Forum
»
US successfully tests Mach 5 hypersonic ballistic missile..
10-06-2021, 02:07 PM
-
#31
Originally Posted By radrd⏩
Lol Mach 15 is nothing. Mach 25+ is what we need to be competitiveMach 5 isn't very fast. While technically hypersonic, mach 15+ is what we need to achieve in order to be competitive.
JFL
10-06-2021, 02:09 PM
-
#32
- suave2000
- Join Date: Mar 2009
- Location: Peru
- Age: 37
- Posts: 29,097
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 11882
-
-
Oh great just what the world needa during a global pandemic and large scale ecological disaster. A fuken missile that will kill us all a bit faster...
We could feed the entire planet with the money wasted in fancier and deadlier weapons just so the military industrial oligarchs can get a bit richer. Fuk them.
We could feed the entire planet with the money wasted in fancier and deadlier weapons just so the military industrial oligarchs can get a bit richer. Fuk them.
10-06-2021, 02:12 PM
-
#33
- exxtracool
- Registered User
-
- exxtracool
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2018
- Location: Canada
- Age: 34
- Posts: 20,766
- Rep Power: 77972
-
-
Originally Posted By JoshSP1985⏩
the only thing that ever matters is: hit the target with the smallest margin of error possible and avoid detection from the enemy. if your missile can do those things, youre golden.Are we thinking about the speed wrong? Isn't more speed past what is needed for the objective a waste and impacts reliability?
It's not how fast you can go but how fast you need to go accounting for the other trade-offs?
It's not how fast you can go but how fast you need to go accounting for the other trade-offs?
people look at the speed and compare it to ballistic missiles i guess, but that is a very wrong perspective because these are two very different missiles. a ballistic missile is fired into space where the payload begins a predictable descent (parabolic trajectory), that is much much easier for defense systems to shoot out of the sky than a hypersonic which flies at only 3 times higher than a commercial airplane and is maneuverable.
the downside is distance. you cant obviously cover as huge a range as a ballistic missile.
10-06-2021, 02:15 PM
-
#34
10-06-2021, 02:16 PM
-
#35
- exxtracool
- Registered User
-
- exxtracool
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2018
- Location: Canada
- Age: 34
- Posts: 20,766
- Rep Power: 77972
-
-
Originally Posted By suave2000⏩
*communist Llama crew*Oh great just what the world needa during a global pandemic and large scale ecological disaster. A fuken missile that will kill us all a bit faster...
We could feed the entire planet with the money wasted in fancier and deadlier weapons just so the military industrial oligarchs can get a bit richer. Fuk them.
We could feed the entire planet with the money wasted in fancier and deadlier weapons just so the military industrial oligarchs can get a bit richer. Fuk them.
sorry buddy, but we live in the real world and not some fantasy utopia youve concocted in your misguided brain.
10-06-2021, 02:21 PM
-
#36
- windchimesilo
- Registered User
-
- windchimesilo
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2021
- Age: 56
- Posts: 1,737
- Rep Power: 10223
-
-
Originally Posted By suave2000⏩
I read somewhere (can't remember) that the reason why we can't help starving ppl in Africa is due to shipping/logistics. It is hard to ship fresh food over there due to shipping costs, preserving the food and the routes that will need to be travelled. The funniest thing is that coca cola actually manages to bring these ppl a coke machine and have their sodas drank over there etc, so a starving African mentions that they can use coca cola to ship the food, but of course, evil logistics, shipping and travel liabilities get in the way. I agree with where you're coming from 100%, and I never really have anything negative to say about any of your posts, but the real world is just a fcked place. Dedfknsrs.Oh great just what the world needa during a global pandemic and large scale ecological disaster. A fuken missile that will kill us all a bit faster...
We could feed the entire planet with the money wasted in fancier and deadlier weapons just so the military industrial oligarchs can get a bit richer. Fuk them.
We could feed the entire planet with the money wasted in fancier and deadlier weapons just so the military industrial oligarchs can get a bit richer. Fuk them.
10-06-2021, 02:27 PM
-
#37
- Leonydus
- Registered User
-
- Leonydus
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2007
- Location: North Carolina, United States
- Posts: 23,260
- Rep Power: 156188
-
-
Originally Posted By windchimesilo⏩
even if we did manage to feed them they'd reproduce until eventually you cant feed them. wait thats what is actually happeneing. the population of africa is set to EXPLODE, 3x the size by 2050. most of them will be sailing to Europe courtesy of jewish NGO's providing life rafts.I read somewhere (can't remember) that the reason why we can't help starving ppl in Africa is due to shipping/logistics. It is hard to ship fresh food over there due to shipping costs, preserving the food and the routes that will need to be travelled. The funniest thing is that coca cola actually manages to bring these ppl a coke machine and have their sodas drank over there etc, so a starving African mentions that they can use coca cola to ship the food, but of course, evil logistics, shipping and travel liabilities get in the way. I agree with where you're coming from 100%, and I never really have anything negative to say about any of your posts, but the real world is just a fcked place. Dedfknsrs.
the african survival strategy has always been to have as many kids as possible.
10-06-2021, 02:28 PM
-
#38
- exxtracool
- Registered User
-
- exxtracool
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2018
- Location: Canada
- Age: 34
- Posts: 20,766
- Rep Power: 77972
-
-
i want to see america do 2 things asap, invest more into missile r&d, and invest more into missile defense r&d. ideally develop some form of capable AI that can be integrated into both aswell.
stop wasting money on more nuclear subs and aircraft carriers, you *******s already have enough you dont need more.
stop wasting money on more nuclear subs and aircraft carriers, you *******s already have enough you dont need more.
10-06-2021, 02:33 PM
-
#39
- LYCLifter
- Registered User
-
- LYCLifter
- Registered User
- Join Date: Sep 2014
- Location: Austin, Texas, United States
- Posts: 469
- Rep Power: 10132
-
-
Originally Posted By keyboardworkout⏩
Um no need. The subs can already park off your coast with nukes. It is only a matter of minutes before they strike. An ICBM takes less than 40 mins from launch to target. I am just saying that reducing the strike time from minutes to seconds doesn't really change the equation of warfare that much when you are targeting a city that would take weeks to empty. Besides James Bond will hit the kill switch mere moments before the strike anyway.Once the US, China and Russia start loading hypersonic missiles into subs, it's over.
No nation will have a chance to retaliate before missiles land on their soil.
This is going to increase the risk of a first strike.
No nation will have a chance to retaliate before missiles land on their soil.
This is going to increase the risk of a first strike.
10-06-2021, 02:46 PM
-
#40
- zknarc
- Registered User
-
- zknarc
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2016
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 16,421
- Rep Power: 44912
-
-
Originally Posted By Leonydus⏩
This. Stop having kids in a place which cannot sustain that amount of humans ffs. The countries are also corrupt af.even if we did manage to feed them they'd reproduce until eventually you cant feed them. wait thats what is actually happeneing. the population of africa is set to EXPLODE, 3x the size by 2050. most of them will be sailing to Europe courtesy of jewish NGO's providing life rafts.
the african survival strategy has always been to have as many kids as possible.
the african survival strategy has always been to have as many kids as possible.
If you can't handle me when I'm incel, you don't deserve me when I'm chad
10-06-2021, 02:53 PM
-
#41
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
-
- Jasonw1178
- 5'3" 300lbs Fudge Rounds
- Join Date: Dec 2012
- Posts: 44,104
- Rep Power: 271274
-
-
LOL a few years ago "the US doesn't have any hypersonic weapons" herp derp how Russia and China did. Yesh, sure.
The US not only has the highest military budged, but also has the most resources in R&D and also intelligence so if anyone thinks that the US doesn't know what everyone is doing and is caught off guard and we have nothing even thought of, then either you're an idiot or they did their jobs.
"American doesn't know anything about hypersonic" bish, we had the SR-71 in the 1960's. Almost 60 years ago. 60 years..... 60 and they have nothing close.
The US not only has the highest military budged, but also has the most resources in R&D and also intelligence so if anyone thinks that the US doesn't know what everyone is doing and is caught off guard and we have nothing even thought of, then either you're an idiot or they did their jobs.
"American doesn't know anything about hypersonic" bish, we had the SR-71 in the 1960's. Almost 60 years ago. 60 years..... 60 and they have nothing close.
10-06-2021, 02:58 PM
-
#42
10-06-2021, 02:58 PM
-
#43
10-06-2021, 03:18 PM
-
#44
- zknarc
- Registered User
-
- zknarc
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2016
- Location: United Kingdom (Great Britain)
- Posts: 16,421
- Rep Power: 44912
-
-
Originally Posted By miscHodor⏩
Or if some homos had made a dink shaped nose coneIf only there had been a midget tranny POC on the design team we could have reached mach 6.
If you can't handle me when I'm incel, you don't deserve me when I'm chad
10-06-2021, 03:22 PM
-
#45
10-06-2021, 03:38 PM
-
#46
- moosik85
- Registered User
-
- moosik85
- Registered User
- Join Date: Nov 2011
- Posts: 14,890
- Rep Power: 81638
-
-
Originally Posted By JeepBruh⏩
ThisMach 5 is nothing and we've had those speeds for decades.
I guarantee there is way more capabilities than they are telling if they are bragging about mach 5.
I guarantee there is way more capabilities than they are telling if they are bragging about mach 5.
Mach 5 is 30+ years old now
Rail gun and direct energy weapons are the now
Plant the trees in whose shade your grandchildren will play
10-06-2021, 03:53 PM
-
#47
- GainzMcgee
- Banned
-
- GainzMcgee
- Banned
- Join Date: Sep 2014
- Location: Tampa, Florida, United States
- Posts: 11,787
- Rep Power: 0
-
-
they should nuke libucks and blm dingers with it
10-06-2021, 03:53 PM
-
#48
- WoofieNugget
- Join Date: Jun 2010
- Age: 51
- Posts: 24,105
- Rep Power: 109783
-
-
Every time I watch those robot videos where they are dancing and jumping I see a rocket launcher on their shoulders and think if the military just bought about a thousand of those it would be game over for any land assault. There's even robot spiders and dogs. The tech is there for a robot army already, no idea why nobody has developed one.
Can you imagine the Taliban with their AK-47s watching as a horde of robot spiders with machine guns on them swarmed into the mountains?
Can you imagine the Taliban with their AK-47s watching as a horde of robot spiders with machine guns on them swarmed into the mountains?
10-06-2021, 03:54 PM
-
#49
- Babayagawick85
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 22,345
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 54026
-
-
Originally Posted By mesobuild⏩
https://open.spotify.com/episode/1NQ...Mk&dl_branch=1podcast link?
Sounds cool.
Sounds cool.
10-06-2021, 03:58 PM
-
#50
- exxtracool
- Registered User
-
- exxtracool
- Registered User
- Join Date: Jan 2018
- Location: Canada
- Age: 34
- Posts: 20,766
- Rep Power: 77972
-
-
Originally Posted By 3fifty⏩
Yes, definitely.Interesting thread.
So the people who know their stuff agree this is a big advancement? Not that it's the fastest but it can move and fly at altitudes that make it better, am I getting that right?
So the people who know their stuff agree this is a big advancement? Not that it's the fastest but it can move and fly at altitudes that make it better, am I getting that right?
10-06-2021, 04:03 PM
-
#51
- jackamo2887
- BEATINGU
-
- jackamo2887
- BEATINGU
- Join Date: Oct 2007
- Posts: 29,617
- Rep Power: 146835
-
-
Crazy how aircraft carries will basically become obsolete in 20 years.
Good luck shooting down a Mach 9 missile.
Good luck shooting down a Mach 9 missile.
Survival. When the jungle tears itself down and builds itself into something new. Guys like you and me, we end up dead. Doesn’t really mean anything. Or, if we happen to live through it, well that doesn’t mean anything either.
10-06-2021, 04:06 PM
-
#52
10-06-2021, 04:09 PM
-
#53
- Babayagawick85
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 22,345
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 54026
-
-
Originally Posted By WoofieNugget⏩
Was watching a show on netflix about spying and the Cia/military uses robotic crabs that look very real but they walk around naval ports doing surveillance on submarines and ships srsEvery time I watch those robot videos where they are dancing and jumping I see a rocket launcher on their shoulders and think if the military just bought about a thousand of those it would be game over for any land assault. There's even robot spiders and dogs. The tech is there for a robot army already, no idea why nobody has developed one.
Can you imagine the Taliban with their AK-47s watching as a horde of robot spiders with machine guns on them swarmed into the mountains?
Can you imagine the Taliban with their AK-47s watching as a horde of robot spiders with machine guns on them swarmed into the mountains?
10-06-2021, 04:10 PM
-
#54
- JeepBruh
- Platinum
-
- JeepBruh
- Platinum
- Join Date: Aug 2019
- Posts: 12,139
- Subscribers: 2
- Rep Power: 146252
-
-
Originally Posted By 3fifty⏩
When I read the thread title I thought it was a mach 5 ballistic missile. Sounds like it is actually a mach 5 cruise missile, which means it is a way bigger advancement.Interesting thread.
So the people who know their stuff agree this is a big advancement? Not that it's the fastest but it can move and fly at altitudes that make it better, am I getting that right?
So the people who know their stuff agree this is a big advancement? Not that it's the fastest but it can move and fly at altitudes that make it better, am I getting that right?
10-06-2021, 04:10 PM
-
#55
- Babayagawick85
- Join Date: Mar 2020
- Posts: 22,345
- Subscribers: 1
- Rep Power: 54026
-
-
Originally Posted By jackamo2887⏩
They are currently working on defense systems. This is where lasers will come into play.Crazy how aircraft carries will basically become obsolete in 20 years.
Good luck shooting down a Mach 9 missile.
Good luck shooting down a Mach 9 missile.
10-06-2021, 04:11 PM
-
#56
Originally Posted By windchimesilo⏩
It would take 2.5 hours for that missile to travel across the face of the earth. Scrap the project. Put money into space force and have satellites in orbit that can shoot down on targets.
10-06-2021, 04:29 PM
-
#57
- jackamo2887
- BEATINGU
-
- jackamo2887
- BEATINGU
- Join Date: Oct 2007
- Posts: 29,617
- Rep Power: 146835
-
-
Originally Posted By XterraRob⏩
What if they jam the jammers?Easy, you jam it
People underestimate the power of Electronic Warfare and all of the wonderful things you can do with it.
People underestimate the power of Electronic Warfare and all of the wonderful things you can do with it.Survival. When the jungle tears itself down and builds itself into something new. Guys like you and me, we end up dead. Doesn’t really mean anything. Or, if we happen to live through it, well that doesn’t mean anything either.
10-06-2021, 04:36 PM
-
#58
10-06-2021, 04:37 PM
-
#59
- BulkingIsHard
- Registered Bigot
-
- BulkingIsHard
- Registered Bigot
- Join Date: Aug 2016
- Posts: 12,670
- Rep Power: 70015
-
-
Originally Posted By jackamo2887⏩
Carriers will never be obsoleteCrazy how aircraft carries will basically become obsolete in 20 years.
Good luck shooting down a Mach 9 missile.
Good luck shooting down a Mach 9 missile.
It's a mobile base of operations. You can't fly troops and equipment across the Earth back and forth strapped to Mach 9 rockets.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/American_decline
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Societal_collapse#By_absorption
10-06-2021, 04:59 PM
-
#60
- KhumatMibra
- Registered User
-
- KhumatMibra
- Registered User
- Join Date: Aug 2014
- Posts: 12,541
- Rep Power: 48893
-
-
Originally Posted By Yoopwat⏩
China can't even power their own cities, literally having black outs non stop. They have to shutdown factories because of it..Literally who cares China would still buttfuk you.
Fking LMAO @ "Superpower" China
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-

- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts