Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » Russia's economy is finished they said
  1. Results 301 to 330 of 415
  2. Page 11 of 14
  3. First
  5. 9
  6. 10
  7. 11
  8. 12
  9. 13
  11. Last

Thread: Russia's economy is finished they said

post 1678234793 03-02-2023, 08:21 PM
-
#301
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,157
  6. Rep Power: 204849
What a sea of cope ITT, but unsurprising from:

1. Folks who don't understand anything about sanctions policy;
2. Folks who buy into rhetoric that sanctions don't affect the targeted country/thematic scope;
3. Folks who probably think sanctions are unfair, and hate the OFAC.

All 3 are on gigacope doses. Totally unsurprising given a number of threads and prolific posters here.

Just remember: the jackboot is on their neck, and nothing will take it off, until Putin stops.
post 1678236653 03-02-2023, 08:48 PM
-
#302
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,791
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384615
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
What a sea of cope ITT, but unsurprising from:

1. Folks who don't understand anything about sanctions policy;
2. Folks who buy into rhetoric that sanctions don't affect the targeted country/thematic scope;
3. Folks who probably think sanctions are unfair, and hate the OFAC.

All 3 are on gigacope doses. Totally unsurprising given a number of threads and prolific posters here.

Just remember: the jackboot is on their neck, and nothing will take it off, until Putin stops.
Irony overload
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1678238713 03-02-2023, 09:22 PM
-
#303
  1. swoleyo
  2. Registered User
  1. swoleyo
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: May 2009
  4. Location: Chicago, Illinois, United States
  5. Age: 42
  6. Posts: 10,948
  7. Rep Power: 48507
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
What a sea of cope ITT, but unsurprising from:

1. Folks who don't understand anything about sanctions policy;
2. Folks who buy into rhetoric that sanctions don't affect the targeted country/thematic scope;
3. Folks who probably think sanctions are unfair, and hate the OFAC.

All 3 are on gigacope doses. Totally unsurprising given a number of threads and prolific posters here.

Just remember: the jackboot is on their neck, and nothing will take it off, until Putin stops.
Russia's economy is schedule to grow 0.7 percent this year despite sanctions.

The only thing the sanctions has done is created a new power axis between China/Russia/Iran/NK - probably some other smaller countries that don't really matter.
Mod neg Cry-Baby Crew
NEG ONLYFANS THREADS CREW
EPSTEIN DIDN'T KILL HIMSELF CREW
RAW DOG CREW - PRESIDENT OF THE COMPANY
post 1678240363 03-02-2023, 09:56 PM
-
#304
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,157
  6. Rep Power: 204849
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
Irony overload
You don't understand what "irony" means, do you?
Originally Posted By swoleyo⏩
Russia's economy is schedule to grow 0.7 percent this year despite sanctions.

The only thing the sanctions has done is created a new power axis between China/Russia/Iran/NK - probably some other smaller countries that don't really matter.
A little reality check:

https://www.state.gov/the-impact-of-...an-federation/

And what 'power axis'? You really think the DPRK is part of a 'power axis'? Russia's military is in such a pathetic state it had to import weapons from the DPRK, JFL at the cope here srs.
post 1678244873 03-03-2023, 12:05 AM
-
#305
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 223
  6. Rep Power: 0
ITT Jizzel, CNN correspondent;

'Why not getting trillions from the West is a GOOD thing"
post 1678253413 03-03-2023, 06:14 AM
-
#306
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,791
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384615
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
You don't understand what "irony" means, do you?



A little reality check:

https://www.state.gov/the-impact-of-...an-federation/

And what 'power axis'? You really think the DPRK is part of a 'power axis'? Russia's military is in such a pathetic state it had to import weapons from the DPRK, JFL at the cope here srs.
Most of our power is in the dollar's global reserve status, and thats over. Sanctions were supposed to literally destroy russia, not cause a temporary drop in gdp while half the world abandoms the dollar entirely. This cope is off the charts
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1678254463 03-03-2023, 06:51 AM
-
#307
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,157
  6. Rep Power: 204849
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
Most of our power is in the dollar's global reserve status, and thats over. Sanctions were supposed to literally destroy russia, not cause a temporary drop in gdp while half the world abandoms the dollar entirely. This cope is off the charts
See my earlier comment re: ignorance regarding sanctions.

"Sanctions were supposed to literally destroy Russia" - lol at the low IQ hyperbole to desperately try to prove a point.
post 1678255673 03-03-2023, 07:20 AM
-
#308
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
What a sea of cope ITT, but unsurprising from:

1. Folks who don't understand anything about sanctions policy;
2. Folks who buy into rhetoric that sanctions don't affect the targeted country/thematic scope;
3. Folks who probably think sanctions are unfair, and hate the OFAC.

All 3 are on gigacope doses. Totally unsurprising given a number of threads and prolific posters here.

Just remember: the jackboot is on their neck, and nothing will take it off, until Putin stops.
Let me guess, we're not doing enough and maybe another 100 billion to Ukraine will make a difference?
post 1678257233 03-03-2023, 07:44 AM
-
#309
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,791
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384615
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
See my earlier comment re: ignorance regarding sanctions.

"Sanctions were supposed to literally destroy Russia" - lol at the low IQ hyperbole to desperately try to prove a point.
What hyperbole? The purpose of sanctions was to end the Ukrainian conflict by literally destroying the Russian economy and causing regime change. If you want to move the goal post back and pretend that's not cope then you do you bruh
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1678257573 03-03-2023, 07:50 AM
-
#310
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,157
  6. Rep Power: 204849
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
What hyperbole? The purpose of sanctions was to end the Ukrainian conflict by literally destroying the Russian economy and causing regime change. If you want to move the goal post back and pretend that's not cope then you do you bruh
You're moving the goalposts.

Sanctions cannot end a war, they are an administrative tool. This basic fact eludes you. When the Tatmadaw took over Myanmar do you think the arms embargo was designed to stop the air strikes against civilians? Or to stop the subject persons from exporting weapons there?

Again: you and other folks talk sanctions like kids playing at foreign policy expertise. It is laughable.
post 1678258733 03-03-2023, 08:12 AM
-
#311
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,791
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384615
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
You're moving the goalposts.

Sanctions cannot end a war, they are an administrative tool. This basic fact eludes you. When the Tatmadaw took over Myanmar do you think the arms embargo was designed to stop the air strikes against civilians? Or to stop the subject persons from exporting weapons there?

Again: you and other folks talk sanctions like kids playing at foreign policy expertise. It is laughable.
I think you should read the first couple pages of this thread. It isn't me that predicted this outcome from sanctions.
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1678265773 03-03-2023, 10:17 AM
-
#312
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
You're moving the goalposts.

Sanctions cannot end a war, they are an administrative tool. This basic fact eludes you. When the Tatmadaw took over Myanmar do you think the arms embargo was designed to stop the air strikes against civilians? Or to stop the subject persons from exporting weapons there?

Again: you and other folks talk sanctions like kids playing at foreign policy expertise. It is laughable.
Are the sanctions working?
post 1678269623 03-03-2023, 11:20 AM
-
#313
  1. devopsengineer
  2. Registered User
  1. devopsengineer
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Location: Serbia
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 3,640
  7. Rep Power: 1145
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Are the sanctions working?
They are working. In favour of Russia.

They weed out all the globalists from the government, they are developing all the tech they previously bought abroad (because globalist in goverment were saying that buying abrod instead using their own is a good idea), they are reindustrializing, their economy is growing again, while west is going into a long recesion and deindustrializing.
Как сладок свободы кнут
Не только лишь все поймут.
post 1678269703 03-03-2023, 11:21 AM
-
#314
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 223
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By devopsengineer⏩
They are working. In favour of Russia.

They weed out all the globalists from the government, they are developing all the tech they previously bought abroad (because globalist in goverment were saying that buying abrod instead using their own is a good idea), they are reindustrializing, their economy is growing again, while west is going into a long recesion and deindustrializing.
this happened.


lol
post 1678269823 03-03-2023, 11:23 AM
-
#315
  1. devopsengineer
  2. Registered User
  1. devopsengineer
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Location: Serbia
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 3,640
  7. Rep Power: 1145
Originally Posted By EngineerDinger⏩
this happened.


lol
Google this word: Chubais
Как сладок свободы кнут
Не только лишь все поймут.
post 1678271263 03-03-2023, 11:41 AM
-
#316
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 223
  6. Rep Power: 0
"Russia could find itself with no money as soon as next year and needs foreign investment, outspoken Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska has said.

“There will be no money already next year, we need foreign investors,” he said at an economic conference in Siberia Thursday, according to comments reported by TASS, a Russian state-owned news agency."



We DonT NEeD ThE WeSt
post 1678271783 03-03-2023, 11:52 AM
-
#317
  1. devopsengineer
  2. Registered User
  1. devopsengineer
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Location: Serbia
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 3,640
  7. Rep Power: 1145
Deripaska has no money. Maybe he should work more, and eat less. And give less stocks of his companies to USA for free, in echange for lifting sanctions. Treachery does not pay off.
Как сладок свободы кнут
Не только лишь все поймут.
post 1678271933 03-03-2023, 11:54 AM
-
#318
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By EngineerDinger⏩
"Russia could find itself with no money as soon as next year and needs foreign investment, outspoken Russian oligarch Oleg Deripaska has said.

“There will be no money already next year, we need foreign investors,” he said at an economic conference in Siberia Thursday, according to comments reported by TASS, a Russian state-owned news agency."



We DonT NEeD ThE WeSt
You make it sound like they're totally isolated.

Also, Western Europe isn't suffering terrible inflation and skyrocketing energy prices right now?
post 1678272603 03-03-2023, 12:06 PM
-
#319
  1. devopsengineer
  2. Registered User
  1. devopsengineer
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Location: Serbia
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 3,640
  7. Rep Power: 1145
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
You make it sound like they're totally isolated.

Also, Western Europe isn't suffering terrible inflation and skyrocketing energy prices right now?
Deripaska is an idiot. He gave away his share in Rusal in exchange for lifting sanctions that were on his name. That was few years ago. And now he got new sanctions. No wonder he has no money, he is like indian giving land for marbles.

But Russia is not Deripaska. Russia does well, Deripaskas are going extinct like Indians.

He is one of those Globalists that I spoke about few posts above
Как сладок свободы кнут
Не только лишь все поймут.
post 1678276153 03-03-2023, 01:08 PM
-
#320
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 223
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
You make it sound like they're totally isolated.

Also, Western Europe isn't suffering terrible inflation and skyrocketing energy prices right now?
Cool whataboutism Dave.
post 1678277513 03-03-2023, 01:32 PM
-
#321
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,791
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384615
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
You make it sound like they're totally isolated.

Also, Western Europe isn't suffering terrible inflation and skyrocketing energy prices right now?
Thats right, sanctions were supposed to isolate russia. Instead it created a competing economic axis

Sort of the opposite of the intended outcome. Woops
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1678277983 03-03-2023, 01:40 PM
-
#322
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,157
  6. Rep Power: 204849
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
I think you should read the first couple pages of this thread. It isn't me that predicted this outcome from sanctions.
I think you should read my posts in full. I blasted anyone using the phrase 'sanctions' ignorantly, and that includes folks saying that these sanctions had the chance of 'stopping the war'.
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Are the sanctions working?
For their desired effect? Yes. But can you understand what their desired effect is, based on the quote you posted?
post 1678278713 03-03-2023, 01:53 PM
-
#323
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
I think you should read my posts in full. I blasted anyone using the phrase 'sanctions' ignorantly, and that includes folks saying that these sanctions had the chance of 'stopping the war'.



For their desired effect? Yes. But can you understand what their desired effect is, based on the quote you posted?
Well, as Stizzel keeps proving to you all, they're not working.
post 1678278813 03-03-2023, 01:55 PM
-
#324
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 223
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Well, as Stizzel keeps proving to you all, they're not working.
Dave, hanging your cock around Jizzel is a bad idea. Dude is dumb as a rock.
post 1678278883 03-03-2023, 01:56 PM
-
#325
  1. jamalfudge
  2. Throbbing Member
  1. jamalfudge
  2. Throbbing Member
  3. Join Date: Jan 2013
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 39,406
  6. Rep Power: 297374
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
You're moving the goalposts.

Sanctions cannot end a war, they are an administrative tool. This basic fact eludes you. When the Tatmadaw took over Myanmar do you think the arms embargo was designed to stop the air strikes against civilians? Or to stop the subject persons from exporting weapons there?

Again: you and other folks talk sanctions like kids playing at foreign policy expertise. It is laughable.
What impact do sanctions have on a country using a brand new system of their own?
#
post 1678279073 03-03-2023, 02:00 PM
-
#326
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  1. LogicalLifts
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 13,157
  6. Rep Power: 204849
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn⏩
Well, as Stizzel keeps proving to you all, they're not working.
All who? There is only one of me, and you were incapable of answering my question. So the only person who has proved anything here is me, if you bothered to read my posts.
Originally Posted By jamalfudge⏩
What impact do sanctions have on a country using a brand new system of their own?
What's this 'brand new system'? They are importing weapons from the DPRK - let that sink in, before considering this new 'axis'.
post 1678279943 03-03-2023, 02:18 PM
-
#327
  1. devopsengineer
  2. Registered User
  1. devopsengineer
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Location: Serbia
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 3,640
  7. Rep Power: 1145
Originally Posted By LogicalLifts⏩
All who? There is only one of me, and you were incapable of answering my question. So the only person who has proved anything here is me, if you bothered to read my posts.



What's this 'brand new system'? They are importing weapons from the DPRK - let that sink in, before considering this new 'axis'.
What does that mean to you? That Russia is done?

In reality that only means that Korea and Russia have same artilery callbire.

Russia is outgunning Ukraine in artilery, but there is no such thing as too much shells in a war. And 152mm caliber can be found only in North Korea and Russia. Even without imports, Russia was outgunning ukraine.
Как сладок свободы кнут
Не только лишь все поймут.
post 1678280123 03-03-2023, 02:23 PM
-
#328
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 223
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By devopsengineer⏩
What does that mean to you? That Russia is done?

In reality that only means that Korea and Russia have same artilery callbire.

Russia is outgunning Ukraine in artilery, but there is no such thing as too much shells in a war. And 152mm caliber can be found only in North Korea and Russia. Even without imports, Russia was outgunning ukraine.
This is true. Only Russia and NK are using WWI artillery.


lol
post 1678280333 03-03-2023, 02:28 PM
-
#329
  1. devopsengineer
  2. Registered User
  1. devopsengineer
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jul 2017
  4. Location: Serbia
  5. Age: 38
  6. Posts: 3,640
  7. Rep Power: 1145
Originally Posted By EngineerDinger⏩
This is true. Only Russia and NK are using WWI artillery.


lol
You think 3mm in 155mm NATO standard make it better somehow?

Simply up the diameter and you make it better?

Well then I have bad news for you. Russians also have Pion/Malka with 203mm shells.

In reality, 3mm make no diference, it is just diferent standard, like AC power outlets.
Как сладок свободы кнут
Не только лишь все поймут.
post 1678280383 03-03-2023, 02:29 PM
-
#330
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  1. EngineerDinger
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Feb 2023
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 223
  6. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By devopsengineer⏩
You think 3mm in 155mm NATO standard make it better somehow?

Simply up the diameter and you make it better?

Well then I have bad news for you. Russians also have Pion/Malka with 203mm shells.

In reality, 3mm make no diference, it is just diferent standard, like AC power outlets.
Diameter isn't as important as modern pieces, recently manufactured ammo, and trained operators. Russia has none of those things.

I get that you think the battle "tactic" called zerging is effective, but it isn't.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts