07:03 PM
-
#22
  1. TLTrooper
  2. Robopoc
  1. TLTrooper
  2. Robopoc
  3. Join Date: May 2011
  4. Posts: 12,787
  5. Rep Power: 10636
Originally Posted By LinuxJon
This. You want to pick one foundational position that feels natural and that you can default to. But the odds are that in a critical situation, you won't have time to settle into it anyway.
This. In a 100% controlled environment, aka simple straight line shooting range, I'd default to what feels natural. In real life, you might be reacting to someone inches away from you, maybe you're behind a wall, the wedge of a car door, a trunk, a hood, a tree stump, fire hydrant, etc.

You can learn the basics, but in shooting, if you put too much thought into certain aspects, you might miss and might get hurt soon after. A good example is point shooting. Close quarters, no aiming, just "feel" the shot and feel it VERY quickly. Stance under time and pressure is the same, IMO.
post 1643667023 07-26-2021, 07:19 PM
-
#23
  1. DrumsNotDead
  2. Registered User
  1. DrumsNotDead
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2019
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 9,649
  6. Rep Power: 41839
spray random from the hip
post 1643669053 07-26-2021, 08:00 PM
-
#24
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  1. latverian41
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2016
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 28,227
  6. Rep Power: 123665
Originally Posted By DrumsNotDead
spray random from the hip
haha i get the humor at least
"it takes a wise man to know when he is in error and a noble man to admit to it"
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts