Skull size doesnt mean anything necessarily. A rottweiler and a chihuahua are both still dogs.

Scandinavians have very low prevalence of lactose tolerance.

Meanwhile, move a bit more Mediterranean and they will **** themselves from more than 3 cups.

https://milk.procon.org/lactose-intolerance-by-country/

Dogs are not valid, they are domesticated and bred to look to like that.Not really, there's not enough Ainu to effectively mix them. Still wouldn't explain Koreans also.

wrong

In 2022 you believe in a book written by random ****ots 2000 years ago who thought the earth was flat.

Take that in…

appearance
skeletal structure
hormonal levels
behavior

All significant differences among races of humans (blacks, whites, etc)


Any one of those would be enough to create a new subspecies classification if we were talking about any other animal on earth.


The reason they won't admit it is because they think it will create more violence

This is a broader point, but related to the one you just made.

East Africans compared to West Africans. 98-99% of all Africans subjected to the 16th-19th century Slave Trade were from West Africa - current-day Nigeria, Cameroon, Congo, Ghana, Angola/Namibia (the Northernmost of those two, I can't remember), and areas around there. Virtually none from Kenya, Mozambique, Tanzania, Ethiopia, ****lia, Eritrea, etc. When I first saw East Africans like those latter I mentioned, it was obvious to me how different they looked compared to the African-Americans I grew up with.

When I went to India, I made a similar discovery. I was in South India, in the State of Tamil Nadu, which is the SouthEastern most state in India. Around 60-70 million people in that state. I was there for 3 weeks. I spent more time in the megacity (SEVERAL million) of Chennai/Madras than anywhere else. It was more diverse. But I went also to one of the other biggest cities, Madurai, of approximately 1-1.5 million. I was shocked. They were about as dark as nearly any African-American, but mostly with fine/pointy features. Kind of like East Africans, but different. Looked nothing like North Indians - at least not the kind you see in Bollywood movies, anyway. There is Tollywood/Kollywood, etc, but not Bollywood.

Humans are a domesticated species too ever since the invention of agriculture. Europeans used to be more robust and had bigger brains when they were hunter-gatherers.

you think red squirrels and gray squirrels are not different species, according to scientific classification

you have nothing of value to contribute, my 10 year old cousin is smarter than you

What's your point?

Okay yeah you do get a variety of head shapes, colouring and height/build differences etc with humans but it's minuscule and no where near to the variety of dogs.

One thing that I also must stress is Neanderthals vs their counterparts.

Apparently, there was a certain degree of intermarriage. I hardly think that makes any difference.

I say this because more recent studies have indicated that their "extinction" had much less, if anything, to do with intelligence, than the fact that they had substantially more massive frames than their counterparts. Their daily caloric needs were like 1.5 to 3 times their counterparts' daily caloric needs. How that came about, I don't know, but it would make sense that such would be awfully hard to sustain and could have something to do with extinction, or at least bottlenecking, especially when something like an Ice Age came around.

If they can reproduce successfully then they are the same species. That is the same for squirrels, humans, wolves, whales, whatever…

You can believe in whatever skygod you want bro, but its not relevant to scientific discussion.

how dare you BIGOT!!!

we are all the same!!

Well I mean a tiger and a lion can reproduce ...

someone else help this man,

i can't deal with this level of pigheaded idiocy, he's just digging deeper.

Maybe. But the last glacial period started 100,000 years ago, meaning the Neanderthals live through most of it just fine. If they survived for 10s of thousands of years during the ice age, why would they suddenly start to have trouble finding food?

Yea but not successfully. The offspring is infertile.

Only the men.

Maybe not the ice age, specifically. Just...some reason... that they might have had a hard time continuing to survive. Maybe somehow there was something in their genetic heritage that tended towards them becoming more massive and that ended up becoming unsustainable and they had a hard time reversing that evolution? IF there really was intermingling, maybe there was a reason and they were smart enough to realize that's a way for some of them to survive. I'm kind of taking a stab in the dark here. Just trying to shed light on a supposed angle to Neanderthal extinction of which many might not be aware. Should probably be a different thread because this is sort of a digression.

Both the females and males are infertile bro. Maybe with the exception of some rare cases. As well as having other serious genetic health issues.

Its the same as a mule which is also infertile.
Always hilarious when the religious people bring their fictional books into scientific discussion lol.

I think the other dude was right about your educational qualifications.

you're a simpleton who doesn't understand how the scientific classification system works


just stop posting

[QUOTE=CoolKnees post_id=1669843453]They said the earliest humans left Africa about 100k years ago

Why do we look so different?
[img]https://image.shutterstock.com/image-photo/caucasian-nordic-man-standing-on-260nw-1570224751.jpg[/img
[img]https://www.compassion.com/Images/kenya-child-smiles-desert.jpg[/img
[img]https://dailynorthwestern.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/Henry_Cao-Web.jpg[/img+
[img]https://www.currentschoolnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/indian-man-1024x538.jpg[/img

Is evolution real bro? Presumably we all looked the same in Africa, how did we diverge so quickly within 100k years? Is there any other species with as much variance in looks as humans? How is it that other monkey species don't look anywhere near as different as us?[/QUOTE]LMFAO, Pajeets, Latinos, etc and even white[b]AREN'T[/b]races.
Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid are the MAJOR races in the world with other smaller races such as Australoid, etc.
Most people are either one race or a mixture of races.
[b]Albino Pakistani Girl[/b]
[img]https://i.ibb.co/f28NVgZ/Albino-Pakistani.jpg[/img]
[b]Albino Asian Man[/b]
[img]https://www.hrw.org/sites/default/files/styles/image_gallery/public/multimedia_images_2020/202001global_disabilities_albinism_lei.jpg[/img]
[b]African Albino[/b]
[img]https://post.medicalnewstoday.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2021/11/albinism_thumb.jpg[/img]

A skull easily determines if an individual was Caucasoid, Negroid, or Mongoloid.
[img]http://lh6.ggpht.com/_1wtadqGaaPs/TFE4OP1sKYI/AAAAAAAALXg/Dhdxh8tiU4k/tmp3931_thumb_thumb1.jpg[/img]

legit, my little cousins are smarter than him

just lol

bro you believe in stories about water turning into wine and walking on water lmao..... its 2022 stop worshipping fictional characters.




A biological species is a group of organisms that can reproduce with one another in nature and produce fertile offspring. Species are characterized by the fact that they are reproductively isolated from other groups, which means that the organisms in one species are incapable of reproducing with organisms in another species. The term species can also be defined as the most basic category in the system of taxonomy. Taxonomy is a scientific system that classifies organisms into categories based on their biological characteristics. Species can also be defined based on a shared evolutionary history and ancestry. This method of defining species is called phylogenetics, which is the study of the evolutionary relationships among organisms. The evolutionary process by which a new species comes into being is called speciation.

[QUOTE=Sal29 post_id=1669850543]LMFAO, Pajeets, Latinos, etc and even white[b]AREN'T[/b]races.
Caucasoid, Mongoloid, and Negroid are the MAJOR races in the world with other smaller races such as Australoid, etc.
Most people are either one race or a mixture of races.

A skull easily determines if an individual was Caucasoid, Mongoloid, or Negroid
[img]http://lh6.ggpht.com/_1wtadqGaaPs/TFE4OP1sKYI/AAAAAAAALXg/Dhdxh8tiU4k/tmp3931_thumb_thumb1.jpg[img][/QUOTE]I don't get it you just posted albinos ?

And ok so, caucasoid, mongoloid, negroid are the different types of humans?

i feel bad for you srs



I have a good heart, I will try one last time.


Red squirrel :
Species: S. vulgaris
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_squirrel



Gray squirrel :
Species : S. carolinensis
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Eastern_gray_squirrel



Sciurus vulgaris ≠ Sciurus carolinensis

They are different species.

What you SHOULD have said, is they are the same Genus.

But they are different species.


So going back to the original point.

The different human races (blacks, asians, whites, etc) should be classified as different subspecies, if we kept the same logic for speciation that we do for every animal on earth.

good one lol. you caught the use of the wrong word in an sentence on a forum.


now go back to reading about stuffing animals on a boat and splitting the sea.

The reason I posted it is because race isn't about skin color. The Albino Pakistani girl will easily pass for a native white person in Europe, North America, etc while the Albino Asian Man or African Woman never will despite the fact that all 3 have the exact same skin, hair, and eye color. The reason for this is that the Albino Pakistani girl is either mostly or perhaps even 100% caucasoid.