Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » COVID outbreak in Duke University, 97.8% were from vaccinated...
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 171
  2. Page 3 of 6
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  9. 5
  11. Last

Thread: COVID outbreak in Duke University, 97.8% were from vaccinated...

post 1647000593 09-14-2021, 08:15 AM
-
#61
  1. Polaris
  1. Polaris
  3. Join Date: Feb 2003
  4. Posts: 63,727
  5. Rep Power: 568352
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie⏩
I DGAF if you don't want to get it but why the push to discredit it?
Well unfortunately, a lot of people don't feel the same as you, in particularly our President with his recent Executive Order. If people would STFU and quit escalating the coercion tactics then you would probably see a lot less people trying to "discredit" this highly dubious vaccine.
post 1647000773 09-14-2021, 08:20 AM
-
#62
  1. Dan_S
  2. Registered User
  1. Dan_S
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2009
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Age: 42
  6. Posts: 12,627
  7. Rep Power: 85920
Here's a better question...

Why are they testing people at all if they're 98% vaccinated?
post 1647000783 09-14-2021, 08:20 AM
-
#63
  1. 1fast1
  2. Registered Misc CEO
  1. 1fast1
  2. Registered Misc CEO
  3. Join Date: Sep 2006
  4. Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 4,624
  6. Rep Power: 81186
Originally Posted By Cudabrah⏩
If the vax was effective at preventing infection, the 2% of unvaxxed should have been significantly over-represented in the positive cases.

This categorically shows a lack of effectiveness of the vax at preventing infection.
See, this is the common sense part that the rest of us can conclude on our own. Libtards won't arrive here without CNN just straight telling them that though.

Instead, MSM is busy pumping out content like "More vaxxed people get covid than unvaxxed, and here's why that's a good thing!"
post 1647000823 09-14-2021, 08:21 AM
-
#64
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
37 cases
0.17% positivity rate on campus
50 active cases
September 6-12 2021

https://coronavirus.duke.edu/covid-testing/

.17 is really low.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1647000983 09-14-2021, 08:24 AM
-
#65
  1. ezmac31
  1. ezmac31
  3. Join Date: Jun 2009
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Age: 43
  6. Posts: 20,166
  7. Subscribers: 1
  8. Rep Power: 248047
Originally Posted By x-trainer
37 cases
0.17% positivity rate on campus
50 active cases
September 6-12 2021

https://coronavirus.duke.edu/covid-testing/

.17 is really low.
450 exposed, 350 got it. 98% were vaccinated.


Sorry facts don’t align with your religion
post 1647001033 09-14-2021, 08:25 AM
-
#66
  1. JMath
  2. .
  1. JMath
  2. .
  3. Join Date: Oct 2008
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Posts: 16,265
  6. Rep Power: 111818
Originally Posted By HayZues
Link? And what is the overall vaccinated rate?

If 98% are vaccinated, one would expect almost all cases to be from those that are vaxxed.



Edit - 98% are indeed vaxxed.

Why tf are miscers who are too stupid to understand basic ratio math, convinced they are smart enough to unravel global conspiracies on ******** and YouTube??
I don't think we're the dumb ones. If the vaccine was actually effective then the unvaccinated SHOULD disproportionately represent the number of positive COVID cases in this scenario right?

Its not like saying 98% were wearing red shirts and 2% blue and 98% of the COVID people were wearing a red shirt. In this case 98% of people had something that was supposed to reduce their likelihood of getting COVID. The 98% should represent less than 98% of the COVID cases if the vaccine is actually working.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.

Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
post 1647001063 09-14-2021, 08:26 AM
-
#67
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2020
  4. Posts: 27,464
  5. Rep Power: 171374
Originally Posted By SillieBazzillie⏩
So, Duke tested 15k and found 364 cases of Covid for a positivety rate of 1.59%.

What's the issue here?


https://www.newsobserver.com/news/lo...253851373.html
That's after testing nearly everyone all at once. The more you test, the lower the rate. 1.59% is higher than the general population's positive rate at any given time last winter. Please don't come back with "but tests were coming back 10-15% positive in January" because that's a retarded response. If positive rates among 1-2 million people in a place with 330 million were representative of the entire population, this pandemic would have been over in Spring 2020. At the peak of winter the general population's positivity rate was 1.2%

But they're young at university, so all but a few obvious fatties and some "skinny fat" gamers should have no more than a mild to asymptomatic cold.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
post 1647001183 09-14-2021, 08:28 AM
-
#68
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
Originally Posted By ezmac31⏩
450 exposed, 350 got it. 98% were vaccinated.


Sorry facts don’t align with your religion
Not religious and not disagreeing with op.

Just stating current data, dont be upset ( i am not)that 2 things can exist at the same time.

Go to the source the university's data.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1647001223 09-14-2021, 08:28 AM
-
#69
  1. eternalnoob
  2. Registered User
  1. eternalnoob
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2020
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 3,025
  6. Rep Power: 16098
So funny how suddenly libs are going 'yeah but they had mild symptoms and none were hospitalized.'

Oh, that matters now? Yesterday cases was the only valid measurement.

Now that vaccinated are getting infected suddenly severity of symptoms, age, pre existing conditions etc actually do matter?
post 1647001393 09-14-2021, 08:32 AM
-
#70
  1. EdwardTheGreat
  2. Registered User
  1. EdwardTheGreat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Age: 52
  5. Posts: 9,092
  6. Rep Power: 235009
Originally Posted By x-trainer
Not religious and not disagreeing with op.

Just stating current data, dont be upset ( i am not)that 2 things can exist at the same time.

Go to the source the university's data.
LOL you are apparently as dumb as Sillie

post 1647001473 09-14-2021, 08:33 AM
-
#71
  1. JMath
  2. .
  1. JMath
  2. .
  3. Join Date: Oct 2008
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Posts: 16,265
  6. Rep Power: 111818
Originally Posted By eternalnoob⏩
So funny how suddenly libs are going 'yeah but they had mild symptoms and none were hospitalized.'

Oh, that matters now? Yesterday cases was the only valid measurement.

Now that vaccinated are getting infected suddenly severity of symptoms, age, pre existing conditions etc actually do matter?
They have to use this. Its the liberal way. Take climate change for example. We were supposed to have an ice age, global warming, acid rain.... when none of those worked they threw out climate change. So ANYTHING random or out of the ordinary can be pointed to as proof.

With COVID, it's "your symptoms won't be as bad". Which could be true. But... its an easy thing to say to anybody who doesn't die. If you get vaxed and put on a vent? "well you would have died if you weren't vaxed". You're asymptomatic? "Oh you would have had to go to the hospital". Theres always the next rung of severity they can say it would have gone to had you not been vaxed, but you can't disprove it.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.

Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
post 1647001523 09-14-2021, 08:34 AM
-
#72
  1. 1fast1
  2. Registered Misc CEO
  1. 1fast1
  2. Registered Misc CEO
  3. Join Date: Sep 2006
  4. Location: Atlanta, Georgia, United States
  5. Posts: 4,624
  6. Rep Power: 81186
Originally Posted By JMath⏩
I don't think we're the dumb ones. If the vaccine was actually effective then the unvaccinated SHOULD disproportionately represent the number of positive COVID cases in this scenario right?

Its not like saying 98% were wearing red shirts and 2% blue and 98% of the COVID people were wearing a red shirt. In this case 98% of people had something that was supposed to reduce their likelihood of getting COVID. The 98% should represent less than 98% of the COVID cases if the vaccine is actually working.
notice how the libtards keep avoiding this point? any of you care to address it?

why are the unvaxxed not disproportionately impacted?



hmmmmm.


lol.
post 1647001543 09-14-2021, 08:34 AM
-
#73
  1. BrunotheBoxer
  2. Registered User
  1. BrunotheBoxer
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2009
  4. Location: Florida, United States
  5. Posts: 8,504
  6. Rep Power: 98512
Pissening.

Love this for them.
post 1647001593 09-14-2021, 08:35 AM
-
#74
  1. EdwardTheGreat
  2. Registered User
  1. EdwardTheGreat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Age: 52
  5. Posts: 9,092
  6. Rep Power: 235009
Originally Posted By JMath⏩
They have to use this. Its the liberal way. Take climate change for example. We were supposed to have an ice age, global warming, acid rain.... when none of those worked they threw out climate change. So ANYTHING random or out of the ordinary can be pointed to as proof.

With COVID, it's "your symptoms won't be as bad". Which could be true. But... its an easy thing to say to anybody who doesn't die. If you get vaxed and put on a vent? "well you would have died if you weren't vaxed". You're asymptomatic? "Oh you would have had to go to the hospital". Theres always the next rung of severity they can say it would have gone to had you not been vaxed, but you can't disprove it.
When Joe Rogaine came down with covid, and he "treated" it with various meds....they all said, "he would have probably been just fine anyway, its not the meds"

When vaxxed people get covid, they say "he would have died without the vax"

Just fukkin LOL
post 1647001613 09-14-2021, 08:36 AM
-
#75
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
Originally Posted By eternalnoob⏩
So funny how suddenly libs are going 'yeah but they had mild symptoms and none were hospitalized.'

Oh, that matters now? Yesterday cases was the only valid measurement.

Now that vaccinated are getting infected suddenly severity of symptoms, age, pre existing conditions etc actually do matter?
Let's start with a few common themes.
1. Vaccines of all kinds never prevent 100 percent of anything, ever.
Flu shot anyone.
2. The reason everyone freaked out last year was because of 2 things, 1 deaths and 2 , having 1 million total hospital beds in the usa... and 331 million total people. So hospital count is valid.

3. Varients escape 1 or 2 jabs according to Israel and their scientists so, the goalposts were moved and the way to respond has as well.
4.In sports it is called halftime adjustments because your plays are not working and you want to win by adjusting your plays and strategy.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1647001633 09-14-2021, 08:36 AM
-
#76
  1. DesiredUserphag
  2. 1:12TilTheDayIFukinDie
  1. DesiredUserphag
  2. 1:12TilTheDayIFukinDie
  3. Join Date: Sep 2014
  4. Posts: 40,176
  5. Rep Power: 397140
lmfaooooooooooooooooo
𝗣𝗨𝗥𝗘𝗕𝗟𝗢𝗢𝗗
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω ₅₀/₁₉₅
𝕬𝖊𝖘𝖙𝖍𝖊𝖙𝖎𝖈𝖆𝖑𝖑𝖞 𝕮𝖚𝖙 𝕸𝖆𝖘𝖙𝖊𝖗 𝕽𝖆𝖈𝖊 ®
ᗪIᔕᑕᖇIᗰIᑎᗩTIOᑎ E᙭ᑕᒪᑌᔕIOᑎ IᑎᗪOᑕTᖇIᑎᗩTIOᑎ
post 1647001753 09-14-2021, 08:38 AM
-
#77
  1. JMath
  2. .
  1. JMath
  2. .
  3. Join Date: Oct 2008
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Posts: 16,265
  6. Rep Power: 111818
Originally Posted By 1fast1⏩
notice how the libtards keep avoiding this point? any of you care to address it?

why are the unvaxxed not disproportionately impacted?

hmmmmm.


lol.
The annoying thing is if there was just some genuine honesty about it, I think there would be so much less debate. Because I do think the vax probably helps with severe symptoms.. but not everybody needs it! At least 1 hospital in my area the unvaxed do represent the vast majority of covid hospitalizations/vents. But again it isn't a justification for mandatory vax for everyone. Almost all of those people in the hospital are old, or were unhealthy prior to COVID. That isn't a justification to make the vaccine mandatory for a 20 year old college athlete. lol.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.

Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
post 1647001843 09-14-2021, 08:39 AM
-
#78
  1. JMath
  2. .
  1. JMath
  2. .
  3. Join Date: Oct 2008
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Posts: 16,265
  6. Rep Power: 111818
Originally Posted By EdwardTheGreat⏩
When Joe Rogaine came down with covid, and he "treated" it with various meds....they all said, "he would have probably been just fine anyway, its not the meds"
That was after they tolerantly were wishing he would die.
Everything depends upon execution; having just a vision is no solution.

Performance and performance alone dictates the predator in any food chain.
post 1647001873 09-14-2021, 08:39 AM
-
#79
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
Originally Posted By EdwardTheGreat⏩
LOL you are apparently as dumb as Sillie

Name calling doesn't make it true, it simply makes you good at drive by name calling.
Of course you didn't refute anything..... but nice ownage, you dunked, I was ethered...lmao,
Clown.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1647002163 09-14-2021, 08:44 AM
-
#80
  1. EdwardTheGreat
  2. Registered User
  1. EdwardTheGreat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2013
  4. Age: 52
  5. Posts: 9,092
  6. Rep Power: 235009
Originally Posted By x-trainer
Name calling doesn't make it true, it simply makes you good at drive by name calling.
Of course you didn't refute anything..... but nice ownage, you dunked, I was ethered...lmao,
Clown.
The percentage you need to be looking at is how many students were exposed to covid, and how many of them got it...NOT how many students were vaccinated and how many got it.

It is really not hard, and you are making yourself look even dumber by not following Sillie's lead here...he recognized how fukkin dumb his posts were and bailed the fukk out of this thread.

Re-read what you have wrote and then dip the fukk out with your grade 2 math skills fukko.
post 1647002193 09-14-2021, 08:45 AM
-
#81
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  1. 5x10
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Apr 2007
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 49,580
  6. Rep Power: 0
Good thing it’s was the vax’ed that spread it

If it were the unvaxxed spreading it, then the vax’ed wouldn’t be protected by the vaccine
Dallas Cowboys

Lifted for 30 years

Ass > tits
No Debt Crew
post 1647002793 09-14-2021, 08:56 AM
-
#82
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  1. frankdtank20
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2020
  4. Posts: 27,464
  5. Rep Power: 171374
Originally Posted By HayZues
A 1% positivity rate doesn't disprove vax work.


Also, vaccines in general do not work if only 50% of population gets them.
Nice try, epic fail. And I'm pro-vax. Americans are generally not healthy after decades of following the federal government's insistence to eat low-fat (high carb and processed) foods, so the vaxes are now just to stop serious illness, not infection.

Over 1% positive within a week is very high, showing vax failure at stopping infection. If testing basically the entire student body, that's extremely high for a snapshot in time. With leaky vaccines that slow transmission for a limited time it's time to admit the shots are to protect one's own health, not the health of others. More evidence the vaccination efforts need to be stepped up on the elderly and obese of every adult age.
Yeah Buddyyy! Light weight! Light weight baby!!!!
post 1647002853 09-14-2021, 08:58 AM
-
#83
  1. ChaliHo
  2. Registered User
  1. ChaliHo
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Posts: 26,136
  5. Rep Power: 144510
Originally Posted By thadderbox⏩
and 2.2% were unvaccinated.

What's going on?

Is this legit or fake? Why is tunafisha posting videos now?
post 1647003033 09-14-2021, 09:02 AM
-
#84
  1. LizzieTish
  2. Registered User
  1. LizzieTish
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 51
  5. Posts: 8,412
  6. Rep Power: 55161
Originally Posted By thadderbox⏩
and 2.2% were unvaccinated.

What's going on?

4 page thread:

"My personal experience being Unvaxed around Vaccinated Health Care Workers. Hint- Stay Away if You Can."
https://www.godlikeproductions.com/f...age4906315/pg1
"The reason we are being murdered with genetic altering drugs is its slow acting and it causes your body to malfunction and destroy itself so there is a "plausible deniability" factor. Unlike most poisons which leave more evidence of being the direct cause of death."

1,151+ pages of peoples accounts of Covid-19 vaccine damage:
https://vestibular.org/forum/dizziness/covid-19-vaccine-side-effects/
post 1647003043 09-14-2021, 09:02 AM
-
#85
  1. HayZues Christi
  2. Registered User
  1. HayZues Christi
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2007
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 33,178
  6. Rep Power: 232547
Originally Posted By 1fast1⏩
or if the "vaccine" actually performed as real vaccines are supposed to, you would not have massive chunks of vaccinated people getting infected. those used to be called vaccine failures, by the way. just change the name and don't worry about it though, right?


lol hurrr durrrrr
You might want to look up the effectiveness rate of all the vaccines on the common pediatric schedule... less effective than you think. In fact, some less effective than the covid, they work cause EVERYBODY GETS THEM. THE ~20% or so whom the vax is ineffective, are never exposed because EVERYBODY IS VAXXED.

now even 50% of population is unvaxxed, those 20% WILL be exposed. It is inevitable.
Ol' 71st street. The devil that birthed me.

606 G0D.
post 1647003223 09-14-2021, 09:04 AM
-
#86
  1. knightofday
  2. Registered User
  1. knightofday
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 14,588
  7. Rep Power: 126002
Originally Posted By pwoL⏩
This is why they’re pushing the vax so ****ing hard. They know it’s bs and don’t want a an unvaxxxed control group to expose them. They want everyone onboard before they start demanding endless boosters as a subscription plan for your immune system to work. Need everyone onboard and bought into the system before they move forward. Also prob want people to buy in before seeing any negative long term effects from vaxxxed people.
Correct on all fronts
post 1647003343 09-14-2021, 09:06 AM
-
#87
  1. HayZues Christi
  2. Registered User
  1. HayZues Christi
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2007
  4. Age: 40
  5. Posts: 33,178
  6. Rep Power: 232547
Originally Posted By JMath⏩
I don't think we're the dumb ones. If the vaccine was actually effective then the unvaccinated SHOULD disproportionately represent the number of positive COVID cases in this scenario right?

Its not like saying 98% were wearing red shirts and 2% blue and 98% of the COVID people were wearing a red shirt. In this case 98% of people had something that was supposed to reduce their likelihood of getting COVID. The 98% should represent less than 98% of the COVID cases if the vaccine is actually working.
They unvaxxed DO in fact make up a much larger percentage of the cases than their percentage of the total population. Maybe this Duke study is an outlier, or maybe it's not even real..I haven't done anything to verify it tbh. But I do remember a recent study of Europe, where 90% were vaxxed, the cases being split almost exactly 50/50. 90% of population made up 50% of cases. 10% made up 50%.


Also 90% of hospitizatons in the US are unvaxxed. That means 50% of population is accounting for 90%...

Don't get the vax, I give 0 fuks honestly, just stop doing horrible math and thinking you've solved the conspiracy.
Ol' 71st street. The devil that birthed me.

606 G0D.
post 1647003413 09-14-2021, 09:08 AM
-
#88
  1. knightofday
  2. Registered User
  1. knightofday
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 14,588
  7. Rep Power: 126002
Originally Posted By LizzieTish⏩
4 page thread:

"My personal experience being Unvaxed around Vaccinated Health Care Workers. Hint- Stay Away if You Can."
https://www.godlikeproductions.com/f...age4906315/pg1
Im convinced shedding is happening srs. Too many coincidences that point of it being true, Im skeptical af of masses of vaxxed people, it just makes too much sense for the globalists to incorporate into their poison.

People forget thyeve been working on this delivery mechanism for 0ver 20 years, jut think of what features they could've engineered into it fuark

Why risk it?
post 1647003633 09-14-2021, 09:10 AM
-
#89
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
Originally Posted By EdwardTheGreat⏩
The percentage you need to be looking at is how many students were exposed to covid, and how many of them got it...NOT how many students were vaccinated and how many got it.

It is really not hard, and you are making yourself look even dumber by not following Sillie's lead here...he recognized how fukkin dumb his posts were and bailed the fukk out of this thread.

Re-read what you have wrote and then dip the fukk out with your grade 2 math skills fukko.
I was **only looking at the current positivity rate,** not all that nonsense that you are rambling on like lost grandpa.
That was an earlier debate that I was not involved in, you versus Sillie.
It really is not that hard to reread what my post was, and you are making yourself look even dumber by assuming things that I am not discussing. Kinda of like arguing with yourself for ownage and ethering.

And Mr Fukko, stop trying.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1647003873 09-14-2021, 09:13 AM
-
#90
  1. knightofday
  2. Registered User
  1. knightofday
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2013
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Age: 39
  6. Posts: 14,588
  7. Rep Power: 126002
Originally Posted By HayZues
They unvaxxed DO in fact make up a much larger percentage of the cases than their percentage of the total population. Maybe this Duke study is an outlier, or maybe it's not even real..I haven't done anything to verify it tbh. But I do remember a recent study of Europe, where 90% were vaxxed, the cases being split almost exactly 50/50. 90% of population made up 50% of cases. 10% made up 50%.


Also 90% of hospitizatons in the US are unvaxxed. That means 50% of population is accounting for 90%...

Don't get the vax, I give 0 fuks honestly, just stop doing horrible math and thinking you've solved the conspiracy.
Every post is lie lie lie lie haha

Theyre not even testing vaxxed GMO humans once they get covid, how are you claiming that unvaxxed are the key patients?

People dying with 14 days of taking the GMO vax are listed as unvaxxed covid deaths, but you already knew that.

Tbh idk why the fuk Im even responding to a 12 year old chinese shill on a gay indian bodybuilding forum lulz
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts