Politico, and bmj...LOOOOL. Good ones. I almost spit up my rootbeer seeing those links


Dr. Janci Lindsay & Dr. Phillip Buckhaults testify that the Pfizer shot has been found to be contaminated with DNA, which can permanently alter your genetic code, and SV40 sequences which can infect the E.coli in your gut, turning you into a 'perpetual spike factory' as well as cause cancer.

Not bailing on it. It was already used to show that you lied earlier when saying covid injections don’t carry greater risk of myocarditis than other vaccines. It’s clear that the risk of myocarditis from covid injections(particularly mRNA injections) is greater than that of flu vaccines. But we’ve also established you lied due to lack of understanding and not necessarily out of desire to deceive.

Lol

It showed you didn't read it and understood neither my argument nor your own

Oh..so it's just "future batches" that will be addressed. Fuark, sucks for all those jabbies that already took it

His own staff confirmed

Yeah... No

"Theoretical"

Janci is a whole 'notha deal

Uhh..no SV40 is confirmed to be in the jabs.

No.

Nice red herring fallacy

Vaccinated: 14% of the population
Vaccinated deaths 6% of the deaths

Not to mention we're skipping over the part where it was promised to stop transmission, then serious illness and death, then just death, then...
And it didnt stopanything

Ok - and putting aside the media hyperbole, we know for fact:

Of those who died of/with covid:
- Average age of death was 78
- 2.8 comorbidities on average
- 80% were obese or grossly obese

So, while people did get covid and die, only a very specific group were in any true danger. The Government propaganda, which profited Pfizer and those companies to the tune of billions, was not directed at all towards the specific group at risk, which again - that is my main problem here. It was never about older sick people needing to be careful, it was about everyone, including children, with knee-jerk reactions which did far more damage than covid itself. All cause mortality is skyrocketed and even during covid's peak, covid itself was not anywhere close to representing mass increase in all deaths (an increase prior to vaccines even being rolled out but coinciding with lockdowns, something to keep in mind). Something else was -- and still is -- killing millions.

Nobody making any money off of those dead bodies though, so the media has kept it under wraps and you, as smart as you are, aren't worked up about it like you were with covid.

He won’t respond to this. He ignores all his checkmates

The fallacy is in attempting to draw inference from eyeballing raw data. It cuts both ways.

Invalid? Yes.

Point proven

Indeed

This is your argument.


“Myocarditis risk with vaccination isn't new and isn't greater for covid vaccines than for other vaccines.”



This is blatantly false, as evidenced by what I shared. It was also evidenced by what you shared(just lol).

Yes. As the doctors testified, surgeon general showed. As well as Health Canada..


"Health Canada has confirmed the presence of a Simian Virus 40 (SV40) DNA sequence in the Pfizer COVID-19 vaccine, which the manufacturer had not previously disclosed. There is debate among scientists with regards to the significance of the finding, with some saying it has the potential to cause cancer, and others saying it poses little to no threat.

"Health Canada expects sponsors to identify any biologically functional DNA sequences within a plasmid (such as an SV40 enhancer) at the time of submission," the agency said in an email to The Epoch Times.

"Although the full DNA sequence of the Pfizer plasmid was provided at the time of initial filing, the sponsor did not specifically identify the SV40 sequence."

The regulator said that after scientists Kevin McKernan and Dr. Phillip J. Buckhaults publicly raised the presence of SV40 enhancers in the vaccines earlier this year, “it was possible for Health Canada to confirm the presence of the enhancer based on the plasmid DNA sequence submitted by Pfizer against the published SV40 enhancer sequence."

Both scientists have made waves after discovering plasmid DNA in the mRNA COVID-19 injections, warning it could potentially alter the human genome. However, the two share different degrees of concern about the significance of an SV40 sequence—which is used as an enhancer to drive gene transcription during the vaccine manufacturing process—being present in the shots.
Mr. McKernan, a former researcher and team leader for the Massachusetts Institute of Technology Human Genome Project, told The Epoch Times he suspects Pfizer didn’t disclose the presence of the DNA sequence due to the association of SV40 with polio vaccines. He said while there is no evidence the sequence is carcinogenic, he has concerns about its integration into the human genome.

The polyomavirus Simian Virus 40, an oncogenic DNA virus, was previously removed from polio vaccines due to concerns about a link to cancers. Polio vaccines used in the late 1950s and early 1960s were found to be contaminated with SV40 as the virus was present in monkey kidney cells that were used to grow the vaccine.

Mr. McKernan said while the full 5kb SV40 virus was present in the polio vaccines, the presence of SV40 promoters was still concerning due to the risk of them integrating into the human genomes near oncogenes, which are genes that have the potential to cause cancer

Angus Dalgleish, professor of oncology at St. George's Hospital Medical School in London, recently wrote in The Conservative Woman about a higher incidence of cancers following COVID-19 vaccination seen by himself and his colleagues, including an “epidemic of explosive cancers” with multiple metastatic spread.
He noted the potential “DNA plasmid and SV40 integration in promoting cancer development.”


https://www.theepochtimes.com/world/...r-shot-5513277

Like a broken record

I shared a meta analysis that addressed the question directly.

You shared a snippet from an abstract of a paper you didn't read and didn't contrast the rates directly. A paper that counters your positions.

CI's matter.

As I thought, it's the regression discussion all over again.

Who developed the algorithm??!!one??

Just lol

So....BMJ unreliable, Epoch Times objective?

Are you for real?

The SV40 sequence has been used in vaccine development for ages (including the influenza and hepatitis shots that have been administered globally for decades).

It's not a complete virus and doesn't alter DNA.

Not anti vaccine, just anti covid vaccine

Just lol

Yikes


JLC do you enjoy being a beta punching bag? I’d love for you to admit who is paying you so I could message them personally but I’m sure you disclosing as much would cost you 5 cents a post so I won’t wait

I guess that explains why cancer skyrocketed as vaccine distribution has increased. Wow, great point

SV40 good
cancer good

Even the spun narrative is false.

Epidemiologic studies showed no increased risk of cancers in those who received polio vaccine between 1955 and 1963.

I don't think others regurgitating anti vaccine talking points and rhetoric is equivalent to landing punches.

I think y'all not even realizing the way the discussion is going is pretty lulzy.

Confer =/= confirm

Just lol

I'm sure those studies did lol.Jonas Salk, inventor of the IPV, testified before a Senate subcommittee that nearly all polio outbreaks since 1961 were caused by the oral polio vaccine."

No one’s paying him, and he doesn't give a sh!t about being a punching bag. He’s just here to troll, but does actually make branch Covidians look pretty bad.

What does that have to do with SV40 and cancer?

Who supervised the training of the machine learning????!!!!!!

Just lol

Why did you get the jab?

Thanks for proving my point.

That's what you asked

I get that when one uses an n of 1, under a frequentist paradigm, there is no variance for which to account when drawing inference. The validity of generalizing results obtained in such a design is suspect, but if that's what you learned, so be it.

However, in larger studies, ignoring the variance surrounding point estimates is invalid.

It's really pretty funny that, similar to the regression debacle, you're unaware of the silliness you've presented while trying to assume an air of authority