Log In

Your email is not your username

Register

If you were a member of the old Bodybuilding.com forums and would like to reuse your previous username, you can request it below. We use your email only for registration and do not store it. For more information, please see our Privacy Policy.

Confirm your email

A registration code was sent to your email. Enter it here.

Welcome

You have successfully setup your account.

Sign in

Quick Navigation Bottom Misc
Forum » BREAKING: Rudy Giuliani ordered to pay $148 million to GA election workers
  1. Results 61 to 90 of 95
  2. Page 3 of 4
  3. First
  5. 1
  6. 2
  7. 3
  8. 4
  10. Last

Thread: BREAKING: Rudy Giuliani ordered to pay $148 million to GA election workers

post 1695093363 12-19-2023, 07:53 AM
-
#61
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Posts: 19,855
  5. Rep Power: 142836
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
I don't need to.
Since you can't, you're pretending it's irrelevant, when the amount is theonlyrelevant topic of my comments. You're such a loser. What do you do for work?
-
post 1695093583 12-19-2023, 08:00 AM
-
#62
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
Since you can't, you're pretending it's irrelevant, when the amount is theonlyrelevant topic of my comments. You're such a loser. What do you do for work?
I do what you do but apparently way better. You have been thoroughly trounced in this discussion for over 1 page now. Yes, it is irrelevant, because I never said the summary judgment amount is right or wrong, I only emphasized that Giuliani was indeed liable for damages. It is funny you are now trying to backtrack on what you originally said.
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
Completely asinine. "Compensatory damages" means those women had to provide evidence of actual financial harm from whatever it is Rudy said about them. The fact that they both got over $16M in compensatory damageswith a total lack of any actual financial harm shows the jury was either completely retarded or decided to completely disregard the actual law because they didn't like Rudy and wanted to make a statement of their own. I wonder the makeup of the jury... oh yeah, 8 Washington DC residents. Surely they were unbiased.
In the future, don't make a claim and then try to cry about "relevant topic." I'm responding to something YOU claimed.

I have pity for your clients. Congratulations for being Attorney of the Decade though. I'm sure the paralegals at the office give you a golf clap every morning.
post 1695093903 12-19-2023, 08:10 AM
-
#63
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Posts: 19,855
  5. Rep Power: 142836
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
I do what you do but apparently way better. You have been thoroughly trounced in this discussion for over 1 page now. Yes, it is irrelevant, because I never said thesummary judgment amountis right or wrong, I only emphasized that Giuliani was indeed liable for damages. It is funny you are now trying to backtrack on what you originally said.


In the future, don't make a claim and then try to cry about "relevant topic." I'm responding to something YOU claimed.

I have pity for your clients. Congratulations for being Attorney of the Decade though. I'm sure the paralegals at the office give you a golf clap every morning.
-
post 1695094233 12-19-2023, 08:21 AM
-
#64
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
Yup, you have nothing coherent to say. I’m going to assume you’ve never had any experience in law and are a fraud. Thanks for embarrassing yourself. I was entertained.
post 1695094393 12-19-2023, 08:23 AM
-
#65
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Posts: 19,855
  5. Rep Power: 142836
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
Yup, you have nothing coherent to say. I’m going to assume you’ve never had any experience in law and are a fraud. Thanks for embarrassing yourself. I was entertained.
You really don't know why I'm laughing at you?
-
post 1695094703 12-19-2023, 08:31 AM
-
#66
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
You really don't know why I'm laughing at you?
I don’t care why an autistic troll is laughing. Move along.
post 1695095403 12-19-2023, 08:48 AM
-
#67
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Posts: 19,855
  5. Rep Power: 142836
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
I don’t care why an autistic troll is laughing. Move along.
Go google what "summary judgment" means and report back to the class.
-
post 1695096373 12-19-2023, 09:05 AM
-
#68
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
Go google what "summary judgment" means and report back to the class.
I don’t need to. Thanks for admitting you are dependent on Google though, fraud. Maybe you should Google “liability” while you are starting out in your educational course.


Next.
post 1695097743 12-19-2023, 09:45 AM
-
#69
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Posts: 19,855
  5. Rep Power: 142836
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
I don’t need to. Thanks for admitting you are dependent on Google though, fraud. Maybe you should Google “liability” while you are starting out in your educational course.


Next.
I'll do it for you:

In law, a summary judgment, also referred to as judgment as a matter of law or summary disposition, is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, i.e., without a full trial.

The word you were looking for was "verdict."

Even a 1L knows the difference.

Pathetic.
-
post 1695097893 12-19-2023, 09:49 AM
-
#70
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
I'll do it for you:

In law, a summary judgment, also referred to as judgment as a matter of law or summary disposition, is a judgment entered by a court for one party and against another party summarily, i.e., without a full trial.

The word you were looking for was "verdict."

Even a 1L knows the difference.

Pathetic.
Did you ever figure out what liability means? A non-college graduate would even know but it continues to confuse you.
post 1695097993 12-19-2023, 09:52 AM
-
#71
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Posts: 19,855
  5. Rep Power: 142836
You are literally too stupid to insult.

He's liable for the harm he caused, nothing more. I've never stated otherwise.

What harm did he cause?
-
post 1695099103 12-19-2023, 10:11 AM
-
#72
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
He's liable for the harm he caused, nothing more. I've never stated otherwise.
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
fact that they both got over $16M in compensatory damages with a total lack of any actual financial harm shows .
Contradictory mental gymnastics seems to be your default debate tactic.
post 1695099843 12-19-2023, 10:24 AM
-
#73
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,769
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384441
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
You are literally too stupid to insult.

He's liable for the harm he caused, nothing more. I've never stated otherwise.

What harm did he cause?
This is a lunatic DC judge, which they very obviously shopped for. There's no other reason to hold a case about a Georgia election in DC. Look into this judge's past rulings and you'll see a history of sheer insanity.

She decided Rudy doesn't get a jury trial, and that he loses by default because he failed to produce evidence of his guilt via records that were confiscated by the FBI. And just like the AJ trial she went full retard with a ridiculous sum.

Such is the state of the American justice system in Joe Biden's America.
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1695100173 12-19-2023, 10:32 AM
-
#74
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Posts: 19,855
  5. Rep Power: 142836
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
Contradictory mental gymnastics seems to be your default debate tactic.
Are you really that dumb?

If I drive over your property with a bulldozer, I am liable for the harm that I caused.

If no harm was caused, I owe you no money.

Do you disagree?

You do know that liability doesn't imply damages, right?
-
post 1695100843 12-19-2023, 10:44 AM
-
#75
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
This is a lunatic DC judge, which they very obviously shopped for. There's no other reason to hold a case about a Georgia election in DC. Look into this judge's past rulings and you'll see a history of sheer insanity.

She decided Rudy doesn't get a jury trial, and that he loses by default because he failed to produce evidence of his guilt via records that were confiscated by the FBI. And just like the AJ trial she went full retard with a ridiculous sum.

Such is the state of the American justice system in Joe Biden's America.
Interesting, the same bald mongoloid that supported the Supreme Court of the United States possibly overturning state election laws (Texas v. Pennsylvania) now thinks lawsuits involving a federal election is strictly a state issue.






Jizzel gonna Jizzel.
post 1695100883 12-19-2023, 10:45 AM
-
#76
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
Are you really that dumb?

If I drive over your property with a bulldozer, I am liable for the harm that I caused.

If no harm was caused, I owe you no money.

Do you disagree?

You do know that liability doesn't imply damages, right?
I'll say it for you real slowly.



Trump's

own

attorney

already

admitted

there

were

damages.



I probably still stated that too quickly for your cognitive abilities. Watching you continue to try to argue something that even Rudy's own attorney wasn't denying is hilarious. You should probably lay off the dope.
post 1695103893 12-19-2023, 11:59 AM
-
#77
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Posts: 19,855
  5. Rep Power: 142836
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
I'll say it for you real slowly.



Trump's

own

attorney

already

admitted

there

were

damages.



I probably still stated that too quickly for your cognitive abilities. Watching you continue to try to argue something that even Rudy's own attorney wasn't denying is hilarious. You should probably lay off the dope.
Look up the term "nominal damages."
-
post 1695104433 12-19-2023, 12:10 PM
-
#78
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
Look up the term "nominal damages."
Look up "Irrelevant to this case."
post 1695105663 12-19-2023, 12:36 PM
-
#79
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Posts: 19,855
  5. Rep Power: 142836
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
Look up "Irrelevant to this case."
Are you this pathetic in real life or are you just pretending for misc?

The question of liability is irrelevant for my arguments.
-
post 1695105733 12-19-2023, 12:40 PM
-
#80
  1. Reserrection
  2. Banned
  1. Reserrection
  2. Banned
  3. Join Date: Oct 2023
  4. Posts: 4,178
  5. Rep Power: 0
What a fukking joke the US has become
post 1695105763 12-19-2023, 12:40 PM
-
#81
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
Are you this pathetic in real life or are you just pretending for misc?

The question of liability is irrelevant for my arguments.
Everything you’ve said has been irrelevant. You keep trying to defend a guy who didn’t even bother defending himself. That’s quite the achievement. But your ability to continue to dig is commendable.
post 1695107333 12-19-2023, 01:18 PM
-
#82
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Posts: 19,855
  5. Rep Power: 142836
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
Everything you’ve said has been irrelevant. You keep trying to defend a guy who didn’t even bother defending himself. That’s quite the achievement. But your ability to continue to dig is commendable.
Most defendants don't take the stand, dumbass. That doesn't mean they should all pay $148M.

I'm not defending Rudy, I'm attacking the injustice of a ridiculous and unsupported verdict. A number (which you hilariously called a "summary judgment award") which you still can not defend.
-
post 1695107953 12-19-2023, 01:30 PM
-
#83
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
Most defendants don't take the stand, dumbass. That doesn't mean they should all pay $148M.

I'm not defending Rudy, I'm attacking the injustice of a ridiculous and unsupported verdict. A number (which you hilariously called a "summary judgment award") which you still can not defend.
You dug your own hole with the first post I responded to trying to make Rudy G out to be a victim and blaming the jury/plaintiffs. You keep throwing out $148 million like I give a fuk when I said from the beginning he’s liable but the number can be debated.


In the future, you should try to develop a coherent consistent argument in your posts. You depend on strawmans, ad hoc fallacies, and even contradict yourself. Quite a *weak* performance from attorney of the decade. ������
post 1695109183 12-19-2023, 01:51 PM
-
#84
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  1. BuckNakedinBama
  2. hell yeah brother
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Posts: 19,855
  5. Rep Power: 142836
Originally Posted By Phil9⏩
You dug your own hole with the first post I responded to trying to make Rudy G out to be a victim and blaming the jury/plaintiffs. You keep throwing out $148 million like I give a fuk when I said from the beginning he’s liable but the number can be debated.


In the future, you should try to develop a coherent consistent argument in your posts. You depend on strawmans, ad hoc fallacies, and even contradict yourself. Quite a week performance from attorney of the decade. ������
It's *weak, dumbass.
-
post 1695109663 12-19-2023, 02:00 PM
-
#85
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By BuckNakedinBama⏩
It's *weak, dumbass.
Oh no, I made a rare grammatical error typing on my phone. When are you planning on fixing all the phuckups you’ve made in this thread? Claiming you were the top lawyer at your firm for the majority of a decade was classic comedy.
post 1695109973 12-19-2023, 02:07 PM
-
#86
  1. TCmaxxing
  2. Registered User
  1. TCmaxxing
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2022
  4. Age: 56
  5. Posts: 5,806
  6. Rep Power: 29036
How did they come up w/ the $148 million number and not something like $500 billion if they're just picking a random large number for a political persecution?
post 1695119603 12-19-2023, 05:31 PM
-
#87
  1. gwg77
  1. gwg77
  3. Join Date: Oct 2017
  4. Location: United States
  5. Posts: 20,554
  6. Subscribers: 19
  7. Rep Power: 1102535
Originally Posted By goody1⏩
Be careful. Phil claims to be a lawyer too, however he didn't know how long it took him to finish law school.
^^This. Smooth Brain Phil is a fake e-lawyer. He can't even figure out how many years he studied law for.
post 1695120453 12-19-2023, 05:46 PM
-
#88
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  1. Stizzel
  2. Rothbardian
  3. Join Date: Apr 2008
  4. Location: Your Mom
  5. Posts: 83,769
  6. Subscribers: 1
  7. Rep Power: 384441
Originally Posted By gwg77⏩
^^This. Smooth Brain Phil is a fake e-lawyer. He can't even figure out how many years he studied law for.
To be fair studying law in a place where the law changes every few weeks when a new warlord takes over is a little different
“It’s the bill of rights, not the bill of requests. Rights are not up for negotiations.” Thomas Massie, MAGA enemy #1
post 1695120763 12-19-2023, 05:49 PM
-
#89
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  1. Phil9
  2. Registered User
  3. Join Date: Aug 2011
  4. Age: 39
  5. Posts: 27,396
  6. Rep Power: 35470
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
To be fair studying law in a place where the law changes every few weeks when a new warlord takes over is a little different
- Fat

- Prematurely bald

- Autistic


You’ve been striking out your entire life, Jizzel. Shilling for a country that would have probably given you the Vasily Blokhin treatment because of your uselessness must be a rough existence. 😂
post 1695120983 12-19-2023, 05:54 PM
-
#90
  1. yabbayabba
  1. yabbayabba
  3. Join Date: Jun 2005
  4. Location: Burning down the belt warehouse
  5. Posts: 19,040
  6. Subscribers: 2
  7. Rep Power: 157908
Originally Posted By Stizzel⏩
To be fair studying law in a place where the law changes every few weeks when a new warlord takes over is a little different
I imagine the "law" there is whoever has the biggest stick wins. All of Smooth Brain Phil's posts are always angry crying because he's suffering from CTE.
Quick Navigation Top Misc
Bookmarks
Digg.com
Digg
del.icio.us
del.icio.us
Stumbleupon.com
StumbleUpon
Google.com
Google
Facebook.com
Facebook
Posting Permissions
  1. You may not post new threads
  2. You may not post replies
  3. You may not post attachments
  4. You may not edit your posts