Not mine, and not sure it is optimal, but would it be BETTER than what we have going on now with the ocean of single moms?

How do we increase the birth rate of a country?

This answer is for contemporary America, although it may apply to other countries as well.

There are several reasons why people are having fewer children now than they did in the past, but many of those reasons come down to two main things:

- They can’t find the right partner.

- They can’t afford children. Either they can’t afford the expenses, or they can’t afford to take time off of work to have and raise a child.

- With that in mind, if your goal were simply to increase the birth rate without considering any negative side effects,* then the solution is simple:

Make polygamy legal and culturally acceptable.

Allow those who can afford children to have as many spouses as they wish, and have children with those spouses if they wish.

I know at least four people in their 30s and 40s who want children, but can’t find the right person to have them with, or can’t afford children, and they know that the window is starting to close on them. I’d bet, if it were legally and culturally acceptable, they’d consider being someone’s second or third spouse, if that someone would make a good parent, and having a child with that someone wouldn’t be a financial burden.

https://qr.ae/pvsJm6

Any of you high value men ready to start your own harem of sister wives?

INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew

HTC is too skinny for me. Fat Girls only crew. serious
Chubby Chaser and Fat Girls Only crew Founder

Originally Posted By Anachron⏩

This.

Just LOL at anyone who signs up for this chit.

I have a simpler solution - men need to start being men again, and not effeminate soyboys.

Heck, even here on the misc we seem to have mostly soyboys.

How does that help with the birth rate though? Men don't have babies.

Originally Posted By soaponarope1⏩

lmao. I love a good threesome as much as the next guy that's as far as I'd ever go. The second best part of having two women over is when one of them leaves.

Just imagine when their cycles all sync up and you've got 3 of them bleeding all over your house, nothx.

lol

Considered the same thing. I think that is why the sister wives all had separate yards.

Another post from the comments-



How much do you want to bet he had a bed of some kind in his workshop?

INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew

FA Crew
Always Pick 1 Crew

"Experience is something you get right after you need it."

INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew

FA Crew
Always Pick 1 Crew

"Experience is something you get right after you need it."

Originally Posted By elterrible987⏩

democrats already have a plan










come on in, everything is free

Originally Posted By FA*******⏩

Nah, they'll just import ****** Easier to let 3rd world chitholes do the birthing for you and then pick the cream of their crop.

ETA: just followed the link to that Quora post and realized that I had already upvoted it in the past, lmao. Matthew Bates is ludicrously based.

Importing bodies from other countries can increase population. Not the same as increasing the birth rate. And birth rates have been falling across the globe.

At the end of May, the Chinese Government announced that parents in China would now be permitted to have up to three children. This announcement came only five years after the stunning reversal of the 1980 one-child policy.

Something is clearly going on.

That something is that China has experienced a fertility collapse. According to the latest census released in May, China is losing roughly 400,000 people every year. China still claims its population is growing, but even if these projections are taken at face value, the population decline previously projected to start by midcentury may now begin as early as 2030. This means China could lose between 600 and 700 million people from its population by 2100.

That’s right: 600 and 700 million people, or about half of its total population today.

Why should you care about population decline? Fewer people are good for the climate, but the economic consequences are severe. In the 1960s, there were six people of working age for every retired person. Today, the ratio is three-to-one. By 2035, it will be two-to-one.

Some say we must learn to curb our obsession with growth, to become less consumer-obsessed, to learn to manage with a smaller population. That sounds very attractive. But who will buy the stuff you sell? Who will pay for your healthcare and pension when you get old?

https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2021/...y-why-matters/

Originally Posted By AncientYouth⏩

change the marriage laws to ensure that they are fully equitable for men and women with equal access and where no one gets screwed financially

vastly cut back on gubmint incentives for women to raise children in single parent households

incentivise tax breaks for married heterosexual couples to raise their children together

Despite misc common wisdom having babies isn't so great for women [at least in the US] even with current divorce laws and government programs.

Originally Posted By Anachron⏩

I never thought I would have to explain to you how babies are made, I thought you had kid(s) already?

Oh, I know how babies happen. But today we have birth control and legal [for now] abortion.

Simply sowing your oats isn't enough to get it done boyo. That seed has to be watered and tended to.

INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew

When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.

Life is easy when you take personal responsibility
MMMC - Assistant to the Assistant of the Secretary of Assistance

I don't do limits.

Originally Posted By Dogkrack⏩

tax credits and ending usury are all that's needed

Ending usury would fix a lot of things. It would also require a complete redo of our monetary and economic system- which we may be facing no matter what, but done to the advantage of the present "winners" if they can get it done.

Originally Posted By Godfrd824⏩

That kind of stuff never works. And I also doubt any high value woman would go for it.

Originally Posted By Destor⏩

Pretty tough to find multiple girls who are down with this and fit in all the important ways. My woman's friend lived with us for a few months and was pushing to make us a throuple, but she doesn't fit in the other ways and so nothing has fully materialized

I would totally have a harem tho

I'm fine with it in theory given everyone is in it voluntarily.

I miss having a "person", but I like alone time too. Not living full time in the same house with my person seems like it could be a good thing so far as not becoming annoyed with each other's habits and not having to be "on" all the time.

'Cause let's be real- you can only hold in a fart for so long.And sometimes you are just in a pissy mood and get mad about petty chit that normally wouldn't phase you.

For some people [most?] exclusivity is an absolute must have. I guess I'm not sure if that is natural or if it stems from fear or jealousy. Like are you upset at the idea of sharing or afraid that you won't get your fair share and might be slighted or feel less than in some way?

Would it be a bad idea for men [or women] with more drive and stamina to openly have multiple families?

Originally Posted By propreffered7⏩

Yea maybe if you're behind a computer. Did you write your own story, bro?

Lol at you thinking the building you're in was built by itself

Also, as to the op, I think it's retarded. And would end retardedly

What's the biggest problem with the falling birth rate?That when my generation is older there will be no one take care of them and then the burden will fall on a newer generation of society?

Total economic and social collapse? It's possible if we don't figure out how to manage degrowth.

Why should you care about population decline? Fewer people are good for the climate, butthe economic consequences are severe. In the 1960s, there were six people of working age for every retired person. Today, the ratio is three-to-one. By 2035, it will be two-to-one.

Some say we must learn to curb our obsession with growth, to become less consumer-obsessed, to learn to manage with a smaller population. That sounds very attractive. But who will buy the stuff you sell? Who will pay for your healthcare and pension when you get old?

Our entire system has been set up for "more, more, more". Fiat is lent into existence.

INTP Crew
Inattentive ADD Crew
Mom That Miscs Crew