People don't seem to understand why mRNA "vaccines" are a problem. Unlike traditional vaccines, which contain a deactivated virus, that provoke the body into creating antibodies to kill the virus, these mRNA "vaccines" teach your body how to build the dangerous spike proteins and release them into your body. In theory, that would provoke your body to create antibodies to kill any of the virus present in your body and the mRNA would remain otherwise inert until it degrades within a few days. However, if your cells malfunction and never cease creating these spike proteins, it's the same as if you were being continually exposed to the virus. At some point your body can't keep up with the needed production of antibodies and these spike proteins (created by your cells) go coursing through your body unhindered, no different than if they were delivered by the virus, reeking damage as they go. Here's the kicker... the pro-vax crowd claims that your cells cannot EVER integrate those mRNA protein building instructions into your DNA, but that is completely false, as shown in Pfizer's own data here:

https://www.tga.gov.au/sites/default...oi-2389-06.pdf


If you go to page 34. the first image is showing you transfection, how effectively the different vaccine constructs were effecting the cells..(entering the cells). When just the RNA itself was used (the black bar) the other (grey bar is the vaccine within a lipid molecule (the RNA encapsulated). Now lets move to page 35..

Page 35 shows Spike Protein inside the nucleus. Start with the top column..cells that were transfected with the vaccine 1st column(blue)..stains nuclei..where the genetic material is being housed..the next column is antibodies being tagged..attaching to proteins in the endoplasmic reticulum.the 3rd column showing you spike protein is present everywhere in the cell..the last column is the merge..blue showing nuclei is present within the cell, red representing endoplasmic reticulum, green, representing the spike protein, the yellow is an overlapping signal of the red (ER) and the green (spike protein), the vast majority of ER is showing yellow, meaning spike protein is being produced actively..you can also see green signal only in the nucleus..we are talking about only vaccinated spike protein..just as the Sweedish study showed.

see the problem now?
See why CDC changed their website info this week as discussed earlier ITT?

The mRNA can't affect your DNA. It never gets into the nucleus. And the spike protein fragments made by the cells are a non issue. What makes a small number of ppl sick in response to vaccinations is things like allergies, cytokine responses flaring up RA, inflammatory responses worsening ITP, issues associated with elevated nonspecific defenses, etc.

That's not what p 35 shows at all you braindead retard. It is showing that it doesn't enter the nucleus. It gets processed in the ER.

Imagine being on the intellectual level that deems calling people "braindead retards" conducive to scientific discussion.



Same goes for you.



Imagine running on the narrative of "mRNA is great because it is very adaptable" and still having the vaccine based on the original strain - two years later!

No... again..look at the blue showing nuclei is present within the cell, red representing endoplasmic reticulum, green, representing the spike protein, the yellow is an overlapping signal of the red (ER) and the green (spike protein), the vast majority of ER is showing yellow, meaning spike protein is being produced actively..you can also see green signal only in the nucleus.

It's color coded for you

You realize cells exist in 3 dimensions, right? If S1 were doing chit to your DNA, you'd see strong overlap with the blue stain. You don't. It's getting processed in the ER, as the paper says.

December of 2021.

Here's a good timeline:


they have also done interviews regarding their departure.

but, pharma sponsors CNN, and biden was president.... so it was completely burried.

Imagine running on the narrative of "mRNA is great because it is very adaptable" and still having the vaccine based on the original strain - two years later!

No... again..look at the blue showing nuclei is present within the cell, red representing endoplasmic reticulum, green, representing the spike protein, the yellow is an overlapping signal of the red (ER) and the green (spike protein), the vast majority of ER is showing yellow, meaning spike protein is being produced actively..you can also see green signal only in the nucleus.

It's color coded for you

Is their any data that shows when the body stops producing the "spike protein"? This is what's extremely concerning to me.

I don’t think there is, which is why the CDC changed their website this week regarding this.
I posted in another thread and linked the original CDC page of spike protein being out of body within a short amount of time.

No telling how long it stays in now

You lie about your education and you lie about being in a relationship with a very average older single mother.

You.

Are.

A.

Fraud.

Can you explain to me why I didn’t get Covid up until now? Has to be pure chance right? Except that I was around a bunch of cases, and I was going to restaurants weekly after my first shots, back in the gym. Have gone to sporting events, concerts, church etc. My kids were in private school around tons of other kids and played on sports teams.

Explain why I got covid now instead of the two years prior? You cant.

I laid down the PhD fraud challenge where I would get the official transcript and take a spoon pic as long you paid the $40 fee to procure it, as the accuser needs to shoulder the burden here. You welshed out on the challenge and ran, tail tucked firmly between legs.


You.

Are.

A.

Pussy.

I don’t think there is, which is why the CDC changed their website this week regarding this.

I posted in another thread and linked the original CDC page of spike protein being out of body within a short amount of time.

No telling how long it stays in now

there definitely are studies with radiolabelled antigen, and mRNA in general isn't supposed to stick around very long,so i'd think for most people it's not very long -- and also, CD8+ T cells will literally kill any cell they come across producing spike. but i think some of the recent studies that found antigen and mRNA in the lymphatic system for quite a bit longer than expected are part of what prompted the CDC to remove that **** from their website. if i had to guess, personally, the evidence seems to point to "well it's likely gone quickly in most people, but for some people, it's around longer than we expected, and we can't say how long" lol

Lol this is just stupid.

My wife had the rona a month ago. Was down for a fukkin week and in rough shape. I was in the car with her , my daughter , and my mom in law and sis in law for hours while she was coming down with it, then with her all night before she tested positive the next day. Her mom and sis tested positive the day after and both went down like sacks of sh*t for over a week. All of them vaxxed and boosted.

The only ones unvaxxed are myself and my daughter….and we got nothing. Nada . Not even a hint of the sniffles while I was babysitting all 3 of those sick cases in my house for 8 days.

“How do you explain that? You can’t”

This should be very very easy to test for. I wouldn't hold your breath that the study will be done in the US though. Or if it is done in the US it would probably be done in secret and not reported to the public.




From Pfizer's own original study that they gave to the FDA seeking approval being infected/symptomatically ill with covid was reported as an effect of getting the shots. The best hypothesis I saw about that was the immune system is briefly lowered after the injection making one more susceptible for some time than people who did not get the shot at all. Then after that window in theory you have higher immunity, again, for some time.




At this point if you support the shots I believe you are either brainwashed, very stupid, or morally compromised in some way.




Curious when that was done. And agree that the percentage that had covid can't be correct, but perhaps it should say percentage that "tested positive for covid".

She is more nuts than the rest of them.

GG conspiracy theorists. I accept your apology.

It's the same argument they use against global warming. This is the result of decades of funded disinformation campaigns. We now have a public with absolutely no understanding of science. Who knows where we will be in 2 generations? Probably resembling something like Afghanistan if we don't blow ourselves up in nuclear war.

There is climate change. Not with you on this one though. Plenty of other more important issues to address first.

So all the doctors and biologists are stupid, brainwashed, or immoral according to you. It's all a huge conspiracy. The thousands of people involved in making and testing the vaccines were all in on it.

Isn't there another possibility here?

And anyone with a basic understanding of chemistry understands how unstable and rapidly degraded RNA is.

No. That is not what I said. I said that anyone who still supports the mRNA treatments is stupid, brainwashed, or morally compromised.

That group does NOT include "all the doctors and biologists". The publicly touted consensus is fake or in some cases coerced.




Wincel you were conned. I know that is hard to take in, that your precious science is no more pure than any other human based institution- fallible.

You shouldn't beat yourself up to badly about it. There was a massive orchestrated campaign to sway public opinion and behavior. You too are only human and that's okay.

But it is time to drop your rose colored glasses and face reality. Because it is out there. So many people everyday sharing that someone has "died suddenly".

They ran a huge unethical experiment and the results are coming in and the results are very very bad.

The shots don't use normal mRNA. They use an altered fake mRNA instead because they wanted something that was more durable and harder for the body to break down. That was done intentionally.

No it isn't. The consensus is absolutely clear on this. If you trust people from AFD/FLCCC, I have a bridge to sell you.

I haven't been conned of anything. My precious science?

A more durable RNA? Are you serious? You understand why RNA is unstable right? Have you ever taken ochem?

Wincel the "science" aka: Fauci, the FDA, CDC, etc. are a pack of liars. They lie and lie and lie until they run out of breath. Then after they inhale they lie some more.

These shots were BS from the start- never that great and they KNEW that many people would suffer negative health effects and they simply did not give a single f*ck.



Link:
https://brownstone.org/articles/real...sly-estimated/

The mRNA WAS altered. It is a matter of public record. You don't have to take organic chemistry to learn how to read.

You were lied to. The institution that you trusted have been hollowed out and corrupted beyond redemption.

Do you know what Brownstone is Katya? You're talking about institutions corrupted beyond redemption, look no further than right there. A think tank formed last year with an explicit political agenda.

You do need ochem to understand why RNA is unstable though. And you do need to learn some biology and medicine to properly evaluate what you read.

BTW neither Fauci nor the FDA/CDC represent medical science as a whole. Fauci's/FDA's/CDC's job is to interpret the scientific literature and make recommendations on policy.