It's just odd that he sought the limelight after being upset he wasn't acknowledged for these vaccines. Either in the patents or awards.

He even told the nurse who administered his Moderna shot that he invented it, so she took a selfie with him.

Now he says they are more harmful than helpful.

But his new drug is probably the answer. I wonder if he'll be on that patent?

OK - Even using your angle that he wants attention.

Why does 2.5hrs of story line up with McCullough's and many other doctors testimony and pre treatment plans? Why not use readily available drug combinations that cost pennies vs having the government print trillions, secure and distribute vaccines, then more vaccines, more boosters, - knowing this stuff does not prevent spread and people are still in hospitals because there is -zero- treatment plan for early, middle, and late stage COVID patients other than painkillers and a vent?

When you're talking about odd stuff, if you actually listen to these and dig through their multiple citations, the only odd things that remain are what the hell is going on with how it's being handled in the US.

Mass psychosis is not a new term, I haven't heard it phrased quite that way but there are clear examples of it. You can see it in the German population in the run-up to WW2, even at the end with the 10s of thousands of Germans who committed mass suicide after Hitler did. There's elements of it in the Bolshevik's dekulakization of the Russian Empire in the run-up to WWI as well.

I've been hearing about how its seen as a potential social-media driven cause in the Myanmar ethnic cleansing and coup the last couple years but I have not read nearly enough about it.

I didn't say mass psychosis was a new term. That's not what he's using. Existing terms don't trend as well as "new discoveries".

I agree there is mass manipulation. I disagree that there's only one angle to the psy-op.

This is the entanglement issue I've tried to bring up.

Vaccines and treatments are not mutually exclusive.

Vaccines and mandates are, or should be, distinct.

"mass formation" is a term used by Freud bro. It's not new. Are you really trying to dismiss him because he said mass formation instead of mass psychosis?

what a pedantic midwit you are

That's far from the only thing I've said in this thread.

Search a couple of scientific databases and see how many hits you get for "mass formation psychosis". You'll get more for Massenbildung.

Dude is obviously genius. I don't think he used a new term by mistake.

yet you still said it. he didn't make a "new term". You are trying to paint him as a manipulative charlatan by claiming he is pulling new terms out of his ass. You know exactly what you are doing by trying to argue that.

What do you get when you google or duckduckgo the term "mass formation psychoisis"?

What do you get for "mass psychosis" or "mass formation"?

Do you think those results were different before the podcast?

Dude, I'm seeing that with some of my guy friends. I can't even get them to leave the house for a beer. And none of them have had COVID including me. I mean it's good to take precautions, but to let a virus, govt, or media change your way of life because of fear is a different story.Will any other medical professionals have a 3hr dialogue with Joe Rogan? sanjay gupta is the only one so far correct? and he got completely obliterated and looked silly.

When they make a tweet saying "You are not a horse. You are not a cow. Seriously, y'all stop it.” when referencing a drug that has shown lots of promise with regards to treatment for Covid and lots of other problems it’s an issue. When they blatantly lie and say they had no evidence that hydroxychloroquine could be useful despite it being sent to them and people knowing for a long time it had lots of promise in preventing viral replication, then yeah…it’s a problem. When they silence and shun people for laying out valid concerns with regards to lockdowns it’s a problem. And as he pointed out, for some reason India decided to not disclose the contents of the care packages they used to seemingly squash a huge surge of Covid in its tracks. Don’t you think that information is important?
Yes there are tons of republicans that are greedy and lots that don’t have the best interest of their constituents at the top of their priority list. Still, there is only one side that seems concerned with mandates(and is actively pushing back against them). There is only one side that seems concerned with making sure people have freedom of speech.


I can’t remember exactly how he worded it, but if that’s what he said you may be correct that he is wrong. If there are studies on long Covid then surely you can find some to share with us. Do you disagree with him because you know he’s wrong or do you just think he’s wrong?He didn’t say it’s the answer. He said he used it himself and that it can be included as part of a broader comprehensive approach to treating people. Are you saying you disagree with his statement that it can help? You are probably right that he will profit in some way from what he develops, but if he comes up with a legit treatment shouldn’t he be rewarded?Well we’ll have to wait and see on that one. There is certainly enough evidence to suggest it’s at the very least plausible.Did he say anyone who tests positive gets counted as a Covid death? Or did he say lots of deaths have been inaccurately attributed to Covid? Because if it’s the latter then it isn’t disputable, we know that has happened lots of times.Did he say all hospitals are doing it?So you disagree with his presentation, but can’t really point out anything from it that you disagree with.Did he create that term? And even if he did, why do you have a problem with it unless you’re scared that it might apply to you?

The labeling of this event as mass formation, or mass psychosis didn't start with Dr. Malone.

AFAIK it began with a professor of clinical psychology from Belgium who has been doing interviews on the subject for some time.

This interview is from March 2021:
https://dailysceptic.org/interview-w...al-psychology/

Some excerpts...Worth reading more. Basically talks about how he saw that the data didn't support the response and that it took some time for him to recognize that what we are seeing is mass formation.

He has a double masters and a doctorate, not that his credentials will mean anything to people who are unwilling to consider that they may have been caught up in a mass event.

I watched the whole thing before youtube canned it. Interesting stuff.

You demanded I list things I disagreed with.You said the CDC ignored countless studies. Which ones?Only one side is currently in power. The other side wants to be in power and has decided on an angle. IMO
You watched it and got mad when I said he was misrepresenting. Did you just take what he said at face value?
Everyone seems pretty upset that pharma companies are profiting from vaccines.His discussion was not "we'll have to wait and see".Gunshot victims counted as covid deaths was his example.Only American hospitalsHe states she is in a wheelchair and on a nasal tube from the vaccine as though it's a fact. Is he privy to some secret information? Completely speculative - stated unequivocally.It sure seems like he did. My point is that he's using a novel term to garner attention, so he is part of what he describes.

It's not ONE psy-op.

Look a few posts above, to paraphrase: "if you believe in the jabs, you're a deliberate traitor".

I also like how he danced around what got him banned.

First, I do not think social media banning is acceptable. It only adds fuel to the fire.

But what he posted was a presentation "The Pfizer inoculations do more harm than good". Kind of messed up that the people who made the presentation weren't banned and continue on with the message.

Agreed. But "mass formation psychosis" does seem to have begun with Malone, as discussed above.The replication crisis is one of the driving reasons I'm a Bayesian.



Everyone has been caught up in a mass event. There is more than one side to it.

Everyone that suggests ivermectin and hydrox can be an effective early treatment option.It’s not an “angle”, it’s a way of governing people. I don’t have to be injected to keep my job or go anywhere in my state. Other than the period of time from March 2020-June 2020 my kids have been in school in person. Other than a few weeks in April 2020 no businesses have ever been forced to close in my state. We never had a mask mandate because our governor preferred to leave it up to local govt. and local businesses. Why? Because I live in a state with a governor who believes in peoples’ right to choose what’s best for them and act accordingly. Just because you refuse to acknowledge one side is doing a much better job of governing people during this mess that doesn’t make it “an angle”. It just makes it a better choice.
I did take what he said at face value, though I’m certainly open to being shown that he was wrong. Did you ever find any of those studies on long covid? If so I’d love to see them, and if not then I’ll just assume he was correct in what he said and that you were wrong in doubting him.
It’s more about how they are profiting. They are shutting down dissent, controlling information, rolling out injections without adequate testing while also being 100% protected from retaliation for all the harm they are doing, and on top of it all they are being paid by the taxpayers. I have not ever received the injection and don’t ever intend to, yet I will help contribute to record profits for big pharma via my tax dollars.Well I will take his word for it over yours. He is much more knowledgeable on the topic and has seen a lot more information. So sure, you can take issue with his claim but that doesn’t make it false.
And there have been tons of examples of people being counted as Covid deaths when Covid wasn’t the cause of death. That isn’t disputable.No, you said he claimed all hospitals did it. Did he claim that, or did you just lie about it?
Or maybe he’s just using the term because that’s what’s happening…..







Edit to add- fittingly enough I was just looking for a new book to buy with one of my gift cards and found this, which is probably one of the big reasons the term has taken off so much lately.


https://www.barnesandnoble.com/w/uni...9781637583197#

Lol the interview pretty much tells you the vaccine is meant to "Kill You"

After reading the World Economic Forum 2030 agenda, it seems they want to reduce the population to 500m

Soooooo how would they achieve this?

mRNA vaccines with no animal studies. Yet alone in court not to release information for 90years?

GET REAL.

Can I just say "everyone that suggests vaccination might provide benefit regarding long covid?Probably not

So here's a couple:

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....17.21263608v1

https://www.thelancet.com/journals/l...460-6/fulltext

https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1....26.21265508v3

See, that wasn’t so hard. After 12 pages of this thread you’ve managed to point out a single legitimate gripe from the 3 hours he spends tearing down the current environment and all the problems we see with our approach…….and it’s about a claim he made about long Covid studies.

I guess we can skip the other things I took issue with. It seems one sided that I have to prove or justify any counter arguments, but anything you or Malone claim is taken at face value with no support.

Is that why he wants credit for inventing the technology?

5 years max to live.

Enjoy it.

**** you you dirt fkin cock sucker. I would smile at the sight of your tombstone.

Every generation has its mass hysteria that smart people exploit

Commies under the beds
Salem witch trials
And many more

As society and becomes more divided expect corporations to use mass hysteria for their own ends

For sure.

But I think corporations work with both the left and the right.

We didn’t skip them, I addressed each complaint you made individually. Feel free to go back and read my posts.

Are you planning to share any of the countless studies demonstrating ivermectin and/or HCQ efficacy that were not included in the NIH review and thus ignored by the CDC

This one is kind of interesting:https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33278625/It isn't huge but it is a controlled trial which showed some benefit in the group taking ivermectin, although the study excluded old sick people and was basically conducted on people who would more or less easily survive covid anyway.

That is an interesting one. While the CI's do overlap, the mean clearance is lower and there were no adverse effects.

But, it was included in the NIH review (ref #16):
https://www.covid19treatmentguidelin...ermectin-data/