Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Ivermectin Does Not Reduce Risk of Covid Hospitalization, Large Study Finds
  1. Results 31 to 50 of 50
  2. Page 2 of 2
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2

Thread: Ivermectin Does Not Reduce Risk of Covid Hospitalization, Large Study Finds

post 1658853823 03-30-2022, 05:03 PM
-
#31
  1. crosso
  2. Registered User
  1. crosso
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Location: Australia
  5. Posts: 3,382
  6. Rep Power: 5757
"Patients who had had symptoms of Covid-19 for up to 7 days and had at least one risk factor for disease progression were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (400 μg per kilogram of body weight) once daily for 3 days or placebo."

So start them a week after symptoms lmao. Meanwhile imask protocol states to start the moment symptoms appear, also for 5+ days, not just 3.
This was intentionally designed to fail
post 1658853983 03-30-2022, 05:04 PM
-
#32
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Posts: 73,334
  6. Rep Power: 713784
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
post 1658853993 03-30-2022, 05:04 PM
-
#33
  1. dmike100
  2. Registered User
  1. dmike100
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jan 2011
  4. Posts: 2,861
  5. Rep Power: 26438
Originally Posted By bsrkoacar2⏩
When did they administer it? Studies show it's only effective in the first 48 hours of symptoms. Beyond that it has no effect. You gotta make sure they are comparing apples to apples. If they waited 5 days an then did it, it's not gonna have any affect. Do I think Pfizer would fund a bs study rigged for failure? Yes, yes I do.
7 days after symptoms start, people also had at least 1 risk factor.

Would like to know what dosage was administered as well. Underdosing: see this doesn't work. Overdosing: see this kills people.

Studies in this day and age: pay us to tell us what you want us to find. Trust the science.
Freedom of speech is a principle pillar of a free government; when this support is taken away, the constitution of a free society is dissolved and tyranny is erected on its ruins.

Benjamin Franklin
post 1658854093 03-30-2022, 05:07 PM
-
#34
  1. OT2000
  2. Registered User
  1. OT2000
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2014
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 47
  6. Posts: 43,970
  7. Rep Power: 1387380
Originally Posted By Smithers115⏩
Have you ever done graduate research or had a job working in research during your undergrad or ya just talking out your ass/alex jones talking points

(you can find studies sponsored by pharmaceutical companies that ended poorly for the drug if you get bored enough to look)
Yes and actually, yes. If you were to ever visit an office and yes I say office (obviously doctor offices, research firms etc) associated with medical research in relation to prescription drugs you would not see some wonderful study in progress like the movies make.

What would be seen is patients in and out, lying about following protocol, poor documentation and filing, constant calls and visits/conversation from the “doctors” funding the drug and or study.

But hey Alex Jones and all that. Whoever the fuk that is.
I probably banged your mom.

Eat the whole animal like a real man.
post 1658854703 03-30-2022, 05:15 PM
-
#35
  1. HMFIC_BROWSIN
  2. Buy high, sell higher.
  1. HMFIC_BROWSIN
  2. Buy high, sell higher.
  3. Join Date: Feb 2009
  4. Location: Arizona, United States
  5. Posts: 73,524
  6. Rep Power: 348838
neither does the miracle "vaccine" that everyone took then also caught covid. LMAO.
post 1658854713 03-30-2022, 05:15 PM
-
#36
  1. aal04
  2. Registered User
  1. aal04
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Feb 2011
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 11,618
  6. Rep Power: 47033
119 studies say yes.

1 study funded by pfizer pushers after 7 days symptoms says only 10% better

ITS A WRAP GUYS! IT DOESNT WORK
post 1658854723 03-30-2022, 05:16 PM
-
#37
  1. steeler505
  2. 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
  1. steeler505
  2. 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
  3. Join Date: Nov 2016
  4. Location: Denmark
  5. Posts: 22,068
  6. Rep Power: 156449
Originally Posted By Smithers115⏩
ya

they did

The trial was coordinated by Platform Life Sciences, and Cardresearch conducted the trial and collected the data. The first and last authors had full access to all the trial data and vouch for the accuracy and completeness of the data and for the fidelity of the trial to the protocol.The funders had in the design and conduct of the trial; the collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of the data; the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; or the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.Ivermectin was purchased at full cost.


i think a lot of you need to take some time away from social media and the internet, cause ya. I dunno what to say anymore, everything is fake and everything is a conspiracy.
















































































Location. cucknada

























































































Spoiler!


Holy fookin chit bro you are so far beyond naïve

and by bro i mean never my bro fookin turbocuck
**Misc. Pureblood Crew**
**No Hymen No Diamond Crew**
**Russia/anti-degen Crew**
**Her anus tint tells you everything you need to about her Crew**

Auto-negging posts with instagram/tiktok links and not embedding a single image
post 1658854853 03-30-2022, 05:18 PM
-
#38
  1. yabbayabba
  1. yabbayabba
  3. Join Date: Jun 2005
  4. Location: Burning down the belt warehouse
  5. Posts: 19,040
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 157908
You convinced me...still no jabs for me. Your welcome to take my fourth booster though.
post 1658854963 03-30-2022, 05:21 PM
-
#39
  1. steeler505
  2. 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
  1. steeler505
  2. 🇷🇺🇷🇺🇷🇺
  3. Join Date: Nov 2016
  4. Location: Denmark
  5. Posts: 22,068
  6. Rep Power: 156449
spent 30 mins face to face with a colleague in a meeting, discussing. Next day she tests positive for covid.

Popped 24mg iverGOATin for 3 days, nada

Ill take my harmless, no side effects, cheap af horse pills any fookin day over Gates funded "research"
**Misc. Pureblood Crew**
**No Hymen No Diamond Crew**
**Russia/anti-degen Crew**
**Her anus tint tells you everything you need to about her Crew**

Auto-negging posts with instagram/tiktok links and not embedding a single image
post 1658855153 03-30-2022, 05:24 PM
-
#40
  1. mulletwarrior
  2. Registered User
  1. mulletwarrior
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Nov 2013
  4. Age: 41
  5. Posts: 13,586
  6. Rep Power: 99233
Originally Posted By crosso⏩
"Patients who had had symptoms of Covid-19 for up to 7 days and had at least one risk factor for disease progression were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (400 μg per kilogram of body weight) once daily for 3 days or placebo."

So start them a week after symptoms lmao. Meanwhile imask protocol states to start the moment symptoms appear, also for 5+ days, not just 3.
This was intentionally designed to fail
This is my question.

To OP and any one else in the “trust the science” crew, has any study been done on its efficacy as a prophylactic? Because all the claims I hear are that it supposedly works as a prophylactic, yet the only studies I see to “debunk” this claim are re it’s use as a treatment.

To be clear, I am not wed to ivermectin, nor do I necessarily “believe” in it. But from my perspective everyone against it appears to be engaged in sophistry, and that is a red flag to me and should be a red flag to you.
mo e
post 1658855403 03-30-2022, 05:29 PM
-
#41
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  1. Joseph1990
  2. Keto shill
  3. Join Date: Nov 2010
  4. Location: Canada
  5. Posts: 18,531
  6. Rep Power: 75714
Does it cause harm?
Control group crew membership revoked 7/5/2022 1:50pm PST not proud.

Inb4 honorable FDA/CDC/NIH/WHO representatives

J.L.C,
NextPound,
mgftp,
SillieBazzillie.
post 1658855863 03-30-2022, 05:37 PM
-
#42
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Strong everything itt. Anti-vaxxers post any little chit study that even hints that Ivermectin might work, but of course trash this one. The study waited too long.. didn't give enough dosage.. my co-worker got covid but I didn't because I took the horse paste.. just fuking lol
post 1658855933 03-30-2022, 05:38 PM
-
#43
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  1. JUSA
  2. No Agony, No Bragony
  3. Join Date: Nov 2004
  4. Location: Texas
  5. Posts: 50,517
  6. Rep Power: 458793
Originally Posted By OT2000⏩
“ The trial was coordinated by Platform Life Sciences”


Who’s biggest donor is the Bill and Melinda Gates foundation.


You dumbass
ie 0.01mg administered to patients already on ventilators.
All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident.

- Arthur Schopenhauer
post 1658856603 03-30-2022, 05:48 PM
-
#44
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  1. dabbmw2002
  2. Trolling the trolls.....
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Location: Maryland, United States
  5. Posts: 73,334
  6. Rep Power: 713784
Post deleted by user
Original Ruckus
post 1658857023 03-30-2022, 05:55 PM
-
#45
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  1. CaliSuperSport
  2. Mercenary. Non-negotiable
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: Sacramento, California, United States
  5. Posts: 47,223
  6. Rep Power: 275363
Can't read the article because of NYTimes subscription chit, but just know that the success of ivermectin depends heavily on when it's administered. That's why you hear "early treatment" so much and it's used in a multi-drug protocol.

At a certain point of hospitalization, ALL treatments vastly decrease in effectiveness. Considering the amount of research showing it reduces hospitalization stay, I'm going to guess this study has the aforementioned confound.
Originally Posted By NYPat⏩
The study waited too long.. didn't give enough dosage..
You're joking right? Late treatment is a genuine concern in drug administration. You can't just scoff at it like it's an excuse......
ωσяℓ∂ тяανєℓєя ȼяєω
Pre-Med crew
★ NUFC ☆
₪ DEFQON.1 AUSTRALIA 2016 ₪
177 lbs | O: 165 /// B: 275 /// S: 335 /// D: 390
post 1658857203 03-30-2022, 05:57 PM
-
#46
  1. Fozzy13
  2. unregistered user
  1. Fozzy13
  2. unregistered user
  3. Join Date: Jan 2007
  4. Posts: 38,659
  5. Rep Power: 41514
I took it when I had covid and had several family members take it when they had it....based on these few experiences (4 people), it did not seem to much.

What did work was the antibody infusions
n4l
Rayaarito
fappin
r32gojirra
post 1658857493 03-30-2022, 06:03 PM
-
#47
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By crosso⏩
"Patients who had had symptoms of Covid-19 for up to 7 days and had at least one risk factor for disease progression were randomly assigned to receive ivermectin (400 μg per kilogram of body weight) once daily for 3 days or placebo."

So start them a week after symptoms lmao. Meanwhile imask protocol states to start the moment symptoms appear, also for 5+ days, not just 3.
This was intentionally designed to fail
"Up to"

Plenty started within 3-days:

post 1658857883 03-30-2022, 06:09 PM
-
#48
  1. bigcat3655
  2. Registered User
  1. bigcat3655
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2017
  4. Age: 43
  5. Posts: 10,214
  6. Rep Power: 87942
Originally Posted By mgftp⏩
https://www.nytimes.com/2022/03/30/h...alization.html

Braindead miscers so mad right now.
Their own data shows a 10% difference. So they intentionally misuse ivermectin by giving it far later than it should be given, and their data STILL shows a 10% difference. OP rekt
post 1658857953 03-30-2022, 06:11 PM
-
#49
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  1. J.L.C.
  2. Wat
  3. Join Date: Apr 2005
  4. Posts: 33,220
  5. Rep Power: 37920
Originally Posted By bigcat3655⏩
Their own data shows a 10% difference. So they intentionally misuse ivermectin by giving it far later than it should be given, and their data STILL shows a 10% difference. OP rekt
302 patients started Ivermectin before the 3rd day of symptoms.

Look at the credible intervals. If the interval includes 1.0, there's no "significant" effect.

post 1658858083 03-30-2022, 06:13 PM
-
#50
  1. seanb1979
  2. Platinum User
  1. seanb1979
  2. Platinum User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2006
  4. Location: Boise, Idaho, United States
  5. Posts: 48,650
  6. Rep Power: 150567
Amazing how it worked so well in india, middle and south america. It's almost as if there are people paid to discredit it because it's such a cheap drug and more expensive drugs that do the same thing are being pushed.
A million miles away - I don't.. feel.... anything.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PXGZu4yxjW0
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts