Yeah, but thats only because women's priorities are screwed up right now. They want to be sexually attracted to the guy on top of absolutely respecting him in terms of finances/status. That would be good for just offspring, women wanting that is just natural, however that formula is meant to improve the human race and not society. A monogamous society doesnt work when women have those priorities.

They should seek commitment, loyalty, respect, love, protection, etc from men, not just money, height, and face, which is whats happening right now. They disregard the virtues that matter for a long term monogamous relationship and put on a pedestal the virtues that matter for a sexual relationship.

Monogamy in a society where women dont need men (due to muh feminism) wont work, since women then go for the men theywant. Every woman wants the same type of men (aka top 10-20%) so this results in a society of sex, situationships, frustration (both from women and men), etc.

Here's the thing BBMG, I've always said, "hold on". Your value is hampered by height, race, and face. As the females market value lowers, yours can at least stay the same until your priced into the market. Yeah, it sucks that you don't get a sloot in their prime, but you may get commitment and a loving relationship.

i dont see how this can be fixed unless society actually collapsed. Because otherwise women will not change, they arent going to fuk men they arent attracted to

Its not very motivating to say 'hold on so when you're 40 you can maybe get some old used up puzzy. I dont think thats a deal men will respond to. they'll be roping and rotting before they make it to 40 to save these used up hoes.

To be fair, this would be worded a lot better if it was written neutrally.

The 53% that settles for a beta male are 100% low value/high body count women typically. Occasionally you'll get a HBB that was cheated on and becomes so mentally ill that she can no longer have a relationship with anyone besides a soy who leaves his phone unlocked next to her all day.

Why are some so fundamentally embittered that they treat "women" as one monolithic group? They are anything but. Perhaps there are trends across socio-economic brackets, as there always are, but to say "women need to X" as if they are all the same reeks of embittered trauma syndrome.

We are rediscovering what people figured out thousands of years ago. The only way to build a large, relatively stable society is to control female sexual resources. Implement socialism (1 woman per man, no more) and physically force women to pair with their looks match. Every single western empire was built on this basic philosophy.

It's counterintuitive, but letting women shop thousands of men and pick their own partner results in epidemic levels of sheer MISERY. Record levels of depression because now they not only get to see what they're missing, but they can get banged by Chad any time they want. They just can't ever have him as a monogamous husband, which must be a huge mind fukk.

Society doesn't need to do that just destroy and ban social media and dating apps. Then men and women will be forced to interact with people in your vicinity

This

I mean seriously nearly everyone I know (male and female) is in a relationship

I don't find most of my friends partners particularly attractive, but they do, and that's what matters.

Maybe some people are settling, but back in the day that was called "compromise"

Anyway relationships aren't dictated by rules or logical patterns , anyone who's ever been in love can attest to that

Lol who cares

People worry so much about relationships and sex, who gives a fuk

i dont see how this can be fixed unless society actually collapsed. Because otherwise women will not change, they arent going to fuk men they arent attracted to

so cliffs of cliffs:

-Women are too entitled today and they end up fuking themselves over.

The other thing that no one really hit on ITT...

If a man doesn't want kids, why would he bother with a monogamous partner?

Yeah, but thats only because women's priorities are screwed up right now. They want to be sexually attracted to the guy on top of absolutely respecting him in terms of finances/status. That would be good for just offspring, women wanting that is just natural, however that formula is meant to improve the human race and not society. A monogamous society doesnt work when women have those priorities.

They should seek commitment, loyalty, respect, love, protection, etc from men, not just money, height, and face, which is whats happening right now. They disregard the virtues that matter for a long term monogamous relationship and put on a pedestal the virtues that matter for a sexual relationship.

Monogamy in a society where women dont need men (due to muh feminism) wont work, since women then go for the men theywant. Every woman wants the same type of men (aka top 10-20%) so this results in a society of sex, situationships, frustration (both from women and men), etc.

listening to women = end of your race. srs


ded fkn Srs

Generally speaking:

No....I don't think it would work out either, not to any noteworthy levels because women can't handle rejection.
We've heard the sisterhood mantra they don't need men and a few other choice phrases they like to parrot back & forth.
The western woman is spoiled and think they are all 10's.

It's men that have built and civilized the world around them.
Every convenience that makes their lives easier was conceived, designed, built and maintained by men.
The very men that will happily give up their life for the loyal woman of his desires.
Women seemed to have forgotten that too.
They now can hang out on the hook up sites, monkey branch with the dudes thinking they'll gain value as they party away their youth.
They can't be trusted and 'trust' is how relationships are held together.

I've witnessed (5) decades of feminism do it's thing.
If I were a young buck today I'd go withit's far too risky to engage with western women at all.
Clear thinking males would be wise to just do a risk/benefit assessment and then make your judgement call.
As far as I'm concerned, they can now do all their own life's heavy lifting.
Women can start changing their own tires, clean their own gutters and get their sisterhood collective to help them move.

To each their own path and life altering consequences.

(Oh....I've been married to a traditional Filipina for 39 years.)

That's only a part of the issue. Without economic and societal pressure, women would just choose to remain single rather than settle for regular wagie type dudes.

Having a smart and motivated wife with good values and work ethic has value outside of just raising kids

I may be biased though because I spent a lot of my adulthood around western women who buy and large tend to be inherently low-value (even if you’re browsing in the top end of the market)

High quality women are generally going to require much more in the way of a commitment purely because they can

this. repped your other post too, spot on the issues going on

There still is economic pressure as 2 incomes in the same household are better than one.

Many times she’ll want someone to go to dinner with. A lot of my single female friends are lonely.

Sexual Market Value I think.

- looks
- money
- social value

That sort of thing.

Is this a young person thing because I never gave a shi* about any of this kind of stuff? If I liked a person and we clicked it was game on period. I'm so glad I'm old srs...

Just reading all this stuff makes my head hurt.

Is this a young person thing because I never gave a shi* about any of this kind of stuff? If I liked a person and we clicked it was game on period. I'm so glad I'm old srs...

Just reading all this stuff makes my head hurt.

I sometimes try to talk about misc stuff with people irl and they just look at me confused, they have no clue what I’m talking about. Maybe their YouTube and other social media algorithms are different since this stuff is there nowadays.

Mine is full of cat videos and music mixes.