Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum
» Supreme Court knocks down loan forgiveness. But they employ a BS rationale to do so.
  1. Results 1 to 30 of 116
  2. 1
  3. 2
  4. 3
  5. Last
post 1685759163 07-02-2023, 11:41 PM
-
#1
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0

Supreme Court knocks down loan forgiveness. But they employ a BS rationale to do so.

So, SCOTUS ruled Biden did not have authority via the Heroes Act to forgive loans. You borrow money, you pay it back, they say. Biden loses. End of story.




Not yet. The Major Questions Doctrine was used in the case:https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12077. Cliffs, as I understand, is that on questions of major political or economic weight Congress can override delegated authority.


But I've read that this was not used before Roberts took over the court. And it's claimed to be completely fabricated. It sounds like a contrived and "farcical" doctrine with no legal standing. Why might the SCOTUS want it or use it?

Because, it gives a way for the conservative elements of the court to feign legal weight to their ideological agenda and shoot down policies which are either liberalistic or just benefit the common folk. They realize loan forgiveness it helps the underprivileged enormously and encourages them to better themselves through the best means available, education.


But this allows the courts to just say "Nope, this helps people who aren't us, and since Congress didn't authorize this exact action, we won't let this happen." Seems like there's a reason this is a recent doctrine, and it looks like it's all ideologically motivated.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1685759213 07-02-2023, 11:45 PM
-
#2
  1. dyee4613
  2. Registered User
  1. dyee4613
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Mar 2015
  4. Age: 35
  5. Posts: 4,522
  6. Rep Power: 12706
Originally Posted By Bodhy
So, SCOTUS ruled Biden did not have authority via the Heroes Act to forgive loans. You borrow money, you pay it back, they say. Biden loses. End of story.




Not yet. The Major Questions Doctrine was used in the case:https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IF/IF12077. Cliffs, as I understand, is that on questions of major political or economic weight Congress can override delegated authority.


But I've read that this was not used before Roberts took over the court. And it's claimed to be completely fabricated. It sounds like a contrived and "farcical" doctrine with no legal standing. Why might the SCOTUS want it or use it?

Because, it gives a way for the conservative elements of the court to feign legal weight to their ideological agenda and shoot down policies which are either liberalistic or just benefit the common folk. They realize loan forgiveness it helps the underprivileged enormously and encourages them to better themselves through the best means available, education.


But this allows the courts to just say "Nope, this helps people who aren't us, and since Congress didn't authorize this exact action, we won't let this happen." Seems like there's a reason this is a recent doctrine, and it looks like it's all ideologically motivated.
This is a really stupid post.
post 1685759973 07-03-2023, 12:23 AM
-
#3
  1. fitnessislife
  2. Registered User
  1. fitnessislife
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2006
  4. Location: Michigan, United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 27,183
  7. Rep Power: 223047
You took out a loan. Pay it back, chit smearer.





"At the core of liberalism is the spoiled child - miserable, as all spoiled children are, unsatisfied,
demanding, ill-disciplined, despotic and useless. Liberalism is a philosophy of sniveling brats."

- PJ O'Rourke
post 1685760313 07-03-2023, 12:44 AM
-
#4
  1. Godfrd824
  1. Godfrd824
  2. Join Date: Oct 2008
  3. Location: DevilMayRage's Head, Rent Free
  4. Posts: 57,349
  5. Subscribers: 2
  6. Rep Power: 385380
Will The Ukraine pay back all that money Biden is sending them?
When it comes your time to die, be not like those whose hearts are filled with the fear of death, so that when their time comes they weep and pray for a little more time to live their lives over again in a different way. Sing your death song and die like a hero going home.
post 1685765693 07-03-2023, 05:23 AM
-
#5
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Take out a loan, you pay it back, real simple.
post 1685767113 07-03-2023, 06:15 AM
-
#6
  1. nkiritsis13
  2. [_]Living [X]Living Dead
  1. nkiritsis13
  2. [_]Living [X]Living Dead
  3. Join Date: Apr 2010
  4. Location: Rochester, Michigan, United States
  5. Posts: 8,312
  6. Rep Power: 331479



I will stand firm, I refuse to kneel - The fury in me is divine
My dark grave awaits, my fate is revealed - But I'm not afraid to die

If you have any problems or need advice, feel free to ask
post 1685767213 07-03-2023, 06:20 AM
-
#7
  1. BearyManilowe
  1. BearyManilowe
  2. Join Date: Dec 2013
  3. Age: 36
  4. Posts: 15,222
  5. Rep Power: 130112
You're not even applying the Major Questions Doctrine correctly. Literally the point of the doctrine is to avoid agencies overstepping their approved bounds. This was actually the 100% proper way to use the doctrine in that the Heroes Act does not have "Clear Congressional Approval" to apply to loan forgiveness across the board in the way it was attempting to be used. This has now been clarified and settled in the Court system.

If CONGRESS doesn't like this, it's on them to create a bipartisan, constitutional bill/law that will apply to loan forgiveness. Good luck to them.
***Mariah Carey is my 10/10 Crew***
***Misc Dads Crew***
post 1685767383 07-03-2023, 06:26 AM
-
#8
  1. matpal
  2. Pressed, but not crushed
  1. matpal
  2. Pressed, but not crushed
  3. Join Date: Dec 2001
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 6,909
  6. Rep Power: 18806
Is there anything you're not an expert in, Bohdy? Molecular biology and now a legal scholar telling the Supreme Court they're wrong? Great to have you here to set everything straight for us, and I do mean everything.
"Love Everyone" - Jesus

Ex-CEO/Unaffiliated

I used to make the Holy Grail

FF/Medic
post 1685767473 07-03-2023, 06:29 AM
-
#9
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By BearyManilowe
You're not even applying the Major Questions Doctrine correctly. Literally the point of the doctrine is to avoid agencies overstepping their approved bounds. This was actually the 100% proper way to use the doctrine in that the Heroes Act does not have "Clear Congressional Approval" to apply to loan forgiveness across the board in the way it was attempting to be used. This has now been clarified and settled in the Court system.

If CONGRESS doesn't like this, it's on them to create a bipartisan, constitutional bill/law that will apply to loan forgiveness. Good luck to them.
The issue is standing, and how standing is a legal means of giving the powerful elite a way to retain their power and prevent the poorer and the powerless out of the court.

The conservative justices can twist the definition of standing to engineer any particular outcome that they want to.



EDIT: I do believe Thomas was actually quoted as saying he was going to use his power on the bench to "Make liberals lives hell".
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1685767553 07-03-2023, 06:33 AM
-
#10
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  1. x-trainer ben
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Oct 2005
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 62,386
  6. Rep Power: 451180
i heard on one of the talking heads shows, that the "heroes thing" was left untouched and they can use it to try and get this done in a different way.
There is an unspoken thing, we are iron brothers and sisters, we are to support each other and...It is our duty to support our brothers and sisters in the iron game!
post 1685767723 07-03-2023, 06:40 AM
-
#11
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By Bodhy
The issue is standing, and how standing is a legal means of giving the powerful elite a way to retain their power and prevent the poorer and the powerless out of the court.


The conservative justices can twist the definition of standing to engineer any particular outcome that they want to.
If you take out a loan for a vehicle, and 3 months later, you no longer want the car, does that loan disappear?
post 1685767803 07-03-2023, 06:42 AM
-
#12
  1. ~Hades~
  2. True Patriot Crew
  1. ~Hades~
  2. True Patriot Crew
  3. Join Date: Dec 2007
  4. Posts: 26,187
  5. Rep Power: 695527
unconstitutional = BS rationale now


Lmao at how stupid you people are
Royal Crew
Chiefs Crew
Festivus Cew
post 1685768053 07-03-2023, 06:49 AM
-
#13
  1. BearyManilowe
  1. BearyManilowe
  2. Join Date: Dec 2013
  3. Age: 36
  4. Posts: 15,222
  5. Rep Power: 130112
Originally Posted By Bodhy
The issue is standing, and how standing is a legal means of giving the powerful elite a way to retain their power and prevent the poorer and the powerless out of the court.


The conservative justices can twist the definition of standing to engineer any particular outcome that they want to.
Standing wasn't the issue in this case.
***Mariah Carey is my 10/10 Crew***
***Misc Dads Crew***
post 1685768663 07-03-2023, 07:12 AM
-
#14
  1. Postmort3m
  2. Chairman of the bored
  1. Postmort3m
  2. Chairman of the bored
  3. Join Date: Apr 2012
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 32,467
  6. Rep Power: 539821
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
If you take out a loan for a vehicle, and 3 months later, you no longer want the car, does that loan disappear?
More importantly, do you get to keep the thing you took the loan out for if it does “disappear”?
post 1685769803 07-03-2023, 07:40 AM
-
#15
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Postmort3m
More importantly, do you get to keep the thing you took the loan out for if it does “disappear”?
Youare the thing the loan is for.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1685770113 07-03-2023, 07:47 AM
-
#16
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  1. Bushmaster
  2. Masculine Toxicity
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Location: Greenville, South Carolina, United States
  5. Posts: 68,360
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 700751
Originally Posted By Bodhy
Youare the thing the loan is for.
All the more reason to pay back the money you borrowed retard.
It's a hot night. The mind races. You think about your knife: the only friend who hasn't betrayed you, the only friend who won't be dead by sunup. Sleep tight mates, in your quilted chambray night shirts.
post 1685771973 07-03-2023, 08:26 AM
-
#17
  1. TaeBoNinja
  2. Vagina Whisperer
  1. TaeBoNinja
  2. Vagina Whisperer
  3. Join Date: Sep 2009
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 46,748
  6. Rep Power: 174067
Originally Posted By Bodhy
The issue is standing, and how standing is a legal means of giving the powerful elite a way to retain their power and prevent the poorer and the powerless out of the court.

The conservative justices can twist the definition of standing to engineer any particular outcome that they want to.



EDIT: I do believe Thomas was actually quoted as saying he was going to use his power on the bench to "Make liberals lives hell".
This isn't about the elite. It's the other 87% who either paid their loans, or didn't take one out, who would be screwed by loan forgiveness.

Imagine working your ass off, paying your bills. Just to be told to now pay for other's education too
6'3 Master Race
GOATCal Crew
No Pillow Crew
Pureblood Crew
post 1685773013 07-03-2023, 08:53 AM
-
#18
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  1. Noliberals4
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2015
  4. Location: United States
  5. Age: 37
  6. Posts: 34,396
  7. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By Dave22reborn
If you take out a loan for a vehicle, and 3 months later, you no longer want the car, does that loan disappear?
If you're a billionaire, sure.

Republicans once again favor the rich over the middle class and wonder why they keep losing.
Republicans are weak men who pretend to be strong

Democrats are strong men who pretend to be weak
post 1685773183 07-03-2023, 08:55 AM
-
#19
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By TaeBoNinja
This isn't about the elite. It's the other 87% who either paid their loans, or didn't take one out, who would be screwed by loan forgiveness.

Imagine working your ass off, paying your bills. Just to be told to now pay for other's education too
No offense but this logic is dumb. Imagine never doing anything about a problem just because "it wouldn't be fair" to others. Brb.. never ending slavery because it wouldn't be fair to the slaves who didn't get their freedom and spent their whole lives as slaves.
post 1685773363 07-03-2023, 08:59 AM
-
#20
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  1. Paul Kreul
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Apr 2006
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 33,385
  6. Rep Power: 316746
Originally Posted By Noliberals4
If you're a billionaire, sure.

Republicans once again favor the rich over the middle class and wonder why they keep losing.
A University Degree can be taken away & your credit should reflect defaulting on a loan. “You” are not exactly the thing the loan was taken out for. The Degree is the “thing”
post 1685773453 07-03-2023, 09:01 AM
-
#21
  1. BearyManilowe
  1. BearyManilowe
  2. Join Date: Dec 2013
  3. Age: 36
  4. Posts: 15,222
  5. Rep Power: 130112
Originally Posted By NYPat
No offense but this logic is dumb. Imagine never doing anything about a problem just because "it wouldn't be fair" to others. Brb.. never ending slavery because it wouldn't be fair to the slaves who didn't get their freedom and spent their whole lives as slaves.
Brb comparing slavery to student loans.
***Mariah Carey is my 10/10 Crew***
***Misc Dads Crew***
post 1685773603 07-03-2023, 09:03 AM
-
#22
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By BearyManilowe
Brb comparing slavery to student loans.
It's an example of the logic, not some form of equivalency..
post 1685773883 07-03-2023, 09:13 AM
-
#23
  1. BearyManilowe
  1. BearyManilowe
  2. Join Date: Dec 2013
  3. Age: 36
  4. Posts: 15,222
  5. Rep Power: 130112
Originally Posted By NYPat
It's an example of the logic, not some form of equivalency..
Brb using hyperbolic statements to inaccurately apply logic to situations which said logic would never apply.
***Mariah Carey is my 10/10 Crew***
***Misc Dads Crew***
post 1685773943 07-03-2023, 09:15 AM
-
#24
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By Anachron
Pseudointellectuals gonna pseudointellectual.
Does Analchug ever post anything on topic? Comes into every thread to split hairs with left leaning posters over chit that has nothing to do with the thread.

Talk about pseudointellectualism..
post 1685774083 07-03-2023, 09:17 AM
-
#25
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  1. Bodhy
  2. Paddling to New Zealand
  3. Join Date: Mar 2020
  4. Posts: 17,326
  5. Rep Power: 0
Originally Posted By NYPat
Does Analchug ever post anything on topic? Comes into every thread to split hairs with left leaning posters over chit that has nothing to do with the thread.

Talk about pseudointellectualism..
Did the same thing to me just recently, split semantic hairs to accuse me of being a liar when I could easily explain my words in a far less insidious way.
Back off, Warchild.

Seriously.
post 1685774113 07-03-2023, 09:17 AM
-
#26
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  1. NYPat
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Dec 2010
  4. Posts: 43,432
  5. Rep Power: 198579
Originally Posted By BearyManilowe
Brb using hyperbolic statements to inaccurately apply logic to situations which said logic would never apply.
Derp. The logic was perfectly fine. Mine that is..


Originally Posted By Bodhy
Did the same thing to me just recently, split semantic hairs to accuse me of being a liar when I could easily explain my words in a far less insidious way.
He does it in every thread, just ignore him.
post 1685774723 07-03-2023, 09:30 AM
-
#27
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
Originally Posted By NYPat
No offense but this logic is dumb. Imagine never doing anything about a problem just because "it wouldn't be fair" to others. Brb.. never ending slavery because it wouldn't be fair to the slaves who didn't get their freedom and spent their whole lives as slaves.
You're comparing slavery, to someone taking out a loan???
post 1685774793 07-03-2023, 09:31 AM
-
#28
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  1. Dave22reborn
  2. Cold Hearted SOB
  3. Join Date: Jan 2005
  4. Location: Ill.
  5. Posts: 120,479
  6. Rep Power: 316531
There's a gym, where it's a one time fee for the entire year. Let's say you sign up, pay the money, and 2 months later, you move, or you just don't feel like going to that gym anymore.

Guess what? You're not getting that money back.
post 1685774933 07-03-2023, 09:33 AM
-
#29
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  1. Kraken
  2. Texas Crew
  3. Join Date: Jul 2003
  4. Age: 47
  5. Posts: 26,780
  6. Rep Power: 198322
Socialism isn't economics, nor is it constitutional, but rather purely ideological. Your posts are always ideological but you can't make that connection.

This is why government shouldn't be loaning money in the first place. Its yet another unconstitutional socialist policy. No matter how socialist we become, the commies just want more and more. Time to walk back all socialist policies. The Dems created the demand for it, and your posts prove that.
One party system; Most Republicans are Democrats, but no Democrats are Republicans.
Hayek and Mises were right; they're all socialists.
"To Call something fair or unfair is a subjective value judgment and not liable to any verification" Ludwig Von Mises
post 1685775483 07-03-2023, 09:43 AM
-
#30
  1. wickedman
  2. Registered User
  1. wickedman
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Jun 2011
  4. Location: California, United States
  5. Posts: 30,900
  6. Rep Power: 79002
Thank God we have a red insect available to educate us on the legal failures of the Supreme Court.
#FreeCryptoBandit
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts