oh it will get there. For every country that wants to take it slow and do test runs and case studies on the ramifications of AI and the state of social meaning, you'll have the Koreans and Chinese blasting-and-cruising with AI, and the only way to stop them is to compete with them by doing the same thing, and if that nation doesn't compete they'll be left in the dust on the world stage economically. Guaranteed its already happening at this moment.

It won't. They can blast as much as they want out there but it's just a sci fi nightmare. It's unsustainable for actual businesses.

so what are you gonna do about it?

oh it will get there. For every country that wants to take it slow and do test runs and case studies on the ramifications of AI and the state of social meaning, you'll have the Koreans and Chinese blasting-and-cruising with AI, and the only way to stop them is to compete with them by doing the same thing, and if that nation doesn't compete they'll be left in the dust on the world stage economically. Guaranteed its already happening at this moment.



There are plenty of smart humans with the ability to do jobs, but no human can compute as fast as AI. Thats where you or noone can compete. Thats why its going to be more efficient to automate jobs of accountants and data entry clerks than to sit a body in a chair to do the work. A human body that needs a salary and vacation time and 15 minute breaks, and sick days and can only work 8 hours in a day. Why would a company put up with that when they can spend a one-time fee of $100k or something for some high end AI unit to do the work of three men around the clock? The only human they'd need to hire is some gig contracted technician to come around once per month to do some re-calibrate testing to see if the work is accurate or some chit, and they're good to go for another month of uninterrupted work.

hm, glass half-full mentality, must be nice.

which is why it won't happen wide spread. The economy would collapse on itself

What does the economy mean when robots and AI provide all the goods and services we need and are largely self-sustaining?

I dunno, it's hard to picture

First of all there is a tradeoff. Robots are expensive and will not be cheaper than labor for most things. Second, it just means we will transition to other kinds of jobs. People would make art and sell it, play videogames, do onlyfans, write books, play songs, study and teach, etc. We would need a society that provides more social support for the masses. But otherwise, it's fine. Technology is supposed to make life easier for people.

can you quantify your first statement. I don't doubt that's the case right now, but eventually there's going to be robots that do most things better than humans. Society is not prepared. UBI will be a huge talking point in 2025 and beyond. Basically the self-declared slobs and intellects like yourself, will get paid to sit at home and not contribute to society. Eventually robots are going to make sense everywhere, eventually the government will have to regulate corporations, or the future is dark. Very dark. Lol @ thinking a robot is more expensive over the long term. Robots will not get pregnant, call off, get fat and lazy, or require health insurance.

You're a fuking dumbass.

I wonder what you do for a living, except sucking dik.

AI has a major limitation: it cannot create anything novel, it can only extrapolate new things from existing data. Hence, while it might be really good at doing all sorts of stuff, there won't be any true innovation...unless of course it somehow becomes self-aware and then at that point it's no longer AI but something else.

AI is retarded and will be dumb and not even a meme in a year

To a certain point, all novelty is an extrapolation from prior information.

We will have like 12 billion humans on Earth. People need remarkably little compared to a robot. And there aren't enough resources to build tons of robots to replace humans. What do you mean not contribute? People participate in society. I teach btw. You should look at the economics of robotics and what goes into making a robot.

I can assure you I am far more educated than you btw. Would you like to take a quiz? I can design one to test elementary understanding of biology, chemistry, physics, and math for you. Let's see if you are as brilliant as you seem to think you are.

It's also easy for me to come up with questions you won't be able to solve with AI or find online.

AI has a major limitation: it cannot create anything novel, it can only extrapolate new things from existing data. Hence, while it might be really good at doing all sorts of stuff, there won't be any true innovation...unless of course it somehow becomes self-aware and then at that point it's no longer AI but something else.

Lol you're a fukin teacher? You're a substitute making $100/day. If you are teaching our youth we are doomed.

I have an engineering degree. It's cute you know like useless 6th grade biology vocabulary and chemistry, but let me know when you pass the FE. Which you can't even take without an engineering degree from an accredited program.

You're a legit fuking retard. I mog you in anything practical. You're going to know more useless ****. It's like me saying let me conjure up a quiz of calculus and thermodynamics, which your dumbass would fail miserably in. Now which is more practical?

get fukt

That's where you're wrong.

AI only needs massive data in the beginning stages, it will and does create novel things, not just extrapolations. Watch the latest interviews with Open AI ceo and many others. We're slowly getting out of these beginning stages...

You can tell how most people have no clue how AI works.

That's where you're wrong.

AI only needs massive data in the beginning stages, it will and does create novel things, not just extrapolations. Watch the latest interviews with Open AI ceo and many others. We're slowly getting out of these beginning stages...

I've been working with Ai since the 90s (ded srs)

The only reason it hasn't taken over before is infrastructure and processing power. Both those things are now reaching the tipping point. Anyone who thinks "AI can't do math" is clueless. White Collar jobs have only been around for 70 years. And there's been massive turnover with them due to lesser technology. The notion that AI won't replace all of these jobs is cope to the max level. The safest jobs are tradie jobs, because AI can't do manual labor....yet.

Literally don't know what "novel" means in this instance...AI cannot create something without a starting point. All that data qualifies. A HUMAN can make new data out of whole cloth, that is the difference.

Source: PhD research in AI. ****g00t

Lmfao, the only PHD you have is in retardation Cletus.

Literally have a published paper evaluating foundation models, but okay.

This is why I cannot take anything on the internet seriously. Confirmation bias is so incredibly high the people who have a marginal understanding of a subject act like someone who has more knowledge is retarded because it doesn't match their conclusions.

Link p haggot