Forum
»
$30M wrongful death lawsuit filed against Fed Govt on behalf of Ashley Babbitt
01-07-2024, 05:49 AM
-
#61
- chalup
- Registered User
-
- chalup
- Registered User
- Join Date: May 2011
- Age: 36
- Posts: 37,885
- Rep Power: 123589
-
-
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
Its a bad shot regardless. There was no immediate threat, she had not actually destroyed/broken anything, and no weapons.I don't really have a problem with people applying the "play stupid games" philosophy to this situation...IF they are consistent. If you screeched about Floyd, for example, yet applaud this - then that is moronic.
Also, what do we all think the narrative would be if it were lefties storming the Capitol, and it was a white cop shooting a black woman?
Also, what do we all think the narrative would be if it were lefties storming the Capitol, and it was a white cop shooting a black woman?
01-07-2024, 05:57 AM
-
#62
- gachase21
- Join Date: Dec 2010
- Location: Georgia, United States
- Posts: 31,767
- Subscribers: 4
- Rep Power: 389233
-
-
They should have started shooting capital attackers (people climbing walls, breaking windows, breaking through doors, etc) sooner / it would have made the event much smaller with maybe a few people trying to enter - instead of a bunch of innocent protestors walking in thinking it's okay - to be prosecuted later.
Attack capital - get shot
Attack capital - get shot
01-07-2024, 06:10 AM
-
#63
- BearyManilowe
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 15,222
- Rep Power: 130112
-
-
Originally Posted By bpatel82⏩
These things aren't mutually exclusive.> Heavily guarded area
> allow hundreds of people freely walk in and take selfies inside the Capitol building amid high tension
Pick one
> allow hundreds of people freely walk in and take selfies inside the Capitol building amid high tension
Pick one
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
Agreed. Chauvin shouldn't have been found guilty, and if the races were reversed this guy would have already been found hanging in his cell, even though the end result IMO would have been the same "play stupid games" on whoever jumped through the window.I don't really have a problem with people applying the "play stupid games" philosophy to this situation...IF they are consistent. If you screeched about Floyd, for example, yet applaud this - then that is moronic.
Also, what do we all think the narrative would be if it were lefties storming the Capitol, and it was a white cop shooting a black woman?
Also, what do we all think the narrative would be if it were lefties storming the Capitol, and it was a white cop shooting a black woman?
***Mariah Carey is my 10/10 Crew***
***Misc Dads Crew***
01-07-2024, 06:38 AM
-
#64
- Maestro
- отличнo!
-
- Maestro
- отличнo!
- Join Date: Oct 2002
- Location: New Mexico, United States
- Posts: 58,400
- Rep Power: 203698
-
-
Originally Posted By bpatel82⏩
The city proper is heavily policed. It started peaceful (city police escorting protestors onto the premises, but as you can see from the videos it clearly got out of control.> Heavily guarded area
> allow hundreds of people freely walk in and take selfies inside the Capitol building amid high tension
Pick one
> allow hundreds of people freely walk in and take selfies inside the Capitol building amid high tension
Pick one
01-07-2024, 06:44 AM
-
#65
- Maestro
- отличнo!
-
- Maestro
- отличнo!
- Join Date: Oct 2002
- Location: New Mexico, United States
- Posts: 58,400
- Rep Power: 203698
-
-
Originally Posted By ezmac31⏩
https://www.bsis.ca.gov/forms_pubs/poa.pdf“He’s basically secret service bro, doesn’t have to follow the rules of policing!”
You just here to make stuff up? lol
You just here to make stuff up? lol
01-07-2024, 07:50 AM
-
#66
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By Fishman15⏩
Lol @ warnings, sugarfoot. He gave her several commands, but the real warning was the House Chamber doors being barricaded. Any retard can figure out that their ascent to reach actual Congressional members had hit a goldmine when they got to those barricaded doors.If I was the one with the gun aimed at center mass on someone in that situation I would have given a warning that coming any further and they would be shot. It's my understanding, he did not engage her in any warning or commands...
There were even like 3 cops standing in their way that one of the Trumpers tried sweet-talking them into getting out of the way. I won't blame you for getting on the cops that got out of the way for whatever reason they did, but a literal retard should have been able to figure out that secret service were there behind those chamber doors.
If she was too stupid to figure that out, the Trumpers (i.e., people she could trust) were yelling that guns were drawn. She didn't didn't care. She thought they wouldn't fire upon her for some dumb reason.
It's actually an embarrassment to the human race that you'd rather look like complete dumb stupid motherfukker than admit she fukked around and found out because you've got an orange dildo peeking out your throat.
Even from reading these forums here, I can tell that you're at least smart enough that you wouldn't have jumped through that window, yet you're retarded enough that you will make excuses for her doing it.
Originally Posted By chalup⏩
Lmao. The immediate threat and weapons was the mob behind her. If they don't make a stand, then the rest will come through and then they're in a tough spot.Its a bad shot regardless. There was no immediate threat, she had not actually destroyed/broken anything, and no weapons.
And guess what? It worked. Once she got pegged, every dumb motherfukker stopped trying to get into the House Chambers. You ever notice not a single member of Congress said it was a bad shoot? That's because they want their secret service detail to actually protect their lives.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
01-07-2024, 07:57 AM
-
#67
- NuggzTheNinja
- Exotic Game Hunter
-
- NuggzTheNinja
- Exotic Game Hunter
- Join Date: Oct 2004
- Posts: 31,871
- Rep Power: 237953
-
-
Originally Posted By Maestro⏩
Did you read this? The deadly force text is identical to the standard required for anybody in the US.Real-Life Scenarios including Potential Consequences
The use of deadly force is the most serious decision an individual may ever have to make.
Deadly force applied by security personnel is force that creates a substantial risk of
causing death or serious bodily injury. The decision to use deadly force to defend against
an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to the individual or to another person
is guided by federal case law and California state law.
Serious bodily harm or injury means a serious impairment of physical condition, including,
but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness, concussion, bone fracture,
protracted loss or impairment of function of any bodily member or organ, a wound
requiring extensive suturing, and serious disfigurement. (Penal Code Section 243(f)(4)
effective January 1, 2016.)
Reasonable necessity means that delay in apprehension would create substantial and
unreasonable risk to the individual or others possibly resulting in serious physical injury
or death.
Imminent: A threat of death or serious injury is “imminent” when, based upon the totality
of the circumstances, a reasonable individual in the same situation would believe that a
person has the present ability, opportunity, and apparent intent to immediately cause
death or serious bodily injury to the security guard or another person. Imminent harm is
not merely a fear of future harm, no matter how great the fear and no matter how great
the likelihood of the harm, but is one that, from appearances, must be instantly confronted
and addressed. (Penal Code Section 835a(e)(2) effective January 1, 2020.)
According to the law, fear alone does not justify the use of deadly force. The courts have
held that:
o A simple statement of fear for your safety is not enough; there must be objective
factors to justify your concern.
o It must be objectively reasonable.
o It must be based on the facts and circumstances known to the officer at the time.
The use of deadly force is the most serious decision an individual may ever have to make.
Deadly force applied by security personnel is force that creates a substantial risk of
causing death or serious bodily injury. The decision to use deadly force to defend against
an imminent threat of death or serious bodily injury to the individual or to another person
is guided by federal case law and California state law.
Serious bodily harm or injury means a serious impairment of physical condition, including,
but not limited to, the following: loss of consciousness, concussion, bone fracture,
protracted loss or impairment of function of any bodily member or organ, a wound
requiring extensive suturing, and serious disfigurement. (Penal Code Section 243(f)(4)
effective January 1, 2016.)
Reasonable necessity means that delay in apprehension would create substantial and
unreasonable risk to the individual or others possibly resulting in serious physical injury
or death.
Imminent: A threat of death or serious injury is “imminent” when, based upon the totality
of the circumstances, a reasonable individual in the same situation would believe that a
person has the present ability, opportunity, and apparent intent to immediately cause
death or serious bodily injury to the security guard or another person. Imminent harm is
not merely a fear of future harm, no matter how great the fear and no matter how great
the likelihood of the harm, but is one that, from appearances, must be instantly confronted
and addressed. (Penal Code Section 835a(e)(2) effective January 1, 2020.)
According to the law, fear alone does not justify the use of deadly force. The courts have
held that:
o A simple statement of fear for your safety is not enough; there must be objective
factors to justify your concern.
o It must be objectively reasonable.
o It must be based on the facts and circumstances known to the officer at the time.
This account was created for the purpose of roleplaying and satire. All posts, messages, images, or other media produced by this Bodybuilding.com profile, including stories, names, references to characters and incidents, and views expressed, are fictitious and intended as parody. No identification or association with actual persons (living or deceased), places, buildings, or products is intended or should be inferred.
01-07-2024, 08:06 AM
-
#68
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By NuggzTheNinja⏩
Cool. Thanks for cropping the relevant section that absolves the officer, son.Did you read this? The deadly force text is identical to the standard required for anybody in the US.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
01-07-2024, 08:35 AM
-
#69
01-07-2024, 08:38 AM
-
#70
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By ezmac31⏩
Who is going to give them $30 million? The cop? He's broke. The government? Ahahehehehehehehehehehehehehhhheeee, son.Ashli’s estate gonna get paid. Cope and seethe, basement dweller
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
01-07-2024, 10:00 AM
-
#71
- bpatel82
- Fuk BLM
-
- bpatel82
- Fuk BLM
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Posts: 5,243
- Rep Power: 40972
-
-
Originally Posted By BearyManilowe⏩
Yes they're mutually exclusive simpleton..These things aren't mutually exclusive.
> everyone (except simpletons) knew things were not going to go smoothly
> Trump's offer to deploy national guards were ignored/rejected so they didn't have enough personnel to handle the situation if it goes south
> given above, why lead people into the building and let them go up until to the point they're one door away from senetors... At that point you don't have a choice but to shoot people if they become violent. Any local mall cop would know that let alone the top cops (lol) protecting the most important people (double lol) in America.
Michael Schumacher is GOAT
01-07-2024, 11:36 AM
-
#72
01-07-2024, 11:41 AM
-
#73
OP getting ethered lol.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
01-07-2024, 11:49 AM
-
#74
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86452
-
-
My view of this is if this had been an ANFITA member doing the same thing, I don't think any of us would have an issue with the person being shot. Now one could argue that in general, an ANTIFA member may be more willing to commit violence compared to someone like Babbitt, but that is really nitpicking.
Do I think she should have been shot, and not just shot but shot with a kill shot? No. I think a couple of warning shots would have accomplished the same thing imo.
My big issue with it is we have seen BLM and ANTIFA literally attacking govt buildings, police precincts, citizens etc, and I can't recall any of them being shot. Let alone shot and killed. And yet the one time we have some right wing people doing something similar, the bullets come flying. I think this has more to do with how left protestors are treated compared to right protestors. One side is treated with kid gloves, and one side is treated with an almost iron fist mentality.
Do I think she should have been shot, and not just shot but shot with a kill shot? No. I think a couple of warning shots would have accomplished the same thing imo.
My big issue with it is we have seen BLM and ANTIFA literally attacking govt buildings, police precincts, citizens etc, and I can't recall any of them being shot. Let alone shot and killed. And yet the one time we have some right wing people doing something similar, the bullets come flying. I think this has more to do with how left protestors are treated compared to right protestors. One side is treated with kid gloves, and one side is treated with an almost iron fist mentality.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
01-07-2024, 11:59 AM
-
#75
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
Well, this proves you're not a gun owner. You don't fire warning shots and risk injuring other people and not stopping the threat. You sound like Joe Biden except worse, LMFAO.My view of this is if this had been an ANFITA member doing the same thing, I don't think any of us would have an issue with the person being shot. Now one could argue that in general, an ANTIFA member may be more willing to commit violence compared to someone like Babbitt, but that is really nitpicking.
Do I think she should have been shot, and not just shot but shot with a kill shot? No. I think a couple of warning shots would have accomplished the same thing imo.
Do I think she should have been shot, and not just shot but shot with a kill shot? No. I think a couple of warning shots would have accomplished the same thing imo.
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
BLM knows how to push boundaries, but when they reached the governor's building in Minnesota and saw the fortress of police, they knew they would be waxed in a heartbeat and so they didn't do shiit.My big issue with it is we have seen BLM and ANTIFA literally attacking govt buildings, police precincts, citizens etc, and I can't recall any of them being shot. Let alone shot and killed. And yet the one time we have some right wing people doing something similar, the bullets come flying. I think this has more to do with how left protestors are treated compared to right protestors. One side is treated with kid gloves, and one side is treated with an almost iron fist mentality.
But the biggest piece of the puzzle that you're apparently too retarded to figure out is there were members of Congress 50 feet away. It doesn't matter which affiliation - anyone who crossed that barricaded door was getting waxed because Congressional members were being guarded, not buildings.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
01-07-2024, 12:05 PM
-
#76
Originally Posted By FIDELityaccount⏩
Drumpfers fell right into it lol.Honestly, to be devil's advocate, Pelosi seems to have been aware of what was going on and decided to roll with it. They let this fiasco happen.
Just lol.
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
01-07-2024, 12:06 PM
-
#77
01-07-2024, 12:06 PM
-
#78
- BearyManilowe
- Join Date: Dec 2013
- Age: 36
- Posts: 15,222
- Rep Power: 130112
-
-
Originally Posted By bpatel82⏩
None of that has anything to do with mutual exclusivity. Stay on topic plz.Yes they're mutually exclusive simpleton..
> everyone (except simpletons) knew things were not going to go smoothly
> Trump's offer to deploy national guards were ignored/rejected so they didn't have enough personnel to handle the situation if it goes south
> given above, why lead people into the building and let them go up until to the point they're one door away from senetors... At that point you don't have a choice but to shoot people if they become violent. Any local mall cop would know that let alone the top cops (lol) protecting the most important people (double lol) in America.
> everyone (except simpletons) knew things were not going to go smoothly
> Trump's offer to deploy national guards were ignored/rejected so they didn't have enough personnel to handle the situation if it goes south
> given above, why lead people into the building and let them go up until to the point they're one door away from senetors... At that point you don't have a choice but to shoot people if they become violent. Any local mall cop would know that let alone the top cops (lol) protecting the most important people (double lol) in America.
If "everyone knew it was gonna go bad" sounds like the outcome matches what was expected.
***Mariah Carey is my 10/10 Crew***
***Misc Dads Crew***
01-07-2024, 12:10 PM
-
#79
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By FIDELityaccount⏩
No idea if that's true or not and it wouldn't surprise me if it were, but I don't see how that is relevant to her jumping through that window when it was clear as day nothing good for her would come from it.Honestly, to be devil's advocate, Pelosi seems to have been aware of what was going on and decided to roll with it. They let this fiasco happen.
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
Lol. So it's Nancy's fault they did the things they did, eh, son?Yes.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
01-07-2024, 12:17 PM
-
#80
Originally Posted By FIDELityaccount⏩
How would he have "called it off immediately" exactly? When did "we all see him eagerly watching it go down"?But again, it was retarded Trumptards who did this. Like...Trump is such a god damn idiot for not calling it off immediately.He was gambling on it actually working out for him. He's that fuking stupid. We all saw him eagerly watching it go down. Pelosi and the dems outplayed him. And you have to lol at McCarthy and friends who got thrown under the bus and are still loyal to Trump. It's incredible to watch.
Yes, the people who got unruly, are responsible for their own actions. Hopefully, you can at least be honest enough to admit there's a pretty significant difference between said unruly ones (hold them accountable for their actions) vs people who were simply present and yet have been treated like major criminals.
Originally Posted By FIDELityaccount⏩
Which is part of why I don't understand all of this pearl clutching and deference about the whole thing. People at least taking their grievances to the actual politicians (God forbid, it's hallowed ground!) vs people going around and destroying private property/businesses/etc. Somehow the latter is perfectly fine.I'm saying if the people we elect from either partydid their fuking jobs and weren't playing games, none of this would have happened.We have absolute garbage juvenile leadersand a retarded uninformed and easily manipulated electorate.
01-07-2024, 12:19 PM
-
#81
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86452
-
-
Originally Posted By z4v4⏩
I am a gun owner actually. So is my wife. I just didn't think that the situation warranted her being shot and killed. She wasn't armed. She was a woman. She wasn't actively attacking anyone. A shot or 2 into the air would have accomplished the same thing. And I would say the same even if it was a leftist who was doing what she was.Well, this proves you're not a gun owner. You don't fire warning shots and risk injuring other people and not stopping the threat. You sound like Joe Biden except worse, LMFAO.
Originally Posted By z4v4⏩
I understand there were members of congress there. Which is why a warning shot imo would have been justified. I certainly don't think anyone should have been killed over it. Which is also why I wonder if it been a black BLM member doing the same as she was? Would that BLM member have been shot?BLM knows how to push boundaries, but when they reached the governor's building in Minnesota and saw the fortress of police, they knew they would be waxed in a heartbeat and so they didn't do shiit.
But the biggest piece of the puzzle that you're apparently too retarded to figure out is there were members of Congress 50 feet away. It doesn't matter which affiliation - anyone who crossed that barricaded door was getting waxed because Congressional members were being guarded, not buildings.
But the biggest piece of the puzzle that you're apparently too retarded to figure out is there were members of Congress 50 feet away. It doesn't matter which affiliation - anyone who crossed that barricaded door was getting waxed because Congressional members were being guarded, not buildings.
I have my doubts.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
01-07-2024, 12:19 PM
-
#82
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By Polaris⏩
On Twitter, derp. Just like when Buffalo Man said, "Hey, hey, Trump says to leave. Trump says to leave." Trump should have done that immediately. Lmao, son.How would he have "called it off immediately" exactly? When did "we all see him eagerly watching it go down"?
Yes, the people who got unruly, are responsible for their own actions. Hopefully, you can at least be honest enough to admit there's a pretty significant difference between said unruly ones (hold them accountable for their actions) vs people who were simply present and yet have been treated like major criminals.
Yes, the people who got unruly, are responsible for their own actions. Hopefully, you can at least be honest enough to admit there's a pretty significant difference between said unruly ones (hold them accountable for their actions) vs people who were simply present and yet have been treated like major criminals.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
01-07-2024, 12:22 PM
-
#83
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By OPGenesis⏩
Lmao. On spread...Drumpfers fell right into it lol.
Just lol.
Just lol.
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
Holy shiit. You're a gunowner and advocate for shooting "in the air" inside a crowded building. You should have all your firearms immediately confiscated.I am a gun owner actually. So is my wife. I just didn't think that the situation warranted her being shot and killed. She wasn't armed. She was a woman. She wasn't actively attacking anyone. A shot or 2 into the air would have accomplished the same thing. And I would say the same even if it was a leftist who was doing what she was.
I understand there were members of congress there. Which is why a warning shot imo would have been justified. I certainly don't think anyone should have been killed over it. Which is also why I wonder if it been a black BLM member doing the same as she was? Would that BLM member have been shot?
I have my doubts.
I understand there were members of congress there. Which is why a warning shot imo would have been justified. I certainly don't think anyone should have been killed over it. Which is also why I wonder if it been a black BLM member doing the same as she was? Would that BLM member have been shot?
I have my doubts.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
01-07-2024, 12:22 PM
-
#84
- pondus_levo
- mic dropper
-
- pondus_levo
- mic dropper
- Join Date: Oct 2006
- Location: United States
- Posts: 24,811
- Rep Power: 163138
-
-
Originally Posted By nutsy54⏩
You are fvking wetarded. You obviously choose to parrot your democrat overloads instead of watching the footage for yourself.How about "don't attack, invade, and beat down doors in the US Capitol"...?
Originally Posted By ezmac31⏩
This.Ashli’s estate gonna get paid. Cope and seethe, basement dweller
Ashely pulled the guy down that broke the window to stop him from going in. She jumped up to block others. Not to enter. She was unarmed, not a threat, and given no warning. She wasn't even through the window, or else she would have fallen forward, not backward. The policeman ****ed up big time and deserves to be held accountable.
Forever alone? Attraction and keeping the girl chasing you - http://forum.obnoxiousbrutes.com/showthread.php?t=131498033
You will never know your limits, unless you push yourself past the imaginary lines you have drawn in the sand.
Knee Dragger - '06 GSX-R750
01-07-2024, 12:26 PM
-
#85
Originally Posted By FIDELityaccount⏩
I didn't see it, but does simply watching = "eagerly watching it go down"? With that being said, I didn't see it so I can't judge.You saw the video of him watching with his family. Don't lie. And he waited to tell them to stop. And yes, a huge number of people there were not there with violent intent.
Why do we assume him "telling them to stop" (and how was he supposed to deliver this message...send out a Tweet?) and everything would magically cease? Seems like a bit of a bold assumption.
01-07-2024, 12:26 PM
-
#86
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By pondus_levo⏩
She dindu nuffin. Classic lib excuse. She climbed into the window to block others from climbing into the window, LMFAO. Fukk outta here, Methuselah.You are fvking wetarded. You obviously choose to parrot your democrat overloads instead of watching the footage for yourself.
Ashely pulled the guy down that broke the window to stop him from going in. She jumped up to block others. Not to enter. She was unarmed, not a threat, and given no warning. The policeman ****ed up big time and deserves to be held accountable.
Ashely pulled the guy down that broke the window to stop him from going in. She jumped up to block others. Not to enter. She was unarmed, not a threat, and given no warning. The policeman ****ed up big time and deserves to be held accountable.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
01-07-2024, 12:29 PM
-
#87
- BeachPro11
- Join Date: Aug 2022
- Age: 56
- Posts: 10,004
- Rep Power: 86452
-
-
Originally Posted By z4v4⏩
A shot in the air is certainly 99.999999999999999999999999999% less likely to kill someone rather than a direct shot into a person's head or upper body. Yet both would have the same result. People dispersing.Lmao. On spread...
Holy shiit. You're a gunowner and advocate for shooting "in the air" inside a crowded building. You should have all your firearms immediately confiscated.
Holy shiit. You're a gunowner and advocate for shooting "in the air" inside a crowded building. You should have all your firearms immediately confiscated.
She didn't have a gun. She didn't have a knife. She didn't have a weapon of any sort. It wasn't like she had a gun in her hand and was trying to storm the hallway. In which case it would have been perfectly justified to shoot her.
Holy **** it blows my mind, you continually protect left wing people like your BLM woke smash and grabbers and black hoodlums. You protect that black criminal that was robbing that house and was shot by the 2 white guys in what was it....Georgia? And yet because she is a white right wing protestor? Your reaction is "sure, go ahead and shoot her".
So f'ing transparent you are.
Words to live by...."You're at the shopping mall with your girl but a hot chick walks by. Are you going to look at the hot girl? No. You use your peripheral vision."
01-07-2024, 12:31 PM
-
#88
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
Hot take from the forums Jordan Belfort genius penny stock trader lmao.A shot in the air is certainly 99.999999999999999999999999999% less likely to kill someone rather than a direct shot into a person's head or upper body.
She didn't have a gun. She didn't have a knife. She didn't have a weapon of any sort. It wasn't like she had a gun in her hand and was trying to storm the hallway. In which case it would have been perfectly justified to shoot her.
Holy **** it blows my mind, you continually protect left wing people like your BLM woke smash and grabbers and black hoodlums, and yet because she is a white right wing protestor? Your reaction is "sure, go ahead and shoot her".
She didn't have a gun. She didn't have a knife. She didn't have a weapon of any sort. It wasn't like she had a gun in her hand and was trying to storm the hallway. In which case it would have been perfectly justified to shoot her.
Holy **** it blows my mind, you continually protect left wing people like your BLM woke smash and grabbers and black hoodlums, and yet because she is a white right wing protestor? Your reaction is "sure, go ahead and shoot her".
"I am a rational animal who occupies the intermediary position between angel and beast"
"The upper class is afforded their position by the collective burden the underclass must carry for them"
**Summer Walker Crew**
01-07-2024, 12:38 PM
-
#89
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
-
- z4v4
- SillieBazzillie Alt #z4
- Join Date: May 2017
- Posts: 41,412
- Rep Power: 82451
-
-
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
If we ignore the recklessness of shooting randomly in buildings, a shot into a person's head or upper body is certainly 99.999999999999999999999999999% more likely to stop the threat than shooting recklessly will.A shot in the air is certainly 99.999999999999999999999999999% less likely to kill someone rather than a direct shot into a person's head or upper body.
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
He knows this how again? Did you not see the BLM riots? Mobs of people are a weapon and a threat.She didn't have a gun. She didn't have a knife. She didn't have a weapon of any sort. It wasn't like she had a gun in her hand and was trying to storm the hallway. In which case it would have been perfectly justified to shoot her.
Originally Posted By BeachPro11⏩
Huh? I just said this today:Holy **** it blows my mind, you continually protect left wing people like your BLM woke smash and grabbers and black hoodlums, and yet because she is a white right wing protestor? Your reaction is "sure, go ahead and shoot her".
Originally Posted By z4v4⏩
Nope. I've spoken on this numerous times already, but why not one more time, eh, son?
The BLM riots, and especially the mayors and governors that allowed it to happen, were reprehensible acts. It's absolutely a slap in the face to all citizens of MN that once the rioters reached the governor's office, the entire building was protected by a fortress of "don't fukk with us" riot police. I mean, arm-to-arm police. They should have been deployed throughout the entire city to stop all the innocent businesses from being destroyed and let other states know it's okay to put a stop to it.
It's also irresponsible that Harris, in her Colbert interview, basically condoned these actions by not separating rioters from people peacefully protesting and calling them out strongly. She conflated rioters with peaceful protestors. This is absolutely not what someone like MLK would have done, and this appearance influenced my thoughts with regard to my vote.
The BLM riots, and especially the mayors and governors that allowed it to happen, were reprehensible acts. It's absolutely a slap in the face to all citizens of MN that once the rioters reached the governor's office, the entire building was protected by a fortress of "don't fukk with us" riot police. I mean, arm-to-arm police. They should have been deployed throughout the entire city to stop all the innocent businesses from being destroyed and let other states know it's okay to put a stop to it.
It's also irresponsible that Harris, in her Colbert interview, basically condoned these actions by not separating rioters from people peacefully protesting and calling them out strongly. She conflated rioters with peaceful protestors. This is absolutely not what someone like MLK would have done, and this appearance influenced my thoughts with regard to my vote.
Deepfat: "I guarantee I beat you by at least 6 strokes. Afterwards, I'll slide my thick conservative cawk in your old lady just to finish the job."
z4: "So when are you available in September to play?"
Deep: "On second thought, I don't play golf with broads. You're such a scumbag that I'd be much more inclined to just slap the chit out of you."
z4: "MMA match works, too. So when are you available this month?
Deep: "I won't subject myself to being in the presence of a scumbag."
01-07-2024, 12:45 PM
-
#90
- bpatel82
- Fuk BLM
-
- bpatel82
- Fuk BLM
- Join Date: Sep 2010
- Location: Illinois, United States
- Posts: 5,243
- Rep Power: 40972
-
-
Originally Posted By BearyManilowe⏩
Yes they're mutually exclusive.None of that has anything to do with mutual exclusivity. Stay on topic plz.
If "everyone knew it was gonna go bad" sounds like the outcome matches what was expected.
If "everyone knew it was gonna go bad" sounds like the outcome matches what was expected.
Michael Schumacher is GOAT
Bookmarks
-
- Digg
-
- del.icio.us
-
- StumbleUpon
-
-
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts