Maybe the terrorists threw the passport out the window 1 milisecond before impact to make the FBI's job easier.

This guy gets it, ****ing lol at the official stories in all 3 locations. Just a joke.

EDIT:On spread.

Building 7 and the pentagon "plane" is what sealed it for me. The fact that they released some potato quality BULLCHIT video that doesn't even catch the plane is laughable. Camera tech wasnt great in 2001, but we aren't talking about a PHUCKING 7/11.... this is the got damn pentagon. Can't tell me they don't use the highest tech chit availible. The fact that they don't have any legit video of it, coupled by the fact that they really claim a pilot who could barely fly a cessna crashed a jumbo jet into the pentagon is laughable. You could not steer a jet like that into the pentagon without hitting trees and chit beforehand.

Exaclty, and if you're covering it up, it means you're complicit in the events.

Now heres the funnier ****. We just witnessed another 9/11 less than a year ago called Nord Stream 2. I know, no one died, and it wasn't on American soli, but its exactly how these operations are carried out and then covered up to push wars further.

It was definitely us bombing Nord Stream 2 because Germany was getting cold feet in the Ukraine war over energy costs. We blew that **** up, and its echoes of 9/11 are uncanny. It shows we have no problem bombing our own allies (our own people) to further military gains & narratives. (See the Seymore Hersch reporting for more details on how it was done and by what branches)

We've seen the enemy and it is us.

Two things should be obvious to everyone.

1) we weren’t told everything about 9/11 (personally I’m ok with that - if flaws in our national security were found and exploited there is no reason to tell the whole world).

2) anyone thinking Tucker is going to inform you is an idiot. He’s whoring for attention via fear, paranoia, and hate.

Neither of those has anything to do with the real info posted from many people in this thread that outright discredit the official narrative about 9/11. Who gives a **** about Tucker when all the info is plain for us to see on this issue.

This.

You don't need cucker in order to use your own eyes.

You mean the literal topic of the thread? Yea - gosh - why would I be responding to Tucker’s claims? Can’t imagine. As for the rest, it’s really really is all just speculation.

So finding two passports of the terrorists of flight 93 makes more sense than the "speculation" that isn't true.

building 7 impolding COMPLETELY from a small fire makes more sense than the "speculation" that doesn't make sense.

Using your eyes is saying “this doesn’t all add up” - making wild claims about what “really happened” takes you to fantasy land.

I'd say that finding two terrorist passports in the debris pile of flight 93 is fantasy land.

Wtf are you even talking about?

Whatever man, you don’t know what happened. Neither do I. Neither does Tucker.

1) We aren't talking about details being left out, we're talking about being lied to.

2) Tucker's only claim is that they weren't allowed to talk about it. This information isn't very irrelevant regarding the actual events that took place on 9/11.

I do know they did not find intact terrorist passports in the debris pile of flight 93 lmao

Well, yea. With something like this not being told what fully/truly happened would be lying - at least in part. That’s a given. “The truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth.” What we have been told obviously isn’t that.

Good for you. I know a letter from my parents wasn’t in the mailbox when it was supposed to be. I know that, I don’t know why. That’s what you people don’t seem to understand. You can’t just make up a whole story around it to feel special.

Glowie spotted. Nice try FBI

Imagine trying to argue in the face of all this evidence. You boyos need to try and be lower key if you're gonna glowout. Nice work on Nord Stream cuh, keep at it!

When there's video evidence of what looks like a controlled demolition of a skyscraper then using that evidence and basing a theory on it isn't "making up a whole story".

It's easier to lie to someone than prove that they were lied to. This thread really brings out the low IQ miscers. Don't forget the 600 billion.

For someone with such weak arguments you'd think you'd hesistate to start one.

Please explain to the class how a passport survived that impact, explosion, fire, building collapse when everything except change was turned to literal dust.

Then maybe you can explain how 19 men passed through an airport without being on video.

Then an explaination for both planes exceeding 500mph at sea level in septemeber would be useful.

After that, explain how 3 steel frame buildings fell from fires when its never happened before with countless examples.

Or, instead of all that, you can understand when you are wrong, understand that "conspiracy theorist" are just people 1 year ahead of everyone else in uncovering stories, and throw away that "I dont know, therefor you dont know mindset". Its not a mde up story, these are facts, backed with more evidence than the commision report or anyhting any US official has given since that day. Just because you arent aware doesnt mean its crazy town.

Your theory holds no water. There would be zero reason for the CIA to feed 'talking points' to a british news company prior to their plans coming into action. That's straight up retarded.
That would be like planning to kill someone and telling their friends you're going to do it half an hour before you do.

just all the covid conspiracies from 2020 that turned out to be true should give one pause any ct theories. tucker prolly heard most of them but was so entrenched in his job, himself and his $$$$ salary to address them.

when they said covid came from a bat, my first question is "so where are all the rest of the diseased bats?" you wouldn't expect an outbreak with a diseased rat/vectorspreader to not break out in multiple places at the around the same time. yet with covid it came down to one single bat, a possible anomaly but unlikely. or more likely it wasn't a bat at all.

btw: anyone remember how Trump said Covid would just go away as fast as it came it...turned out to be true. or it was never the threat alleged in the first place.

Clearly you didn't read my next post. It was fed to them by Reuters, and no one has explained how Reuters got the report.

DJKhaledcongradulationsyouplayedyourself.mpeg

Control the media, control the minds of the public.

Two planes hit the towers and lodged themselves into the building. Some debris surely fell to the ground, however when the buildings collpased, the weight of eveything pulverized everything into dust. Only steel beams (which were shipped to china before an investigation could occur) and loose change survived...hence the documentry name. But that passport floated right down onto a policemans shoe lmao.

Shanksville plane left a debris field several miles long with floating debris in the near by lake. This was never recovered and only eye witness accounts say that they saw floating trash like papers and misc trash along with a passengers seat. If a seat is floating, then the plane got hit with a missle over the lake thats why it went down. When it did go down in that field, it turned on its back and nose dived. It went straight into the ground, as in the only thing on site was a 20ft by 20ft hole in the ground, no visable plane srs. The debris that the FBI collected and shared photos of was all diner plate sized except for a portion of a door. No rolls royce engines, which always survive due to density. Also no plane eneters the earth like that lmao, we have dozens of examples of crashed commerical flights and not a single aspect of the shanksville crash adds up. White whispy smoke from crash site, towns power went out seconds before the crash, 2 Veitnam vets claim they heard a missle get fired, FBI on site suspiciouslly fast, again...

The Pentagon plane also left a debris field. But again, small parts with no engine. Photos were shared and photos immediatley after show a debris field. But every single crash has large debris, then in one day we get two crashes with minimal debris and a lack of the biggest, heaviest peice of metal on the plane.

There are hundreds of inconsistencies between the four planes and their crashes, but the above quote is incorrect.

But there is video of some of them going through the airport.

LOL at trying to convince the braindead libtard groomer miscnbro of anything that's actually true.

Just neg and move on.